Connect with us

The Center Square

Here’s what’s in Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-25 08:11:00


The Republican-led budget reconciliation bill, passed narrowly by the House, extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts and includes major reforms to Medicaid, food stamps, student loans, and border security, costing \$3.3 trillion to \$5.2 trillion over 10 years. It permanently codifies tax cuts like the child tax credit and QBI deduction, while increasing taxes on universities and foundations. Medicaid changes tighten eligibility and impose work requirements, reducing enrollment by millions but still growing overall spending. The bill reforms SNAP benefits, boosts border security funding, imposes immigrant fees, and scales back clean energy subsidies. Senate changes are expected before final approval.

(The Center Square) – Republicans’ mammoth budget reconciliation bill includes major changes to Medicaid, food stamps, student loans and more. It also permanently extends President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts – at a cost of at least $3.3 trillion.

Passing the House Thursday by a razor-thin margin, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act funds large swaths of Trump’s policy agenda while authorizing a $4 trillion debt ceiling hike. The legislation consists of 11 separate House committee prints that collectively fulfill the budget resolution’s 10-year spending and savings instructions

The bill includes more than $1.5 trillion in savings found by congressional committees. But budget watchdogs say the package, if passed by the Senate without major alterations, will still add anywhere from $3.3 to $5.2 trillion to the national debt and at least $3.2 trillion to the primary deficit by 2035. 

Most of the cost stems from the Ways and Means committee’s portion, which deals with codifying most of the sunsetting 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law. 

That includes the higher standard deduction for nearly all tax filers, the $2,000 child tax credit – both parents will need a Social Security number to claim it – and the 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction.

American manufacturers would particularly benefit from the legislation, which would allow them to deduct 100% of facility improvement or construction costs. The bill would deal a blow to large universities by increasing endowment taxes, as well as hiking taxes on many private foundations.

Republicans clashed over how high to raise the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction cap, eventually settling on $40,000 for taxpayers earning less than $500,000 annually, via a last-minute Rules Committee amendment.

The tax portion of the reconciliation bill also features many short-term tax provisions set to expire after four years. Those include boosting the maximum standard deduction from $15,000 to $16,000 for single filers and from $30,000 to $32,000 for joint filers. The maximum child tax credit will see a $500 increase and the QBI deduction will rise to 23%. 

Other temporary changes lasting until fiscal year 2028 include nixing taxes on tips and overtime, making the adoption tax credit partially refundable, ending interest on loans for American cars, and increasing tax deductions for eligible seniors by $4,000.

While lawmakers on the Ways and Means committee contributed most to the cost of the reconciliation package, the Energy and Commerce committee found the most savings – over $988 billion – primarily via scaling back the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act and Medicaid spending.

Energy and Commerce’s addition claws back unobligated funds from the IRA and repeals or phases out more than a dozen IRA renewable energy-related subsidies.

Four tax credits related to alternative fuel vehicles, three credits related to home energy efficiency or “clean” energy sourcing, and the clean hydrogen production credit will end by 2026. After facing pressure from fiscal hawks, the Rules Committee pushed forward the 2032 phaseout deadline for the IRA’s clean electricity production and investment credits to 2028.

Medicaid reforms in the bill include changing program eligibility requirements back to pre-COVID-19 standards, imposing work requirements on most able-bodied adults without dependents, and closing loopholes exploited by states. 

The plan also axes federal funding to Planned Parenthood and other reproductive clinics, as well as prevents Medicaid and CHIP funding from going to gender transition procedures on children.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the changes will save hundreds of billions of dollars and make at least 7.7 million current Medicaid recipients – including 1.4 million people without verified citizenship status – ineligible for Medicaid coverage by 2034. But given the Biden-era 20% spending increase on Medicaid, total program spending will still grow by at least 3% a year for the next decade.

Another last-minute addition by the Rules committee doubled down on Medicaid reforms, accelerating the work requirement deadline to take effect in 2026 and preventing states from implementing new taxes on providers.

House Democrats, none of whom voted for the bill, repeatedly called the Medicaid changes “cruel.” They similarly blasted the Agriculture Committee’s section of the bill, which saves $230 billion by reforming the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

SNAP reforms include requiring states to cover 5% of their SNAP benefit cost share by fiscal year 2028, with their contribution increasing the higher the state’s payment error rate. States have an average payment error rate of 11.68%, as of 2023. 

The bill also closes state “waiver gimmicks” that have exempted 84% of able-bodied adult beneficiaries without dependents from SNAP work requirements, plus bans all noncitizens aside from legal permanent residents from receiving benefits.

Trump’s border security and defense priorities received hundreds of billions of additional dollars collectively from the Homeland Security, Judiciary, and Armed Services committees’ portions of the megabill.

The Homeland Security committee authorized approximately $47 billion for the construction of the “Border Barrier System,” a technologically enhanced southern border wall. Roughly $5 billion will go toward building new U.S. Customs and Border Patrol facilities and checkpoints and $6 billion toward border agent workforce and hiring.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement receives a $45 billion funding boost meant for building new detention centers from the Judiciary Committee’s print. 

Notably, the bill also imposes new fees on immigrants, implementing a $1,000 minimum fee on migrants seeking asylum and a $500 fee on individuals requesting Temporary Protected Status, which is currently free. Sponsors of unaccompanied migrant children will face a $3,500 charge, while many work permit applications will carry a $550 fee that renews every six months.

The Armed Services committee portion contributes $5 billion to border security efforts, but most of the $150 billion in spending is slated for shipbuilding, restocking munitions, increasing weapon production capacity and nuclear deterrence, and financing the Golden Dome for America project

While the Transportation and Infrastructure committee gives $22 billion to the Coast Guard and $15 billion to the Federal Aviation Administration for infrastructure modernization, it imposes new fees on electric vehicle owners. 

Under the bill, EV owners will have to pay $250 annually as a contribution to the dwindling Highway Trust Fund. Owners of combustion engine vehicles contribute to the HTF every time they fill up their gas tank.

The Natural Resources committee checks the box for Trump’s energy agenda by expanding onshore oil and gas leasing on federal lands, reducing drilling royalty rates to 12.5%, and permanently reinstating coal leasing suspended by Biden.

A final blow to the Biden administration in Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” comes from the Education and Workforce committee’s addition. It axes the 2023 SAVE loan repayment program, which amounted to potentially billions in complete loan forgiveness for thousands of student borrowers. 

The legislation also simplifies and shrinks student loan repayment options and penalizes higher education institutions that allow students to take out unaffordable levels of debt. Additionally, it restricts Pell Grant eligibility to students taking more than six credit hours and low-income students in short-term programs.

Under normal Senate filibuster rules, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act would have no chance of passing. But since the budget reconciliation process bypasses the filibuster, Republican leaders are hopeful the package will make it to the president’s desk. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., is aiming for that to happen by Independence Day.

Senate Republicans are eyeing potentially derailing changes, however, with some senators opposing the IRA and Medicaid cuts – key compromises Johnson made with House hardliners – with others wanting even more spending reductions.

“I think you can improve the product,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said in an interview about the bill with Punchbowl News. “There are certain things the Senate wants to have its imprint on.”

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, cautioned against drastic bill reforms.

“I’m urging my Senate colleagues to take up our balanced reconciliation package – and only consider changes that further strengthens our fiscal reforms – so we can quickly advance this One Big Beautiful Bill to the President’s desk and deliver for the American people,” he said.

The post Here’s what’s in Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

This article reports extensively on a large Republican-led budget reconciliation bill, highlighting its provisions largely in favorable or neutral terms, such as extensions of Trump-era tax cuts, support for manufacturers, border security funding, and reductions to Medicaid and other social programs. The tone emphasizes fiscal conservatism, deficit reduction, and law-and-order themes consistent with Republican priorities. While it includes some critique from Democrats, it largely presents the legislation from the perspective of Republican sponsors and supporters, with limited critical framing. The article’s language, focus, and selection of details reflect a right-leaning editorial stance, supporting Republican policy goals without overt critique.

The Center Square

Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Chris Wade – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-26 08:22:00


New York Gov. Kathy Hochul opposes President Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from states allowing cashless bail, arguing it misunderstands New York’s bail reforms. Trump claims cashless bail endangers public safety by releasing suspects who commit further crimes. Hochul’s office counters that New York hasn’t eliminated cash bail, but reformed laws to hold violent offenders accountable, contributing to a historic low in violent crime rates. Republicans praise Trump’s stance, blaming bail reform for rising crime. NYC Mayor Eric Adams criticized rivals who support bail reform, while Cuomo’s camp defended the changes and questioned the legality of Trump’s order.

(The Center Square) — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is pushing back on President Donald Trump’s “reckless” push to do away with cashless bail, saying the move to withhold federal funding would undermine public safety. 

Trump signed an executive order Monday threatening to withhold federal funding from states and cities that allow cashless bail, arguing the policies pose a threat to public safety. The White House also released a memo with the new order highlighting several cases where suspects in New York and other cities were released without bail but later accused of committing other crimes, including murder, drug dealing and sexual assault. 

“Maintaining order and public safety requires incarcerating individuals whose pending criminal charges or criminal history demonstrate a clear ongoing risk to society,” Trump’s directive states. “When these individuals are released without bail under city or State policies, they are permitted — even encouraged — to further endanger law-abiding, hard-working Americans because they know our laws will not be enforced.” 

However, a Hochul spokesperson issued a statement blasting Trump for misunderstanding how New York’s bail law works and pointing to changes in the law that strike a balance between due process and protecting public safety. 

“New York has not eliminated cash bail. His reckless threat to withhold federal funds would only undercut law enforcement and make our communities less safe,” the statement said. “The fact is Governor Hochul changed New York’s bail laws so violent offenders are held accountable, and as a result rearrests are down. New York now has one of the lowest violent crime rates in six decades.” 

New York eliminated bail for most nonviolent felony charges in 2020 as part of overhauling the criminal justice system. A series of high-profile murders and shootings across the state prompted Hochul and others to call for tightening pre-detention bail laws. A provision in the two-year $229 billion budget signed by Hochul in April included changes to the system that gave New York state judges more discretion to keep dangerous suspects locked up ahead of trial.

But Trump’s order drew praise from New York Republicans, who have sought unsuccessfully for years to do away with the state’s bail law. 

“Kathy Hochul and NY Democrats’ failed bail reform has been a catastrophic disaster leading to a crime crisis in New York making every family and community less safe,” U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, a New York City Republican, said in a statement. “Again and again, Kathy Hochul has prioritized violent criminals over law-abiding New Yorkers. Enough is enough.” 

New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who has pushed for changes to the state’s bail law, used Trump’s order to criticize his main rivals in the upcoming election, Democratic nominee and Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who signed the original bail reform law. 

“Zohran Mamdani wants to finish what Andrew Cuomo started,” Adams, who is running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary, said in a statement. “Cuomo signed the reckless bail reform law that unleashed violent criminals into YOUR neighborhoods. Now Mamdani wants to take it even further by defunding the NYPD and leaving YOUR city — especially Black and Brown communities — defenseless.” 

A Cuomo campaign spokesman defended the 2020 bail reforms and criticized Adams for claiming that he is the “law and order” candidate in the mayoral race.

“As New York has cash bail for violent offenses, and repeat offender arrests have been decreasing, it’s clear that the drafters of this executive order don’t know the facts about New York’s law,” Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in the statement. “But it doesn’t matter as it’s very likely that this order — like many of this administration’s EOs — won’t stand up in court.”

The post Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the differing ideological positions and actions of political figures regarding bail reform without endorsing a particular viewpoint. It presents statements from both Governor Kathy Hochul and former President Donald Trump, as well as responses from other political actors across the spectrum, including Republicans and Democrats. The language remains factual and balanced, focusing on quotes and policy descriptions rather than using emotionally charged or persuasive language that would indicate a clear bias. Thus, the content adheres to neutral reporting by outlining the debate and contrasting perspectives without promoting one side over the other.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-25 14:47:00


State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee, succeeding Michael Whatley, a 2026 Senate candidate from North Carolina. Both appointments were influenced by former President Donald Trump. Gruters, 48, an accountant and current state senator, won the post unopposed and emphasized the party’s alignment with Trump’s vision, aiming for a strong 2026 midterm showing. Trump praised Gruters for his role in significant Florida Republican victories since 2016. Gruters’ political career includes serving in the Florida House (2016-18) and Senate (since 2018). He remains in his Senate seat unless running for state CFO in 2026.

(The Center Square) – State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee.

He succeeds Michael Whatley, the North Carolinian running for a U.S. Senate seat in 2026. Both were tapped by Donald Trump, Whatley as the 2024 presidential cycle heated up and Gruters in Atlanta on Friday as Trump’s wingman for the party in the 2026 midterms.

Gruters, 48, is an accountant by trade. He is not required to resign his state Senate post; in the “resign-to-run” state law, he would need to if still planning to run for state chief financial officer in 2026.

That post was given to state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia on July 16 by second-term Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. Jimmy Patronis resigned the position and Ingoglia serves until the 2026 midterms.

Trump, a Palm Beach resident when not at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., had encouraged DeSantis to choose Gruters for CFO.

In a network broadcast interview after elected, Gruters said, “This is the president’s party. This is the president’s vision, overall. The party fully embraces the president. We’re going to ride the president all the way to victory in the midterms, and we are going to win big.”

Whatley called his time as chairman “the honor of a lifetime.”

“I am immensely proud of the work we accomplished, and I am excited to pass the torch on to Chairman Gruters,” he said. “Now, it’s time to get to work and fight for the people of North Carolina.”

Gruters had no opposition for election. On social media, Trump called Whatley “incredible” and again pledged his support for the senatorial campaign.

“As state senator and chairman of the Republican Party of Florida,” Trump said of Gruters, “Joe helped us deliver massive and historic victories across the state, including my big six wins, including primaries, in 2016, 2020 and 2024, and has helped us turn Florida red as red can be!”

The connection between Gruters and Trump dates more than a decade. History traces it in earnest to a Sarasota County Statesman of the Year dinner in 2012. He followed with support in 2015 while Marco Rubio, now secretary of state in the Trump administration, and Gov. Jeb Bush were presidential candidates.

Gruters is a former member (2016-18) of the state House of Representatives. He has served in the state Senate since 2018.

The post Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the election of Joe Gruters as chairman of the Republican National Committee, detailing his background, connections to Donald Trump, and statements made by involved parties. The tone is factual and descriptive, focusing on events and quotes without overtly endorsing or criticizing the subjects. However, the content centers on Republican figures and includes positive language from Trump and associates, which may reflect a slight center-right perspective due to the subject matter and source. Overall, it adheres mostly to neutral reporting by presenting information and direct quotes rather than promoting a particular ideological viewpoint.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Transportation energy prices below national norm as Labor Day approaches | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-25 09:11:00


North Carolina motorists are paying about 30 cents less per gallon for gasoline than the national average, with the state average at $2.86 for unleaded gas and $3.45 for diesel. Prices are slightly lower in the mountains and higher along the coast. Compared to last year, gas and diesel prices have decreased. The state follows EPA rules requiring summer blend fuel until September 15, adding 10-15 cents per gallon. North Carolina has over 8 million combustion engine vehicles and more than 100,000 electric vehicles, with EV charging rates below the national average. Motor fuel taxes fund state transportation projects.

(The Center Square) – As they often have throughout the summer, motorists in North Carolina are paying about 30 cents less than the nation on average for gasoline.

Summer’s unofficial closing of Labor Day weekend arrives this week, with many families already in the state’s tourism meccas. The state average for a gallon of unleaded gasoline is $2.86, with prices a little lower in the mountains and a tick higher along the 320 miles of ocean shoreline.

A year ago, the state average was $3.11, according to the American Automobile Association. The average for diesel is $3.45, down from $3.64 a year ago.

Nationally, the unleaded gas average is $3.16, down from $3.35 last year, and diesel is $3.68, down slightly from $3.70, respectively.

Per Environmental Protection Agency rules in place from June 1 to Sept. 15, the less volatile summer blend fuel must be sold. Price impact is generally considered 10 cents to 15 cents higher per gallon.

Combustion engine consumers make up more than 8 million vehicle registrations in the nation’s ninth-largest state.

North Carolina’s electric vehicle charging rate average, according to AAA, is 33.2 cents per kilowatt-hour. The national average is 36.3 cents per kWh. More than 100,000 zero-emission vehicles are registered in the state. At the start of the calendar year, the state norm was 33.5 cents per kWh and the national was 34.7 cents per kWh.

Ten states have lower average prices for a gallon of unleaded; 14 are lower for diesel; and seven are lower in electric.

Among 14 major metro areas, the least expensive average for unleaded gas is in Fayetteville at $2.76. The most expensive area is the Durham-Chapel Hill metro area at $2.92.

Diesel is the most consumer-friendly ($3.29) in the Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton market.

North Carolina’s 40.3 cents per gallon tax rate for 2025 is topped by California (59.6), Pennsylvania (57.6), Washington (49.4), Illinois (47), Maryland (46.1), and New Jersey (44.9).

Motor fuel taxes in the state fund the Department of Transportation’s highway and multi-modal projects, accounting for more than half of the state transportation resources. The revenues go into the Highway Fund and the Highway Trust Fund.

The post Transportation energy prices below national norm as Labor Day approaches | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article provides a straightforward report on gasoline and diesel prices in North Carolina compared to national averages, along with information about electric vehicle charging rates and state fuel taxes. The language is neutral and factual, focusing on data, statistics, and relevant state policies without endorsing or criticizing any political ideology or party. The content neither advances a particular political perspective nor uses charged language, making it a clear example of neutral, factual reporting rather than an article with discernible political bias.

Continue Reading

Trending