Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

How the state GOP seized control of North Carolina’s elections boards could be a ready-for-Hollywood thriller • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – TOM FIEDLER – 2025-05-21 11:20:00


North Carolina’s Republican Party has subtly seized control of the state’s election machinery, potentially impacting future elections. This takeover began with a December law that shifted control of state election boards from Democratic Governor Josh Stein to Republican Auditor Dave Boliek. Boliek, with little experience in elections, appointed new GOP members to the State Board of Elections, including controversial figures like Francis X. DeLuca and Bob Rucho, both known for efforts to suppress Democratic-leaning voter turnout. The shift occurred with minimal public attention, raising concerns about election fairness. Local election officials now fear the impact on future ballots and the fairness of results.

In my years observing politics and hurricanes at The Miami Herald I frequently rewatched the 1948 thriller “Key Largo,” which combined the two subjects in a classic hero-versus-villain story.  The hero, played by Humphrey Bogart, was a decorated World War II veteran. The villain, a mob boss named Johnny Rocco who controlled rackets and local politicians, was played by Edward G. Robinson.

The two were thrown together in a Florida Keys hotel as a killer hurricane bore down and people huddled inside, terrorized by the storm and Rocco’s gun-wielding gangsters. My favorite scene came when Robinson’s Rocco brags of how he bends local government to his malevolent will. 

“I make [politicians] out of whole cloth, just like a tailor makes a suit,” Rocco sneers. “…I get them on the ballot, then after the election we count the votes. And if they don’t turn out right, we recount them. And recount them again. Until they do.”

The North Carolina Republican Party could teach some new tricks to Johnny Rocco.

In recent months, mostly obscured from public view, the GOP has seized control of the state’s election system in ways that would make Rocco envious. Not only has the party shown a propensity to count and count again (Jefferson Griffin vs. Allison Riggs for a state Supreme Court seat), but it has backed that up with legislative and judicial muscle.

This doesn’t just impact what goes on in Raleigh. By the end of June, it will hit with hurricane force in Buncombe and other counties when the GOP completes the process of having placed loyalists in position to oversee the ballot counting in the 2026 elections. 

“When you talk about rigging elections,” Buncombe County Board of Elections chairman Jake Quinn told me as he described all that has occurred in recent months, “the question people will have is how North Carolina became ground zero for doing that.”

How we got to “ground zero” is the story that remains largely untold. 

Here’s a scenario to help picture the situation that awaits us in future elections: Had the state Republican Party had this machinery in place during last year’s judicial elections, Griffin likely would be on the state Supreme Court among an 8-1 Republican majority despite losing by 734 meticulously counted votes to Justice Riggs, a Democrat. 

How? Because a GOP-majority state Board of Elections, backed by a GOP-majority Supreme Court, would have erased the ballots of 66,000 voters – disproportionately Democratic ones – on the tenuous claim they failed to provide appropriate voter ID. 

 The Republican leadership has captured North Carolina’s elections machinery with nary a public outcry, at least not yet. It was orchestrated like a chess game with the different pieces moving in multiple directions at once until checkmate.   

Power shift began in December

The first move occurred in December, six weeks after Democrat Josh Stein won election as governor and the General Assembly – still with the GOP’s veto-proof majority –  was seeking ways to weaken his authority.  

Using a Tropical Storm Helene-relief bill for cover, the Republican leadership rammed through a veto-proof amendment stripping the governor of authority to administer North Carolina’s state and county election boards and appoint their chairmen. 

By statute, each board has five members: two Republicans and two Democrats nominated by their parties, plus the governor’s pick as chairman, typically a fellow party member. With Stein’s victory, the certain result would have been boards with three Democrats and two Republicans.  

For the Republicans to implement the takeover, that law had to change.

Within 24 hours and without legislative deliberation or public input, a new section was tacked on to Senate Bill 382 shifting these election board appointments from Stein to newly elected state Auditor Dave Boliek whose primary qualification for the new assignment appeared to be that he is a Republican who says he was “inspired” by President Trump to run.  

State Auditor Dave Boliek is a former prosecutor, small business owner, and most recently worked as an attorney and served as Chairman of the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees. // Photo courtesy of Office of the State Auditor

Boliek, an ex-Democrat, is a lawyer and former head of the UNC Board of Trustees who boasts of his efforts to “eliminate woke diversity and equity policies” from the university. But he acknowledges being clueless about how he was gifted this newly found executive power to administer North Carolina elections. 

“It’s not something I asked for; it’s certainly not something that I expected,” he says. 

Despite this utter lack of preparation, Boliek has seized this mantle with zeal. On May 7, a week after the new law took effect, Boliek fired the state elections board’s award-winning executive director Karen Brinson Bell, who had just been elected president of the non-partisan National Elections Association. 

But Brinson Bell had drawn withering fire from Republicans for recommending certification of Riggs’s narrow victory over Griffin. Boliek also appointed two new Republican board members whom the Democratic Party immediately labeled as extremists: retired Marine Corps pilot Francis X. DeLuca and former state Sen. Bob Rucho.

Karen Brison Bell, director of the North Carolina Board of Elections, was replaced by GOP lawyer Sam Hayes amid a power shift in the state’s election control. // Photo courtesy of State Board of Elections

DeLuca formerly headed the arch-conservative Civitas Foundation which, among other initiatives, attempted to eliminate early-voting on Sundays and same-day voter registration, reforms that have increased turnout among low-income voters who tend to support Democratic candidates. 

Rucho earned the dubious nickname “Senator Gerrymander” for crafting a pro-Republican district-election map that one state appellate court said had been drawn with “surgical precision” to ensure GOP control. A determining feature of Rucho’s maps included diluting the collective voting strength of Blacks who tend to vote for Democrats. 

Yet in 2019 his map passed muster with the U.S. Supreme Court in a landmark case titled Rucho v. Common Cause. The 5-4 majority conceded that the map was “incompatible with democratic principles.” But Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that such partisan matters as gerrymandering were not within the jurisdiction of federal courts and should be left up to the states. 

So here we are in North Carolina with a gerrymandered General Assembly, a gerrymandered congressional delegation, and the state’s appellate and Supreme Court with lopsided Republican majorities. 

Gov. Stein’s failed attempt to regain administrative authority over the election machinery exemplifies how effectively the GOP can now exercise power. Days after his inauguration, Stein filed suit to strike the section of Senate Bill 382 stripping him of executive authority over elections.

A three-judge panel in Wake County composed of two Republicans and one Democrat heard the case. In a 2-1 decision – the Democrat and one Republican – the court declared the section to be unconstitutional, thus returning authority to the governor.

But Boliek appealed that decision to the state’s Republican-dominated appellate court. The appellate judges reversed the result and gave a green light to the auditor’s takeover.  

Notably, this court’s decision was rendered anonymously and without comment, the judicial equivalent of a back-handed slap at the Wake County district judges. Stein’s appeal to the state Supreme Court, with its 7-2 Republican majority, went unheard and it died in silence. The new law took effect May 1. 

“We’re at a stage where we have to pray for judges to make decisions upholding free and fair elections.” said Jake Quinn, chairman of the Buncombe County Board of Elections. // Photo courtesy of Buncombe County

The full impact of this change remains to be felt in Buncombe and the state’s other 99 counties. Boliek has until June 30 to appoint the heads of these county boards and to certify appointments of their members. 

Let me return to Buncombe County Board Chairman Quinn whom I quoted earlier characterizing the state as “ground zero for vote rigging.” As a Democrat, he expects to be ousted from the leadership post and perhaps as a board member, which he admits he will lament. Yet two things trouble him more than his own plight. 

One has been the role that many (though not all) Republican state judges have played in enabling this partisan power grab.

“I have no faith any longer in the North Carolina courts,” Quinn said.  “We’re at a stage where we have to pray for judges to make decisions upholding free and fair elections.”

The second has been that this bulldozing of the elections system has been carried out with hardly any public knowledge or outcry, and deliberately so. “Only election nerds like me know about this,” Quinn said.

Johnny Rocco would applaud.


Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments on this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Tom Fiedler is a Pulitzer Prize-winning political reporter and dean emeritus from Boston University who lives in Asheville. Email him at tfiedler@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post How the state GOP seized control of North Carolina’s elections boards could be a ready-for-Hollywood thriller • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This content critiques Republican control over election administration in North Carolina, highlighting concerns about partisan manipulation and voter suppression efforts predominantly credited to GOP actions. The article emphasizes the Republican Party’s consolidation of election oversight and judicial support to maintain power, while portraying Democratic actors and election officials as marginalized or undermined. The language and framing suggest a critical stance toward conservative policies and practices, aligning it with a center-left perspective that is wary of right-wing political maneuvers affecting democratic processes.

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Woman speaks out about shooting that left her fighting for her life on Mother's Day

Published

on

www.youtube.com – WRAL – 2025-05-21 11:53:38


SUMMARY: On Mother’s Day, Mon’nique Wallace, a Raleigh woman, was shot through her front door by Thomas Green, an acquaintance breaking into her apartment with power tools. Wallace, who was in the shower, put her hand against the door to stop him and was shot multiple times, suffering severe injuries including a badly damaged hand with uncertain recovery. Green was arrested and charged with assault with a deadly weapon, larceny of a firearm, and attempted breaking and entering. Wallace, who works at a hospital, fears she may never return to work and no longer feels safe at home. A GoFundMe has been started to assist with medical expenses.

YouTube video

WRAL’s Willie Daniely spoke to her and has the story.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Hurricanes fall 5-2 to Panthers in Eastern Conference Finals opener

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-05-21 08:46:10


SUMMARY: The Hurricanes fell 5-2 to the Florida Panthers in the Eastern Conference Finals opener. Despite the loss, fans remain optimistic and embrace the challenge of facing the defending champions. They admire the resilience of their team, highlighting their faith and teamwork throughout the season. While disappointed, the crowd is expected to return strong for the next games, supporting the Hurricanes as the series continues. The Hurricanes, no strangers to the Panthers after last year’s intense series, face an uphill battle but retain hope for a comeback, believing in their goalie’s potential to perform under pressure and the team’s proven grit.

YouTube video

Panthers methodically jumped on the Carolina Hurricanes, immediately ripped away home-ice advantage and played with an edge befitting their status as reigning Stanley Cup champions in Tuesday night’s 5-2 win in Game 1.

https://abc11.com/post/canes-stanley-cup-playoffs-hurricanes-open-eastern-conference-finals-visit-defending-champion-florida-panthers/16486121/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Foxx delivers ‘the why’ of a 1 a.m. House Rules hearing | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-21 08:07:00


North Carolina Republican Rep. Virginia Foxx addressed criticism from Democrats regarding the late timing of a House Rules Committee meeting on the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” Foxx highlighted that such late meetings have occurred under both Democratic and Republican leadership in the past. The bill, which has passed through 11 committees, outlines spending for President Trump’s tax, border, defense, and energy priorities. Foxx defended the timing, emphasizing transparency and the importance of passing legislation that aligns with American needs. She criticized Democratic inaction on tax cuts and inflation, asserting that the bill addresses key Republican goals.

(The Center Square) – As promised, North Carolina Republican U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx delivered early Wednesday on why the Rules Committee in the House of Representatives convened a 1 a.m. meeting.

Democrats were heavily critical ahead of the hearing on Tuesday, including sending a letter from the party leader of the chamber and ranking member of the committee. Foxx, however, gave multiple times where the “dark of night,” as the writing said, was the time of the business for past committees led by Democrats.

Eight hours after beginning, the Rules Committee remained in session discussing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as so authored from the Budget Committee led by Texas Republican Rep. Jodey Arrington. The resolution’s spending and saving instructions will fund President Donald Trump’s tax, border, defense and energy agenda.

The overall proposal has run through 11 committees and rested at 1,116 pages entering the hearing Wednesday morning.

The following are Foxx’s remarks as prepared for delivery:

Good morning, the Committee will come to order.

Without objection, the Chair is authorized to declare a recess at any time.

Today, the Rules Committee is convening to consider H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Before we discuss the legislation that’s before us, I want to respond to a letter I received earlier today from the Democratic Leader and the Ranking Member of this Committee.

The letter calls the decision to hold a hearing at 1 a.m. “unprecedented.” However, let’s look at the record.

Democrats in the 110th Congress held a hearing beginning at precisely the same time: at 1 a.m. on Aug. 1, 2007, on the Children’s Health and Medicare Protection Act. When this was discussed on the floor earlier today, Mr. McGovern responded that this was decades ago. However, we’ve looked back and observed that you did indeed convene a hearing at 1:30 a.m. only a few years ago, in 2022. It was for an Omnibus, in addition to a short-term CR. Once again, those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

Secondly, the letter asks, “What else are you hiding?”

I want to be clear; I have been as open and transparent as possible throughout this entire process.

We posted the text of the Rules Committee Print late Sunday night, after the Budget Committee ordered the legislation reported and we posted a comparative print at that same time, showing the changes between the reported bill and the Rules Committee print.

There have been many complaints from my friends on the other side about not knowing about whether there will be a manager’s amendment and what will be in it.

There will be a manager’s amendment. It is how reconciliation has operated under both Republican and Democrat control.

I certainly can’t control the time that it will be ready, but I can assure my Democrat colleagues that they will certainly have more time than we were given in 2009 when a 309-page manager’s amendment was dropped on us when the Ranking Member began reading the motion to report a rule for HR2454.

Our friends on the other side of the aisle LOVE to cherry pick the facts about how this meeting is taking place in the dark of night.

They’ve done it for several committee markups thus far. Never mind the fact that the only reason the hearings went as long as they did was because Democrats engaged in the legislative process – which is their right.

But here’s the thing: they can’t have their cake and eat it too.

They cannot complain about reporting legislation in the dark of night when the only reason it went so late was because of their own actions.

Now, in the case of the Rules Committee, the same holds true.

The Rules Committee has a long tradition of meeting late into the evening, and reporting legislation long after most of America has gone to bed.

It is our duty to advance the agenda of the House of Representatives – The People’s House.

Let’s roll the clocks back to when Democrats held the majority in the 110th and 111th Congresses.

They reported legislation out of the Rules Committee well into the twilight hours. I know of what I speak – I was on the Rules Committee then.

For example:

House Resolution 587 – 3:47 a.m.

House Resolution 481 – 2:09 a.m.

House Resolution 597 – 3:43 a.m.

House Resolution 903 – 2:25 a.m.

And, House Resolution 445 in the 116th Congress –12:20 a.m.

I do not think that there is anything wrong with this – it is how the committee has operated when necessary.

It has occurred under Democrat and Republican control.

In this case, I do believe we’ll be reporting not in the dark of night, but after the day has dawned.

I encourage my colleagues on the other side to prove me wrong.

Now, to the business that’s before us this morning.

There will be a lot of commentary from our friends across the aisle about what is not within this legislation.

We’ll experience, ad nauseam, a lot of granular-level grievances, legislative indigestion, and I’m sure considerable hyperallergic reactions to everything under the sun.

It’ll be the same song and dance routine that we’ve seen and heard for months – likely with more drama than Shakespeare.

Despite their misleading rhetoric and talking points, Democrats had their opportunities to deliver when they had full control and passed their own reconciliation packages.

They did nothing to make the middle-class centered, the Trump tax cuts permanent – despite the existence of the expiration of these tax cuts within their ten-year window.

They refused. They even refused to raise the top income tax bracket … despite all their campaign talking points.

Instead, they passed the so-called “Inflation Reduction Act” and the so-called “American Rescue Plan Act” that led to reckless spending and record inflation.

But Republicans are here to do our jobs. And our job in this case isn’t out of discretion, it’s grounded in statute.

We are considering legislation that executes the instructions given to the committees pursuant to the budget resolution – one that passed both chambers and is binding on this body and the Senate.

And our express purpose is this: to ensure that our federal spending, taxation, and other revenue generating concepts align with the current needs of the American people.

The American people, and this government by extension, cannot afford inaction. Americans need this legislation to ensure our economic survival and the sustainability of this Republican government.

Americans cannot afford the largest tax hike in our nation’s history.

Americans cannot afford the runaway, endless spending machine that Democrats have enshrined via their policies.

Americans cannot afford the inflation caused by the Democrats in the last four years.

Americans cannot afford a soft, fragile embrace of President Trump’s successful policies on the border, national security, and growth.

Inflation has fallen to the lowest level in more than four years as April’s Consumer Price Index smashed expectations for the third straight month.

Workers’ real wages are up 1.9%, increasing each of the last three months.

Encounters with gotaways – the top threat to public safety – are down by 95%.

In March of 2025, fentanyl traffic at the southern border fell by 54% compared to March of 2024.

Lastly, Americans and this government cannot afford to ignore the specific, pro-growth provisions that President Trump campaigned on. 

Our bill delivers on the specific, acute policies American workers embraced:

• We end taxes on tips.

• We end taxes on overtime pay.

• We boost tax deductions for seniors.

• We expand family-centered tax incentives like the Child Tax Credit, the Standard Deduction, and family leave.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is our answer to the American people’s mandate from November.

It’s a clear, full-throated response to the millions of hardworking men and women across the entire nation who demand a serious course correction from the last four years and the setting of our fiscal situation on a sustainable footing.

The committees within the House have all completed their respective parts, and all the pieces have come together.

I commend all the committees, chairmen, members, and staff who worked for months – often well into the night and early hours of the morning – to craft the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 

We are here to finish the job and ship this legislation to the House floor.

With that, I look forward to the discussion, and I now yield to the ranking member, Mr. McGovern, for any comments he wishes to make.

The post Foxx delivers ‘the why’ of a 1 a.m. House Rules hearing | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a clear ideological perspective aligned with Republican viewpoints. It prominently features the prepared remarks of North Carolina Republican U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, who defends the late-night Rules Committee meeting and strongly supports the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” associated with advancing President Donald Trump’s agenda. The tone and language emphasize Republican accomplishments, criticize Democrats’ spending and policy decisions, and frame Democratic actions in a negative light, such as accusing them of reckless spending and inflationary impacts. The piece does not neutrally report on the ideological positions of both parties but rather foregrounds the Republican narrative and critiques of Democratic policies without presenting counterarguments or a balanced viewpoint, indicating a right-leaning bias.

Continue Reading

Trending