News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Is Buncombe County a “sanctuary” for undocumented residents? • Asheville Watchdog
Part two of three
Asheville and Buncombe County officials face a dilemma of enormous consequences.
If they refuse to cooperate fully with the Trump administration’s orders to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants nationwide, the president has threatened to cut off access to all federal funds to the storm-ravaged city and county, and instructed the attorney general to pursue possible legal action against local officials. The loss of potentially hundreds of millions in federal assistance could bankrupt the city and county, cripple local social and legal justice agencies, and significantly delay recovery from Helene.
If they allow local law enforcement to fully cooperate with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in deporting potentially thousands of local residents, they and their constituents will incur huge social, cultural, and economic costs, and they will destroy whatever trust the immigrant community has with the police.
Coming in Part III: “I love this country, and I want to stay here.”
“It’s hard to figure out what a winning position here is,” Western Carolina University political scientist Chris Cooper said. “If you ‘stand up’ to the federal government and to ICE, you might make the citizens of Asheville happy, but you are going to run the risk of running afoul of the federal government in general and Donald Trump in particular.”
Trump has visited Asheville twice in recent months, once during the campaign and again, on Jan. 24, as president. Trump visited the disaster zone in Swannanoa, east of Asheville, both times.
“If Trump ever thinks of Asheville, I doubt it’s fondly,” Cooper said. “He sees Asheville as a sign of things he’s fighting against. A loud and proud pushback against Trump would likely draw his ire, and his public ire.”
State law prohibits sanctuary cities
President Trump issued executive orders Jan. 20 that would deny all federal assistance to sanctuary cities. They ordered federal officials “to ensure that so-called ‘sanctuary’ jurisdictions, which seek to interfere with the lawful exercise of Federal law enforcement operations, do not receive access to Federal funds.”
The order also threatened legal action against “any such jurisdiction’s practices that interfere with the enforcement of Federal law.”
There are no sanctuary cities or counties in North Carolina, Brad Branham, city attorney with the city of Asheville, said.
“With regard to ‘sanctuary city’ status, it is important to be aware that such a designation by a local government is prohibited in this state,” Branham said, citing North Carolina General Statutes 160A‑205.2.
That statute specifically prohibits any city from enacting any policy, ordinance, or procedure that “limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws to less than full extent permitted by federal law.”
“This includes a restriction on a variety of activities that would frustrate law enforcement officials from gathering information,” Branham said. “In accordance with this statute, the city of Asheville has not designated itself a ‘sanctuary city.’”
Further, Branham said, “The city currently has no intention of taking action which would render us out of compliance with this law.”
Asheville Mayor Esther Manheimer did not respond to Asheville Watchdog’s questions about what steps the city is taking in preparation for the promised mass deportations. Instead, she issued a statement:
“Asheville has a long history of being a diverse and welcoming city,” Manheimer wrote. “We have repeatedly come together as neighbors to support one another in times of challenge or crisis, as witnessed in the aftermath of Tropical Storm Helene.”
Manheimer, an attorney, continued: “We are served, as a whole community, by a police department dedicated to public safety and the enforcement of existing state laws and ordinances. The Asheville Police Department (APD) neither operates a jail nor is authorized to enforce federal immigration laws. City Council and staff value our strong relationship of trust with all members of our community. “
Antanette Mosley, Asheville’s Vice Mayor, also issued a statement to The Watchdog: “We are facing challenges in our nation and questions those challenges create in our communities. We want to send our hearts out to anyone who does not feel safe and secure in their homes, businesses, or in our communities. We think of Asheville as a place that’s open and welcoming to everyone, and I hope that continues to be the case.”
Is Buncombe a sanctuary county?
The city of Asheville is wholly contained within Buncombe County, which in 2019 served notice that it would not cooperate with ICE. Buncombe Sheriff Quentin Miller was one of 11 county sheriffs to sign an open letter to state legislators opposing House Bill 10, the “Require ICE Cooperation” law, which was passed in 2024, vetoed by then-Gov. Roy Cooper, but overridden by the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
On Jan. 21, the Justice Department instructed U.S. attorneys offices to investigate and prosecute noncompliance with immigration enforcement initiatives.
The Watchdog asked Dena J. King, then-U.S. attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, if her office has been in touch with officials in Asheville or Buncombe. King, who was appointed by then-President Joe Biden, resigned Wednesday at the request of the Trump administration. Her office responded via a spokesperson: “The U.S. Attorney’s Office declines to comment beyond the information contained in the DOJ memo.”
In an extraordinary statement of defiance last week, following The Watchdog’s request for comment, Sheriff Miller wrote:
“As the Sheriff, I am not in charge of operating the churches or schools within this community but I am elected to ensure the safety and security of ALL the residents in Buncombe county. WE are a community of WE and because I have deputies positioned in schools as School Resource Officers, my stance is clear and strong that immigration enforcement is not allowed on our school campuses unless forced through a valid court order.”
“I have repeatedly spoken out against cooperation with ICE, saying federal immigration law is not the responsibility of local officers and damages law enforcement’s trust within the immigrant community,” Miller continued. “I also indicated in the past that I would not comply with just an ICE “detainer” to hold undocumented immigrants taken into custody, however the passing of HB10 amended that compliance to involve the issuance of both a detainer and an administrative warrant in order to hold someone undocumented in custody for up to 48 hours. As much as I have constitutional concerns about holding someone who is able and willing to post bond and subsequently be released, I do not make the laws, I only enforce the laws.
“The Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office (BCSO) will not be partnering with ICE to help enforce federal immigration laws beyond following HB10 which is only after someone has committed a crime. BCSO deputies will not be arresting and detaining persons to solely investigate immigration status in the absence of probable cause of an independent crime, that is racially profiling and unconstitutional.”
Noem, Hamilton meet with local leaders
In an email to Buncombe County Commission Chair Amanda Edwards, America First Legal, a foundation co-founded by Stephen Miller, now Trump’s deputy chief of staff and a Duke graduate, threatened legal action against any Buncombe or Asheville officials who resist cooperating with ICE.
“Federal law is clear: aliens unlawfully present in the United States are subject to removal from the country, and it is a crime to conceal, harbor, or shield them,” the email stated. “It is also a crime to prevent federal officials from enforcing immigration law.”
Edwards, who was in Raleigh for meetings related to Buncombe’s disaster recovery, declined a request to be interviewed on Buncombe’s preparations for possible mass deportations.
On Feb. 8, Edwards, Manheimer, and City Councilman Bo Hess spoke at a news conference in Swannanoa with Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, who on the previous day had visited Guantanamo Bay in Cuba to view progress in erecting tents capable of housing as many as 30,000 detainees.
Appearing Feb. 9 on CNN, Noem refused to rule out sending undocumented immigrants found guilty of non-violent offenses — like theft or shoplifting — to Guantanamo Bay.
Joining Noem at the Swannanoa event was Cameron Hamilton, acting administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Last October, Hamilton criticized FEMA for providing shelter, food, and medical aid to undocumented immigrants in North Carolina in Helene’s aftermath.
Edwards and Manheimer told The Watchdog that the topic of immigration did not come up in the meeting with Noem and Hamilton.
Asheville Police: ICE detainers ‘not relevant’
Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order authorized Noem “to the maximum extent permitted by law, and with the consent of State or local officials as appropriate,” deputize local sheriffs and police officers “to perform the functions of immigration officers in relation to the investigation, apprehension, or detention of aliens in the United States under the direction and the supervision of the Secretary of Homeland Security.”
However, Rick Rice, spokesman for the Asheville Police Department, said last week that “the APD is not authorized to enforce federal immigration laws.”
“We are here to protect and serve everyone, regardless of immigration status,” Rice said. “The Asheville Police Department’s focus as a law enforcement agency is to uphold and enforce criminal laws. Once an individual is in custody, they are processed by the Buncombe County Detention Facility, and APD is not involved in that process.”
“ICE issues detainers for persons in the custody of jails,” Rice said. “The Asheville Police Department does not operate a jail, so ICE detainers are not relevant to our work.”
On Jan. 22, North Carolina’s two Republican senators, Thom Tillis and Ted Budd, and U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-Hendersonville, introduced bills allowing crime victims to sue sanctuary cities that shelter undocumented migrants. Under the bills, Buncombe County could face civil lawsuits for failing to deport undocumented immigrants who later commit felonies.
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan research organization, Buncombe, Chatham, Durham, Forsyth, Guilford, Mecklenburg, Orange, Wake, and Watauga counties all operate as “sanctuary jurisdictions.”
In his monthly newsletter to Buncombe County Republicans, chairman Doug Brown wrote that “recently appointed Border Tzar Tom Homan is so popular that retired agents are signing back up to help, and sanctuary cities will end.”
The Town of Woodfin, bordering Asheville on the northwest, has a sizable population of Latinos, primarily Hondurans and Guatemalans.
In response to a Watchdog question about how the town and its police are preparing for possible deportation actions, Town Manager Shannon Tuch issued a statement: “Municipal police departments are minimally impacted by changing federal priorities and immigration enforcement is anticipated to be managed by federal agencies. Should we be contacted by any federal agency, we would continue to perform our responsibilities as a local law enforcement agency, which includes ensuring the safety of all residents.”
James McAllister, the elected mayor of Woodfin, told The Watchdog, “You can quote me on this: It angers me that a number of residents of my town live in fear every day because of the color of their skin or where their parents might have been born. It angers me. We are a nation of immigrants. We’ve turned our back on them, and for that I am ashamed.”
“I am going to state publicly that, other than criminals with outstanding warrants, ICE has no business in this town,” McAllister said. “Our people work, they go to church, they send their kids to school, they pay taxes.”
“Leave us in peace,” McAllister said.
Shortly after learning that The Watchdog had spoken with McAllister, Tuch called The Watchdog to say the mayor was not authorized to speak on behalf of the Woodfin government. “He does not represent the views of the town,” Tuch said.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle is a staff reporter and columnist. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. Peter H. Lewis is The Watchdog’s executive editor. Email plewis@avlwatchdog.org. Linus Schafer-Goulthorpe is a student reporting intern. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post Is Buncombe County a “sanctuary” for undocumented residents? • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Flooded homes, cars frustrate people living in Wilson neighborhood: ‘I’m so tired’
SUMMARY: Residents in a Wilson, North Carolina neighborhood are expressing frustration after yet another round of flooding damaged homes and vehicles following heavy overnight rains. Water rose to knee level on Starship Lane, flooding driveways, cars, and apartments. One resident reported losing music equipment, furniture, and clothes for the third time due to recurring floods. The rising water even brought worms and snakes from a nearby pond into homes. Debris and trash were scattered as floodwaters receded, leaving many questioning why no long-term solution has been implemented. Residents are exhausted, facing repeated loss and cleanup efforts after each heavy rainfall.
“We have to throw everything out. This is my third time doing this.”
More: https://abc11.com/post/overnight-storms-central-north-carolina-cause-flooding-wilson/16764793/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
McDowell DSS shakeup after child abuse not reported to NC DHHS
More than three months after McDowell County placed its Department of Social Services director on leave, officials have kept quiet about upheaval inside the office responsible for child welfare and a range of other public services. A letter obtained by Carolina Public Press revealed that McDowell DSS failed to alert law enforcement to evidence of child abuse — and violated other state policies, too.
County commissioners placed former McDowell DSS director Bobbie Sigmon and child protective services program manager Lakeisha Feaster on paid administrative leave during a special session meeting on Feb. 3. Another child protective services supervisor resigned the following week.
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]
County Commissioner Tony Brown told local news media at the time that the county initiated an investigation into its DSS office and the state was involved, but did not provide any details about the cause for the investigation. County commissioners haven’t spoken publicly about the matter since.
That Feb. 21 letter, sent by the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services to Brown and county manager Ashley Wooten, offered previously undisclosed details about issues at the DSS office.
State letter details DSS missteps
According to the letter, McDowell County reached out to the state with concerns that its DSS office hadn’t been notifying law enforcement when evidence of abuse and neglect was discovered in child welfare cases.
The letter didn’t say how or when the county first became aware of the problem, but District Attorney Ted Bell told CPP that he had “raised issues” with the county about DSS prior to Sigmon and Feaster being put on leave. Bell’s office was not involved with the investigation into McDowell DSS.
The state sent members of its Child Welfare Regional Specialists Team to look into the claim. Their findings confirmed that McDowell DSS had failed in multiple instances to alert law enforcement to cases of abuse.
Additionally, the state identified several recent child welfare cases in which social workers failed to consistently meet face to face with children or adequately provide safety and risk assessments in accordance with state policy.
“Next steps will include determining how to work with (McDowell DSS) to remediate the service gaps identified in the case reviews,” the letter concluded.
However, that nearly four-month-old correspondence is the state’s “most recent engagement” with McDowell DSS, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services told CPP last week.
Sometimes the state will initiate a “corrective action plan” when it finds a county DSS office in violation of state policy. If a county fails to follow through on its corrective action plan, the state may strip the DSS director of authority and assume control of the office.
Just last month, the state took over Vance County DSS when it failed to show improvement after starting a corrective action plan.
The state hasn’t taken similar measures in McDowell.
McDowell considers DSS overhaul
Wooten has served as the interim DSS director in Sigmon’s absence. He told CPP that Sigmon and Feaster resigned “to seek employment elsewhere” on May 31, after nearly four months of paid leave.
That Sigmon and Feaster resigned, rather than being fired, leaves open the possibility that they may continue to work in DSS agencies elsewhere in North Carolina. CPP reported in 2022 on counties’ struggles to hire and retain qualified social workers and social services administrators.
Wooten would oversee the hiring of a new DSS director if the commissioners choose to replace Sigmon, but the county is considering an overhaul to its social services structure that may eliminate the director position entirely.
The restructure would consolidate social services and other related departments into one human services agency, Wooten said. The county may not hire a new DSS director in that case, but instead seek someone to lead an umbrella agency that would absorb the duties of a traditional social services department.
A 2012 state law changed statute to allow smaller counties to form consolidated human services agencies, which are typically a combination of public health and social services departments.
County DSS directors across the state opposed such a change to state statute at the time, but county managers and commissioners mostly supported it, according to a report commissioned by the General Assembly.
At least 25 counties moved to a consolidated human services model in the decade since the law was passed.
McDowell shares a regional public health department with Rutherford County, so it’s unclear what a consolidated human services agency there might look like. Statute does not define “human services” so it’s up to the county what to include in a consolidated agency.
Wooten told CPP that no decisions about such a transition have been made.
This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The post McDowell DSS shakeup after child abuse not reported to NC DHHS appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This article from Carolina Public Press focuses on administrative failures within McDowell County’s Department of Social Services, relying on official documents, quotes from public officials, and a chronological recounting of events. It avoids emotionally charged language and refrains from assigning blame beyond documented actions or policies. The piece does not advocate for a specific political solution or frame the story through an ideological lens, instead presenting the issue as a matter of public accountability and governance. Its tone is investigative and factual, reflecting a commitment to journalistic neutrality and transparency without promoting a partisan viewpoint.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Enjoying the I-26 widening project? Great, because it won’t be over until July 2027 — if it stays on schedule • Asheville Watchdog
Among the many topics that draw continued interest — and ire — from you good readers, the I-26 widening project has to be right at the top of the list.
No, not the I-26 Connector project, which we will get to complain about for roughly the next decade. I’m talking about the widening of I-26 through Buncombe and Henderson counties, the $534 million project that started in October 2019.
Initially, it was to be completed in 2024, but that date got pushed back to this year. Then next year.
And now?
“Our revised contract completion date for I-26 widening in Buncombe — which includes Exit 35 — is July 1, 2027,” David Uchiyama, spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Transportation in western North Carolina, said via email.
You read that right — two more years of harrowing passes through Jersey barriers, slamming on the brakes because the pickup in front of you didn’t notice the line of cars in front of him coming to a standstill, and serious concrete envy when you drive I-26 in Henderson County, which is a glorious four lanes on each side in places.
Most times I go to Asheville, I take I-26. It’s gotten so I give myself about 40 minutes for what once was a 20-minute trip, mainly because I just don’t know what I’m going to get.
Best-case scenario is a sluggish slog through the Long Shoals area and up the mountain to the Blue Ridge Parkway, as the tractor-trailers refuse to move over and they slow everything down. Worst-case scenario is a wreck, for which I can plan on settling in for a good 50 minutes or so.
Clearly, this road project makes me a little grumpy, but I can assure you I’m not the only one. I routinely hear from readers who might even outdo me on the grump-ometer. Most recently, an octogenarian wrote to express his displeasure:
“If the pace of building the Connector takes as long as building out I-26 at the Outlet Mall to below the airport and beyond toward Hendersonville, it almost certainly will not be completed in our lifetimes, and I’m 82 years old. Could you please determine why this project is still not complete? It seems like an interminable length of time exacerbated by the many days one passes through the area and sees lots of machinery not in use nor any work going on at all. It seems to me that magnificent roads in Western Europe get done a lot faster, and certainly in China where significant projects get done three times faster than here with work ongoing 24 hours a day. You want to get things done, then China’s approach may be worth our consideration. Or, are we too soft?”
I chuckled. To be fair, China is a communist country that builds apartment buildings and roads that folks don’t even use, and if you’re a worker there, they might suggest your life could be a lot shorter if you don’t put in all that overtime.
To be fair to the NCDOT and its contractor, the new exit for the Pratt & Whitney plant got added in well after the I-26 widening had begun.
“The addition of Exit 35 — an economic development project in addition to a project that will relieve congestion and increase safety — created (the) completion dates,” Uchiyama said.
Back in March, when another reader had asked about delays, Luke Middleton, resident engineer with the NCDOT’s Asheville office, said, “The addition of a new interchange, Exit 35, after the project was more than halfway completed extended the timeframe needed to complete the north section.
“The south end of the project did not have these obstacles,” Middleton said then. The new exit was announced in early 2022.
Middleton noted that Exit 35 will include an additional bridge and multiple retaining walls, “which increased the overall project timeline by almost two years.”
This month, I asked if the contractor was facing any penalties because of the extended time frame.
“Damages will not be charged unless the contractor is unable to complete the work by the newly established contract date,” Uchiyama said. “If work goes past that date a multitude of items will be considered before damages are charged.”
Those damages could be $5,000 a day.
While it may appear work is not going on yet with the interchange, that’s a misperception, Uchiyama said.
“The contractor started working on the westbound on and off ramps in March of 2024,” Uchiyama said. “I-26 traffic has been on the other side of the interstate island, which obstructs the view of drivers in the area.”
Over the past month, “earthwork operations have started on the offramp on the eastbound side of I-26, just south of the French Broad River,” Uchiyama added. He also noted that the interchange bridge will be a little less than one mile south of the French Broad River bridge and about halfway between the French Broad River and the Blue Ridge Parkway.
New Blue Ridge Parkway bridge building has been slow
Another factor in the widening slowness is the construction of a new Blue Ridge Parkway bridge, which Middleton acknowledged in March “has taken longer than anticipated, which has resulted in a delay to remove the existing structure. Removal of the existing structure is key to getting traffic in its final pattern.”
Uchiyama said the removal of the old bridge is coming up this summer.
“We anticipate switching traffic from the old bridge to the new bridge and new alignment on the Blue Ridge Parkway late this summer,” Uchiyama said. “Once traffic has been moved to the new alignment, the contractor will begin taking down the existing bridge.”
I wrote about the parkway bridge last August, noting that it was supposed to be finished between Halloween and Thanksgiving. The $14.5 million bridge is 605 feet long, 36 feet wide and will provide two lanes of travel over I-26.
It’s also right in the area where I-26 traffic gets bottlenecked pretty much every day, especially traveling west (which is really more northward through this area, but let’s not split hairs). Coming from Airport Road, you’re driving on three lanes of concrete, which narrow down to two at Long Shoals.
Add in a fairly steep hill leading up to the Parkway bridge, and it’s a guaranteed bottleneck. I asked Uchiyama what causes this.
“Congestion issues existed for years prior to construction,” he said. “The opening of new lanes, wider shoulders and faster speeds approaching this area, and the opening of lanes in the opposite direction exacerbate the perception of current congestion.”
Allow me a moment to note that this is not a “perception of current congestion.” It’s congested through here every day, just about any time of day, and it’s particularly horrid during rush hours. If I’m heading to Asheville during rush hours, or coming home, I opt for another route.
As far as the bottleneck, Uchiyama said the NCDOT had to narrow four lanes down to two.
“Functionally, NCDOT chose a traffic pattern that trims four lanes down to two while providing drivers with ample time for merging to the appropriate lanes, including the Long Shoals Road offramp,” Uchiyama said.
Part of the problem is this is an area where you get people not paying attention and then slamming on the brakes, or folks hauling arse into the construction zone instead of slowing down, resulting in someone slamming on the brakes, or a rear end collision. It’s unpleasant to say the least, dicey and dangerous to say the most.
Regarding trucks not moving over, don’t look for that to change.
Right now there’s just nowhere to pull over as you head up the mountain, so pulling over trucks is not practical.
“The truck restriction enacted prior to construction has been suspended to increase safety for construction workers, those who would enforce any truck restriction, and those responding to any crashes or breakdowns,” Uchiyama said. “NCDOT and other agencies — including law enforcement — will revisit the necessity of a truck restriction upon completion of the project.”
Some relief in sight
Once you crest the hill and pass under the Parkway bridges, the construction zone is curvy and lined with concrete barriers. You better be on your toes through here, in both directions.
Some relief is coming, though.
“The current configuration is temporary — less than a month remaining,” Uchiyama said. “The contractor anticipates moving traffic to the new westbound alignment from Long Shoals (Exit 37) to Brevard Road (Exit 33) before the July 4th holiday,” Uchiyama said. “This will provide for more shoulder area.”
So that covers the widening project.
But if you really think about all this, the fun is just starting.
By that, I mean we can now anticipate the $1.1 billion I-26 Connector project kicking off and creating traffic issues for, oh, I don’t know, the next 25 years.
I asked Uchiyama if we can expect these projects — the ongoing widening and the Connector — to overlap.
“On the calendar? Yes. On the ground? No,” Uchiyama said. “Construction has started on the south section of the Connector. The north section is slated to start in the second half of 2026.”
I’m going to classify that as overlapping, at least in my world.
The NCDOT’s official page on the Connector project lists the completion date as October 2031. I’m going to add five years, just to be on the safe side.
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments about this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post Enjoying the I-26 widening project? Great, because it won’t be over until July 2027 — if it stays on schedule • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This content provides a detailed and pragmatic overview of a local infrastructure project without showing clear ideological bias. It critiques government project delays and inefficiencies, compares practices internationally, and addresses practical concerns of local residents. The tone is concerned but balanced, focusing on accountability and transparency rather than promoting a specific political agenda or leaning left or right.
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
Retired military officer: In America, the military is not used against its own citizens for law enforcement
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed6 days ago
Repeated problems at Raytown park frustrate neighbors
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
Deadly Sunday in Mobile County leaves 5 people dead
-
News from the South - South Carolina News Feed7 days ago
SLED investigates Florence traffic stop amid racial profiling allegations
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed4 days ago
Former Jacksonville radio host Mark Kaye announces he’s running for Congress, bashes current Rep. John Rutherford
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Georgia GOP's attempt to block Brad Raffensperger from running as a Republican may go nowhere
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
News 5 NOW at 8:00am |Tuesday, June 10, 2025
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed7 days ago
State-federal tensions over ICE rise as Trump deploys troops against Los Angeles protests