Kirk Curole of Bayside Oysters in Grand Isle harvests off-bottom oysters cultivated in floating cages, an alternative to traditional seafloor beds. Marketed as “Grand Isle Jewels,” these boutique oysters offer potential resilience against threats like hurricanes, climate change, and sediment diversions from restoration projects like the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion. While on-bottom oyster farming is vulnerable to environmental impacts and habitat loss, off-bottom cultivation offers mobility to mitigate storm damage. However, challenges include regulatory hurdles, high costs, and reliance on state subsidies. Experts view off-bottom farming as a supplemental strategy to support—rather than replace—the traditional oyster industry amid environmental uncertainties.
GRAND ISLE – Not all jewels have the deep green features of emeralds or sparkle of diamonds. Some tumble from algae-coated cages in a rush of rock and shell, briny water splashing alongside them onto the deck of a boat.
These fine commodities are oysters, grown and harvested just off Louisiana’s coastline in a different way than the traditional seafloor beds that have been farmed for generations.
Cultivated in a string of floating cages instead of on the water’s bottom, Grand Isle Jewels, the umbrella brand for all off-bottom oysters in the barrier island community, are marketed as precious gems of the Gulf Coast.
“You create this craze for a certain item, and everybody’s jumping on it,” said Kirk Curole, owner of Bayside Oysters in Grand Isle.
After retiring from a career in oil and gas, Curole began harvesting off-bottom oysters as a hobby that turned into a small business. He now spends his days on the water, clad in rubber waders and toughened gloves as he pulls his crop from the floating cages.
“It’s the ‘bougie’ oyster. It’s the boutique oyster,” he said. “Everybody wants to try it.”
Louisiana is exploring Grand Isle Jewels as more than just a marketing strategy. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lists the state’s strong interest in off-bottom oyster cultivation as a way to help build resiliency into an industry under threat from sediment diversions in its final environmental impact statement for the controversial Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project.
Whether this technique can beat back worsening hurricanes, climate change and the impact of sediment diversions is still undetermined.
Curole, owner of Bayside Oysters in Grand Isle, describes his day running a small off-bottom oyster business in Grand Isle, Louisiana. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Curole waits for his oysters to pass through his homemade, solar-powered washing machine. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
The mobility of off-bottom, floating cages can, in theory, be helpful during storm prep and in response to low salinity events. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Curole bags oysters to sell in Grand Isle. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Crabs, snails and other sea creatures can hide in off-bottom oyster cages. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Curole swings over the side of his boat in waders to get to his floating oyster cages. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Curole has a transportable cooler for keeping oysters chilled. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
On-bottom culture, where oysters attach to reefs or substrate on the water’s bottom, is and has been the most popular method of oyster harvesting in Louisiana’s waters, fed for centuries by the wealth of nutrients carried down the Mississippi River and into the delta region.
“Oysters here are probably in the best location in this regard because they show very high growth,” said Romain Lavaud, an oyster scientist and researcher at LSU. “They can be harvested within a year, whereas in other parts of their distribution range it can take two to three years.”
But Louisiana’s environment can also be an oyster harvester’s worst enemy. Hurricanes inflict huge damage to oyster reefs, and heavy rains can dilute the salt content of the water, killing oyster crops.
“You’re kind of, like in any agriculture production, at the mercy of environmental conditions,” Lauvaud said.
Farming oysters has always been a gamble, said Peter Vujnovich, a third-generation on-bottom harvester based in Port Sulphur. Oyster farmers can lose big after a storm, he said.
“Mostly you try to protect your house, your boats and the equipment and stuff like that, and the rest is really up to God,” Vujnovich said. “Make the sign of the cross, just hope you don’t get a direct hit.”
Port Sulphur saw large losses to its oyster reefs in 2005 from Hurricane Katrina, which eliminated seeding ground for traditional farmers.
Then, there are sediment diversions, a coastal restoration approach that mimics the natural process of building a delta with silty water from the Mississippi River. There are multiple planned diversions in Louisiana’s Coastal Master Plan to rebuild wetlands that have been diminished through hurricanes, natural subsidence and countless man-made canals.
The Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project is one of the more controversial ones because of its likelihood of “major, permanent, adverse impacts” to oyster populations, according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers environmental impact statement. It would alter or eliminate vast swaths of habitat in the Barataria basin, with the goal of returning the area to what it looked like before the effects of sea level rise, erosion and subsidence changed it.
But on-bottom harvesters need reefs, and diversions would likely permanently eliminate vast swaths of oyster habitat. The Corps of Engineers’ study for the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion suggests the most productive oyster grounds in its basin, Hackberry Bay, “would experience the highest losses,” potentially experiencing “total loss” of habitat.
Gov. Jeff Landry has called for a pause on the nearly $3 billion project, citing in part its impact on the oyster industry.
This map from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers environmental impact statement for the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project shows where oyster habitat gets better and worse over time, with the top row representing no sediment diversion and the bottom showing a future with fresh water from the sediment diversion. (Courtesy of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)
Seeding off-bottom solutions
The Corps of Engineers has identified off-bottom oyster cultivation as a potential way for the industry to adapt to the threat of sediment diversions. The federal agency has oversight of all coastal restoration projects and acts as a gatekeeper for what’s proposed in Louisiana’s Coastal Master Plan.
Off-bottom farming could “help diversify the oyster industry and add a level of sustainability as the industry adjusts to a changing coast,” specifically in response to the diversion’s impact on salinity, the corps study said.
Off-bottom culture can help with protection against predators and offer a way to harvest in areas without abundant reefs, left stripped after storms. But the key advantage the Army Corps and the state’s Coastal Restoration and Protection Authority cites centers around mobility.
Floating cages could, in theory, be moved in response to a low salinity event such as the opening of a diversion. But harvesters need permission from regulators to store their gear and oysters in different bodies of water from where they’re harvested, and that can take up to 18 months to obtain. Also, the Louisiana Department of Health and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not allow oysters to be out of the water for more than 24 hours.
Mobility could also help mitigate hurricane damage even if the oysters have to be jettisoned so the cages could be moved on shore temporarily during a storm.
Curole said even if he loses his crop, it’s worth it to save his expensive equipment and harvest off-bottom again after the storm.
“If a storm is coming, I’m just going to go pick up my equipment, even if I have to dump my oysters out,” he said. “I can oyster next year, or I can oyster in two or three months.”
This works for Curole, whose trailer can haul up to 350 oyster cages, but his business is relatively small. At the scale industry would need, there might not be enough time to relocate all the cages they would use, and the loss could spell doom for a business’ bottom line.
“It has not been demonstrated that gear can be sunk and retrieved cost-effectively or relocated in time to avoid damage and loss of both gear and crop,” Daniel Petrolia, a University of Mississippi agro-ecomomics professor, wrote in a 2023 report on the economic challenges to off-bottom harvesting in Louisiana.
Time is in short supply as hurricanes approach, especially with storms developing and intensifying more rapidly in recent years. Off-bottom oyster operations are already expensive, according to the Petrolia report. He concludes the loss of harvesting gear to a storm could sink an off-bottom oyster harvester’s livelihood indefinitely.
Curole lays two oysters side by side on his boat’s sorting table. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator)
Reliant on subsidies
Petrolia’s report also found that the success of off-bottom oysters in Louisiana relies entirely on state subsidies.
Louisiana began to offer grants for off-bottom harvesters in 2022, starting with $3 million to address the high startup costs
“Although the … grant program can indeed provide a hand up to existing growers, it does distort market signals and may give the impression that economic conditions are better than they actually are,” the report reads. “The eventual disappearance of the [subsidy] program will likely have consequences.”
The report also doesn’t expect “the average small-scale operation” to be profitable, even with funding support from the state. Curole did not receive a grant from the state and said his business is currently profitable, but he represents a smaller set of growers that operate more for supplemental income. True profitability becomes more possible, according to the report, with larger businesses.
Off-bottom cultivation was never pitched as a silver bullet solution for the oyster industry’s future. Louisiana SeaGrant, a federal government-LSU partnership, is responsible for the majority of the off-bottom funding and hatchery support. It paid for Petrolia’s report and stands by the idea that off-bottom culture is meant to supplement rather than replace traditional techniques.
Different off-bottom initiatives continue to support the oyster industry, such as the expansion of hatchery operations that farmers rely on for seed. Further research, such as how to sink and secure cages during hurricanes, and grant money to support it are also needed.
To harvesters like Vujnovich, the survival of the industry doesn’t hinge on a choice between off-bottom or on-bottom cultivation. It’s whether or not these tools will help his industry stand on its own again.
“They’ll always have a few hardcore like me,” he said. “The question is not if it’ll survive; it’s if it’ll flourish again.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
SUPPORT
Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This content leans center-left as it focuses on environmental and economic challenges faced by the oyster industry, emphasizing climate change, hurricane impacts, and the consequences of large-scale coastal restoration projects. It highlights concerns about sediment diversions and their potential adverse effects on oyster habitats, while also discussing state subsidies as necessary support for off-bottom cultivation methods. The article reflects an interest in sustainable practices and government intervention to support vulnerable industries, common themes in center-left discourse, but it does so in a balanced, fact-driven manner without overtly partisan language or ideological framing.
SUMMARY: Governor Landry and District Attorney Jason Williams are at odds over the recent jailbreak involving seven dangerous inmates. Landry blames Williams for mismanagement and a backlog of cases, which he says contributed to the escape. Williams, defending himself, points to the challenges of a halted court system due to the pandemic and crime lab delays, as well as a lack of evidence from the sheriff’s office to prosecute certain cases. He shared correspondence with Sheriff Hudson, asking for necessary evidence to move forward with charges. Both leaders continue to point fingers as the escapees remain at large.
Sunday, Governor Landry criticized D.A. Jason Williams but as Alyssa Curtis reports Williams came with receipts on Monday.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-19 15:21:00
A bill advancing in Louisiana requires state agencies to inform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) about non-citizens’ status. The bill mandates that public assistance, such as food stamps, housing vouchers, and Medicaid, be terminated for individuals found ineligible due to their immigration status. The bill also requires agencies to submit annual reports detailing how many people were reported to ICE and had their benefits revoked. The legislation clarifies the verification process for citizenship or immigration status and outlines the reporting obligations for state and local entities administering these programs. It passed the House Judiciary committee in late April.
(The Center Square) — A bill requiring state agencies to inform U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement of a person’s status as a non-citizen has cleared another hurdle, now advancing to the House floor.
The bill would also require that the state terminate any federal or state assistance if the person is found to be a non-citizen.
“Most of this already exists on the federal level, so these agencies already have to check for eligibility which in that process, citizenship is one of them,” bill sponsor Rep. Chance Henry, R-Crowley, said, responding to concerns from opposition. “These agencies have the ability to cross check these databases anyhow.”
The House Appropriations committee was the second hoop the bill needed to jump through. The bill passed the House Judiciary committee in a 10-5 vote along party lines in late April. This time there was no objection.
House Bill 307 mandates that state agencies and political subdivisions verify the citizenship or immigration status of anyone applying for federal, state, or local public assistance — such as food stamps, housing vouchers, or Medicaid— unless federal law prohibits it.
“This is mainly making sure our tax dollars only go to citizens of the United States,” Henry said.
If an applicant is found to lack U.S. citizenship or legal immigration status after a verification process, the agency must both terminate the individual’s public benefits and refer their information to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to the bill.
The legislation also requires each agency to submit an annual report detailing how many individuals were reported to ICE and how many had their benefits revoked. That report must be submitted to top state officials, including the governor, the president of the Senate, the House speaker, the secretary of state, and the David R. Poynter Legislative Research Library.
The bill clarifies what constitutes public benefits and outlines verification procedures, as well as the reporting obligations of state and local entities that administer these programs.
An amendment adopted in the House Judiciary Committee added the secretary of state as one of the recipients of the annual reports.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
The article presents information on a legislative bill in a straightforward manner, primarily reporting the content of the bill, statements from its sponsor, and its progression through the legislative process without overt editorializing. However, the subject matter—restricting public benefits to citizens and reporting non-citizens to ICE—is a policy issue often associated with conservative or center-right political agendas focusing on immigration enforcement and fiscal responsibility. The inclusion of direct quotes from the Republican bill sponsor and the emphasis on protecting tax dollars contribute to a framing aligned with center-right viewpoints. Despite this, the article largely remains factual and descriptive, describing ideological positions held by legislators rather than promoting them explicitly, thus maintaining a generally neutral tone with a slight center-right inclination due to topic choice and framing.
SUMMARY: This week’s City and Parish council meetings cover several key items. The Parish Council will vote on renewing the Bayou Vermilion District millage for river and museum funding and consider courthouse upgrades costing over $4 million. The City Council will introduce new Lafayette Housing Authority director Latweeta Smyers, discuss Cajundome funding, a conditional use permit for Artmosphere bar, and agreements for parking leases and annexations for residential developments. Rezoning proposals include adjusting Soho Circle lots for single-family homes. Sidewalk improvements on South College Road are funded primarily by federal dollars. Jointly, the PARC department’s reorganization focuses on athletics and the Heymann Center.