Connect with us

The Center Square

Joe Biden’s Approval Rating in Mississippi | Mississippi

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Samuel Stebbins, 24/7 Wall St. via The Center Square – 2023-08-23 18:24:59

With the 2024 presidential election less than a year and a half away, campaign season is heating up. In recent months, the field of Republican contenders vying for the top spot on the party’s ticket next November has grown considerably. Meanwhile, since announcing plans to seek a second term in April 2023, President Joe Biden is the presumptive Democratic nominee – and as the incumbent candidate, voters’ perception of his job performance could be a decisive factor in his bid for reelection.

When it comes to voter sentiment, Biden is facing an uphill battle. According to a nationwide Gallup poll, his job approval rating stands at 40%, only slightly higher than his lowest rating of 37% recorded in April 2023, but well below his all-time high of 57% from early 2021. Public opinion regarding the Biden administration is not uniform across the country, however, and in some states, the president is viewed far more favorably than in others.

Another poll conducted in the first quarter of 2023 by public opinion research company Morning Consult found that 35% of adults in Mississippi approve of how Biden is handling his job as president and 61% disapprove.

In the 2020 presidential election, Biden received 41.1% of the popular vote in Mississippi, his 16th worst performance among states, and Donald Trump received 57.6%, the 14th largest share for the former president.

All data on Biden’s job approval rating is from Morning Consult. Data on the 2020 presidential election results by state is from The Cook Political Report, an independent, nonpartisan, political analysis newsletter.

Rank State Adults who approve of Biden’s job as president (%) Adults who disapprove of Biden’s job as president (%) 2020 election winner Biden share of vote in 2020 (%) Trump share of vote in 2020 (%)
1 California 54 42 Biden 63.5 34.3
2 Hawaii 53 44 Biden 63.7 34.3
3 Maryland 52 44 Biden 65.4 32.2
4 Vermont 51 44 Biden 66.1 30.7
5 Massachusetts 50 46 Biden 65.6 32.1
6 New York 50 47 Biden 60.9 37.7
7 Illinois 49 48 Biden 57.5 40.6
8 Washington 49 48 Biden 58.0 38.8
9 Connecticut 49 48 Biden 59.3 39.2
10 Rhode Island 48 48 Biden 59.4 38.6
11 Delaware 46 50 Biden 58.7 39.8
12 Oregon 46 51 Biden 56.5 40.4
13 New Jersey 45 51 Biden 57.3 41.4
14 New Mexico 44 52 Biden 54.3 43.5
15 Virginia 44 53 Biden 54.1 44.0
16 Alaska 43 52 Trump 42.8 52.8
17 Georgia 43 54 Biden 49.5 49.3
18 Minnesota 43 54 Biden 52.4 45.3
19 Colorado 43 54 Biden 55.4 41.9
20 Wisconsin 42 55 Biden 49.4 48.8
21 New Hampshire 42 57 Biden 52.7 45.4
22 Nevada 41 55 Biden 50.1 47.7
23 Pennsylvania 41 56 Biden 50.0 48.8
24 Michigan 41 56 Biden 50.6 47.8
25 Arizona 40 57 Biden 49.4 49.1
26 Maine 40 57 Biden 53.1 44.0
27 Florida 39 57 Trump 47.9 51.2
28 North Carolina 39 58 Trump 48.6 49.9
29 Texas 38 58 Trump 46.5 52.1
30 Montana 38 59 Trump 40.5 56.9
31 Louisiana 37 59 Trump 39.9 58.5
32 Ohio 37 60 Trump 45.2 53.3
33 South Carolina 37 60 Trump 43.4 55.1
34 Mississippi 35 61 Trump 41.1 57.6
35 Kansas 35 62 Trump 41.6 56.2
36 Missouri 34 62 Trump 41.4 56.8
37 Tennessee 34 63 Trump 37.5 60.7
38 Indiana 34 63 Trump 41.0 57.0
39 Iowa 33 64 Trump 44.9 53.1
40 Idaho 33 65 Trump 33.1 63.9
41 South Dakota 33 65 Trump 35.6 61.8
42 Utah 32 65 Trump 37.6 58.1
43 Kentucky 31 66 Trump 36.2 62.1
44 Alabama 31 66 Trump 36.6 62.0
45 Nebraska 31 67 Trump 39.4 58.5
46 Oklahoma 30 67 Trump 32.3 65.4
47 Arkansas 29 67 Trump 34.8 62.4
48 Wyoming 27 71 Trump 26.6 69.9
49 North Dakota 25 71 Trump 31.8 65.1
50 West Virginia 25 73 Trump 29.7 68.6

Read More

The post Joe Biden’s Approval Rating in Mississippi | Mississippi appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas Senate passes THC ban | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-30 19:23:00


The Texas Senate has passed SB 5, a bill banning THC products, for the second time, following Gov. Greg Abbott’s veto of a similar bill (SB 3). Abbott has proposed legalizing THC for adults 21+, but the GOP-led legislature opposes legalization and supports the ban, citing health and safety concerns, especially for children. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick strongly advocates the ban, condemning loopholes exploited by retailers selling potent THC products marketed to youth. The bill bans production, sale, and possession of most THC products except CBD/CBG. Opponents argue it harms businesses and patients, but Patrick highlights expanded medical access through the Compassionate Use Program. The Texas House plans to pass the ban, deepening the rift with Abbott.

(The Center Square) – The Texas Senate on Wednesday passed for a second time a ban on THC.

In the regular legislative session, the Senate passed SB 3, filed by state Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, with bipartisan support in both chambers. Gov. Greg Abbott then vetoed it in the last hour of the last day allowed by the Texas Constitution after the legislature adjourned and couldn’t convene to override it.

Next, Abbott proposed legalizing THC for adults over age 21, making it a legislative priority for the special session, which began July 21. However, the Texas Legislature, led by Republicans, oppose Abbott’s proposal and oppose legalizing THC and marijuana.

The Texas Senate next passed Perry’s second THC ban, SB 5, out of committee with bipartisan support last week. The full Senate passed it on Wednesday by a vote of 21-8.

The Texas House is also not backing down on a THC ban. An identical bill to Perry’s was filed by state Rep. Gary VanDeaver, R-New Boston, HB 5.

In response to the Senate again passing the THC ban, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said, “Since 2019, bad actors have taken advantage of a loophole in Texas agriculture law to sell potent, intoxicating forms of THC that have nothing to do with agriculture. These shops have rapidly spread throughout Texas, endangering the health and safety of children and families across our state, with no accountability. These products, often containing dangerous levels of THC, are marketed directly towards young people with colorful packaging and images, making THC look like candy or sweets.”

Patrick has made a THC ban his mission this year, holding multiple press conferences and posting videos on social media about why a ban is important.

A THC ban remains a legislative priority, he said on Wednesday, “because we refuse to let these rogue retailers exploit loopholes in state law to sell dangerous THC products into our communities.”

The bill has the support of every law enforcement agency in Texas, the Texas Medical Association, Texas Pediatric Society, and many families impacted by THC. Law enforcement officers oppose regulating it, arguing regulation won’t work. Current regulation related to hemp farming has already been abused and unenforced, witnesses testified, pointing out that an official list of hemp growers includes smoke shops, extract labs and closed businesses.

Abbott is standing in opposition to law enforcement and Texas families, and is paving the way to legalize marijuana, Patrick argues. Abbott has proposed regulating THC like alcohol.

Marijuana and THC products are considered Schedule 1 controlled substances by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, which “considers them to have a high likelihood of being abused and no current medical use, despite marijuana being legal in some cities and states, including for medical purposes,” WebMD explains.

In Texas, marijuana for recreational use is illegal; CBD oil, an extract of the marijuana plant, is legal for medical use. In 2015, the state legislature passed the Compassionate-Use Act, authorizing qualified physicians to prescribe low-THC cannabis (less than one percent) to patients with certain conditions. It initially only applied to patients with intractable epilepsy but was later expanded to include those diagnosed with a seizure disorder, multiple sclerosis, spasticity, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, autism, cancer, post-traumatic stress disorder and an incurable neurodegenerative disease, the State Law Library explains.

SB 5 allows Cannabidiol (CBD) or CBG, whole hemp seeds, hemp seed protein powder and hemp seed oil to continue being sold in Texas. Their sale is “currently legal today through the FDA,” Perry said at a hearing last week. However, “It is with almost 99% assuredly most of the [THC] products that are being sold off these retail shelves today through these hemp stores and other venues is illegal federally. We have court cases building by the week that support that.”

SB 5 bans the production, sale, and possession of consumable marijuana products that contain any cannabinoids other than CBD or CBG, including banning substances marketed as delta-8, delta-9, delta-10, THCA, and THC-O. Violators face criminal penalties ranging from a Class C misdemeanor for possession to a third-degree felony for manufacturing or distribution of THC.

Opponents of the ban say it will wipe out small businesses, tens of thousands of jobs and negatively impact veterans, seniors, cancer survivors and others experiencing chronic pain who use THC, The Center Square reported.

Patrick says they can legally purchase THC with a prescription from their doctor. The legislature also passed HB 46 to expand the Texas Compassionate Use Program, “the largest compassionate use program in America” to ensure they had access, he said.

The Texas House is expected to again pass the THC ban, setting up another showdown between the Republican-led legislature and Republican governor.

The post Texas Senate passes THC ban | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article presents a largely factual and straightforward report on the Texas Senate’s legislative actions regarding a THC ban, detailing the positions of Republican lawmakers, the governor, and other stakeholders. While the content predominantly reflects the viewpoints and legislative priorities of conservative Republicans opposing THC legalization, it reports these without overt editorializing or strong emotive language favoring one side. The framing highlights Republican concerns about public health and law enforcement backing, as well as opposition arguments about economic and medical impacts. Overall, the article leans moderately toward conservative perspectives through its focus but maintains a largely neutral tone in presenting the facts and differing opinions.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

FTC to receive public comments on gender-affirming care on minors | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Tate Miller – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-30 09:51:00


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched a public inquiry seeking consumer comments on alleged harms and deceptive practices in gender-affirming care for minors. Critics like Dr. Jared Ross and Terry Schilling condemn these treatments as ideologically driven, financially motivated, and harmful, accusing providers of manipulating vulnerable children and families. They argue that sex is biologically fixed at conception and that gender-affirming care promotes false ideas about sex and gender, including harmful body modifications and dismissal of underlying mental health issues. The FTC aims to assess possible violations of its Act regarding risks and unsubstantiated claims in this care. The comment period lasts 60 days.

(The Center Square) – Following its workshop on the deceptive practices in “gender-affirming care” for minors, the Federal Trade Commission launched a public inquiry in order to learn from consumers how such care has harmed and deceived them personally.

Do No Harm Senior Fellow Dr. Jared Ross told The Center Square that “the Federal Trade Commission’s request for public comment is a great step forward in exposing ideologically motivated physicians and ending the heinous practice of so-called pediatric gender medicine.”

“This is a much-needed invitation for victims and family members to share their stories and shed light on how vulnerable children and their desperate parents have been manipulated by doctors seeking to spread their ideology and benefit financially while mutilating and sterilizing children to create lifelong medical patients,” Ross said.

Do No Harm is a group of medical professionals and more committed to “keeping identity politics out of medical education, research, and clinical practice,” according to its website.

Similar to Ross, President of the American Principles Project Terry Schilling told The Center Square that “the Trump Administration and the FTC have stepped up to the plate to protect our kids from woke gender ideology.”

“Their decision to request comments shows their commitment to ending the federal government’s support for the Gender Industrial Complex,” Schilling said. “I am confident that we will get justice for the victims of so-called ‘gender-affirming’ care.”

The American Principles Project is an organization that advocates for families.

The period to submit comments will last 60 days, according to the FTC’s news release.

In its release, the FTC said it “seeks to evaluate whether consumers (in particular, minors) have been harmed and whether medical professionals or others may have violated Sections 5 and 12 of the FTC Act by failing to disclose material risks associated with ‘gender-affirming care’ or making false or unsubstantiated claims about the benefits or effectiveness of ‘gender-affirming care.’”

Ross told The Center Square that “pediatric gender medicine uses multiple deceptive practices in selling an alleged cure to a disease that cannot be objectively measured or observed, yet requires mass participation, controlling speech and thought to ‘affirm’ a child’s delusion.”

“From promoting the idea that sex is somehow randomly ‘assigned at birth’ to the absurd and biologically incorrect concept that humans exist on a spectrum of sex, including so-called non-binary,” Ross said.

“This doctrine-driven bastardization of medicine requires us to concede that feelings prevail over objective reality, that the brain overrides the body,” Ross said.

“Gender ideology reinforces regressive stereotypes about human behavior and sexual orientation, imposing extreme body modification as the treatment for societal nonconformity,” Ross said.

Ross told The Center Square that the most harmful deception in the gender-affirming care industry is “the suicide myth.” Ross called it “the most sinister form of emotional blackmail, unprecedented elsewhere in medicine.”

“Suicidal patients not only lack the capacity to give informed consent but also need emergency psychiatric treatment, not hormones and surgery,” Ross said.

“These interventions detract from the true underlying mental health conditions that these gender-confused youth are suffering from,” Ross said. “These very treatable conditions go untreated, psychological inquiry is discarded in favor of dissociation, and medications that worsen mental health (such as estrogen and testosterone) are administered.”

In summary, Ross told The Center Square that “sex is determined at conception, then observed and recorded at (or before) birth.”

“No amount of puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, or plastic surgery can change someone’s sex,” Ross said. “Attempting to convince susceptible children otherwise is deceptive and scandalous.”

As The Center Square previously reported, the FTC held a workshop that concerned the dangers and deception of gender-affirming care for minors in early July.

Doctors, medical ethicists, whistleblowers, detransitioners, and parents of detransitioners gathered at the workshop, many of whom said that practices in gender-affirming care for minors “are misleading to consumers and are ‘one of the greatest frauds’ committed against the American people.”

The FTC has not yet responded to The Center Square’s request for comment.

The post FTC to receive public comments on gender-affirming care on minors | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

This article presents a clear ideological perspective aligned with conservative and right-leaning viewpoints. The language and framing heavily criticize gender-affirming care for minors, labeling it as deceptive, harmful, and ideologically motivated. It prominently features quotes from groups and individuals known for opposing gender-affirming treatments and “woke gender ideology,” such as Do No Harm and the American Principles Project. The article does not strive for balanced perspectives, as it omits voices supporting gender-affirming care or experts advocating for such medical practices, which indicates an editorial choice to promote a particular ideological stance rather than neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

National teachers union, its mission questioned in congressional proposal | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-30 09:01:00


Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn introduced a bill banning the National Education Association (NEA) from influencing Congress, requiring annual certification of non-interference. Blackburn criticized the NEA for abandoning its mission to support teachers, accusing it of pushing a “far-left political agenda” involving “woke gender ideology, antisemitism, and propaganda.” Earlier, Blackburn and Rep. Mark Harris proposed revoking the NEA’s congressional charter, accusing the union of partisan activism. Their efforts are backed by groups like Moms for Liberty and Heritage Action, who condemn the NEA for prioritizing radical politics over parental rights and children’s education.

(The Center Square) – Tennessee Republican U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn introduced her second bill this month targeting the nation’s largest teacher’s union.

Her latest bill would ban the National Education Association from influencing Congress. The association would be required to submit a certification every year proving that it has not tried to influence lawmakers, according to a news release from Blackburn.

“The National Education Association has abandoned its mission of supporting America’s teachers and students in the name of pushing its far-left political agenda,” Blackburn said. “The NEA has become nothing more than a radical-left activist group, and it has no business using its status as a congressionally chartered entity to push woke gender ideology, antisemitism, and propaganda on America’s students.”



U.S. Rep. Rev. Mark Harris, R-N.C.




Earlier this month, Blackburn and U.S. Rep. Mark Harris, R-N.C., introduced a bill that would revoke the National Education Association’s charter.

“Congress established the NEA in 1906 to support America’s teachers and strengthen our schools, but it has abandoned that mission in favor of a radical agenda,” Harris said. “From branding President Trump a fascist to embracing divisive gender ideology and walking away from efforts to fight antisemitism, the NEA has become nothing more than a partisan advocacy group.”

The bill is supported by Moms for Liberty, Heritage Action, Young America’s Foundation and other groups, according to Harris and Blackburn.

“It’s incredibly sad that the nation’s largest teachers union has put woke politics before America’s children,” said Tina Descovich, CEO of Moms for Liberty. “The NEA’s embrace of radical left policies and antisemitism combined with their rejection of parental rights has forced moms and dads across America to condemn this organization.”

The post National teachers union, its mission questioned in congressional proposal | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a clear ideological perspective aligned with conservative viewpoints. It highlights criticism of the National Education Association (NEA) by Republican lawmakers using charged language such as “radical-left political agenda,” “woke gender ideology,” and “partisan advocacy group.” The inclusion of supportive statements from conservative organizations like Moms for Liberty and Heritage Action reinforces this stance. The framing focuses on portraying the NEA negatively for its political positions, rather than neutrally reporting on the legislative actions, indicating a right-leaning bias in tone and content.

Continue Reading

Trending