Connect with us

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

How does Missouri’s investment in a behavioral health crisis network improve mental health care?

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Meg Cunningham – 2025-07-01 07:00:00


Missouri has launched a statewide mobile crisis response network linked with the 988 mental health hotline to better address behavioral health crises. Traditionally reliant on 911 and emergency rooms, the state now dispatches trained behavioral health professionals to assist individuals in crisis without law enforcement involvement. Funded with $15 million annually, the network includes 20 centers providing in-person support, often preventing hospital visits. Challenges remain, particularly in rural areas where stigma and limited internet access hinder care. The goal is lasting impact through ongoing support, offering alternatives to emergency rooms and jails, improving outcomes via de-escalation and connecting people to appropriate treatment.

by Meg Cunningham, Missouri Independent
July 1, 2025

For years, Missouri has sought to address a growing mental and behavioral health crisis that touches every corner of the state.

In 2024, Missouri was ranked 38th nationwide when it came to prevalence of mental illness and overall access to treatment. So the state made multimillion-dollar investments to improve responses when Missourians are in moments of crisis.

For decades, calling 911 or going to the emergency room was the norm if a person was experiencing a mental health crisis.

Now, with the rollout of a statewide network in tandem with the national crisis hotline, 988, Missouri’s behavioral health providers dispatch teams of social workers or other specialists to be there for someone experiencing a crisis, at no cost to them.

“Not everything requires a level 10 response,” said Jamie Manning, the vice president of access and urgent care services at Compass Health Network. “Outside of calling 911, there’s now this free, accessible service, and you don’t have to wait until it’s that bad. You don’t have to go to the hospital when you’re at your wits’ end. We can help you before it gets to that point.”

Missouri currently has 20 behavioral health centers in the mobile crisis response network statewide. If a person dials 988 in the midst of a crisis and they need more support than is available through a phone call, the providers in the network will send out a team of two behavioral health workers to help them through their crisis.

“For many, many years, there weren’t other options,” Manning said. “Thank goodness we have new resources so there’s now that in between.”

How mobile crisis came online as part of Missouri’s mental health response

Many behavioral health providers, especially those serving rural patients, had some form of a mobile crisis response in place even before the state launched its network in tandem with 988.

As a caseworker early in her career, Manning remembers the toll that mobile response calls could have on staff. Workers were on call outside of their typical working hours, which meant more work and management for caseworkers outside of their day-to-day responsibilities.

But with the launch of 988 and an investment in the statewide mobile crisis network, behavioral health providers were able to hire full-time staff and create separate mobile teams whose purpose is to go out into the community and respond to the calls.

For fiscal years 2025 and 2026, Missouri set aside about $15 million annually that trickles down to behavioral health providers to staff and fund their mobile crisis teams. And the investment is changing the way the state responds to mental health crises.

“They are trained behavioral health professionals that will respond to a situation without law enforcement,” said KC Rafferty, the director of community engagement at the Missouri Behavioral Health Council.

The goal is to get to the root cause of someone’s crisis moment and get them connected to care that better fits their needs.

“If we’ve seen this person over and over and over again, how can we maybe think differently, think outside the box, to engage with them and ensure that they are getting the appropriate care for what they need?” Rafferty said.

In 2024, the 988 hotline in Missouri answered nearly 85,000 calls, 20,500 texts and nearly 8,800 chats. Of those contacts, about 3,000 — or just over 2.7% — resulted in a mobile crisis team being dispatched.

So far in 2025, 3.08% of contacts result in a mobile team heading out into the state, data provided by the Department of Mental Health shows.

Providers go to a patient’s home or meet them at a more public location, like a library or parking lot. After responding to a call and deescalating the situation, providers offer the opportunity to check back in with patients in the days following a crisis. They offer them options for short- or long-term care and treatment, or other assistance, such as helping them fill out Medicaid applications or making a doctor’s appointment.

But each case is different, and challenges remain when treating behavioral health conditions, especially in rural areas.

“Whenever we’re talking about rural mobile response, it’s the culture,” said Natasha Corkins, the director of crisis services for Burrell Behavioral Health’s southwest region, which covers Springfield and six surrounding counties. “There are people who call and want to speak, and we offer a mobile response and they’re hesitant because they don’t want to invite someone to their home or their location.”

“Consent is very important to us, because a crisis is a very individual and intimate situation,” Corkins said. “We don’t want to show up and possibly escalate a crisis by our presence. We want them to invite us in.”

Another challenge posed in rural communities is access to the internet when people are ready to seek out resources, Rafferty said.

“That can pose its own threat if they don’t have the ability to get where they need help, or to call someone to get assistance, if there is poor coverage in their area,” Rafferty said.

In all behavioral health responses, patience and understanding are key to better outcomes for patients, said Laurie Cox, the director of crisis services at Swope Health in Kansas City.

“If you keep getting in crisis, the only way to stop that is to get the services that you need,” Cox said. “But we also know that it is really hard for people to do. So it takes patience, it takes determination, it takes knowing how hard to push.”

Shifting from 911 and emergency rooms to living rooms and libraries 

Emergency responders and behavioral health workers agree that an emergency room or a jail cell isn’t the best place for someone who is experiencing a crisis. But for many years, it was the only option.

Now, if it is safe, emergency medical services and law enforcement don’t need to be on-site at many of the 988 mobile dispatches, because there are mobile responders across the state trained in deescalation.

And they say the number of behavioral health calls they are needed for has dropped as the option becomes better known.

“If we go back and look at repeat patients, a lot of those have significantly decreased because they are getting the follow-up they need,” said Chris Bogguss, the director of EMS in Macon County. “They were given the appropriate resources.”

And for situations where emergency responders are needed at a behavioral crisis call, Missouri is incentivizing them to receive crisis intervention training in how to assess and deescalate crisis calls.

“It’s the education that we’ve received outside of our traditional EMS training that’s really helped us … better understand the patient’s needs,” Bogguss said.

Burrell Behavioral Health’s southwest coverage area has a crisis hotline specialist embedded in the Springfield-Greene County 911 dispatch center.

“We can work on diverting crisis callers from 911 to our crisis team, and hopefully stop the dispatching before it happens,” Corkins said.

Ultimately, providers want Missourians to know they can reach out for help and get connected to support or services through the 988 network.

“The goal is not to provide the Band-Aid in the moment, although that has its benefits,” Manning said. “How can we ensure that this has some lasting impact? It’s not a one and done. We’re here for you in whatever capacity you’re open to.”

This article first appeared on Beacon: Kansas City and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://thebeaconnews.org/stories/2025/06/25/missouri-mental-health-988-mobile-crisis-network/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } }

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post How does Missouri’s investment in a behavioral health crisis network improve mental health care? appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article presents a largely factual overview of Missouri’s mobile mental health crisis response efforts, emphasizing increased public funding, de-escalation without police, and access to care. The tone is supportive of government intervention in mental health services and highlights challenges in rural access, equity, and alternatives to law enforcement — positions often associated with center-left public health policy. While it does not criticize opposing views, its consistent framing of these developments in a positive light and emphasis on systemic reform suggests a Center-Left bias focused on progressive health and social service expansion.

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

A whites-only community could be coming to Springfield area

Published

on

www.ozarksfirst.com – Kathryn Skopec – 2025-07-22 14:39:00

SUMMARY: Eric Orwoll, co-founder of Return to the Land (RTTL), a whites-only private membership group excluding non-white and Jewish people, said the group may expand near Springfield, Missouri. RTTL, based on 160 acres in northern Arkansas, promotes communities rooted in European ancestry and traditional values. The Anti-Defamation League condemned the group’s segregationist nature, calling for enforcement of fair housing laws. Orwoll claims RTTL’s activities are legal under the right to free association and envisions RTTL communities nationwide, offering services like homeschooling and legal advocacy. He emphasizes living among like-minded people amid demographic changes without forced racial integration.

Read the full article

The post A whites-only community could be coming to Springfield area appeared first on www.ozarksfirst.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Experience youthful skin with Dekliderm for only $19.95!

Published

on

www.youtube.com – FOX 2 St. Louis – 2025-07-22 11:24:08

SUMMARY: Dekliderm offers a clinically studied topical cream to reduce wrinkles and loose, crepey skin on the neck for just $19.95. Aging often causes sagging skin in the neck area, making you look older, but Dekliderm’s retinol-based formula stimulates new cell growth and firms skin, showing visible improvements in as little as two weeks. A clinical study revealed 95% of women experienced firmer, more youthful-looking necks and chests. The cream also contains a gentle plant-based ingredient to reduce sagging. With a 60-day money-back guarantee, Dekliderm promises a confidence-boosting, luxurious skincare solution for aging neck skin.

SPONSORED – Dekliderm is a simple cream, no procedure or doctor’s visits and it’s clinically proven to give the neck a smoother appearance. Take the 60-day Dekliderm challenge and purchase yours for only $19.95!
For more information, visit dekliderm.com
Sponsored content disclaimer: The information and advice displayed in this story are those of individual sponsors or guests and not Nexstar Media Group, Inc

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

‘One big, beautiful’ law provision on Planned Parenthood funding partly blocked by judge

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Jennifer Shutt – 2025-07-22 07:21:00


A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking a Republican provision that would bar Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood for one year. Judge Indira Talwani found Planned Parenthood likely to succeed on its equal protection and First Amendment claims, preserving Medicaid reimbursements for certain clinics. The law sought to defund Planned Parenthood for services beyond abortion, including physicals and cancer screenings. The original 10-year defunding moratorium was reduced to one year in the Senate. Planned Parenthood sued shortly after President Trump signed the law. The injunction currently applies to specific affiliates, with broader relief pending, amid concerns over patient care access.

by Jennifer Shutt, Missouri Independent
July 22, 2025

This report has been updated.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction Monday, blocking a provision in Republicans’ “big, beautiful” law that would have barred Medicaid funding from going to Planned Parenthood for one year.

District Court Judge Indira Talwani wrote in a 36-page opinion that Planned Parenthood established “a substantial likelihood of success on their equal protection claim” since the new law “burdens” the organization’s First Amendment rights. But she limited the protections to only certain Planned Parenthood clinics.

“A preliminary injunction maintains Planned Parenthood Members’ ability to seek Medicaid reimbursements—and maintain their status quo level of service to patients,” Talwani wrote. “And an injunction requiring Defendants to continue funding Medicaid reimbursements in accordance with the status quo imposes no additional Medicaid costs on Defendants, where there is no dispute that Medicaid funds will still be provided only for reimbursable healthcare services.”

Congress has barred federal taxpayer dollars from going to abortion services with limited exceptions for decades. But GOP lawmakers used their sweeping tax and spending cuts package to eliminate Medicaid funding from going to Planned Parenthood for other types of health care, like annual physicals and cancer screenings.

The original House version of the bill included a 10-year moratorium on Medicaid reimbursements to Planned Parenthood, but that was changed to a one-year prohibition in the Senate.

Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit challenging the new law just days after President Donald Trump signed it during a ceremony on the Fourth of July.

Talwani, who was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order the same day the case was filed, blocking that provision’s implementation.

The Trump administration argued against the court issuing a preliminary injunction, writing in a 58-page motion submitted last week that Planned Parenthood’s “constitutional claims are utterly meritless.”

“All three democratically elected components of the Federal Government collaborated to enact that provision consistent with their electoral mandates from the American people as to how they want their hard-earned taxpayer dollars spent,” the brief states. “But Plaintiffs—Planned Parenthood Federation of America (“PPFA”) and its members (together, “Planned Parenthood”)—now want this Court to reject that judgment and supplant duly enacted legislation with their own policy preferences.”

Talwani wrote in her ruling that it would apply to “Planned Parenthood Association of Utah and other Planned Parenthood Federation of America Members who will not provide abortion services as of October 1, 2025, or for which the total amount of Federal and State expenditures under the Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act for medical assistance furnished in fiscal year 2023 made directly to them did not exceed $800,000.”

Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah — the three organizations that filed the suit — issued a written statement after the ruling that they were “disappointed that not all members were granted the necessary relief today.”

“Patients across the country should be able to go to their trusted Planned Parenthood provider for birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment,” they wrote. “This is about patients and their right to get care — no matter their insurance. The court has not yet ruled on whether it will grant preliminary injunctive relief to other members. We remain hopeful that the court will grant this relief. There will be nothing short of a public health crisis if Planned Parenthood members are allowed to be ‘defunded.’”

The Department of Justice declined to comment whether it would appeal the preliminary injunction, though a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services said it doesn’t agree with the ruling.

“We strongly disagree with the court’s decision,” HHS Director of Communications Andrew Nixon wrote in a statement. “States should not be forced to fund organizations that have chosen political advocacy over patient care. This ruling undermines state flexibility and disregards longstanding concerns about accountability.”

The Trump administration filed a notice later Tuesday it intends to appeal the preliminary injunction to the United States Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. 

Last updated 4:54 p.m., Jul. 22, 2025

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post ‘One big, beautiful’ law provision on Planned Parenthood funding partly blocked by judge appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article presents a factual report on a federal court decision involving Planned Parenthood and Medicaid funding, focusing on the legal arguments, court rulings, and responses from both sides. The coverage highlights the protection of access to reproductive health services and critiques Republican-led efforts to restrict funding, which aligns with a center-left perspective that typically supports Planned Parenthood and Medicaid services. However, it maintains a balanced tone by including statements from the Trump administration and details about the legislative process, avoiding overtly partisan language. Overall, the content leans moderately center-left due to its emphasis on safeguarding healthcare access through judicial intervention.

Continue Reading

Trending