Connect with us

The Center Square

Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 09:21:00


A federal judge in Massachusetts, Brian Murphy, attempted to block deportation of violent criminal foreign nationals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court. On July 4, eight convicted felons from countries including Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam, and South Sudan were deported to South Sudan under new agreements allowing detention of criminal foreign nationals. These individuals had extensive criminal records and final removal orders but remained in the U.S. due to previous diplomatic refusals by their home countries. Justice Elena Kagan affirmed the Trump administration’s authority to deport such criminals, rejecting Murphy’s injunction that contradicted federal law.

(The Center Square) – A federal district judge in Massachusetts, Judge Brian Murphy, sought to prevent deportation of violent criminals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

On July 4, eight convicted felons, citizens of Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam and South Sudan, were deported to South Sudan. The country’s leaders have entered into an agreement with the U.S. to detain criminal foreign nationals, including those who aren’t their citizens. El Salvador and others have entered into similar agreements, with the U.S. government agreeing to pay for detention costs.

U.S. deportation efforts rely on diplomacy with foreign governments, many of which won’t accept their own citizens. Under previous administrations, federal efforts to deport criminal illegal foreign nationals failed because many countries wouldn’t take back their citizens. As a result, they illegally remained in the U.S. even though they had deportation orders from a federal immigration judge, authorities have explained to The Center Square. Under the Trump administration, this has changed.

Those deported to South Sudan were all men illegally in the U.S. with extensive criminal histories, including felony convictions and prison sentences in the U.S. They all received due process in federal immigration court and received final removal orders from federal immigration judges that were never enforced, including one dating back to 1999.

Burmese national Kyaw Mya was convicted of lascivious acts with a child-victim under age 12 and sentenced to 10 years in prison and paroled after four years. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued March 17, 2022.

Burmese national Nyo Myint was convicted of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting and sentenced to 12 years in prison. He was also charged with aggravated assault-nonfamily strongarm and a registered sex offender. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued August 17, 2023.

Cuban national Enrique Arias-Hierro was convicted of homicide, armed robbery, false impersonation of official, kidnapping, and robbery strong arm. His final removal order was issued September 13, 1999. Due to Cuban authorities refusing to take him, he remained illegally in the U.S.

Cuban national Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones was convicted of attempted first-degree murder with a weapon, battery and larceny, and cocaine possession and trafficking. ICE Miami officers arrested him in April; his final removal order was issued Dec. 4, 2012.

Laos national Thongxay Nilakout was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Los Angeles officers arrested him in January. His final removal order was issued July 12, 2023.

Mexican national Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Miami officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 16, 2005.

Vietnamese national Tuan Thanh Phan was convicted of first-degree murder and second-degree assault and sentenced to 22 years in prison. ICE Seattle officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 17, 2009.

The only South Sudan national in the deportation group was Dian Peter Domach, who was first encountered by ICE in 2011 and received a final removal order on July 19, 2011. He wasn’t deported and remained in the U.S. illegally and committed a range of crimes. He was convicted of robbery and possession of a firearm, possession of defaced firearm, possession of burglar’s tools, and driving under the influence.

Murphy, born in 1979, a former public defender and a criminal defense attorney, was appointed by former President Joe Biden less than six months ago. Murphy argued a Supreme Court ruling didn’t apply to his injunction, seeking to keep convicted felons, including sex offenders and murderers, in the U.S. in violation of federal law. His order violated due process, critics argue, because the convicted felon illegal foreign nationals already appeared multiple times before federal immigration judges who issued judgements against them and final orders of removal.

Justice Elena Kagan chastised Murphy in the court’s July 3 ruling, affirming the Trump administration’s authority to deport illegal foreign nationals to third-party countries.

The post Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article predominantly presents facts about the deportation of convicted foreign criminals and the associated legal proceedings, but it is framed in a manner that aligns with a law-and-order, tough-on-crime perspective commonly associated with right-leaning viewpoints. The language emphasizes the criminality of the individuals, the failure of previous administrations (implicitly the Biden administration) to enforce deportations effectively, and the positive framing of the Trump administration’s policies as a corrective measure. The piece also characterizes Judge Murphy’s injunction as an obstruction of justice and highlights criticism of his ruling, which reflects a particular ideological stance favoring stricter immigration enforcement and portrays judicial resistance as misguided. While it reports on judicial and executive actions, the tone and selective details contribute to a bias that leans toward supporting hardline immigration enforcement policies typical of conservative perspectives, rather than maintaining strictly neutral or centrist reporting.

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 07:52:00


On Independence Day, Elon Musk proposed creating the America Party as an alternative to the traditional two-party system, supported by a social media poll showing 2-1 favorability. For recognition in North Carolina, the party must meet criteria such as achieving 2% of votes in the last general election, collecting signatures from 0.25% of registered voters by May 16, or fielding candidates in 70% of states during presidential elections. The America Party could qualify for the 2025 municipal elections. Musk’s platform emphasizes debt reduction, tech advancement, free speech, and centrist policies. Currently, four parties are recognized in North Carolina, with a large unaffiliated voting bloc.

(The Center Square) – After an Independence Day question on his social media platform, the world’s richest man offered Americans an alternative political party independent of Democrats and Republicans.

For North Carolinians, that means one of three criteria will have to be met before the America Party – or any other creations – can be officially recognized for purposes of being on the ballots.

Musk, a 53-year-old space and automotive industry phenom, served Republican second-term President Donald Trump in the Department of Government Efficiency. Reviews were mixed. On Friday, the 249th celebration of the Fourth of July, Musk asked on social media, “Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party?”

His poll, he reported the next day, was 2-1 in favor and he wrote, “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

Registration with the Federal Election Commission would be necessary on the national level.

For recognition by the North Carolina State Board of Elections, as outlined in the General Statutes, the three ways involve the options of a party’s voters getting at least 2% of the entire vote cast in the most recent general election; signature petition of at least 0.25% of all registered voters who voted in the most recent gubernatorial election; or a group of voters showing documentation the group had their candidate on the general election ballot in 70% of the states (35) in the most recent presidential election.

The first and third of those are moot at this point; the America Party was not in existence for the 2024 cycle. In fact, Musk was a significant campaign piece for Trump.

For petitions, they must be filed with the state board before noon on June 1 of the year of the election the party wishes to participate in. There’s also a stipulation that, so that counties can verify, the signatures must go to them 15 days before being due to the state. That’s May 16.

The 2025 cycle is known as municipal elections in the state, and 2026 is the midterms – second-longest ballot of the four cycles for the state. The America Party could get into place for next year.

Last year’s governor’s race drew 5,591,547 votes among Democrat Josh Stein, Republican Mark Robinson, Libertarian Mike Ross, Vinny Smith (Constitution Party) and Wayne Turner (Green Party). A quarter of 1% would be 13,979 (rounded up).

More than once, Musk reposted a question on party platform that listed reduce debt, responsible spending only; modernize military with artificial intelligence/robotics; pro tech, accelerate to win in artificial intelligence; less regulation across the board but especially in energy; free speech; “pro natalist,” a form of pronatalism or belief in human reproduction and a high birth rate; and centrist policies everywhere else.

Among other posts through the weekend from Musk, estimated Monday morning by Forbes at more than $405 billion, was one that included the following:

• Tesla will never succeed.

• Elon can’t start a space company.

• Neuralink will never work.

• SpaceX will never reuse a rocket.

• Elon can’t run a social media.

Three political parties lost recognition through the last cycle and North Carolina has four recognized today. Alphabetically, they are the Democratic Party, the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, and the Republican Party.

By registrations through Saturday, those unaffiliated (more than 2.8 million, or 38.3%) have the largest bloc, followed by Democrats (2.3 million, or 30.6%), Republicans (nearly 2.3 million, or 30.4%), Libertarians (only 45,986, or 0.6%) and Green (just 4,024, or 0.05%).

The post Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article predominantly reports factual information about Elon Musk’s recent social media initiative to form a new political party called the America Party, outlining the legal requirements for new party recognition in North Carolina, voter registration statistics, and Musk’s political background. The tone is neutral, presenting Musk’s statements and related voting data without emotive or persuasive language. While it includes references to Musk’s own political history and platform ideas, it does so descriptively rather than endorsing or criticizing them. The article balances coverage of multiple parties and election rules, adhering to straightforward reporting rather than promoting an ideological stance, thus maintaining a centrist, neutral perspective.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

At least 69 dead, 51 missing as recovery efforts continue in Hill Country | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-06 19:20:00


At least 69 people died and 51 are missing following July 4 flash floods in Texas Hill Country, Governor Greg Abbott reported. The dead and missing include 59 confirmed deceased and 11 missing at Camp Mystic, Kerr County, plus 10 others dead and 41 missing statewide. Many missing are adults camping near the river, with ongoing searches continuing throughout affected areas. Over 1,500 personnel and 925 vehicles from 20 state agencies are involved in rescue and recovery. Flash flooding threats remain, urging Texans to stay off roads. More than 850 people have been rescued, including 525 by the Texas National Guard and 165 by a heroic U.S. Coast Guard swimmer. The Trump administration supports federal disaster relief efforts.

(The Center Square) – At least 69 people are dead and 51 are missing as a result of the July 4 flash flood event in Texas Hill Country, Gov. Greg Abbott said at a news  conference Sunday night.

There are 59 confirmed deceased and 11 missing from Camp Mystic, in Kerrville and Kerr County, Abbott said. In the Central Texas area, there are confirmed 10 additional people deceased. Statewide, in all areas affected by flooding, there are 41 known missing.

But it’s unknown how many remain missing. Abbott said it was important to clarify that “there were so many people who were just camping out – not children in camps – but adults camping out near the river, people in RVs and things like that,” who are missing. “There are people who are missing, who are not on the known, confirmed missing because we don’t yet know who they are,” he said.

Authorities are involved in ongoing searches “throughout the entire river system to find anybody who may be missing,” he said. Abbott also called on members of the public to contact local Kerr County officials if they believe they know someone is missing who was camping in the area.

“Please contact the local officials in Kerr County and let them know that you have the name, identification and other information about a person who is suspected to be missing,” he said. “Call only if you have specific information,” otherwise calls could slow emergency response efforts, he said.

The state has deployed more than 1,500 personnel and more than 925 vehicles and equipment assets across 20 state agencies in response to the flood event.

Expected dangerous weather conditions continue, Abbott also warned, adding that “life threatening danger over the next 24 to 48 hours” exists. Flash flooding could occur in the regions of “the Big Country, Concho Valley, Central Texas and Kerrville,” he said.

“There are still public safety issues and lives to be saved in Kerr County, and all of these regions,” he said.

He urged Texans to remain vigilant and stay off the roads.

Texas Department of Public Safety Colonel Director Freeman Martin said three people have been reported missing in Williamson County, one has been recovered; the fire chief and a 17-year-old female are missing in Burnet County.

At least six people are confirmed dead and 17 are reported missing in Travis and Burnet counties as a result of flood waters, authorities confirmed to the Dallas Morning News.

Recovering operations are ongoing for everyone including “every single one of the children who were at Camp Mystic, as well as anybody else,” Abbott said. After visiting what’s left of the camp, he said, “it was nothing short of horrific to see what those young children went through.”

“We know that parents and families, they want information, they want closure, and we want them to know that we are working as swiftly as possible to get them accurate information that will provide that closure,” Abbott said.

More than 850 people have been rescued, the majority by the Texas Military Department.

Texas National Guard helped rescue/evacuate 525 people, 366 by air and 159 by ground; 20 were in San Sabo County and five in Burnet County, Texas Military Department Adjutant General Major General Thomas Suelzer said.

One single U.S. Coast Guard officer rescued a record 165 people.

U.S. Coast Guard rescue swimmer Petty Officer Scott Ruskin “directly saved an astonishing 165 victims in the devastating flooding in central Texas,” Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said. “This was the first rescue mission of his career and he was the only triage coordinator at the scene. Scott Ruskin is an American hero. His selfless courage embodies the spirit and mission of the USCG.”

The Trump administration is supporting recovery efforts, including the president already approving a major disaster declaration authorizing FEMA assistance.

The post At least 69 dead, 51 missing as recovery efforts continue in Hill Country | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article primarily reports factual information about the tragic July 4 flash flood event in Texas, focusing on casualty numbers, ongoing rescue efforts, and official statements from Governor Greg Abbott and other authorities. The tone is neutral and informative, without emotive or partisan language. It highlights government response and the severity of the disaster, mentioning support from the Trump administration in a straightforward manner. There is no discernible ideological stance or bias in favor of any political party; instead, it adheres to factual reporting on the events and responses related to the flood.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

\Trump wants to set up a sovereign wealth fund. What is it? | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-06 08:17:00


President Trump’s plan to create a U.S. sovereign wealth fund remains vague, with no official proposal released despite a 90-day deadline. The White House says Treasury and Commerce Departments are working on it, but details on funding, governance, and investment strategy are unclear. Experts note challenges due to U.S. political structure and debt, contrasting with established funds like Norway’s $1.8 trillion Government Pension Fund Global and Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund. Transparency and control are major concerns. The Peterson Institute warns without clarity, the fund risks inefficiency and corruption, potentially harming the U.S. economy and markets.

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump’s plan to create a sovereign wealth fund that’s the world’s envy remains undefined.

In the meantime, Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global is among the largest in the world, with more than $1.8 trillion in assets. 

In February, Trump told Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick they had 90 days to present him with a plan for a sovereign wealth fund. That time has passed and no plans have been released. 

“Treasury and Commerce Departments have formulated plans for a Sovereign Wealth Fund, but no final decisions have yet been made,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said. 

Ana Nacvalovaite, a sovereign wealth funds research fellow at the University of Oxford’s Kellogg College, said the fund’s appearance depends on the details, including funding mechanisms, investment strategies, fund structure, and governance.

Nacvalovaite noted that relatively little information is known about the U.S. plans for a sovereign wealth fund. However, she said many other countries have established funds that the U.S. could follow, but the U.S. will likely face challenges.

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, with $925 billion in assets, was established by royal decree in 1971. That could be one roadmap, but America has a different culture and government.

“There is a huge difference between a fund run by a country … where the Royals rule everything, versus an American system where it doesn’t quite work that way,” Nacvalovaite said. 

Another question that remains unanswered is how the administration would seed the fund and whether it would need help from Congress, which traditionally allocates federal revenue. The U.S. has $36.2 trillion in debt and hasn’t had a surplus budget since 2001. The White House noted in February that the U.S. government holds about $5.7 trillion in assets. The administration said the U.S. holds far more in natural resources.

Trump also is bringing in new revenue through tariffs. Just how much that generates could vary based on the final terms of trade deals the White House initially hoped to complete by July 9. Tariffs are taxes on imported goods paid to the federal government by the company that imports the goods.

In Norway, the government declared it owned all offshore oil in the North Sea in 1963. Much of the money in the Government Pension Fund Global now comes from a mix of investments, including stocks and real estate. The fund reports it owns nearly 1.5% of total shares in the world’s publicly listed companies.

Most SWFs don’t report everything, which could raise concerns in the U.S.

“Any state-owned investment vehicle must have a focused mandate and a highly transparent and accountable governance structure,” Adnan Mazarei, Anna Gelpern and Edwin M. Truman wrote in a report for the Peterson Institute for International Economics after Trump’s executive order.

Nacvalovaite said some SWFs share more information publicly than others.

“Let’s not forget that there are some sovereign wealth funds which are not transparent,” she told The Center Square.

Four months ago, Bessent said the U.S. would have a fund “within the next 12 months.” That timeline could prove challenging. 

Control in the U.S. would almost certainly be an issue. Some nations assign the task to a central bank or government agency. 

Norway’s Ministry of Finance has overall responsibility for the fund. It also issues management guidelines. Norges Bank manages the fund. 

Norway’s government gets some of the money to spend.

“The Norwegian government can spend only a small part of the fund, but this still amounts to almost 20% of the government budget,” according to the bank.

On average, the Norwegian government spends only the returns – estimated to be around 3% per year – not the fund’s capital.

The report from Peterson Institute for International Economics said the proposal carries risks, especially in absence of more information

“Without much greater clarity and a broadly shared understanding on these issues, a US SWF risks becoming a misplaced fiscal gimmick and an inefficient and potentially corrupt diversion of public resources that could do long-term damage to the US and global economy and financial markets,” it concluded.

The post \Trump wants to set up a sovereign wealth fund. What is it? | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on President Donald Trump’s plan to create a sovereign wealth fund by outlining facts, expert opinions, and comparisons with established funds like Norway’s. It presents multiple perspectives, including cautious views from experts and references to potential risks without endorsing or criticizing the proposal explicitly. The tone remains factual and neutral, focusing on the challenges and uncertainties surrounding the plan rather than advancing a particular ideological stance. Thus, it adheres to neutral, factual reporting by conveying the complexities of the issue without framing it through partisan bias.

Continue Reading

Trending