Louisiana’s juvenile crime amendment draws bipartisan opposition, district attorney support

by Julie O’Donoghue, Louisiana Illuminator
March 17, 2025

It’s not everyday that conservative activist Chris Alexander finds himself on the same side of a political fight as the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana. But a ballot measure that could make it easier to send minors to adult prisons has brought him together with many liberal advocates. 

Alexander runs the Louisiana Citizen Advocacy Group and produces a podcast called “State of Freedom.” He’s known for his fights against vaccine mandates and denying the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. 

More recently, however, he has been campaigning against Constitutional Amendment 3 on the March 29 ballot. The proposal would give the Louisiana Legislature more authority to expand the list of crimes for which a person under 17 could be sent to an adult prison.

Persons age 14-16 can already be treated as adults in the criminal justice system when accused of one of 16 serious offenses, including murder, rape and armed robbery. If Amendment 3 passes, lawmakers would have the authority to add other felonies to that list without voters’ permission. 

“It’s going to do nothing to reduce crime in Louisiana. Nothing,” Alexander said in an interview last week. 

A menagerie of groups who oppose Amendment 3  repeated that sentiment ahead of early voting, which started Saturday. They range from the Louisiana Federation of Teachers, one of the state’s largest unions, to the Leaders for a Better Louisiana, made up of business leaders.  

Among the most surprising opponents are eight retired Louisiana juvenile justice and prison officials, including two former heads of the state juvenile justice system, a previous director of probation and parole services, and a retired adult prison warden. They released a statement this week encouraging people to vote against Amendment 3. 

“The professionals in corrections that worked in this field do not think this is a good idea,” said Mary Livers, former deputy secretary of juvenile justice under Gov. Bobby Jindal. “We do not want to send more kids to adult prisons. That may get people elected but it’s not good policy.”

But Gov. Jeff Landry, the most powerful elected official in the state, is personally backing the amendment. He won his 2024 campaign by promising to bring a tough-on-crime approach back to Louisiana and capitalized on a crime spike during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase funding for law enforcement and lengthen prison sentences.

Last week in Terrebonne Parish, the governor encouraged people at a business group luncheon to vote in favor of Amendment 3, characterizing it as another step toward increasing public safety. 

“[R]ight now on the ballot, there are four amendments, and one of those amendments is Amendment 3 that is going to further aid us,” he said.

But opponents argue there is no evidence that putting younger teenagers in adult prisons makes communities safer as Landry claims. 

The amendment opponents also point to scientific studies that show a person’s brain doesn’t fully develop until their mid-20s, meaning younger people who commit crimes have far more capacity for rehabilitation. Teenagers’ lack of brain development also explains why they  exhibit poor judgment and commit offenses they might not do once they reach adulthood.

The U.S. Supreme Court has found this brain science so convincing, they ruled in multiple cases to limit criminal sentences for minors. The justices abolished the death penalty and life sentences for all crimes except murder for defendants in their adolescence. 

Still, Amendment 3 has one powerful group of supporters: The Louisiana District Attorneys Association has endorsed the proposal, executive director Zach Daniels said. 

Current restrictions in the Louisiana Constitution make it difficult for state lawmakers to respond to modern public safety concerns, Daniels said. He considers the list of crimes that allow someone under 17 to be transferred into adult outdated, and said lawmakers need to be able to revise it without having to go through a statewide vote each time. 

“None of that should have been in the constitution to begin with,” Jefferson Parish Sheriff Joe Lopinto, who also supports the amendment, said in an interview.

Amendment supporters point to carjacking as an example of an offense that should be added to the list of crimes.

State Rep. Debbie Villio, a Republican who sponsored the legislation to get Amendment 3 on the ballot, said in January that she would likely file a bill to expand the types of carjackings that could land a younger teen in adult prison if voters approve the measure. 

Minors as young as 15 can already go to adult prison for carjacking with a weapon under the state’s armed robbery statute. Villio wants to add carjacking “by use of force or intimidation” — in other words without a weapon — to the list of crimes could get a younger minor transferred to adult prison. 

Should that happen, 15- and 16-year-olds could face much longer sentences. An adult found guilty of carjacking without a weapon can be put in prison five to 20 years for an initial conviction, a maximum sentence four times longer than the current guidelines for people under 17. 

Amendment opponents argue putting more teens into adult facilities will be expensive for the state. Teenagers are easily influenced by older prisoners and more vulnerable to coercion and threats, they maintain. It takes more prison staff and more money to keep them safe in adult correctional facilities, according to Kelly Ward, a retired warden who managed the David Wade Correctional Center in Homer who is against the amendment.

The federal government also requires adult prisons to house minors separate from incarcerated adults. 

“If you are going to spend money on additional resources, then why not take those resources and apply them into a juvenile system that is designed for that age group?” Ward said. 

It’s not clear there’s a formal political campaign in support of Amendment 3.

Daniels said it was be left up to individual district attorneys to decide how much they want to campaign for the proposal. Landry, who has vast political resources, could put up money for a late advertising push if he wanted, but there isn’t a high-profile effort to do so yet. 

The amendment’s opposition has a more visible public campaign two weeks out from the election. A large coalition of mostly left-leaning organizations has launched a “No on 3” website and has paid for digital advertising, yard signs and direct mail pieces across the state.

“The Legislature is asking for a blank check to fill our adult jails and prisons with children,” said Sara Omojola, a criminal justice advocate and coordinator for the “No on 3” coalition. “We can’t really trust them with that judgement and that power.” 

At least two influential, right-leaning groups working to pass the three other amendments on the March 29 ballot are sitting out the Amendment 3 fight.

The Pelican Institute, a conservative think tank focused on Louisiana, is encouraging its followers to vote yes on every other proposal except Amendment 3, for which it hasn’t taken a position. The Louisiana Association of Business and Industry also announced its support for every amendment except for No. 3 this month. 

Will Greene, LABI’s CEO and president, said the group decided not to take a stance because the amendment didn’t touch upon the group’s main mission to improve Louisiana’s business climate. 

Editor Greg LaRose contributed to this report.

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.

The post Louisiana’s juvenile crime amendment draws bipartisan opposition, district attorney support appeared first on lailluminator.com