Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Know your rights at the U.S. border and airports

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By María Méndez – 2025-04-25 05:00:00

Immigration crackdown: Know your rights at the U.S. border and other ports of entry” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


Federal immigration and customs agents have long had lots of leeway to question and search people at U.S. ports of entry, but recent reports of some travelers from Western nations facing detention have spurred more concerns for travelers.

Amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown, which has also targeted visa-holders and permanent residents connected to pro-Palestinian protests and activities, immigration experts recommend travelers inform themselves about how they can respond to questioning according to their particular circumstances.

The U.S. Constitution generally affords people the right to remain silent and the right to refuse a search without a warrant, but the extent of these protections are not the same at airports and border ports of entry, especially for immigrants such as visa holders.

“What it really boils down to is the status that that person has in terms of how they should decide how to respond,” said Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, an immigration attorney based in Austin.

And though people can choose to remain silent, some experts say it may be in a person’s best interest to advocate for themselves, such as by explaining to agents that they fear returning back to their home country or by proving they’ve been in the U.S. for more than two years to avoid expedited removal.

Here’s what citizens and immigrants need to know about their rights in these ports of entry.

What should people expect when traveling to or re-entering Texas?

Texas has 28 international bridges and crossings along the U.S.-Mexico border and more than a dozen international airports where Texans and people traveling into the state may encounter federal immigration and customs agents.

At these ports of entry, agents from the different branches of the Department of Homeland Security, most commonly from U.S. Customs and Border Protection, may inquire about the legal status of the people seeking entrance into the U.S. to determine if they can be admitted.

They may also ask about the purposes of travel or additional personal questions, particularly for visa or green card holders whose status is tied to conditions such as studies, employment or marriage, said Kathleen Martinez, an immigration attorney based in Dallas.

Federal agents may also search luggage without a warrant at the airport, as well as belongings inside vehicles at the border, according to the American Civil Liberties Union. Though there has been some debate about the legality of electronic device searches without warrant, CBP also may request to search cell phones and devices or confiscate them.

How much information or cooperation must be given to be admitted at ports of entry depends on a person’s immigration status.

What rights do citizens have at the border and airports?

A U.S. citizen cannot be denied entry and cannot be put into immigration detention, but they can have their items confiscated and face questioning or secondary inspections, said Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, an Austin-based immigration attorney. This means a citizen could refuse to give their password for their phone to be searched, but their phone could be confiscated and their entry may be delayed. A citizen should only be detained if there’s a criminal issue against them, Lincoln-Goldfinch said.

If you do allow your phone to be searched, you can choose to unlock it yourself rather than give agents your password, said Valeria Alvarado, a legal assistant for the ACLU of Texas.

What rights do permanent residents have at the border and airports?

A permanent resident can face secondary inspection interviews and be detained if they’re held to be deportable, Lincoln-Goldfinch said. Permanent legal residents can be deemed deportable for immigration fraud, such as falsifying a marriage for a green card or living outside of the U.S. for an extended time, and for certain crimes, such as murder, rape or drug-related offenses.

This could also include green card holders who have engaged in protest behavior, Lincoln-Goldfinch said. The Trump administration has targeted some legal residents for pro-Palestinian behavior, declaring it a threat to U.S. foreign policy interests.

Green card holders have the right to plead their case, and immigration judges, not agents, have the authority to decide whether a green card can be revoked.

If people do face detention or issues, Alvarado noted people have the right to translation and to not sign anything they don’t understand and wait for an attorney to be present.

What rights do visa holders have at the border and airports?

People seeking admission with a visa or a visa waiver have the least rights, Lincoln-Goldfinch said. CBP agents may question and search people to see if they meet the conditions of their visa, but the agent can decide to not allow them in.

“They probably want to consider being the most cooperative, because the consequence for non-cooperation will probably be denial of entry,” Lincoln-Goldfinch said.

Does Customs and Border Protection have authority beyond airports and border bridges?

CBP also has internal checkpoints, where Border Patrol agents typically stop vehicle drivers and passengers to ask about their citizenship or immigration status.

There are many permanently stationed checkpoints like these along the Texas-Mexico border, but CBP or Border Patrol agents can also choose to create a makeshift “tactical checkpoint” with markers like traffic cones, said Valeria Alvarado, a legal assistant for the ACLU of Texas.

Evading these checkpoints is a felony, so people should take them seriously, she said. Agents are supposed to generally keep questioning short, she added.

What is the 100-mile border zone?

CBP has also cited U.S. immigration law to be able to board a bus or train without a warrant anywhere within 100 air miles, or roughly 115 standard miles, of the U.S.’s borders and coastline. This includes cities not typically considered to be a part of the border like Houston and Los Angeles. CBP agents’ jurisdiction in this zone only applies to immigration violations and federal crimes, and a certain level of suspicion may be required for agents to hold you depending on the location and the length of the detention. Texas law requires people to provide their name, but people can still choose to otherwise remain silent within this zone, Alvarado said.

Read more about rights within the 100-mile border zone from the ACLU.

Can immigrants travel right now? How can people prepare to travel?

Both Martinez and Lincoln-Goldfinch said they are giving clients recommendations on whether they should travel out of the country on a case by case basis. If possible, they recommend that people consult with an immigration attorney or at least have contact information for a few attorneys in case they face issues while traveling.

Within the U.S., such as for domestic flights, Lincoln-Goldfinch said people can travel with a valid state ID. But for international flights or for crossing the border, people should make sure to have their U.S. passport and immigrants should also have their visa or green card on them.

Note that agents from the Transportation Security Administration on May 7 will begin checking that a traveler’s state ID was issued under federal Real ID standards. This is indicated with a star on the ID. As enforcement is phased in, those without a Real ID-compliant state ID may temporarily still be allowed to travel if they go through extra screening. Read how to get a Real ID-approved Texas drivers license or state ID here.

Due to the Trump administration’s expedited removals for immigrants in the country for less than two years, immigrants may want to carry with them proof that they’ve been in the country for more than two years.

Immigration attorneys also suggest that people, and immigrants in particular, prepare for detention or any issues by making plans with their families, getting a power of attorney document to allow someone else to take care of their property and a voluntary caregiver authorization form for their children in case of deportation.

And if a relative goes missing without notice, families can see if they’re in detention through an Immigration and Customs Enforcement database.

For more information about undocumented immigrants’ rights at home or at work you can read this guide.

Editor’s note: This story has been updated to clarify the mileage of the 100-mile border enforcement zone, which is based on air miles.


Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas’ breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/25/texas-immigration-border-airport-ports-entry-know-your-rights/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Know your rights at the U.S. border and airports appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content presents an analysis of immigration policies and the rights of travelers at U.S. ports of entry. It acknowledges the significant legal and procedural challenges immigrants face, particularly with reference to the Trump administration’s immigration practices. The focus on legal protections for individuals at the border, particularly for immigrant communities, as well as critiques of certain border enforcement policies (e.g., searches of electronic devices without warrants), reflects a leaning toward advocating for immigrant rights. The framing of immigration issues, especially the concerns raised by legal experts and the mention of the Trump administration’s policies, suggests a Center-Left perspective that favors individual rights and critiques stringent immigration enforcement measures.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Bystander shot during 2023 police shooting in Austin files lawsuit

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Brianna Hollis – 2025-09-09 13:25:00

SUMMARY: In December 2023, Nakole Curry, 24, filed a lawsuit after being struck in the eye by a bullet during a police shooting outside Soho Lounge on Austin’s Sixth Street, resulting in permanent blindness. The shooting occurred when a man attempted to illegally bring a gun into the bar, prompting police to intervene. The suit alleges insufficient de-escalation efforts and names the City of Austin, APD, and Soho Lounge. The officers involved were not charged, and the internal investigation closed in October 2024. Curry seeks a jury trial and damages capped by Texas law. The APD offers victim support through the Crime Victims’ Compensation Fund.

Read the full article

The post Bystander shot during 2023 police shooting in Austin files lawsuit appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Israeli military urges full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of expanded military operation

Published

on

www.kxan.com – WAFAA SHURAFA, SAMY MAGDY, and MELANIE LIDMAN, Associated Press – 2025-09-09 07:15:00

SUMMARY: The Israeli military urged a full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of an expanded offensive targeting Hamas’ stronghold amid severe famine conditions. Despite warnings, few Palestinians have left due to exhaustion, overcrowded displacement sites, and high evacuation costs. Israel demolished 50 high-rise buildings, claiming they housed Hamas military infrastructure. Emergency responders rescued some survivors but faced equipment shortages. Protests erupted in Gaza against the evacuation, with medical staff refusing to leave. Hostage families in Jerusalem urged a diplomatic resolution. The UN highlighted the humanitarian crisis, noting displaced families lack shelter and basic needs. Meanwhile, violence continues in the West Bank, with recent killings and retaliatory Israeli measures.

Read the full article

The post Israeli military urges full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of expanded military operation appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

‘Resilience and hope’ in Galveston: 125 years after greatest storm in US history | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-09-09 06:00:00


The Great Storm of 1900 devastated Galveston on September 8, killing over 8,000 people and causing $30 million in damages. Winds reached 100 mph, tides rose 16 feet, and nearly all buildings were destroyed, leaving thousands homeless. The aftermath involved severe challenges, including corpse disposal by burning to prevent epidemics, martial law, and widespread suffering. Yet, survivors, led by local leaders, rebuilt the island with seawalls, enabling it to withstand future hurricanes. On the 125th anniversary, the Bryan Museum unveiled “The Emotional Trinity,” a painting symbolizing hope amid tragedy. The storm remains the deadliest U.S. natural disaster in history.

(The Center Square) – Hope remains 125 years after the Great Storm of 1900 decimated Galveston Island.

On Sept. 8, 1900, a massive hurricane tore through Galveston, creating an estimated $30 million worth of damages at the time.

The last wind speed measured 100 miles an hour before instruments were blown away. The tide reached roughly 16 feet above sea level; the barometric pressure at 7:30 PM “was the lowest ever recorded in the United States to that day,” according to accounts in a Rosenberg Library exhibit in Galveston.

An estimated more than 8,000 people were killed in Galveston and north on the mainland, although total deaths are unknown and believed to be much higher. At least 8,000 were left homeless; nearly all buildings and churches were destroyed. Bridges, train tracks, utilities and telegraph lines were wiped out. Ocean steamers were stranded; boats were destroyed. No fresh water and a limited food supply created a desperate situation for survivors.

Corpses were strewn on land and floating in the Gulf. Dead animals, rotting vegetation and fragments of houses were piled stories deep, stretching across the east end of the island.

“There is hardly a family on the island whose household has not lost a member or more, and in some instances entire families have been washed away or killed. Hundreds who escaped from the waves did so only to become the victims of a worse death, being crushed by falling buildings,” one account describes in “Galveston in Nineteen Hundred,” published in 1900 and edited by Clarence Ousley of the Galveston Tribune.

After extensive looting and price gouging ensued among the living, the mayor declared martial law, enforced by the military and local police. All able-bodied men were required to collect the corpses to bury. The volume was so great there wasn’t enough land, men, horses and carts to bury them. Attempts to bury corpses at sea resulted in them washing back ashore. The only solution left was to burn bodies, which lasted for months. Identification of the dead was impossible, according to multiple accounts.

“Bonfires are burning all over the city. They are the funeral of a thousand festering corpses cast back upon the shore at high tide,” another account from Galveston in Nineteen Hundred reads. “Cremation has become a necessity to prevent an epidemic. The townspeople are paralyzed with fright and suffering, or are making preparations to leave the doomed island.”

After appeals were made by the governor and Clara Barton, founder of the Red Cross, relief money, supplies, volunteers and messages of hope poured in from across the country.

“In the wake of the disaster of 1900, the determined majority of the survivors stayed on Galveston Island and turned their eyes to the future,” the library states. They were led by a group of businessmen resolved to rebuild. Among them was W. L. Moody, Sr., who said, “Galveston will be rebuilt stronger and better than ever before.”

Within a few years, part of the east end of the island was raised and a seawall was built. The island survived a massive hurricane in 1915 and every subsequent hurricane. In 125 years, the island’s population increased roughly 35%; more than 8 million visit a year.

Among the many commemorative events on Sept. 8, was the unveiling of the Bryan Museum’s first grand scale outdoor painting, “The Emotional Trinity: Hope, Fear and Awe,” painted by Vickie McMillan-Hayes. It’s available to view for free.

“In the world’s great tragedies that of Galveston stands remarkable. In no other case in history has a disaster met with such courage and fortitude; in no other case in history were the people of the whole world so responsive to the call for help for the helpless,” the museum states.

Its founder, J.P. Bryan, another instrumental leader in Texas and descendent of Stephen F. Austin’s sister, encouraged the public at the unveiling, “in all things great or small, never give in. … Hope abides abundantly regardless of the tragedy and the magnitude of it that you might face like we faced here in Galveston. God’s amazing grace is available for all of us who seek it, and it abides abundantly in our lives.”



Native Texan and wildlife conservation artist Vickie McMillan-Hayes painted “The Emotional Trinity: Hope, Fear and Awe,” in commemoration of the 125 year anniversary of the Great Storm, which killed more than 8,000 people in Galveston on Sept. 8, 1900. It remains the greatest natural disaster in U.S. history. The painting is permanently displayed at the Bryan Museum in Galveston and is free to the public to view.




The painting depicts a woman holding her baby, with her son clinging to her legs, looking at sunlight with the ruins of Galveston below. The baby represents awe; the boy, fear and comfort. The mother “isn’t looking down at destruction but is gazing at hope,” Hayes said. “She has fixed her eyes upon something beautiful. She is looking to the future, renewal, rebirth. She had a choice to look down at the devastation and distraction or to lift her gaze up … in hope.

“This is a question we can all ask ourselves when faced with difficult circumstances, what are my eyes fixed on? Does it lead me on a path of peace and hope for myself? It is the Lord Jesus Christ who gives me great hope,” she said. “It is fixing my eyes on him and him alone.”

The painting was collaborative, with members of the public brushing strokes. “We all came together and added our stroke of paint to this piece, and we were a community at large coming together, making a statement of resilience and hope faced with tragedy,” she said.

The Storm of 1900 remains the deadliest natural disaster in U.S. history.

The post ‘Resilience and hope’ in Galveston: 125 years after greatest storm in US history | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the historical event of the Great Storm of 1900 in Galveston, focusing on the facts, human impact, and community response without promoting a particular political ideology. The tone is factual and commemorative, emphasizing resilience and hope in the face of tragedy. While it includes references to faith and community values, these elements are presented as part of personal perspectives rather than a political stance. Overall, the content adheres to neutral reporting by recounting historical events and public reactions without endorsing or criticizing any political viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending