News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
If you think your post-Helene world is rough, put yourself in Amber and Trevor Ballew’s shoes • Asheville Watchdog
At this point, it’s fair to say we’re all a little wiped out from Helene.
Nearly two months after Tropical Storm Helene blew in her unwanted gusts of destruction, life has not returned to normal. And it likely won’t for some time.
But perspective is so important.
Consider the situation of Fairview residents Amber and Trevor Ballew, and you’ll likely feel better about your own plight. The couple, who both work in the business office of the VA hospital, have been married five years. They recently decided to stop renting the home that once belonged to Amber’s grandmother and just buy it.
They decided to renovate the place, too, incorporating one whole wall of a family cabin that dates to 1913.
“We were renting it until August of this year,” Trevor Ballew, 28, told me. “We had bought it in the middle of August.”
Sounds great, right? Young couple rents, then buys an old family home in a tight-knit community filled with family members, a place where they want to spend the rest of their lives and raise their kids.
The catch? Helene, of course, which hit Friday, Sept. 27.
“We made our first house payment the Monday after the storm,” Trevor said.
He called the mortgage company and the agent congratulated him on making that first payment.
“I was like, ‘We ain’t got a house,’” Trevor recalled.
House cut in half
The house, on Old Fort Road just across a ridge from Craigtown, was cut in half by a landslide that would eventually link up with the slide that claimed 13 lives in that neighboring area, including 11 members of the Craig family. Amber Ballew is related to the Craigs, and she and Trevor often had dinners at their homes, so the loss stung especially hard.
The debris flow destroyed the Ballews’ home — smashed it in and spun around the garage — and left the property an unholy mess of smashed trees, strewn rocks and relocated creek bed.
So instead of busying themselves with the details of a renovation, the Ballews found themselves homeless.
“I’ve been staying with my parents, and he’s been staying with his parents,” Amber said, standing a few feet from their home and the now open-air master bedroom.
They both work from home, so trying to work and juggle visits to the property and meeting with FEMA and inspectors and people wanting to help has been a lot.
And I haven’t even mentioned the kicker yet: Amber, 26, is seven months pregnant with the couple’s first child.
“We’re trying to move into a rental home that someone offered up to us, because we’re expecting, and she could come any day,” Amber said, noting that she’s 29 weeks pregnant. “And she’s ahead by quite some size. She’s the light at the end of this for sure.”
Mortgage, rent, and uncertainty
Yeah, this young couple has a lot on them right now.
On the financial side, the couple faces the prospect of having to pay their $2,300 monthly mortgage as well as rent, probably in the $1,300 range. Their total household income is in the $90s, Amber said.
“We basically made enough to afford the mortgage that we had,” Amber said. “We basically paid off everything that we could to afford the mortgage, to do a construction loan.”
“That was the thing,” she continued. “Our mortgage was really high, but it was going to be redone in six months when construction was done and factored into a regular loan. And so the interest rate wasn’t going to be so high, and it would have been a lot more affordable.”
A foundation has agreed to help them with rent, but that would just cover about two months. When that runs out and they’d have to pay both a mortgage and rent, well…
“We would never be able to afford it, so we would have to go back to our parents’ house,” Amber said.
Their mortgage company gave them a grant of about $4,000 and offered two months of a grace period with no payments, but they’re still stuck with a loan for the full amount of the house, about $265,000. And the house no longer exists.
They’d tapped only a little more than half of the loan amount, but they owe the full amount.
“We’re paying a mortgage on a full amount, as if we were doing the construction,” Trevor said.
A FEMA rep came out and took pictures, but the agency told the Ballews that it could be 30 to 60 days before they hear what help is available.
So they’re stuck, living separately with their parents, working, trying to figure out what to do with their family land — and trying not to stress the baby out.
“That has been my thing,” Amber said. “I’ve had to sit back and really just try to sit on things, because I didn’t want to stress and cause her to come early, because that wouldn’t be fair.”
Some good news from Buncombe County
The Ballews said they’re also worried whether Buncombe County will even allow them to build back on their site. In 2010, the county adopted higher standards for properties located in steep-slope and protected-ridge areas, and they’re worried that because their home was destroyed by a landslide they might not be able to rebuild.
I was able to get some good news on that front from Buncombe County Planning Director Nathan Pennington.
“Right off the bat, there’s no problem with rebuilding,” Pennington said, noting he had checked their lot on the county’s land system. “There’s no restriction against rebuilding. And quite frankly, the overlays don’t prohibit rebuilding. They just make sure that you work with a geotechnical engineer.”
The Ballews’ house, though “is not located in the steep slope overlay at all,” Pennington said. “So if they want to build back, I don’t have any restrictions on them.”
Pennington said a fair amount of confusion exists in the county right now, post-Helene, because in some cases people are conflating steep slope regulations and overlays with floodplain standards, which are a different animal. They do not apply in the Ballews’ case, either, as they’re not in a floodplain.
“I would suspect that what’s happening is everyone is looking at floodplain standards and trying to apply them to landslide areas that are nowhere near the Special Flood Hazard Area,” Pennington said. “Because in the Special Flood Hazard Area, yes, there are absolute requirements if you want to rebuild, if you’re not built to modern standards.”
But again, floodplain does not apply to the Ballews, and neither does the steep slope ordinance, apparently.
“I think if they tried to submit an application, there would be no problem for us to process a site plan review and zoning permit to put a new home here,” Pennington said. “Like I said, the house is located outside of our overlay. And then I think I could probably be successful in moving this through the chain of permitting that would occur next door and permits and inspections quite quickly as well.”
Kassi Day, a spokesperson for Buncombe County, added a couple of other boxes the Ballews will have to check.
“For this case, before they apply for a building permit, they would need to apply for an existing systems check or septic repair permit through Environmental Health,” Day said, noting that an existing systems check is appropriate if no portion of the septic system was damaged, and the replacement home will use a footprint similar to the house that was there previously. “A septic repair permit is appropriate if there is visible damage to the septic system”
The Ballews’ septic system was still visible on the lot. Day noted that an inspector will need to visit the site to make sure it’s still suitable for a septic system.The permits are free of charge.
“Next, they would submit a site plan review to Planning, and once Planning has signed off, they would apply for building permits,” Day said.
Residents can apply for the permits at 30 Valley Street or e-mail applications to permitdocs@buncombecounty.org. Day said Permits and Inspection staffers are completing plan reviews at a rate of 98 percent within 24 hours.
So that’s good news for the Ballews and all the other people in Buncombe County facing similar hurdles.
Now, if the Ballews can just get the financial end of their puzzle to fall into place …
I also reached out to FEMA, but public affairs specialist Nicole Wilson said, “We are unable to offer any details about a specific survivor’s case; however, if they are comfortable with you sharing their phone number with us, we will be happy to reach out and work with them directly.”
Amber Ballew told me Friday she finally got in touch with a FEMA representative, so that’s a hopeful sign as well.
The Ballews’ mortgage company did not respond to me by deadline. The couple still has a lot of angst over how they’re going to extract themselves from the mortgage, if they even can.
A family friend has started a gofundme page for Amber and Trevor, and as of Friday it had raised $12,290 of a $50,000 goal. That’ll help, and the couple is really appreciative of the community support they’ve gotten, but that amount of money would likely cover only the grading that needs to be done on site, and maybe not all of it.
By the way, the Ballews did have regular home insurance, but their policy doesn’t cover landslides. Flood insurance doesn’t cover it, either, but the couple did not have flood insurance anyway because they didn’t live in the floodplain.
A strong bond to the land
If you’re wondering why the couple doesn’t just look into the FEMA program wherein the agency buys your home and you agree to live elsewhere, that’s not in their playbook. The property off Old Fort Road might not qualify anyway, and more important, it is home for the Ballews and has been for generations.
“My thing is, I’m not gonna sell my property,” Amber said. “My great grandparents owned this. This was their home, and my whole family grew up here. Both sides of us, the property (belongs to) my family.”
She’s the fourth generation on the property, so she and Trevor will stay on the land, which totals 1.62 acres. They’d like to rebuild where they were but maybe a little bit elevated.
Amber said she believes the chance of another slide is slim because all the material was cleared out in the devastating Sept. 27 debris flow.
What they’re really looking for is some sense of normalcy to provide for their baby when she arrives in January.
“We really haven’t had a sense of normal yet,” Trevor said. “And that’s what a lot of people don’t have, is the sense of normal. It takes a while, because really all the normal is gone.”
Let’s hope normal returns soon for the Ballews, and for all of us.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting during this crisis is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post If you think your post-Helene world is rough, put yourself in Amber and Trevor Ballew’s shoes • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Flooded homes, cars frustrate people living in Wilson neighborhood: ‘I’m so tired’
SUMMARY: Residents in a Wilson, North Carolina neighborhood are expressing frustration after yet another round of flooding damaged homes and vehicles following heavy overnight rains. Water rose to knee level on Starship Lane, flooding driveways, cars, and apartments. One resident reported losing music equipment, furniture, and clothes for the third time due to recurring floods. The rising water even brought worms and snakes from a nearby pond into homes. Debris and trash were scattered as floodwaters receded, leaving many questioning why no long-term solution has been implemented. Residents are exhausted, facing repeated loss and cleanup efforts after each heavy rainfall.
“We have to throw everything out. This is my third time doing this.”
More: https://abc11.com/post/overnight-storms-central-north-carolina-cause-flooding-wilson/16764793/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
McDowell DSS shakeup after child abuse not reported to NC DHHS
More than three months after McDowell County placed its Department of Social Services director on leave, officials have kept quiet about upheaval inside the office responsible for child welfare and a range of other public services. A letter obtained by Carolina Public Press revealed that McDowell DSS failed to alert law enforcement to evidence of child abuse — and violated other state policies, too.
County commissioners placed former McDowell DSS director Bobbie Sigmon and child protective services program manager Lakeisha Feaster on paid administrative leave during a special session meeting on Feb. 3. Another child protective services supervisor resigned the following week.
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]
County Commissioner Tony Brown told local news media at the time that the county initiated an investigation into its DSS office and the state was involved, but did not provide any details about the cause for the investigation. County commissioners haven’t spoken publicly about the matter since.
That Feb. 21 letter, sent by the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services to Brown and county manager Ashley Wooten, offered previously undisclosed details about issues at the DSS office.
State letter details DSS missteps
According to the letter, McDowell County reached out to the state with concerns that its DSS office hadn’t been notifying law enforcement when evidence of abuse and neglect was discovered in child welfare cases.
The letter didn’t say how or when the county first became aware of the problem, but District Attorney Ted Bell told CPP that he had “raised issues” with the county about DSS prior to Sigmon and Feaster being put on leave. Bell’s office was not involved with the investigation into McDowell DSS.
The state sent members of its Child Welfare Regional Specialists Team to look into the claim. Their findings confirmed that McDowell DSS had failed in multiple instances to alert law enforcement to cases of abuse.
Additionally, the state identified several recent child welfare cases in which social workers failed to consistently meet face to face with children or adequately provide safety and risk assessments in accordance with state policy.
“Next steps will include determining how to work with (McDowell DSS) to remediate the service gaps identified in the case reviews,” the letter concluded.
However, that nearly four-month-old correspondence is the state’s “most recent engagement” with McDowell DSS, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services told CPP last week.
Sometimes the state will initiate a “corrective action plan” when it finds a county DSS office in violation of state policy. If a county fails to follow through on its corrective action plan, the state may strip the DSS director of authority and assume control of the office.
Just last month, the state took over Vance County DSS when it failed to show improvement after starting a corrective action plan.
The state hasn’t taken similar measures in McDowell.
McDowell considers DSS overhaul
Wooten has served as the interim DSS director in Sigmon’s absence. He told CPP that Sigmon and Feaster resigned “to seek employment elsewhere” on May 31, after nearly four months of paid leave.
That Sigmon and Feaster resigned, rather than being fired, leaves open the possibility that they may continue to work in DSS agencies elsewhere in North Carolina. CPP reported in 2022 on counties’ struggles to hire and retain qualified social workers and social services administrators.
Wooten would oversee the hiring of a new DSS director if the commissioners choose to replace Sigmon, but the county is considering an overhaul to its social services structure that may eliminate the director position entirely.
The restructure would consolidate social services and other related departments into one human services agency, Wooten said. The county may not hire a new DSS director in that case, but instead seek someone to lead an umbrella agency that would absorb the duties of a traditional social services department.
A 2012 state law changed statute to allow smaller counties to form consolidated human services agencies, which are typically a combination of public health and social services departments.
County DSS directors across the state opposed such a change to state statute at the time, but county managers and commissioners mostly supported it, according to a report commissioned by the General Assembly.
At least 25 counties moved to a consolidated human services model in the decade since the law was passed.
McDowell shares a regional public health department with Rutherford County, so it’s unclear what a consolidated human services agency there might look like. Statute does not define “human services” so it’s up to the county what to include in a consolidated agency.
Wooten told CPP that no decisions about such a transition have been made.
This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The post McDowell DSS shakeup after child abuse not reported to NC DHHS appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This article from Carolina Public Press focuses on administrative failures within McDowell County’s Department of Social Services, relying on official documents, quotes from public officials, and a chronological recounting of events. It avoids emotionally charged language and refrains from assigning blame beyond documented actions or policies. The piece does not advocate for a specific political solution or frame the story through an ideological lens, instead presenting the issue as a matter of public accountability and governance. Its tone is investigative and factual, reflecting a commitment to journalistic neutrality and transparency without promoting a partisan viewpoint.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Enjoying the I-26 widening project? Great, because it won’t be over until July 2027 — if it stays on schedule • Asheville Watchdog
Among the many topics that draw continued interest — and ire — from you good readers, the I-26 widening project has to be right at the top of the list.
No, not the I-26 Connector project, which we will get to complain about for roughly the next decade. I’m talking about the widening of I-26 through Buncombe and Henderson counties, the $534 million project that started in October 2019.
Initially, it was to be completed in 2024, but that date got pushed back to this year. Then next year.
And now?
“Our revised contract completion date for I-26 widening in Buncombe — which includes Exit 35 — is July 1, 2027,” David Uchiyama, spokesperson for the North Carolina Department of Transportation in western North Carolina, said via email.
You read that right — two more years of harrowing passes through Jersey barriers, slamming on the brakes because the pickup in front of you didn’t notice the line of cars in front of him coming to a standstill, and serious concrete envy when you drive I-26 in Henderson County, which is a glorious four lanes on each side in places.
Most times I go to Asheville, I take I-26. It’s gotten so I give myself about 40 minutes for what once was a 20-minute trip, mainly because I just don’t know what I’m going to get.
Best-case scenario is a sluggish slog through the Long Shoals area and up the mountain to the Blue Ridge Parkway, as the tractor-trailers refuse to move over and they slow everything down. Worst-case scenario is a wreck, for which I can plan on settling in for a good 50 minutes or so.
Clearly, this road project makes me a little grumpy, but I can assure you I’m not the only one. I routinely hear from readers who might even outdo me on the grump-ometer. Most recently, an octogenarian wrote to express his displeasure:
“If the pace of building the Connector takes as long as building out I-26 at the Outlet Mall to below the airport and beyond toward Hendersonville, it almost certainly will not be completed in our lifetimes, and I’m 82 years old. Could you please determine why this project is still not complete? It seems like an interminable length of time exacerbated by the many days one passes through the area and sees lots of machinery not in use nor any work going on at all. It seems to me that magnificent roads in Western Europe get done a lot faster, and certainly in China where significant projects get done three times faster than here with work ongoing 24 hours a day. You want to get things done, then China’s approach may be worth our consideration. Or, are we too soft?”
I chuckled. To be fair, China is a communist country that builds apartment buildings and roads that folks don’t even use, and if you’re a worker there, they might suggest your life could be a lot shorter if you don’t put in all that overtime.
To be fair to the NCDOT and its contractor, the new exit for the Pratt & Whitney plant got added in well after the I-26 widening had begun.
“The addition of Exit 35 — an economic development project in addition to a project that will relieve congestion and increase safety — created (the) completion dates,” Uchiyama said.
Back in March, when another reader had asked about delays, Luke Middleton, resident engineer with the NCDOT’s Asheville office, said, “The addition of a new interchange, Exit 35, after the project was more than halfway completed extended the timeframe needed to complete the north section.
“The south end of the project did not have these obstacles,” Middleton said then. The new exit was announced in early 2022.
Middleton noted that Exit 35 will include an additional bridge and multiple retaining walls, “which increased the overall project timeline by almost two years.”
This month, I asked if the contractor was facing any penalties because of the extended time frame.
“Damages will not be charged unless the contractor is unable to complete the work by the newly established contract date,” Uchiyama said. “If work goes past that date a multitude of items will be considered before damages are charged.”
Those damages could be $5,000 a day.
While it may appear work is not going on yet with the interchange, that’s a misperception, Uchiyama said.
“The contractor started working on the westbound on and off ramps in March of 2024,” Uchiyama said. “I-26 traffic has been on the other side of the interstate island, which obstructs the view of drivers in the area.”
Over the past month, “earthwork operations have started on the offramp on the eastbound side of I-26, just south of the French Broad River,” Uchiyama added. He also noted that the interchange bridge will be a little less than one mile south of the French Broad River bridge and about halfway between the French Broad River and the Blue Ridge Parkway.
New Blue Ridge Parkway bridge building has been slow
Another factor in the widening slowness is the construction of a new Blue Ridge Parkway bridge, which Middleton acknowledged in March “has taken longer than anticipated, which has resulted in a delay to remove the existing structure. Removal of the existing structure is key to getting traffic in its final pattern.”
Uchiyama said the removal of the old bridge is coming up this summer.
“We anticipate switching traffic from the old bridge to the new bridge and new alignment on the Blue Ridge Parkway late this summer,” Uchiyama said. “Once traffic has been moved to the new alignment, the contractor will begin taking down the existing bridge.”
I wrote about the parkway bridge last August, noting that it was supposed to be finished between Halloween and Thanksgiving. The $14.5 million bridge is 605 feet long, 36 feet wide and will provide two lanes of travel over I-26.
It’s also right in the area where I-26 traffic gets bottlenecked pretty much every day, especially traveling west (which is really more northward through this area, but let’s not split hairs). Coming from Airport Road, you’re driving on three lanes of concrete, which narrow down to two at Long Shoals.
Add in a fairly steep hill leading up to the Parkway bridge, and it’s a guaranteed bottleneck. I asked Uchiyama what causes this.
“Congestion issues existed for years prior to construction,” he said. “The opening of new lanes, wider shoulders and faster speeds approaching this area, and the opening of lanes in the opposite direction exacerbate the perception of current congestion.”
Allow me a moment to note that this is not a “perception of current congestion.” It’s congested through here every day, just about any time of day, and it’s particularly horrid during rush hours. If I’m heading to Asheville during rush hours, or coming home, I opt for another route.
As far as the bottleneck, Uchiyama said the NCDOT had to narrow four lanes down to two.
“Functionally, NCDOT chose a traffic pattern that trims four lanes down to two while providing drivers with ample time for merging to the appropriate lanes, including the Long Shoals Road offramp,” Uchiyama said.
Part of the problem is this is an area where you get people not paying attention and then slamming on the brakes, or folks hauling arse into the construction zone instead of slowing down, resulting in someone slamming on the brakes, or a rear end collision. It’s unpleasant to say the least, dicey and dangerous to say the most.
Regarding trucks not moving over, don’t look for that to change.
Right now there’s just nowhere to pull over as you head up the mountain, so pulling over trucks is not practical.
“The truck restriction enacted prior to construction has been suspended to increase safety for construction workers, those who would enforce any truck restriction, and those responding to any crashes or breakdowns,” Uchiyama said. “NCDOT and other agencies — including law enforcement — will revisit the necessity of a truck restriction upon completion of the project.”
Some relief in sight
Once you crest the hill and pass under the Parkway bridges, the construction zone is curvy and lined with concrete barriers. You better be on your toes through here, in both directions.
Some relief is coming, though.
“The current configuration is temporary — less than a month remaining,” Uchiyama said. “The contractor anticipates moving traffic to the new westbound alignment from Long Shoals (Exit 37) to Brevard Road (Exit 33) before the July 4th holiday,” Uchiyama said. “This will provide for more shoulder area.”
So that covers the widening project.
But if you really think about all this, the fun is just starting.
By that, I mean we can now anticipate the $1.1 billion I-26 Connector project kicking off and creating traffic issues for, oh, I don’t know, the next 25 years.
I asked Uchiyama if we can expect these projects — the ongoing widening and the Connector — to overlap.
“On the calendar? Yes. On the ground? No,” Uchiyama said. “Construction has started on the south section of the Connector. The north section is slated to start in the second half of 2026.”
I’m going to classify that as overlapping, at least in my world.
The NCDOT’s official page on the Connector project lists the completion date as October 2031. I’m going to add five years, just to be on the safe side.
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments about this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post Enjoying the I-26 widening project? Great, because it won’t be over until July 2027 — if it stays on schedule • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This content provides a detailed and pragmatic overview of a local infrastructure project without showing clear ideological bias. It critiques government project delays and inefficiencies, compares practices internationally, and addresses practical concerns of local residents. The tone is concerned but balanced, focusing on accountability and transparency rather than promoting a specific political agenda or leaning left or right.
-
Mississippi Today6 days ago
Retired military officer: In America, the military is not used against its own citizens for law enforcement
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed6 days ago
Repeated problems at Raytown park frustrate neighbors
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed5 days ago
Former Jacksonville radio host Mark Kaye announces he’s running for Congress, bashes current Rep. John Rutherford
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Georgia GOP's attempt to block Brad Raffensperger from running as a Republican may go nowhere
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed7 days ago
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. firing every member of panel that makes vaccine recommendations
-
News from the South - South Carolina News Feed7 days ago
SLED investigates Florence traffic stop amid racial profiling allegations
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
News 5 NOW at 8:00am |Tuesday, June 10, 2025
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed7 days ago
State-federal tensions over ICE rise as Trump deploys troops against Los Angeles protests