Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced he will not seek reelection after delivering a passionate Senate speech criticizing President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” for its harmful effects on Medicaid recipients. Tillis condemned the bill for breaking promises to protect healthcare for low-income Americans and warned it would harm millions. Though typically aligned with Trump, Tillis spoke out strongly only after deciding to retire, citing frustration with political gridlock and partisanship. Unlike Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, who supported the bill despite reservations, Tillis opposed it, joined by Rand Paul and Susan Collins. The article highlights Trump’s control over Republicans, discouraging dissent.
It was an interesting question from a good friend: “So, Mr. Boyle, are you proud of Senator Tillis now?”
This was right after Tillis, a Republican U.S. senator who’s represented North Carolina since 2014, announced he wouldn’t seek reelection next year. That came after Tillis delivered an impassioned speech June 29 on the Senate floor in which he lambasted President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” for the devastating effect it will have on Medicaid recipients.
The speech was a barn burner, unusual for any senator these days, but especially Republicans who don’t want to cross the very vindictive orange leader who now heads their party, and for Tillis, who’s usually pretty restrained.
“What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding is not there anymore?” Tillis said, noting that Trump’s White House advisers “are not telling him that the effect of this bill is to break a promise.”
Tillis was not done.
“Republicans are about to make a mistake on health care and betraying a promise,” he said. “It is inescapable that this bill, in its current form, will betray the very promise that Donald J. Trump made in the Oval Office or in the Cabinet Room when I was there with (the Senate Finance Committee), where he said we can go after waste, fraud and abuse on any programs.”
Trump promised to protect the program and its mission of providing health care for low-income Americans. But Tillis said the “amateurs” who are advising Trump have persuaded the president to eliminate what’s called the “provider tax,” which funds Medicaid, Tillis said. That’s not exactly removing “waste, fraud and abuse,” the senator said.
The bill passed the Senate, 51-50, on Tuesday with Vice President J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The House passed a final version July 3. The Congressional Budget Office estimates of devastation to Medicaid remain.
Considering how Tillis was dressed that night when he delivered his fiery oration, we should’ve known he was done with public service, as well as kissing Trump’s derriere. He sported a dark blazer, gray golf shirt and a strangely large bolo tie, which is not exactly standard dress for the Senate, or North Carolina for that matter. Or really, most of the United States.
‘Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics’
Clearly, this was a man saying loudly, in so many words, “Screw it, I’m done with this bovine excrement!”
His formal retirement statement, like his speech, was also well-crafted.
Sen. Thom Tillis contended that President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” will leave tens of thousands of North Carolinians without medical care and many without nutrition. He also publicly warned his Republican colleagues that the bill’s unpopularity will cause the GOP to lose tenuous majorities in the Senate and the House. // Photo credit: U.S. Congress
“In Washington over the last few years, it’s become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,” Tillis said, noting the Senate recently lost two leaders “who were dedicated to making the Senate more of a functional and productive legislative body.”
“They got things done,” Tillis wrote, apparently referring to former Democrat-turned-independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. “But they were shunned after they courageously refused to cave to their party bosses to nuke the filibuster for the sake of political expediency. They ultimately retired and their presence in the Senate chamber has been sorely missed every day since.”
Obviously, the same scenario plays out when anyone steps out of line on the right, especially with Trump.
“It underscores the greatest form of hypocrisy in American politics,” Tillis said in the statement. “When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer. But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.”
I wouldn’t normally cite so much of a retirement statement, but these next paragraphs really hit the mark. And again, you don’t hear politicians speaking this way until they’re quitting, which is a shame.
“Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who really don’t give a damn about the people they promised to represent on the campaign trail,” Tillis said. “After they get elected, they don’t bother to do the hard work to research the policies they seek to implement and understand the consequences those policies could have on that young adult living in a trailer park, struggling to make ends meet.”
“Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who really don’t give a damn about the people they promised to represent on the campaign trail. After they get elected, they don’t bother to do the hard work to research the policies they seek to implement and understand the consequences those policies could have on that young adult living in a trailer park, struggling to make ends meet.”
North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis
Tillis had noted earlier that his own journey started with him “living in a trailer park and making minimum wage as a young man” before evolving into him “having the honor of serving as U.S. Senator for North Carolina.”
It’s important to note that Tillis has voted with Trump just about all of the time.
So yes, I was proud of Tillis for standing up for his convictions, for fighting the insidious and destructive policies of Trump, a serial liar and con man whose “Big Beautiful Bill” will provide tax cuts for the wealthy, explode the national deficit and boot 11 million people (probably more) off of Medicaid. As National Public Radio reported, “The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the Senate bill would add more than $3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Extending the 2017 tax cuts made up the bulk of the cost but other changes have added to the bottom line.”
Tillis was joined by fellow Republicans Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine in voting against this atrocity of a bill.
But as I told my buddy, what would’ve made me super proud of Tillis — and maybe got me wearing bolo ties in his honor — is if he had decided to stay and fight Trump, perhaps even forming a coalition of somewhat moderate Republicans (or at least those who recognize legislative harm when they see it) to block the president’s worst instincts.
But Tillis, as others before him, including former Republican Senators Jeff Flake and Mitt Romney, have opted to speak truth to power only after announcing their resignations. Sure, it gives them a measure of freedom they wouldn’t have otherwise, but they also cede the future fight to a replacement, who’s likely to be a Trump-endorsed sycophant.
Hey, at least we don’t have Murkowski representing us
I also told my friend that I was infinitely more proud of Tillis than of Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a Republican who delivered perhaps the most mealy-mouthed defense of her deciding yes vote that the planet has ever heard. Cornered by ABC News, Murkowski was told that Paul said she negotiated a “bailout” for her state because she insisted on provisions to protect Alaskans from the worst cuts of the bill.
Murkowski paused for several seconds, looking angry and angst-ridden, then said, “Do I like this bill? No, because I tried to take care of Alaska’s interests, but I know, I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don’t like that.”
When Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski was told that Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, said she negotiated a “bailout” for her state because she insisted on provisions to protect Alaskans from the worst cuts of the bill, she responded, “Do I like this bill? No, because I tried to take care of Alaska’s interests, but I know, I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don’t like that.” // Photo credit: United States Senate
Well then, don’t vote for it, Senator!
If you know a bill is harmful for millions of Americans, why would you give it your approval? How about you actually stand up for what’s right for the country? What a novelty that would be!
Also, what a line of feigned phoniness to back into your statement with they’re “not going to be advantaged by this bill.” They’re not only going to be disadvantaged by the bill, some of them are likely to be greatly harmed by it, even possibly by dying once they lose their health care and cannot get treatment. That’s more than “not going to be advantaged.”
Maybe if Murkowski had located her spine, she would have joined Tillis, Paul and Collins to fight the good fight. What’s so astounding is that she knows the bill is wrong for America, yet she still chose wrong over right, after selfishly securing favors for her state.
That’s a sad state of affairs when a powerful elected official looks at an issue, identifies what is right and what is wrong, and chooses wrong because it’s politically expedient.
Why won’t Republicans fight back against Trump?
But getting back to forming a coalition to fight Trump, we all know that’s not going to happen for one reason: All the politicians truly care about is getting reelected, and if you cross Trump you’re going to get primaried.
Tillis clearly does not care anymore about getting reelected.
“As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven’t exactly been excited about running for another term,” he said in his statement. “That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home. It’s not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking reelection.”
I really can’t blame him. As I said, you can’t cross Trump and get reelected.
“We’re of course used to presidents exerting power,” Western Carolina University political scientist Chris Cooper said. “We’re used to presidents being the leader of their party, but we’re not used to presidents threatening members of their own party who deviate even the slightest bit from their message and their preferred legislation.” // Photo credit: Western Carolina University
“It’s Trump’s party, and they’re just living in it,” Western Carolina University political scientist Chris Cooper told me. “We’re of course used to presidents exerting power. We’re used to presidents being the leader of their party, but we’re not used to presidents threatening members of their own party who deviate even the slightest bit from their message and their preferred legislation.”
Trump has power over the legislators but also over the voters, many of whom follow his direction without asking any substantial questions, or even peeling themselves away from Fox News or Newsmax for a few minutes.
The Washington Center for Equitable Growth had a fascinating recent report on the Big Beautiful Bill that found Americans do not support the bill, especially once they find out its specifics. The center bills itself as “a nonprofit research and grantmaking organization dedicated to advancing evidence-backed ideas and policies that promote strong, stable, and broad-based economic growth.”
Lots of folks have heard about Trump’s provisions for not taxing overtime or boosting border security spending, and maybe that makes them happy, but they’re not so aware of the tax breaks for the uber-wealthy or the gutting of Medicaid and food stamps programs. The center notes that the bill is “the most regressive policy package in living memory,” with a “distinctive mix of tax cuts that help the rich and spending cuts that hurt middle- and low-income Americans.”
“The public is already against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” the report states. “Yet our survey results show that when its historic regressivity becomes clearer and more concrete, Americans across the political spectrum become overwhelmingly opposed.”
It seems most Americans aren’t in favor of exploding the deficit and booting poor people off their insurance so mega-wealthy folks can get more tax breaks. The problem is that so many Americans are blissfully unaware of what’s actually in the bill.
“The word ‘blissfully,’ I think, is actually not just a colloquialism,” Cooper said. “I think that it is actually the key word in that sentence — just blissfully unaware, right? It’s easier to go along with the leader. It’s a lot harder psychologically and cognitively to say, ‘I supported this person and he is supporting something that’s going to hurt millions of people.’ It’s like the day you find out Santa Claus ain’t real, or that your parents aren’t perfect.”
Cooper said Tillis probably would have been OK in a future primary, “just because we don’t tend to vote out U.S. senators in the primary.” But the party could punish Tillis with less funding, Cooper said.
I’ll note that outside groups would probably run ads saying all sorts of ridiculous rubbish about Tillis, ranging from he’s actually a Democratic socialist to he’s destroying the country by abandoning the real Republican Party — “I mean, just look at that fancy bolo tie!”
Maybe that’s the biggest lesson here: the real Republican Party now is Trump’s party. There’s no room for moderates, or those who tend to think for themselves — or consider the ramifications of legislation on their constituents. Or who care about working class stiffs or the poor.
I guarantee you Trump will find ways to punish Collins and Paul, and their states, in the near future. He truly is the king of the party.
And that’s why Republicans won’t stand up to him, now or in the future.
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments about this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Left-Leaning
The content critically examines the policies supported by former President Donald Trump and certain Republicans, particularly focusing on Senator Thom Tillis’s opposition to a Republican bill that is portrayed as harmful to Medicaid recipients and middle- and low-income Americans. While it acknowledges Tillis’s Republican background and voting record, the piece praises his publicly rare dissent against Trump’s agenda, framing Trump and his close allies as prioritizing the wealthy at the expense of vulnerable populations. The language used—such as calling Trump a “serial liar and con man” and describing the bill as “atrocity” and “regressive”—conveys a skeptical and critical stance towards the Republican Party’s current direction. Overall, the article aligns more with progressive or left-leaning scrutiny of Republican policies and Trump’s influence while advocating for an independent and people-centered approach to governance.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-22 08:31:00
North Carolina’s main route through the Outer Banks, N.C. 12, remains closed on Ocracoke and Hatteras Islands after Hurricane Erin caused flooding and sand buildup. Closures are between the Northern Ferry Terminal and Pony Pens on Ocracoke, and between Marc Basnight Bridge and Hatteras Village on Hatteras Island. Road reopening depends on sand removal and pavement damage assessment. As of 5 a.m., Hurricane Erin was transitioning to a post-tropical storm about 425 miles south-southwest of Halifax, with 90 mph winds and moving at 22 mph. Hurricane-force winds extended 125 miles from the center; tropical storm-force winds reached 370 miles. No coastal warnings remain.
(The Center Square) – North Carolina’s primary driving route through the Outer Banks on Friday morning remained closed on Ocracoke Island and Hatteras Island.
N.C. 12 was washed over by water and sand from the ocean following the pass of Hurricane Erin. The closure on Ocracoke Island is between the Northern Ferry Terminal and the National Park Service Pony Pens; on Hatteras Island, it is between the Marc Basnight Bridge and Hatteras Village.
In addition to sand removal, pavement damage would determine how long sections of N.C. 12 are to remain closed.
In the 5 a.m. update from the National Hurricane Center, Erin was in the first stages of post-tropical transition about 425 miles south-southwest of Halifax, Nova Scotia, and about 700 miles north of Bermuda. Maximum sustained winds were 90 mph, and the movement had increased to 22 mph.
Hurricane force winds of 74 mph or greater were up to 125 miles from the center of the storm, and tropical storm force winds of 39 mph or greater had grown to 370 miles from the center. A gust of 56 mph was reported on Bermuda at Wade International Airport.
No coastal watches or warnings were in effect on the Atlantic Seaboard.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article provides a straightforward factual report about the closure of N.C. 12 due to the impact of Hurricane Erin. It relays information from official sources such as the National Hurricane Center without editorializing or inserting opinion. The language is neutral and focused solely on the event and its consequences, without promoting or criticizing any political stance or ideology. This adherence to objective reporting indicates no discernible political bias in the content.
Costco representatives met with Enka community residents to discuss plans for Asheville’s first Costco store at Enka Commerce Park, expected to be submitted to the city within weeks. The 25-acre site includes 839 parking spaces and preservation of the historic Enka clock tower. The city’s planning process may take 9-12 months, with construction lasting about a year after approvals. Residents voiced concerns about traffic congestion, as Costco stores can attract up to 600 vehicles per hour at peak times. A traffic study is underway, and Costco plans traffic mitigation and participation in the stalled Enka Heritage Trail greenway project.
Representatives from Costco and its affiliated development companies told local residents at a Enka community meeting Thursday night that the warehouse retailer plans to submit official plans for its first Asheville store to the city within two to four weeks.
The meeting, in which multiple residents expressed concerns about the prospect of increased traffic because of Costco’s popularity, marked the first significant update on the project since Asheville Watchdogbroke the news in March that the low-cost retailer had submitted plans to the city for a store situated on 25 acres within Enka Commerce Park, with 839 parking spaces.
At the time, The Watchdog had obtained plans that also showed the preservation of the nearby historic Enka clock tower, which officials reiterated was a priority Thursday.
Renee Rutherford, Costco’s director of real estate, told about 25 people gathered in a meeting space by the Enka-Candler Library that the project is moving ahead, but it will take time.
“This is the first part of a long approval process,” Rutherford said. “We haven’t submitted anything to the town yet.”
Nettie Boyle, a project manager with BL Companies, which is handling design and architecture elements of the project, said after the meeting that the entire planning and approval process with the city could take nine to 12 months. (Boyle is not related to this article’s author.)
Nettie Boyle, a project manager with BL Companies, which is handling design and architecture elements of the Costco project in Enka, said after the Thursday evening meeting that the entire planning and approval process with the city could take nine to 12 months. // Watchdog photo by John Boyle
“So this is the first process — the neighborhood meeting — and then I believe it’s 14 days later, we can submit our preliminary site plan to the city,” said Boyle.
Costco has not finalized the purchase of the land from the owner, Martin Lewis, but it has signed a nonbinding letter of intent to buy the property, Rutherford said. After the permitting and design process, construction could take another year, Rutherford said.
Will Palmquist, principal planner with the city’s Planning & Urban Design department, said previously that Costco had scheduled an early July review meeting with the city’s Technical Review Committee. Palmquist said the project would require a conditional zoning, as it’s more than 100,000 square feet.
Once plans are submitted, it will next head to the Planning & Zoning Commission. The commission’s recommendation would be forwarded to City Council for the final decision.
Traffic a huge concern
Many locals expressed joy following the initial announcement last spring, as the current nearest Costco to Asheville is in Spartanburg, South Carolina, about 70 miles away.
But multiple residents at the meeting expressed concerns about Costco’s potential impact on traffic because it will likely draw customers from a wide area. Rutherford said Costco stores, which are open seven days a week, can draw about 600 vehicles an hour, although she stressed that occurs at peak shopping times.
The Biltmore Lake neighborhood, which has more than 800 homes, sits just across Sand Hill Road from the proposed site.
“It’s gonna be quite devastating for Biltmore Lake residents to have 600 cars an hour (going there),” one resident said, adding that it seems “really irresponsible to add” thousands of vehicles a day onto local roadways.
“And I understand everything about the jobs and all that — all that’s great for the city, and I agree with that,” he said. “But there also needs to be something that’s going to be done about the increased traffic.”
Another resident voiced similar concerns, saying, “It seems grossly inappropriate to throw all the traffic from Asheville proper and all the surrounding areas — because everybody loves Costco — and plop it down right here in the middle of this beautiful area where they’re already struggling with development.”
Plans provided by the City of Asheville to Asheville Watchdog in March show the location of a proposed Costco.
Rutherford and Boyle said 80 percent of the traffic coming into Costco will enter off Smokey Park Highway, turning onto the former “bridge to nowhere” that opened earlier this year after years of dormancy. They also said the Costco would likely have two other entrances, one off of Sand Hill Road and another off Jacob Holm Way.
Rutherford said Costco stores typically hire about 200 employees to start, “and then it grows from there.”
Barbara Mosier, an associate engineer with Kittelson & Associates, said her firm is conducting the traffic study, which should be complete within about a month. The study will encompass the area around the commerce park, including multiple intersections and Smokey Park Highway east to the I-40 interchange, she said.
The methodology for traffic studies is fairly standard, but Mosier said allowances are made for Costco’s popularity.
“We have Costco-specific traffic rates, because we know that Costco is a very intense use,” Mosier said. “We know that there’s a lot of people who like it. It generates more use than a similar-sized other warehouse club. So we do have Costco specific rates that we use to make sure that we are fully capturing that impact, and we will reflect that in the study.”
Rutherford, Boyle and Mosier said Costco will consider mitigation efforts to make traffic flow smoother.
Costco also offered assurances that it plans to participate in a greenway project at the Enka Commerce site. Known as the Enka Heritage Trail, it’s supposed to span 2 miles of asphalt, starting at Sand Hill and Enka Lake roads, proceeding along Hominy Creek to its intersection with Sand Hill Road, south of Warren Haynes Drive.
Construction was supposed to start in 2023, with completion due this year. But the project has stalled.
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments about this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The content presents a straightforward, fact-based report on a local development project involving Costco, focusing on community concerns such as traffic and planning processes. It avoids partisan language or ideological framing, providing balanced coverage of both the benefits and challenges of the project without favoring any political perspective.
SUMMARY: On October 29, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to allow the Trump administration to cancel $783 million in NIH grants focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The Court set aside lower court rulings that had blocked the cancellations, citing jurisdictional issues and aligning with a prior decision involving the Department of Education. Democratic attorneys general and the American Public Health Association opposed the ruling, warning of harm to research and public health. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett supported the administration, while Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissented, criticizing the Court’s rushed intervention and its consequences.