by Piper Hutchinson, Louisiana Illuminator
September 2, 2025

LSU is not documenting feedback from student athletes in most of its athletic programs, including football, raising concerns about the university’s compliance with NCAA rules. 

In a public records request, the Louisiana Illuminator and Tiger Rag asked for five years of player exit interviews, which all NCAA Division I schools are required to conduct with a sampling of athletes every year at the time they graduate or their eligibility expires. 

The interviews are intended to give athletes an opportunity to provide critical feedback on their school’s sports programs. But for most teams, LSU did not document a single interview during the five-year period. 

LSU athletics spokesman Zach Greenwell said the university is complying with the NCAA’s exit interview bylaw, but the interviews aren’t always documented – which the NCAA does not require. 

The NCAA gives schools immense latitude on how to conduct the interviews and what questions to ask. Its rules don’t require that the questions are asked in person, allowing some schools to provide students with an online form. The NCAA did not respond to a request for comment asking whether there are penalties for institutions that don’t comply or what value the bylaw holds if institutions don’t have to prove compliance. 

For the five-year period, LSU did not document any interviews with the football, men’s basketball, men’s golf, women’s golf, gymnastics or track and field programs. No LSU team had at least one interview documented annually, and most sports went multiple years without having any interviews documented, representing more than 1,000 student athletes who may have had their feedback ignored. 

!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}})}();

A review of the 64 athlete interview forms LSU provided in response to the public records requests revealed complaints about facilities and coaches — including multiple allegations of bullying and intimidation by swimming and diving coaches. 

It is rare for exit interviews from a major college athletic program to be released. In 2019, the online news outlet The Intercollegiate submitted public records requests for the interviews from every public NCAA Division I program. Most universities denied the requests, including LSU and almost every other Southeastern Conference institution. The unavailability of these records makes it difficult to compare LSU’s compliance with peer institutions. 

Experts say not documenting student-athletes’ feedback is a disservice to them, and it raises concerns about whether the university is actually conducting the interviews at all. 

Molly Harry, a University of Florida sports management professor whose research has focused on NCAA exit interviews, said it is concerning LSU is not documenting its athletes’ feedback. 

“Athletes are gaining power economically, as we speak, with [revenue sharing] … but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they have the more procedural power in the athletics department,” Harry said. “These exit interviews could potentially lead to changes in the future through that procedure.” 

Greenwell did not respond to follow-up questions about why LSU only documents interviews for certain sports, how many interviews LSU has conducted in each sport or how LSU is able to use information it gathers in the interviews if no notes are taken. 

Harry said not recording interviews for men’s sports could lead to gender inequities, as they tend to have worse academic and social experiences than women athletes. Football and basketball programs also tend to have more taxing travel schedules, and not obtaining feedback from these teams leaves a significant gap in the data, she added. 

“You’re not getting the perspective of the high profile sports who might have found it pretty unmanageable,” Harry said. 

‘Made her life hell’: LSU athletes allege bullying, racism by swimming and diving coaches

Allison Smith, a professor of sport management at Georgia State University, said allowing universities to self-police is a weakness in many NCAA bylaws. 

“The NCAA needs to uphold what the member institutions are doing regarding their bylaws,” Smith said. 

LSU initially attempted to deny the Illuminator’s public records request when it was made in 2023, arguing exit interviews were exempted from disclosure under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, a federal law that protects students’ personal information. 

With the help of the Tulane First Amendment Law Clinic, the Illuminator and Tiger Rag were able to obtain the 65 interviews that were recorded, though they were released with redactions. On each document, LSU redacted the student’s name as well as their response to questions about team medical and mental health providers. 

]

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.

The post LSU isn’t recording complaints from student athletes in most sports  appeared first on lailluminator.com

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content critically examines LSU’s handling of NCAA-required athlete exit interviews, highlighting concerns about transparency, accountability, and athlete welfare. It emphasizes institutional shortcomings and advocates for stronger oversight, which aligns with a center-left perspective that often supports increased regulation and protection of individual rights within institutions. The tone is investigative and calls for reform without adopting an overtly partisan stance.