Connect with us

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

KY Senate votes to stop state funding of hormone treatments for transgender prisoners

Published

on

kentuckylantern.com – Sarah Ladd – 2025-02-18 17:17:00

KY Senate votes to stop state funding of hormone treatments for transgender prisoners

by Sarah Ladd, Kentucky Lantern
February 18, 2025

This article mentions suicide. The number for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is 988.

A bill that would end hormone treatments for 67 Kentucky inmates and prohibit the use of public funds for any future gender-affirming surgeries for transgender prisoners passed the Senate Tuesday along party lines 31-6.  

Opponents called the bill cruel and politically-motivated when it was heard in committee. 

The sponsor, Senate Majority Whip Mike Wilson, R-Bowling Green, pushed back on that accusation when introducing the measure on the Senate floor. Wilson also pointed out that Kentucky excludes transgender treatments from its Medicaid benefits and said taxpayer dollars should not be used to pay for transgender treatments for prisoners either. 

Senate Republican Whip Mike Wilson. (LRC Public Information)

“I’ve been criticized that we are somehow being inhumane by taking these folks off of these cross-sex hormones. But I will tell you that in the bill we provide for that, that a physician says that if it is something that would harm them, by taking them off cold turkey, they can cycle them off of these hormones,” he said. “These are the only medical services that we’re prohibiting. They can still get all the other medical services that a normal person would get. So, we’re not being inhumane.” 

Senate Bill 2 says public dollars cannot be used to fund a “cosmetic service or elective procedure” for Kentucky inmates including for  “cross sex hormones” and “any  gender reassignment surgery.” It also says if a health care provider documents that ending a treatment would harm an inmate, use of the drug or hormone may be “systematically reduced and eliminated.”

Wilson pointed to the controversy late last year over a Kentucky Department of Corrections policy allowing transgender inmates to apply for gender-affirming treatments, saying the department went about that “under the cover of darkness, out from the public view.”  

Sen. Karen Berg, D-Louisville, whose transgender son died by suicide in 2022, called the bill a “fearmongering” effort while evoking the Salem witch trials. 

“This is nothing but … a continued witch hunt to make sure that the most vulnerable people in this state are outed and abused and tortured for no reason other than you’re not comfortable with it,” she said. “They did not burn witches. They didn’t hang witches. Not one person that was hung at the Salem witch trials was a witch. They hung women — real, live people with real lives, over mass hysteria, over fear that is being propagated by lies coming from leadership of the Republican party to your door, and I don’t know why we put up with it.” 

Bill barring use of public funds on transgender treatments for Kentucky inmates advances

Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, R-Smithfield, asked if biologically female inmates have access to breast reduction for health reasons, if they receive hormone replacement therapy for hot flashes and if they’re given feminine care products at taxpayer expense. Wilson said he did not believe they got the period products or breast reductions, but did not know about the hormone treatments. 

“Female inmates are not even treated with the dignity to have medical treatment covered by taxpayers for necessary, basic, common necessities and cosmetic surgeries that have health implications,” Tichenor said. “This bill is a priority, in my opinion, because we’re dealing with the issue of spending taxpayer dollars on issues that are exacerbating a false reality for inmates. It doesn’t matter how many hormones you put them on, which lead them eventually towards surgery, and that is the goal, they cannot change who they are.” 

Tichenor also said she thinks male prisoners would take hormones with the goal to “eventually be in women’s prisons.” 

The opposition: The Constitution and misplaced priorities 

Democrats focused their arguments against the bill on the protections against cruel and unusual punishments guaranteed by the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the potential cost of lawsuits based on constitutional claims. They also slammed the high priority of SB 2, saying they believed other issues deserved that attention. 

Here’s how state lawmakers are taking aim at transgender adults’ health care

“We have a long line of cases that say that when a physician deems something to be medically necessary for someone, it is, in many cases, unconstitutional for the government to enact a blanket ban to deny it,” said Sen. Cassie Chambers Armstrong, D-Louisville.  

“Of course, when we take folks into custody and they are unable to access health care in any way except through us, and a licensed physician has determined that something is medically necessary, for the government to step in and say ‘we know better,’ is unconstitutional,” said Chambers Armstrong. 

Minority Caucus Chair Sen. Reggie Thomas, D-Lexington, said the high priority of the bill is a way to “vilify the LGBTQ community.” 

“We’ve got schools that are underfunded. We’ve got rural hospitals going out of business. We’ve got a serious problem with over 600,000 children on Medicaid. And this is our No. 2 priority,” Thomas said. “I would submit to the public today and to this body that our priorities are really out of whack.” 

Senate Bill 1, the chamber’s top priority, reduced the state income tax. It already has been signed into law by the governor.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Kentucky Lantern is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kentucky Lantern maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jamie Lucke for questions: info@kentuckylantern.com.

The post KY Senate votes to stop state funding of hormone treatments for transgender prisoners appeared first on kentuckylantern.com

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Stormy weather continues into the mid-week

Published

on

www.wtvq.com – T.G. Shuck – 2025-06-17 15:06:00

SUMMARY: Central and Eastern Kentucky have experienced persistent stormy weather with scattered showers and slow thunderstorms causing localized heavy rain and minor flooding. Tuesday saw cooler highs in the upper 70s to low 80s under thick clouds. Wednesday brings muggy conditions with mid-80s highs and mostly dry skies early, but a cold front will increase late-day thunderstorm chances, with a Level 2 severe risk for damaging winds northwest of Lexington. The front passes Thursday, ending daily storms but not lowering temperatures. Summer kicks off Friday with mid-80s warmth, rising to upper 80s and low 90s by the weekend, with humid, mostly dry weather and possible afternoon storms early next week.

Read the full article

The post Stormy weather continues into the mid-week appeared first on www.wtvq.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Smiths Grove man arrested after motorcycle pursuit

Published

on

www.wnky.com – WNKY Staff – 2025-06-17 13:28:00

SUMMARY: A Warren County man, Steven Dye, 38, of Smiths Grove, was arrested after leading Kentucky State Police on a high-speed motorcycle chase in Bowling Green. The pursuit began when troopers attempted a traffic stop for a missing taillight. Dye fled, reaching 75 mph in a 35 mph zone, ran a red light, nearly caused a head-on collision, and eventually lost control on Rock Creek Drive. Authorities found meth, pills, marijuana, a handgun, digital scales, cash, and a stolen motorcycle. Dye faces multiple charges including drug trafficking, fleeing police, possessing a firearm as a felon, and driving under the influence.

Read the full article

The post Smiths Grove man arrested after motorcycle pursuit appeared first on www.wnky.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Two-thirds of those in nonpartisan poll view GOP’s tax and spending cut bill unfavorably

Published

on

kentuckylantern.com – Jennifer Shutt – 2025-06-17 06:37:00


A KFF poll reveals broad public opposition to the GOP’s House-passed “big, beautiful bill,” with 64% of Americans disapproving, including 87% of Democrats and 73% of independents, though 61% of Republicans and 72% of MAGA supporters favor it. Opposition grows when informed of impacts like a $700 billion Medicaid cut and 10 million losing insurance. The bill risks reducing funding for hospitals and blocks Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood, a provision opposed by 67%-80% of respondents. Despite controversy, 83% support Medicaid overall. Senate Republicans are modifying the bill, facing vote-a-rama debates before approval.

by Jennifer Shutt, Kentucky Lantern
June 17, 2025

WASHINGTON — Republicans and backers of President Donald Trump’s Make America Great Again platform support the party’s “big, beautiful bill” as passed by the U.S. House, though Americans overall view the legislation unfavorably, according to a poll released Tuesday by the nonpartisan health research organization KFF.

The survey shows that nearly two-thirds of those polled, or 64%, don’t support the tax policy changes and spending cuts Republicans have included in the sweeping House version of the bill that the Senate plans to take up this month.

When broken down by political affiliation, just 13% of Democrats and 27% of independents view the legislation favorably. Those numbers are in sharp contrast to Republicans, with 61% supporting the bill and 72% of those who identify as MAGA supporters.

But those views fluctuated when the people surveyed were asked specific questions about certain elements of the package and the real-world impacts of the legislation:

  • The overall percentage of those surveyed with an unfavorable view of the bill increased from 64% to 67% when they were told it would lower federal spending on Medicaid by more than $700 billion, an estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
  • Dislike of the legislation rose to 74% when those polled were told policy changes would lead to 10 million people losing their health insurance coverage, another estimate from the CBO analysis.
  • Opposition rose to 79% when people were told the legislation would reduce funding for local hospitals.

“The public hasn’t had much time to digest what’s in the big, beautiful, but almost incomprehensible bill as it races through Congress, and many don’t have a lot of information about it,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman wrote in a statement. “Our poll shows that views toward the bill and its health-care provisions can shift when presented with more information and arguments about its effects, even among MAGA supporters.”

Senators wrestling with what to do

The House voted mostly along party lines to approve its 11-bill package in late May, sending the legislation to the Senate.

GOP senators have spent weeks internally debating which parts of the House legislation to keep, which to change and which to remove, while also conducting closed-door meetings with the parliamentarian to determine which parts of the bill comply with the rules for the complex reconciliation process.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., plans to bring his chamber’s version of the package to the floor next week, though that timeline could slip. Before the Senate can approve the rewritten bill, lawmakers will spend hours voting on dozens of amendments during what’s known as a vote-a-rama.

Significant bipartisan support for Medicaid

The KFF poll released Tuesday shows that 83% of Americans support Medicaid, slated for an overhaul and spending reductions by GOP lawmakers.

That support remains high across political parties, with 93% of Democrats, 83% of independents and 74% of Republicans holding a favorable opinion of the state-federal health program for lower-income people and some with disabilities.

Those surveyed appeared supportive of a provision in the House bill that would require some people on Medicaid to work, participate in community service, or attend an educational program at least 80 hours a month.

The change is supported by about two-thirds of those surveyed, though the numbers shift depending on how the question is asked.

For example, when told that most adults on Medicaid already work and that not being able to complete the paperwork associated with the new requirement could cause some to lose coverage, 64% of those polled opposed the new requirement. 

Planned Parenthood

There was also broad opposition, 67% overall, to language in the House bill that would block any Medicaid funding from going to Planned Parenthood for routine health care. There is a long-standing prohibition on federal funding from going toward abortion with exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the pregnant patient.

Opposition to the Planned Parenthood provision increased to 80% when those polled were told that no federal payments to Planned Parenthood go directly toward abortion and that ending all Medicaid payments to the organization would make it more challenging for lower-income women to access birth control, cancer screenings and STD testing.

Republicans are more supportive of that change, with 54% backing the policy and 46% opposing the new block on Medicaid patients going to Planned Parenthood. But 78% of independent women and 51% of Republican women oppose the change.

Food assistance program

Those surveyed also had concerns about how changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, would impact lower-income people’s ability to afford food, with 70% saying they were either very or somewhat concerned.

Democrats held the highest level of concern at 92%, followed by independents at 74% and Republicans at 47%.

Overall, Republicans hold the highest share of people polled who believe the dozens of GOP policy changes in the “big, beautiful bill” will help them or their family.

A total of 32% of Republicans surveyed believe the legislation will benefit them, while 47% said it will not make much of a difference and 21% said it will hurt them or their family.

Thirteen percent of independents expect the legislation will help them, while 39% said it likely won’t make a difference and 47% expect it will harm them or their family.

Of Democrats polled, just 6% said they expect the GOP mega-bill to help them, while 26% said it wouldn’t matter much and 66% expected it to hurt them or their family.

When asked whether the bill would help, not make much of a difference, or hurt certain groups of people, the largest percentage of those polled expect it to help wealthy people.

Fifty-one percent of those surveyed said they expect wealthy people will benefit from the bill, 21% believe it will help people with lower incomes and 20% said they think middle-class families will benefit.

Seventeen percent think it will help immigrants, 14% expect it to help people who buy their own health insurance, 13% believe it will help people on Medicaid, 13% think it will help people on SNAP and 8% expect it will benefit undocumented immigrants.

KFF conducted the poll June 4 – 8, both online and by telephone, among a nationally representative sample of 1,321 U.S. adults. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the full sample size. 

Kentucky Lantern is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kentucky Lantern maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jamie Lucke for questions: info@kentuckylantern.com.

The post Two-thirds of those in nonpartisan poll view GOP’s tax and spending cut bill unfavorably appeared first on kentuckylantern.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article presents data from a nonpartisan poll while highlighting public opposition to a Republican-backed bill, emphasizing the negative impacts of proposed GOP policy changes, particularly in areas like Medicaid, SNAP, and Planned Parenthood funding. The framing often underscores how public support drops when consequences are explained, and it presents the perspectives of Democrats and independents more sympathetically. Although factual and sourced, the tone and selective emphasis on adverse outcomes and dissent suggest a modest Center-Left bias in how the information is contextualized and presented.

Continue Reading

Trending