Connect with us

The Center Square

Here’s what’s in Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-25 08:11:00


The Republican-led budget reconciliation bill, passed narrowly by the House, extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts and includes major reforms to Medicaid, food stamps, student loans, and border security, costing \$3.3 trillion to \$5.2 trillion over 10 years. It permanently codifies tax cuts like the child tax credit and QBI deduction, while increasing taxes on universities and foundations. Medicaid changes tighten eligibility and impose work requirements, reducing enrollment by millions but still growing overall spending. The bill reforms SNAP benefits, boosts border security funding, imposes immigrant fees, and scales back clean energy subsidies. Senate changes are expected before final approval.

(The Center Square) – Republicans’ mammoth budget reconciliation bill includes major changes to Medicaid, food stamps, student loans and more. It also permanently extends President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts – at a cost of at least $3.3 trillion.

Passing the House Thursday by a razor-thin margin, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act funds large swaths of Trump’s policy agenda while authorizing a $4 trillion debt ceiling hike. The legislation consists of 11 separate House committee prints that collectively fulfill the budget resolution’s 10-year spending and savings instructions

The bill includes more than $1.5 trillion in savings found by congressional committees. But budget watchdogs say the package, if passed by the Senate without major alterations, will still add anywhere from $3.3 to $5.2 trillion to the national debt and at least $3.2 trillion to the primary deficit by 2035. 

Most of the cost stems from the Ways and Means committee’s portion, which deals with codifying most of the sunsetting 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law. 

That includes the higher standard deduction for nearly all tax filers, the $2,000 child tax credit – both parents will need a Social Security number to claim it – and the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction.

American manufacturers would particularly benefit from the legislation, which would allow them to deduct 100% of facility improvement or construction costs. The bill would deal a blow to large universities by increasing endowment taxes, as well as hiking taxes on many private foundations.

Republicans clashed over how high to raise the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction cap, eventually settling on $40,000 for taxpayers earning less than $500,000 annually, via a last-minute Rules Committee amendment.

The tax portion of the reconciliation bill also features many short-term tax provisions set to expire after four years. Those include boosting the maximum standard deduction from $15,000 to $16,000 for single filers and from $30,000 to $32,000 for joint filers. The maximum child tax credit will see a $500 increase and the QBI deduction will rise to 23%. 

Other temporary changes lasting until fiscal year 2028 include nixing taxes on tips and overtime, making the adoption tax credit partially refundable, ending interest on loans for American cars, and increasing tax deductions for eligible seniors by $4,000.

While lawmakers on the Ways and Means committee contributed most to the cost of the reconciliation package, the Energy and Commerce committee found the most savings – over $988 billion – primarily via scaling back the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act and Medicaid spending.

Energy and Commerce’s addition claws back unobligated funds from the IRA and repeals or phases out more than a dozen IRA renewable energy-related subsidies.

Four tax credits related to alternative fuel vehicles, three credits related to home energy efficiency or “clean” energy sourcing, and the clean hydrogen production credit will end by 2026. After facing pressure from fiscal hawks, the Rules Committee pushed forward the 2032 phaseout deadline for the IRA’s clean electricity production and investment credits to 2028.

Medicaid reforms in the bill include changing program eligibility requirements back to pre-COVID-19 standards, imposing work requirements on most able-bodied adults without dependents, and closing loopholes exploited by states. 

The plan also axes federal funding to Planned Parenthood and other reproductive clinics, as well as prevents Medicaid and CHIP funding from going to gender transition procedures on children.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the changes will save hundreds of billions of dollars and make at least 7.7 million current Medicaid recipients – including 1.4 million people without verified citizenship status – ineligible for Medicaid coverage by 2034. But given the Biden-era 20% spending increase on Medicaid, total program spending will still grow by at least 3% a year for the next decade.

Another last-minute addition by the Rules committee doubled down on Medicaid reforms, accelerating the work requirement deadline to take effect in 2026 and preventing states from implementing new taxes on providers.

House Democrats, none of whom voted for the bill, repeatedly called the Medicaid changes “cruel.” They similarly blasted the Agriculture Committee’s section of the bill, which saves $230 billion by reforming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

SNAP reforms include requiring states to cover 5% of their SNAP benefit cost share by fiscal year 2028, with their contribution increasing the higher the state’s payment error rate. States have an average payment error rate of 11.68%, as of 2023. 

The bill also closes state “waiver gimmicks” that have exempted 84% of able-bodied adult beneficiaries without dependents from SNAP work requirements, plus bans all noncitizens aside from legal permanent residents from receiving benefits.

Trump’s border security and defense priorities received hundreds of billions of additional dollars collectively from the Homeland Security, Judiciary, and Armed Services committees’ portions of the megabill.

The Homeland Security committee authorized approximately $47 billion for the construction of the “Border Barrier System,” a technologically enhanced southern border wall. Roughly $5 billion will go toward building new U.S. Customs and Border Patrol facilities and checkpoints and $6 billion toward border agent workforce and hiring.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement receives a $45 billion funding boost meant for building new detention centers from the Judiciary Committee’s print. 

Notably, the bill also imposes new fees on immigrants, implementing a $1,000 minimum fee on migrants seeking asylum and a $500 fee on individuals requesting Temporary Protected Status, which is currently free. Sponsors of unaccompanied migrant children will face a $3,500 charge, while many work permit applications will carry a $550 fee that renews every six months.

The Armed Services committee portion contributes $5 billion to border security efforts, but most of the $150 billion in spending is slated for shipbuilding, restocking munitions, increasing weapon production capacity and nuclear deterrence, and financing the Golden Dome for America project

While the Transportation and Infrastructure committee gives $22 billion to the Coast Guard and $15 billion to the Federal Aviation Administration for infrastructure modernization, it imposes new fees on electric vehicle owners. 

Under the bill, EV owners will have to pay $250 annually as a contribution to the dwindling Highway Trust Fund. Owners of combustion engine vehicles contribute to the HTF every time they fill up their gas tank.

The Natural Resources committee checks the box for Trump’s energy agenda by expanding onshore oil and gas leasing on federal lands, reducing drilling royalty rates to 12.5%, and permanently reinstating coal leasing suspended by Biden.

A final blow to the Biden administration in Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” comes from the Education and Workforce committee’s addition. It axes the 2023 SAVE loan repayment program, which amounted to potentially billions in complete loan forgiveness for thousands of student borrowers. 

The legislation also simplifies and shrinks student loan repayment options and penalizes higher education institutions that allow students to take out unaffordable levels of debt. Additionally, it restricts Pell Grant eligibility to students taking more than six credit hours and low-income students in short-term programs.

Under normal Senate filibuster rules, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would have no chance of passing. But since the budget reconciliation process bypasses the filibuster, Republican leaders are hopeful the package will make it to the president’s desk. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is aiming for that to happen by Independence Day.

Senate Republicans are eyeing potentially derailing changes, however, with some senators opposing the IRA and Medicaid cuts – key compromises Johnson made with House hardliners – with others wanting even more spending reductions.

“I think you can improve the product,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in an interview about the bill with Punchbowl News. “There are certain things the Senate wants to have its imprint on.”

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, cautioned against drastic bill reforms.

“I’m urging my Senate colleagues to take up our balanced reconciliation package – and only consider changes that further strengthens our fiscal reforms – so we can quickly advance this One Big Beautiful Bill to the President’s desk and deliver for the American people,” he said.

The post Here’s what’s in Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

This article reports extensively on a large Republican-led budget reconciliation bill, highlighting its provisions largely in favorable or neutral terms, such as extensions of Trump-era tax cuts, support for manufacturers, border security funding, and reductions to Medicaid and other social programs. The tone emphasizes fiscal conservatism, deficit reduction, and law-and-order themes consistent with Republican priorities. While it includes some critique from Democrats, it largely presents the legislation from the perspective of Republican sponsors and supporters, with limited critical framing. The article’s language, focus, and selection of details reflect a right-leaning editorial stance, supporting Republican policy goals without overt critique.

The Center Square

Media, Biden team face ongoing questions about former president’s condition | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Casey Harper – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-24 08:35:00


President Joe Biden’s alleged cancer diagnosis and cognitive decline have ignited controversy, with critics accusing the Biden family, media, and Democratic aides of a cover-up. President Trump expressed surprise over the delay in public disclosure. A viral 2022 clip appeared to show Biden mentioning cancer, later dismissed as a misspeak by the White House. Vice President JD Vance and others called for greater transparency about Biden’s health. Special Counsel Robert Hur’s 2024 report detailed serious memory issues during a classified documents investigation. House Oversight Chair James Comer demands transcribed interviews with Biden’s doctors and aides, accusing the White House of obstructing inquiries into Biden’s mental fitness.

(The Center Square) – President Joe Biden’s cancer diagnosis and ongoing mental decline has sparked a firestorm of controversy and criticism for the Biden family, the media, and the Democratic staffers who allegedly helped cover up the former president’s condition.  

President Donald Trump said this week he was “surprised the public wasn’t notified a long time ago” given how far Biden’s cancer has progressed.

A Biden spokesperson pushed back on these allegations, saying that the president did not hide a cancer diagnosis. Critics say Biden would have known sooner given how far along the cancer has progressed. 

Notably, in a viral moment caught on camera in July 2022, Biden appeared to tell the audience present that he had cancer before the White House later followed up to say Biden misspoke. 

“That’s why I and so damn many other people I grew up with have cancer and why for the longest time Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation,” Biden said during his remarks when referring to oil refinery emissions near his childhood home in Delaware.

As The Center Square previously reported, Vice President JD Vance told reporters that the American people should have had more transparency about the president’s health last year.

“In some ways, I blame him less than I blame the people around him,” Vance said. “You can separate the desire for him to have the right health outcome with the recognition that whether it was doctors or whether there were staffers around the former president, I don’t think he was able to do a good job for the American people. And that’s not politics. That’s not because I disagreed with him on policy. That’s because I don’t think that he was in good enough health.”

On Biden’s mental health, the mainstream media in particular has taken criticism for downplaying Biden’s decline. The mental decline was often on display as the president stumbled through speeches and often seemed confused or unsure of where to go after speaking. Eventually, his condition became impossible to ignore during a presidential debate with Trump last summer, effectively ending Biden’s presidential campaign as Democrats and the mainstream media turned against him. 

Biden appeared better on some days and worse on others. 

Special Counsel Robert Hur released a report in February 2024 calling Biden “an elderly man with a poor memory.” Hur had been tasked with investigating Biden’s handling of classified documents but reported on Biden’s apparent mental deficiencies during questioning, saying Biden had trouble remembering key events in his life.

“In his interview with our office, Mr. Biden’s memory was worse,” the report said. “He did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘if it was 2013 – when did I stop being Vice President?’), and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘in 2009, am I still Vice President?’)”

Biden served as vice president in the administration of then-President Barack Obama from 2009 to 2017. After the report was released, Biden held a news conference insisting his memory was “fine.”

“He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died,” the report continued. “And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him. Among other things, he mistakenly said he ‘had a real difference’ of opinion with General Karl Eikenberry, when, in fact, Eikenberry was an ally whom Mr. Eiden cited approvingly in his Thanksgiving memo to President Obama.”

House Oversight Chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., called this week for transcribed interviews with the White House doctor and top Biden officials in his investigation into the alleged coverup of Biden’s mental decline, as The Center Square previously reported

Comer called for transcribed interviews with Biden’s Physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor; former Director of the Domestic Policy Council Neera Tanden; former Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor to the First Lady Anthony Bernal; former Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff Annie Tomasini; and former Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Oval Office Operations Ashley Williams.

“In the last Congress, the Biden White House blocked these individuals from providing testimony to the Oversight Committee as part of the effort to cover-up Biden’s declining health,” Comer said. “Any continued obstruction will be met with swift and decisive action. The American people demand transparency and accountability now.” 

The post Media, Biden team face ongoing questions about former president’s condition | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article exhibits a right-leaning bias through its tone, language, and framing. It presents unverified claims about President Biden’s health, including cancer and mental decline, largely relying on criticisms from Republican figures such as Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Rep. James Comer. The language used, like “firestorm of controversy,” “allegedly helped cover up,” and highlighting moments that suggest cognitive impairment, emphasizes negative portrayals of Biden. The coverage also criticizes mainstream media and Democrats for allegedly minimizing these issues, which aligns with a right-leaning narrative that is skeptical of Biden and his administration. While the article cites sources and quotes, it does not balance these sharply critical perspectives with counterpoints or a neutral tone, thus reflecting an ideological stance rather than purely factual reporting on the involved parties’ positions.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

THC ban edges closer to finish line, lawsuits expected | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-23 17:59:00


The Texas legislature passed SB 3, a bipartisan bill aiming to ban THC sales, a priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick who cited dangers of unregulated THC targeting children, including sales near schools. The bill prohibits consumable hemp products containing THC while allowing regulated CBD and CBG products. It increases legal protections by banning sales to under-21s and enforcing strict packaging and labeling standards. Opponents, including the hemp industry and some lawmakers, warn it could cause job losses, revenue decline, and limit veterans’ access to THC for relief. Hometown Hero plans to sue to block the ban, advocating for regulation over prohibition.

(The Center Square) – The Texas legislature has passed with bipartisan support a bill that would ban Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from being sold in Texas.

It’s a legislative priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick’s, who’s been advocating for the ban for months. The Senate passed SB 3 earlier in the session. The House just passed its version. Different bill versions need to be ironed out before the final bill is sent to Gov. Greg Abbott.

The bill faces strong opposition from the hemp industry, which is expected to sue to stop it from going into effect.

“Since 2019, retailers across Texas have exploited a state agriculture law to sell life-threatening, unregulated forms of THC to Texans, including children,” Patrick said. After conducting his own investigation, he found that the stores often target children and sell to them, with many stores located next to public schools – even though the products are only permitted to be sold to individuals over age 21. In one shop, they were openly selling gummies with 750 milligrams of THC, he said, “which is powerfully strong.”

Ahead of the House vote, Patrick published a video explaining the dangers of THC, saying there were 8,000 THC smoke shops and stores in Texas, many of which are located within 1,000 feet of public schools.

“THC is being sold to school children all across Texas,” he said. It isn’t regulated and “No one knows what’s in it. And it’s more powerful … than what you could buy from a drug dealer on the street. … They’re poisoning our children and we must ban it. We can’t regulate it. We don’t have enough police to check every store when there’re 8,000 of them.”

Speaking in support of the bill earlier this year, state Sen. Cesar Blanco, D-El Paso, said, “When you look at the data, the Texas Poison Control Network reported a 495% increase in marijuana related calls involving children aged 5 and under between 2017 and in 2022. In 2017, before Texas deregulated hemp those calls made up 4.8% of all cases.”

Earlier in the legislative session, Patrick held a news conference at which mothers testified about their children who died or were seriously mentally injured from THC, suffering psychosis, psychotic breaks, and needing antipsychotic medication to survive. At hearings held during the legislative session, doctors and law enforcement officers testified to the danger of THC in candy, sweets, chips and flavored vape products that they argue cause addiction, suicidal ideation, depression and anxiety disorders.

SB 3 creates a mechanism to monitor and regulate hemp production and bans the sale of all consumable hemp products that contain THC in Texas. Once the bill becomes law, only consumable hemp products that contain cannabidiol (CBD) or cannabigerol (CBG) will be legal in Texas and must comply with a strict regulatory framework.

SB 3 prohibits the purchase of consumable hemp products by anyone under age 21, prohibits marketing them to minors and requires them to be properly labeled and placed in tamper-evident, child-resistant, and resealable packaging. The bill also creates several new criminal offenses to prevent the sale of THC, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision, according to the bill analysis.

The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 27-4; the unofficial vote tally in the House was 87-54.

Those opposing the ban argue it would prevent veterans from having access to THC products, cause roughly 50,000 people to lose their jobs and reduce state sales tax revenue by more than $256 million in addition to local tax revenue losses.

Austin-based Hometown Hero says it will sue to fight the ban.

“We understand and emphasize with all of the Texans who would suffer as a direct result of SB3,” it said. “Hundreds of thousands of Texans and veterans use hemp-derived THC for relief every day, yet lawmakers proceeded with a full ban with that knowledge, rather than regulating the industry. We will do everything in our power to ensure that this ban doesn’t take effect, and are putting all of our resources into a lawsuit to do just that. We’ve fought for this industry, this community, and Texans rights to access these products for nearly a decade and we won’t stop now.”

State Rep. Ron Reynolds, D-Missouri City, argued the bill will kill small businesses, destroy $1.6 billion worth of wages overnight and “directly attacks Texas farmers, manufacturers and small businesses.” Instead of regulating the industry, he says a “total ban tells Texans what they can and cannot purchase or possess in a legal market, restricting personal freedom and ignoring the will of the majority of Texans.”

The post THC ban edges closer to finish line, lawsuits expected | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on the Texas legislature’s passage of a bill banning THC sales, presenting the positions of key political figures, proponents, and opponents without overt editorializing. The language largely reflects the viewpoints of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and other supporters emphasizing public safety and protecting children, which aligns with conservative and law-and-order framing common in center-right discourse. Opposition voices, including industry groups and some Democrats, are also included, highlighting economic and personal freedom concerns. The article thus conveys ideological perspectives from both sides but leans slightly toward the conservative viewpoint by giving prominence and detailed coverage to the bill’s justification and Republican advocates.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Shreveport has 44% decline in reported homicides compared to this time last year | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Emilee Calametti | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-23 15:41:00


Shreveport Police Department reports a 44% decrease in homicides this year, with 15 homicides so far compared to 27 last year. Overall crime is declining, including shots fired calls down from 1,149 to 828, and shootings causing injury reduced by 31%. Vehicle thefts fell 10%, armed robberies 52%, burglaries 17%, vehicle burglaries 23%, and carjackings 67%. However, sex crimes increased by 6%, with 200 reported this year versus 188 last year. Police Chief Wayne Smith and Councilman Grayson Boucher credit these improvements to the police department’s efforts in reducing crime across the city.

(The Center Square) — Updated reports from the Shreveport Police Department show crime is continuing to trend down in the city, with homicides decreasing by 44%.

Shreveport is still seeing a significant decrease in crimes, especially homicides. This year, the city reported 15 homicides year-to-date, a 44% decline from 2024. Last year, the department had 27 reported homicides for the same period. 

Homicides are not the only crime decreasing throughout the city.

Year-to-date shots fired calls number 828 so far this year, which is significantly lower than the same time last year when the department reported 1,149. In 2021, the department had 2,230 by this point in time. 

According to the report, shootings are also down year-to-date. These stats are incidents where someone is injured from a gunshot. This year, there have been 86 compared to 125 last year, showing a 31% reduction. The city saw the most in 2021, with 207 shootings that injured someone. 

Police Chief Wayne Smith noted that sex crimes are still reporting higher than previous year-to-date. There have been 200 reported sex crimes so far this year compared to 188 last year at this time — an increase of 6%.

Vehicle thefts are down 10%, armed robberies are down 52%, burglaries are down 17%, vehicle burglaries are down 23% and carjacking is down 67% compared to last year.

“It is very refreshing to be sitting here listening to these crime stats go down,” said Councilman Grayson Boucher. “It’s because of the work that the police department is doing. I can’t say enough for what you’ve done as chief.”

Emilee Ruth Calametti currently serves as Staff Reporter for The Center Square covering the Northwestern Louisiana region. She holds her M.A. in English from Georgia State University and an additional M.A. in Journalism from New York University. Her articles have been featured in DIG Magazine, Houstonia Magazine, Bookstr, inRegister, EntertainmentNOW, AOL, MSN, and more. She is a Louisiana native with over seven years of journalism experience.

The post Shreveport has 44% decline in reported homicides compared to this time last year | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on crime statistics in Shreveport without endorsing or criticizing any political ideology. It reports changes in crime rates, quotes a police chief and a city councilman, and provides factual data, all of which contribute to a neutral tone. The language is factual and unembellished, focusing on quantitative changes rather than framing the information to support a particular political viewpoint. Therefore, the content maintains a neutral stance and serves as objective reporting on the issue of crime trends.

Continue Reading

Trending