Connect with us

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Jury orders Chevron to pay $744M in landmark Louisiana coastal restoration case | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-04 14:58:00

(The Center Square) − In a historic decision with sweeping implications for Louisiana’s energy sector and environmental restoration efforts, a jury in lower Plaquemines Parish on Friday ordered Chevron to pay $744 million in damages for its role in the degradation of the state’s coastal wetlands.

The verdict marks the conclusion of the first trial among 42 lawsuits filed since 2013 by parishes across coastal Louisiana. The lawsuits allege that decades of oil and gas activity – primarily canal dredging and other infrastructure work –violated state permitting laws and accelerated the state’s catastrophic land loss.

The case, Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA, Inc., is the first of its kind to go before a jury. Chevron was sued as the successor to Texaco, whose operations in the parish date back decades.

“This is about responsibility,” said lead parish attorney John Carmouche. “If somebody causes harm, fix it.”

Chevron argued the lawsuit was flawed, claiming that the activities in question were permitted, legal, and often conducted under federal direction – particularly those tied to national security during World War II.

The company also sought to move the case to federal court, a request repeatedly denied over the years, with the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals affirming its place in state court in 2022.

Plaquemines Parish sought nearly $3 billion in damages. Environmental advocates and plaintiffs’ attorneys say the ruling could open the door to billions more in damages across the remaining lawsuits.

The verdict drew sharp criticism from Louisiana’s oil and gas industry and its allies, who warned the ruling could have dire consequences for the state’s economy.

“Today’s verdict not only undermines Louisiana’s position as an energy leader, but but also threatens our country’s trajectory at America-first energy dominance across the globe,” Tommy Faucheux, president of the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association, said. “These lawsuits were never about restoring the coast. As the number one private investor in our working coast, the energy industry is already doing that. Instead, this is a deep-pocketed trial lawyers driving baseless lawsuits hoping to make millions in legal fees. Today’s decision is sacrificing the livelihoods of our families, friends and neighbors to give these trial lawyers their big payday.”

Faucheux and others said the verdict will cost the state jobs and investments. 

“This is a shortsighted, flawed verdict that has the potential to sacrifice tens of thousands of jobs at the altar of Louisiana’s trial lawyer economy,” said Marc Ehrhardt, executive director of the Grow Louisiana Coalition. “With this verdict, Louisiana will be branded as a state that will extort the most recognizable companies on earth for billions of dollars, decades later.”

Daniel Erspamer, CEO of the free market Pelican Institute for Public Policy, called the decision a “setback for the new administration and the thousands of Louisiana families who depend on a strong energy sector.”

“For more than a decade, coastal lawsuits like this one have unfairly targeted energy producers for activities that were lawfully conducted decades ago,” Erspamer said. “There is little doubt that, if left to stand, this chilling precedent would further undermine legal certainty and deter future investment in our state.”

The state’s chamber of commerce, the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry, was critical of the decision.  released the following statement on behalf of  in response to the verdict handed down Friday by a Plaquemines Parish jury.

“Louisiana’s oil and gas industry supports more than 250,000 jobs and contributes billions of dollars annually to our state’s economy, funding critical infrastructure, education and coastal restoration projects,” LABI President and CEO Will Green said in a statement. “This verdict — which should absolutely be appealed — not only threatens those economic benefits but also sends a chilling message to businesses across the country about the risks of operating in Louisiana.

“These baseless lawsuits jeopardize one of our state’s most vital industries, deterring investment and enticing companies to take their jobs and resources to more business-friendly states at a time when Louisiana should be doubling down on supporting the industries that serve as the backbone of our economy.”

Green continued his criticism of the verdict.

“Instead of fostering an environment where industry and government collaborate on real solutions, this decision paves the way for more frivolous lawsuits that undermine economic stability, hurt Louisiana families and only benefit lawyers,” Green said. “Our state’s leading investors in coastal restoration — those with both the expertise and financial resources to make a real impact — are now being driven away.

All three groups argued that the decision sends a negative signal to businesses about Louisiana’s legal climate and economic stability.

Environmental and legal experts say the verdict could be a turning point in Louisiana’s long-running struggle to address coastal erosion — one of the fastest rates in the world. State officials estimate the coast loses the equivalent of a football field of land every 100 minutes.

Supporters of the lawsuit say oil and gas companies cut more than 10,000 miles of canals through wetlands — damage that was never properly repaired or mitigated.

“Coastal communities have been demanding accountability for decades,” said an environmental advocate familiar with the litigation. “This ruling shows that the courts are finally listening.”

Chevron is expected to appeal the decision.

 

 

The post Jury orders Chevron to pay $744M in landmark Louisiana coastal restoration case | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

M-P Boulet wants to spend $17 million on city hall — criticism was swift

Published

on

thecurrentla.com – Camden Doherty – 2025-07-31 15:52:00

SUMMARY: Lafayette Consolidated Government (LCG) plans to spend $17 million renovating city hall, addressing outdated plumbing, ventilation, and non-ADA-compliant facilities. The $21.5 million project, part of LCG’s five-year capital program, is funded through bonds, sales tax revenue, and existing ARPA funds, which must be spent by December 2026. The project aims to improve public access and modernize the building, following similar city hall renovations in Alexandria, VA, and Clearwater, FL. Design will continue until bidding in summer 2026, with construction starting fall. Approval of new funding depends on this year’s city council budget process, amid some local budget criticism.

Read the full article

The post M-P Boulet wants to spend $17 million on city hall — criticism was swift appeared first on thecurrentla.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Morning Forecast – Thursday, July 31st

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KTVE – 2025-07-31 08:50:01

SUMMARY: Thursday, July 31st will be marked by continued excessive heat, with temperatures near 100°F and heat indices over 110°F across southwest Arkansas, north Louisiana, and northeast Texas. An Extreme Heat Warning is in effect for most of southwest Arkansas, though eastern areas and parts of east Texas are excluded due to earlier thunderstorm development, which may reduce heat. Scattered showers and gusty thunderstorms are expected later today with a frontal boundary moving in. This front will bring cooler temperatures by the weekend, lowering highs to the upper 80s and lows to the mid-60s. However, the heat will return by next Wednesday with upper 90s expected.

Clouds have continued to cover the skies overnight and for parts of this morning. Peeks of sunshine are still expected as the excessive heat continues. Temperatures are still expected to reach near 100 degrees with the heat index at or over 110 degrees. A frontal boundary is expected to arrive later today when more scattered showers and thunderstorms are expected. These storms will pose a gusty wind threat and along with heavy downpours. The plus side is temperatures will start to cool down through the next few days into the start of the weekend. This cool down will be brief because temperatures will begin to climb back to the upper 90’s by next Wednesday.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

‘Half-baked’ USDA relocation irritates members of both parties on Senate Ag panel

Published

on

lailluminator.com – Jacob Fischler – 2025-07-31 05:00:00


U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee members criticized USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Vaden for proposing to shift 2,600 of 4,600 jobs out of the D.C. area without prior congressional consultation. The plan, announced by Secretary Brooke Rollins, aims to create five regional hubs—Raleigh, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Fort Collins, and Salt Lake City—to bring the department closer to farmers and reduce federal workers’ living costs. Democrats, led by Amy Klobuchar, argued the move weakens USDA’s presence near Congress, risking rural interests. Some Republicans supported cost savings but wanted more congressional input. A 30-day engagement period with Congress is underway to address concerns.

by Jacob Fischler, Louisiana Illuminator
July 31, 2025

Members of both parties on the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee chastised a U.S. Department of Agriculture official Wednesday for not consulting Congress before proposing to shift thousands of jobs out of the Washington, D.C., area.

USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Alexander Vaden defended the sweeping proposal, which Secretary Brooke Rollins announced with a five-page memo last week, saying it would help bring the department closer to the people the government oversees and lower the cost of living for federal workers, while pledging to work with members of the committee over the next month of planning.

“The secretary’s memorandum was the first step, not the last step,” Vaden told Minnesota’s Amy Klobuchar, the top Democrat on the panel, who criticized several aspects of the plan.

The proposal calls for cutting 2,600 of the 4,600 USDA jobs in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia and expanding the department’s footprint in five regional hubs: Raleigh, North Carolina; Indianapolis; Kansas City, Missouri; Fort Collins, Colorado; and Salt Lake City.

Klobuchar said moving workers out of the capital region hurts the constituencies USDA serves. Agency officials should be nearby to meet with members of Congress, other executive branch offices and trade groups that are based in the nation’s capital, she said.

“Whittling down USDA’s resources to do this crucial work puts rural America at a disadvantage when they don’t have people in the room where it happens,” Klobuchar said.

“We have differences across the aisle,” she continued. “But I think every one of my colleagues understands that you need people that can meet with you, you need people that can go over to the White House so that you don’t have people that don’t have the interests of rural America in mind making all the decisions.”

Vaden said the USDA would keep employees in all of the department’s mission areas in the Washington area.

No advance notice

Even Republicans who said they generally agreed with the aims of the proposal indicated they did not appreciate the lack of notice before it was announced.

“I support finding cost savings where you can, I support the idea of moving people out of the D.C. area and out into the field and closer to the farmer,” North Dakota Republican John Hoeven said. “We support the goals, but we want it to be a process where you work with Congress, with the Senate, both the authorizing committee and the Appropriations Committee on it, and we achieve those results together. And I think that’ll help garner a lot more support for the effort.”

In an opening statement, Chairman John Boozman, an Arkansas Republican, thanked Vaden for being available for the hearing on “very, very short notice”

Klobuchar took issue with that description.

“The reason it’s short notice is because the administration put out a half-baked plan with no notice and without consulting agricultural leaders,” she said.

Interest groups were not told ahead of the announcement, Vaden told Klobuchar, though the White House Office of Management and Budget did receive notice.

In response to complaints about the lack of engagement with Congress, Vaden said that lawmakers were notified at the same time as USDA employees, shortly before the announcement was public, and he emphasized that the announcement started a 30-day engagement period that would involve Congress.

He also compared the reorganization plan to the remote work that the department’s workforce used well past the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“From January 2021 to January 2025, the Biden administration, 2,200 employees left Washington, D.C.,” he said. “There was no congressional notice, there was no outcry, there was no committee hearing. For more than 1,700 days, extending well beyond any fair definition of the COVID pandemic, USDA was on a maximum telework footing.”

Midwest Republicans miffed

Some Republicans on the panel offered hearty endorsements to the proposal, including Jim Justice of West Virginia, who used his time to promote the plan instead of questioning Vader.

“I don’t have any questions,” Justice said. “All I’m telling you is, we absolutely need to move and do the very best that we can for these great people.”

But the issue transcended party lines in several cases. Some Republicans whose states were passed over in selecting the proposed hubs had sharp questions for Vaden, while some Democrats who would gain a federal presence under the proposal were less critical.

Hoeven questioned the proposed siting selections, noting Fargo, North Dakota, didn’t have a hub within 600 miles. Fargo is “in the heart of ag country,” Hoeven said.

“What’s magic about five hubs?” he asked. “How much agriculture is there in the state of Utah? We can go through all those things and whether, in fact, it’s actually easier or better for our farmers and our ranchers in North Dakota, given the five hubs you’ve selected.”

Utah ranked 37th in total agricultural income, according to the USDA’s 2023 statistics.

No Nebraska hub

Nebraska Republican Deb Fischer said she had discussed with Vaden, prior to his confirmation hearing this year, the possibility of moving some of the USDA’s workforce outside the Beltway, and advocated for Nebraska as a suitable location.

Because of that, she was underwhelmed by the proposal and its introduction.

“I would have liked to see a process that allowed for Nebraska to demonstrate its strong value proposition,” she said. “So while I do agree with the overreaching goal here, I have to express disappointment in how this has been rolled out and the lack of engagement with Congress prior to the announcement.”

Meanwhile, Colorado Democrat Michael Bennet, whose state would see a regional hub that would also house a consolidated U.S. Forest Service office, said he agreed with the plan’s goals.

“I have long called for the idea of trying to relocate people from Washington, D.C., to parts of the country, to partly to get out of the insulation of this place, to just be closer to, in this case, producers, but others as well,” Bennet said. “So philosophically, that’s where I’ve been.” 

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.

The post ‘Half-baked’ USDA relocation irritates members of both parties on Senate Ag panel appeared first on lailluminator.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article presents a balanced report on the USDA job relocation proposal, providing viewpoints from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers without showing favoritism. It includes Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar’s concerns about the impact on rural representation and Republican lawmakers’ support for cost savings and regional hubs, alongside their shared frustration with the lack of prior consultation. The language is factual and neutral, focusing on the details of the proposal and the bipartisan nature of the debate. Overall, it adheres to objective reporting, reflecting perspectives across the political spectrum without promoting a particular ideological stance.

Continue Reading

Trending