Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

In a departure from past North Carolina elections, Republican voters are turning out more heavily than Democrats to vote early • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – TOM FIEDLER – 2024-10-30 06:15:00

With just a week before Election Day, North Carolina’s Republicans are turning out more heavily than Democrats and independents in early voting, shedding the party’s former disdain for anything other than balloting on the first Tuesday of November.

The number of registered Republicans casting early ballots across the state surpassed Democrats late last week and have been holding a slim lead through Tuesday’s overnight count.  

Trailing both parties are voters who are independent, the so-called unaffiliated voters, who constitute the largest bloc of registrants and are capable of tilting most races.  

The numbers through Oct. 27: Republicans 961,871; Democrats 938,167; and the unaffiliated 904,669. That’s less than a half percent separating the two major party’s voters.

But here are some key qualifiers to keep in mind when looking at these numbers:  

  • First and foremost, this is the count of party and unaffiliated voters who have cast ballots. None of these ballots will be counted until the polls close at 7:30 p.m. Nov. 5.  While party loyalty is a strong indicator of how we vote, there will be party defectors and the party disgruntled who leave the ballot blank. (Spoiler alert: In this election the voter’s gender may matter more than party; see below).
  • Second, these numbers are snapshots taken in the middle of a race and don’t show which competitor may have some energy in reserve (more on this below) for a final sprint, including on Nov. 5. 
  • Third, unaffiliated voters are true wild cards whose leanings defy accurate predictions. Although they vote in lower percentages than party loyalists, their sheer numbers can decide the winner.

Two additional measures in the early-voting reports are noteworthy. One, which I alluded to above, is a measure called “proportion.”  So far, about 35 percent of the early ballots have been cast by Republicans and 33 percent by Democrats. 

But here’s that qualifier: To get that lead, it’s taken 38 percent of all registered Republicans to cast votes. Just 35 percent of all Democrats have voted, meaning the party has more in reserve to catch up. Think of it like a NASCAR race in which the leading car is slightly ahead of a rival. But the rival has more fuel in the tank, which could be important toward the finish.   

The other noteworthy measure has nothing to do with party registration. It’s gender. It comes to this: Women can determine this election. In North Carolina, one of the handful of swing states in the presidential election, women have the clout to decide every race from the White House and governor’s mansion to school boards, county commissions and the judiciary.  

In the 12 days of early voting since Oct. 17, women have outvoted men by about 10 percentage points. On a typical day, about 52 percent of the ballots are cast by women and just 42 percent cast by men. ( Six percent of voters decline to report their gender). 

Through Monday, women have cast about 300,000 more ballots than men – more of a gender chasm than a gender gap.  Keep in mind that this is a state where Donald Trump beat Joe Biden in 2020 by just 74,483 votes. By Nov. 5, that winning margin four years ago will be a small fraction of the gender gap. 

The size of that gap is widened even more by the fact that women turn out to vote  disproportionately higher than their percentage of the electorate. In this early voting period, although women comprise 49 percent of all registered voters, they have cast 52 percent of the early ballots. 

What does this mean? The words written in 1865 by poet William Ross Wallace may apply here: “The hand that rocks the cradle is the hand that rules the world.”   

Bluest of the blue Buncombe County

Not surprisingly, Democrats are outvoting Republicans by more than 2-to-1 in the latest tallies. Unaffiliated voters – the largest bloc – trail the Democrats by a smidgen. Unless something akin to a political Helene happens, it looks like Buncombe’s impact on Nov. 5 will be to make a lopsided contribution to the Democratic Party’s statewide vote total, which may offset Republican victories in more numerous, deep red counties. 

Also notable in Buncombe early-voting turnout is the gender gap, which mirrors the statewide average. Going into the final five days of early voting, women had cast 42,084 ballots while men added just 33, 651. That’s a commanding 52-41 percent gap.  (Memo to men: Find cradles to rock). 

Campaign fallout from Helene

The disruption – and some would say damage – from Helene extended also into many political campaigns, just as most candidates were hoping to hit their peaks. Communicating with potential voters who were struggling to mend shattered lives became impossible, if not intrusive.  Campaigning as we know it – door knocking, rallying, phone calling – was out of the question. 

From the beginning, Democratic challenger Caleb Rudow faced an uphill battle in unseating Republican U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards in District 11. After Helene, the hill got steeper. // Photo credits: Watchdog photo by Starr Sariego, official congressional portrait 2023

No campaign has been hit harder than Democrat Caleb Rudow’s longshot effort to unseat incumbent Republican Chuck Edwards in the 11th Congressional District, which was ground zero for the storm’s wrath. Unseating an even marginally competent incumbent is always a challenge, which Rudow, the Asheville state legislator, acknowledged when he launched his campaign a year ago. 

Edwards began the race with an infusion of special-interest money, much of it coming from corporate and partisan PACs whose interests the Hendersonville Republican could impact through his House committee votes. Big checks rolled in from Walmart, gun rights organizations, the trucking and aviation industries, big pharma and even rural electrification. Big oil and gas funneled support through the American Battleground Fund, which is the House GOP’s deep pocket that provides camouflage for anti-green energy industries.

When Helene hammered the region, Edwards announced he was suspending his campaign to concentrate on assisting constituents because “it’s no time for politics.” Give credit where it is due: Edwards’s office became a lifeline for many victims, connecting them to many federal agencies – notably FEMA – and to local governments. He’s been on battered ground in the district’s farthest corners, while shuttling back and forth to the Capitol to advocate for FEMA’s continued need. 

Had he not failed to criticize ex-President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson for falsely accusing FEMA of diverting aid money from Helene victims to assist undocumented immigrants, Edwards would merit praise for actually keeping his pledge to put partisanship aside. Speaking truth to GOP power was apparently a bridge too far. He gave up the no-campaigning facade in the past week with a TV ad that, paradoxically, implies he’s not being political. 

Fact is, he had the money to burn. When he called a halt to the campaign he had $309,221 in the bank. Rudow was down to $142,998 with little more than money for yard signs and digital ads to show for his efforts. 

Politics isn’t an equal opportunity employer.


Original article

The post In a departure from past North Carolina elections, Republican voters are turning out more heavily than Democrats to vote early • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00

(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.

Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.

Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.



Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance




“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”

SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.

“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”

The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.

“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”

Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.

The post NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

N.C. Treasurer names conservative climate skeptic to state Utilities Commission

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Lisa Sorg – 2025-04-30 15:52:00

SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.

Read the full article

The post N.C. Treasurer names conservative climate skeptic to state Utilities Commission appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

‘Crypto-friendly legislation’ clears North Carolina House | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00

(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.

Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.

The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”

With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.

Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.

The post ‘Crypto-friendly legislation’ clears North Carolina House | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending