SUMMARY: Former Richland County Council member Anthony “Tony” Mizzell was arrested on June 29 after deputies observed his speeding Cadillac and initiated a traffic stop. Mizzell fled, claiming his daughter had a medical emergency, but deputies found no medical issues at the home he stopped at. The homeowner presented text messages and recordings of Mizzell threatening her. Two weapons were found in his vehicle. Mizzell became combative and threatened a deputy before being checked by EMS. Charged with failure to stop, reckless driving, third-degree domestic violence, and threatening a public official, he was later released on surety bonds.

Read the full article

The post RCSD: Former county council member arrested appeared first on www.abccolumbia.com

SUMMARY: A South Carolina beach town once known as “Dirty Myrtle” for its rowdy nightlife has transformed into the fastest-growing U.S. metro area for senior citizens. Myrtle Beach’s population aged 65 and older grew by 6.3% last year and over 22% during the 2020s, now making up more than a quarter of its 413,000 residents. The pandemic encouraged retirees and remote workers from states like Ohio and New York to settle there, attracted by the climate, low taxes, and recreational opportunities. Nationwide, the senior population rose 3.1% last year, while the child population declined, reflecting an aging U.S. demographic.

Read the full article

The post Once known as ‘Dirty Myrtle,’ Myrtle Beach is now the fastest-growing US metro for seniors appeared first on www.abccolumbia.com

by Jane Winik Sartwell, Carolina Public Press
July 2, 2025

In the aftermath of Tropical Storm Helene, some in government and the news media were sounding the alarm on the prospect of population loss in affected areas of the state. The fear that there would be a mass exodus from the North Carolina mountains was contagious. 

The storm’s effect on the population will likely not be as dramatic as some imagined, but that doesn’t mean nothing has changed. It’s hard to say, nine months out, what to expect as the situation continues to develop. 

But some clues have come into focus. 

[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]

State demographer Mike Cline thinks that, in the best-case scenario, the region will lose about 5% of its displaced population. The worst-case scenario could result in population loss as high as 35% among those who have been displaced. 

Two factors affecting population were already in play. Families were being priced out of Western North Carolina — and the population has been aging. 

Then came Helene. Some lost their homes and were forced to leave. They often had no choice. Some evacuated and never came back. People lost loved ones, pets, cars, businesses and so much more that had tied them to the area.

While most people who left their community will take up residence somewhere else in Western North Carolina, according to Cline, some won’t. Those who do return are likely to be older and have more financial resources than those who do not.

On the other hand, many, many people have stayed put and appear likely to remain where they are.

“When you have a disaster, people want to know immediately what is happening,” Cline told Carolina Public Press. “Most studies show that 65% to 95% of people, depending on the disaster, will return within six months to a year.

“But the data is limited. Most of Western North Carolina’s population live in unincorporated communities or very small towns. When you have a smaller population, it’s harder to track.”

But that doesn’t stop him from trying.

His office formed an ad-hoc subcommittee to meet and discuss the issue of population change post-Helene. They look at housing permits, demolition rates, rehabilitated properties, school enrollments and surveys of local governments. 

From there, they can start to get a sense of how many people were displaced and unlikely to return. But they are wary to release anything official until more robust data is available.

Changing population migration patterns

The storm may deter or delay people who were thinking of moving or retiring to Western North Carolina. 

“Are the people who were planning to move here actually going to move now?” Cline asked. “That’s where I think the greatest impact in terms of future growth or change will be.”

The region was seen as something of a “climate haven” before Helene, a place where one could be safe from extreme temperatures, sea-level rise and natural disasters, according to Mitchell County resident Lori Gilcrist. 

The mountains have lost that status, she says. The chance of something like Helene happening again may decrease the region’s popularity.

It also could be the final straw for someone who was thinking of leaving the region already. 

But Gilcrist, for one, said she is not going anywhere. 

One factor Cline talks about is the “rootedness” of the region. Even though it’s a popular retirement destination, some families have been there for generations, folks born and raised and still living in the same communities their great-grandparents did. 

That Appalachian rootedness may insulate the region from extreme population loss.

Academic aftershocks

But for some populations, like the student population at Appalachian State University in Boone, for example, that rootedness is not really a factor.

“There were a lot of students who had housing problems and real psychological trauma, during and right after the event,” said Colin Kelley, a professor of climate science at App State. “Many had to go home to help their families or deal with their own problems.”

In the Henderson County school system, enrollment dropped by 283 students after the storm.

That number includes families who left the region completely, relocated to a different school district or withdrew their children from school while dealing with the aftermath.

In Buncombe County, eight schools experienced “large losses” in the student body, meaning losses of 20 students or more. 

But school officials in Haywood and McDowell County say enrollment numbers have been steadily declining for years, so it’s hard to say how different things would have looked if Helene had not happened.

That’s the prevailing feeling in the Haywood County government as well. 

“It’s really difficult to quantify population changes and even more so to attribute any shifts directly to Helene,” said Dillon Huffman, the public information officer for Haywood County. 

“From a local government perspective, I don’t know how we associate anything as a direct result of the storm. In fact, I would venture to say that Haywood County has grown in terms of overall population over the past year. One indicator we keep an eye on is building permit activity, which remains strong.

“We won’t have official Census data for another five years, and we’re only nine months out from Helene — it’s tough to establish meaningful trends in such a short window.”

Clarification: This article has been updated to show that the predicted 5% to 35% population loss for Western North Carolina is among just the displaced portion of the population and not the overall population. An earlier version of the article was unclear on that point.

This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Population loss in Western NC after Helene expected appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article provides a factual and balanced report on the population impacts following Tropical Storm Helene in Western North Carolina. It relies on data from multiple sources, including state demographers, local officials, and academics, presenting varying perspectives without editorializing or advocating for a specific political viewpoint. The language is neutral, focusing on observed effects and uncertainties without emotional or ideological framing. There is no clear alignment with partisan or ideological stances, reflecting an objective, data-driven approach typical of centrist reporting.