avlwatchdog.org – JOHN BOYLE, PETER LEWIS and LINUS SCHAFER-GOULTHORPE – 2025-02-18 06:00:00
Part two of three
Asheville and Buncombe County officials face a dilemma of enormous consequences.
If they refuse to cooperate fully with the Trump administration’s orders to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants nationwide, the president has threatened to cut off access to all federal funds to the storm-ravaged city and county, and instructed the attorney general to pursue possible legal action against local officials. The loss of potentially hundreds of millions in federal assistance could bankrupt the city and county, cripple local social and legal justice agencies, and significantly delay recovery from Helene.
If they allow local law enforcement to fully cooperate with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in deporting potentially thousands of local residents, they and their constituents will incur huge social, cultural, and economic costs, and they will destroy whatever trust the immigrant community has with the police.
Coming in Part III: “I love this country, and I want to stay here.”
“It’s hard to figure out what a winning position here is,” Western Carolina University political scientist Chris Cooper said. “If you ‘stand up’ to the federal government and to ICE, you might make the citizens of Asheville happy, but you are going to run the risk of running afoul of the federal government in general and Donald Trump in particular.”
Trump has visited Asheville twice in recent months, once during the campaign and again, on Jan. 24, as president. Trump visited the disaster zone in Swannanoa, east of Asheville, both times.
“If Trump ever thinks of Asheville, I doubt it’s fondly,” Cooper said. “He sees Asheville as a sign of things he’s fighting against. A loud and proud pushback against Trump would likely draw his ire, and his public ire.”
State law prohibits sanctuary cities
President Trump issued executive orders Jan. 20 that would deny all federal assistance to sanctuary cities. They ordered federal officials “to ensure that so-called ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions, which seek to interfere with the lawful exercise of Federal law enforcement operations, do not receive access to Federal funds.”
The order also threatened legal action against “any such jurisdiction’s practices that interfere with the enforcement of Federal law.”
There are no sanctuary cities or counties in North Carolina, Brad Branham, city attorney with the city of Asheville, said.
City Attorney Brad Branham // Credit: City of Asheville
“With regard to ‘sanctuary city’ status, it is important to be aware that such a designation by a local government is prohibited in this state,” Branham said, citing North Carolina General Statutes 160A‑205.2.
That statute specifically prohibits any city from enacting any policy, ordinance, or procedure that “limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than full extent permitted by federal law.”
“This includes a restriction on a variety of activities that would frustrate law enforcement officials from gathering information,” Branham said. “In accordance with this statute, the city of Asheville has not designated itself a ‘sanctuary city.’”
Further, Branham said, “The city currently has no intention of taking action which would render us out of compliance with this law.”
Protesters at the Feb. 8 rally in Pack Square, downtown Asheville. Social service organizations say many “mixed status” families in Buncombe County could be separated under new Trump administration policies. // Watchdog photo by Katie Shaw
Asheville Mayor Esther Manheimer did not respond to Asheville Watchdog’s questions about what steps the city is taking in preparation for the promised mass deportations. Instead, she issued a statement:
“Asheville has a long history of being a diverse and welcoming city,” Manheimer wrote. “We have repeatedly come together as neighbors to support one another in times of challenge or crisis, as witnessed in the aftermath of Tropical Storm Helene.”
Manheimer, an attorney, continued: “We are served, as a whole community, by a police department dedicated to public safety and the enforcement of existing state laws and ordinances. The Asheville Police Department (APD) neither operates a jail nor is authorized to enforce federal immigration laws. City Council and staff value our strong relationship of trust with all members of our community. “
Antanette Mosley, Asheville’s Vice Mayor, also issued a statement to The Watchdog: “We are facing challenges in our nation and questions those challenges create in our communities. We want to send our hearts out to anyone who does not feel safe and secure in their homes, businesses, or in our communities. We think of Asheville as a place that’s open and welcoming to everyone, and I hope that continues to be the case.”
Is Buncombe a sanctuary county?
The city of Asheville is wholly contained within Buncombe County, which in 2019 served notice that it would not cooperate with ICE. Buncombe Sheriff Quentin Miller was one of 11 county sheriffs to sign an open letter to state legislators opposing House Bill 10, the “Require ICE Cooperation” law, which was passed in 2024, vetoed by then-Gov. Roy Cooper, but overridden by the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
On Jan. 21, the Justice Department instructed U.S. attorneys offices to investigate and prosecute noncompliance with immigration enforcement initiatives.
The Watchdog askedDena J. King, then-U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, if her office has been in touch with officials in Asheville or Buncombe. King, who was appointed by then-President Joe Biden, resigned Wednesday at the request of the Trump administration. Her office responded via a spokesperson: “The U.S. Attorney’s Office declines to comment beyond the information contained in the DOJ memo.”
Buncombe County Sheriff Quentin E. Miller
In an extraordinary statement of defiance last week, following The Watchdog’s request for comment, Sheriff Miller wrote:
“As the Sheriff, I am not in charge of operating the churches or schools within this community but I am elected to ensure the safety and security of ALL the residents in Buncombe county. WE are a community of WE and because I have deputies positioned in schools as School Resource Officers, my stance is clear and strong that immigration enforcement is not allowed on our school campuses unless forced through a valid court order.”
“I have repeatedly spoken out against cooperation with ICE, saying federal immigration law is not the responsibility of local officers and damages law enforcement’s trust within the immigrant community,” Miller continued. “I also indicated in the past that I would not comply with just an ICE “detainer” to hold undocumented immigrants taken into custody, however the passing of HB10 amended that compliance to involve the issuance of both a detainer and an administrative warrant in order to hold someone undocumented in custody for up to 48 hours. As much as I have constitutional concerns about holding someone who is able and willing to post bond and subsequently be released, I do not make the laws, I only enforce the laws.
“The Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office (BCSO) will not be partnering with ICE to help enforce federal immigration laws beyond following HB10 which is only after someone has committed a crime. BCSO deputies will not be arresting and detaining persons to solely investigate immigration status in the absence of probable cause of an independent crime, that is racially profiling and unconstitutional.”
Noem, Hamilton meet with local leaders
In an email to Buncombe County Commission Chair Amanda Edwards, America First Legal, a foundation co-founded by Stephen Miller, now Trump’s deputy chief of staff and a Duke graduate, threatened legal action against any Buncombe or Asheville officials who resist cooperating with ICE.
“Federal law is clear: aliens unlawfully present in the United States are subject to removal from the country, and it is a crime to conceal, harbor, or shield them,” the email stated. “It is also a crime to prevent federal officials from enforcing immigration law.”
Edwards, who was in Raleigh for meetings related to Buncombe’s disaster recovery, declined a request to be interviewed on Buncombe’s preparations for possible mass deportations.
On Feb. 8, Edwards, Manheimer, and City Councilman Bo Hess spoke at a news conference in Swannanoa with Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, who on the previous day had visited Guantanamo Bay in Cuba to view progress in erecting tents capable of housing as many as 30,000 detainees.
Appearing Feb. 9 on CNN, Noem refused to rule out sending undocumented immigrants found guilty of non-violent offenses — like theft or shoplifting — to Guantanamo Bay.
Joining Noem at the Swannanoa event was Cameron Hamilton, acting administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Last October, Hamilton criticized FEMA for providing shelter, food, and medical aid to undocumented immigrants in North Carolina in Helene’s aftermath.
Edwards and Manheimer told The Watchdog that the topic of immigration did not come up in the meeting with Noem and Hamilton.
Asheville Police: ICE detainers ‘not relevant’
Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order authorized Noem “to the maximum extent permitted by law, and with the consent of State or local officials as appropriate,” deputize local sheriffs and police officers “to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary of Homeland Security.”
However, Rick Rice, spokesman for the Asheville Police Department, said last week that “the APD is not authorized to enforce federal immigration laws.”
“We are here to protect and serve everyone, regardless of immigration status,” Rice said. “The Asheville Police Department’s focus as a law enforcement agency is to uphold and enforce criminal laws. Once an individual is in custody, they are processed by the Buncombe County Detention Facility, and APD is not involved in that process.”
“ICE issues detainers for persons in the custody of jails,” Rice said. “The Asheville Police Department does not operate a jail, so ICE detainers are not relevant to our work.”
On Jan. 22, North Carolina’s two Republican senators, Thom Tillis and Ted Budd, and U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-Hendersonville, introduced bills allowing crime victims to sue sanctuary cities that shelter undocumented migrants. Under the bills, Buncombe County could face civil lawsuits for failing to deport undocumented immigrants who later commit felonies.
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan research organization, Buncombe, Chatham, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg, Orange, Wake, and Watauga counties all operate as “sanctuary jurisdictions.”
In his monthly newsletter to Buncombe County Republicans, chairman Doug Brown wrote that “recently appointed Border Tzar Tom Homan is so popular that retired agents are signing back up to help, and sanctuary cities will end.”
The Town of Woodfin, bordering Asheville on the northwest, has a sizable population of Latinos, primarily Hondurans and Guatemalans.
Jim McAllister // Photo credit: Town of Woodfin
In response to a Watchdog question about how the town and its police are preparing for possible deportation actions, Town Manager Shannon Tuch issued a statement: “Municipal police departments are minimally impacted by changing federal priorities and immigration enforcement is anticipated to be managed by federal agencies. Should we be contacted by any federal agency, we would continue to perform our responsibilities as a local law enforcement agency, which includes ensuring the safety of all residents.”
James McAllister, the elected mayor of Woodfin, told The Watchdog, “You can quote me on this: It angers me that a number of residents of my town live in fear every day because of the color of their skin or where their parents might have been born. It angers me. We are a nation of immigrants. We’ve turned our back on them, and for that I am ashamed.”
“I am going to state publicly that, other than criminals with outstanding warrants, ICE has no business in this town,” McAllister said. “Our people work, they go to church, they send their kids to school, they pay taxes.”
“Leave us in peace,” McAllister said.
Shortly after learning that The Watchdog had spoken with McAllister, Tuch called The Watchdog to say the mayor was not authorized to speak on behalf of the Woodfin government. “He does not represent the views of the town,” Tuch said.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle is a staff reporter and columnist. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. Peter H. Lewis is The Watchdog’s executive editor. Email plewis@avlwatchdog.org. Linus Schafer-Goulthorpe is a student reporting intern. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00
(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.
Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.
Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.
Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance
NCLeg.gov
“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”
SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.
“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”
The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.
“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”
Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.
SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00
(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.
The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”
With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.
Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.