Connect with us

The Center Square

Frustrated with tariffs, some family businesses fight back | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-18 16:27:00

(The Center Square) – Victor Schwartz has been importing wine for nearly four decades, little of which prepared him to deal with President Donald Trump’s on-again, off-again tariffs.

The founder of New York-based wine and spirit importers VOS Selections is trying to run a business that imports from 16 countries as tariffs seemingly change on a whim. But that’s just one challenge in the heavily regulated alcohol industry. Schwartz has set prices with the state of New York. So, during Trump’s halting and constantly changing tariff rollouts at the beginning of April, Schwartz was setting prices for May, another challenge given the likelihood of changing prices.

Schwartz and his team of 19 employees reviewed hundreds of products by SKU, or stock-keeping unit codes, to try to determine how tariffs would affect their inventory. 

“We had to strategize with a very cloudy crystal ball in terms of what our pricing was going to be, how much of an impact was going to happen and how much could a particular product afford in terms of a price increase,” he told The Center Square. 

In the end, some of it came down to where the company was going to take a loss. 

“You had to make decisions on where you were going to eat it,” Shwartz said.

Schwartz was so frustrated that he and other business owners filed a lawsuit against Trump and his administration over the tariffs.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a similar lawsuit alleging that Trump doesn’t have the power he thinks he has to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Liberty Justice Center, the Texas nonprofit that filed suit on behalf of VOS Selections and four other businesses, on Friday asked a judge for a temporary restraining order to stop tariffs from going into effect while the court determines how to proceed. 

The group’s 68-page request asks for a temporary restraining order to prevent the implementation of the April 2 tariffs Trump announced. 

“The power claimed by the President here is extreme: he claims the power to unilaterally impose infinite tariffs of his choosing on any country he chooses – even countries with which we run a trade surplus,” the TRO request notes. “Any grant of such authority by Congress to the President should qualify as a major question subject to the strictest judicial scrutiny – which this claim of authority under IEEPA cannot survive.”

California’s lawsuit noted the word “tariffs” doesn’t appear in the 1977 law and that no previous president – except Trump briefly during his first term – has used the IEEPA to impose tariffs. Both the California suit and the LJC suit claim Congress, not the president, has the power to impose tariffs.

The LJC suit says IEEPA was passed to curb presidential power. 

“The statute was passed in 1977, in the wake of various presidential scandals that motivated Congress to attempt to cabin the president’s emergency powers – the entire point was to take away power the President had previously asserted, and abused, under the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917,” the legal filing notes.

It further states: “If Congress had wanted to include broad tariff powers as part of IEEPA’s grant of emergency authority, it could have said as much.”

Trump has made bold promises about his tariffs on the campaign trail and since inauguration. He has said tariffs will make the U.S. “rich as hell,” bring back manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past, and shift the tax burden away from U.S. families.

A tariff is a tax on imported goods. The importer pays the tax and can either absorb the loss or pass the tax on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

In his “Liberation Day” speech, Trump said foreign nations for decades have stolen American jobs, factories and industries. He said the tariffs would bring in new jobs, factories and industries and return the U.S. to a manufacturing superpower.

“Our country and its taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”

Some nations, including China, have responded with retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Others have signaled they are eager to make a deal with the Trump administration. Trump has not yet announced any trade deals. Trump paused the higher tariffs for 90 days, giving his administration limited time to make deals with 75 nations the White House said reached out seeking trade negotiations.

The post Frustrated with tariffs, some family businesses fight back | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

Two Israeli diplomats killed in D.C. ‘antisemitic’ attack | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Sarah Roderick-Fitch – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-22 07:44:00


Two Israeli embassy staffers, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, were shot and killed in Washington, D.C., in a targeted antisemitic attack outside the Capital Jewish Museum after a diplomatic event. The shooter reportedly shouted “Free Palestine” during the attack. The FBI quickly responded, arresting the suspect. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu condemned the attack and ordered enhanced security for Israeli missions globally. President Trump also denounced the violence, calling for an end to antisemitism. This shooting follows other recent antisemitic incidents, including protests at universities and the 2018 Tree of Life Synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh.

(The Center Square) – Two Israeli embassy staffers were shot and killed late Wednesday in Washington, D.C., in what officials are describing as a targeted antisemitic attack and act of terror.

The shooting occurred outside the Capital Jewish Museum following an event for diplomats. Multiple media reports say the alleged shooter repeatedly shouted, “Free Palestine,” following the attack.

The Israeli Embassy identified the victims as Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim in a social media post, calling the pair “friends and colleagues.”

“This evening, a terrorist shot and killed them as they exited an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in DC. The entire embassy staff is heartbroken and devastated by their murder. No words can express the depth of our grief and horror at this devastating loss,” the embassy added.

The FBI was on scene quickly, as the shooting occurred a short distance from the headquarters. Dan Bongino, deputy director of the FBI, confirmed the suspect had been taken into custody and was being interviewed by D.C. Metropolitan Police and members of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

“Last night’s act of terror has the full attention of your FBI. Targeted acts of anti-Semitic violence are typically carried out by spineless, gutless cowards. And the penalties will be harsh as we tighten up this investigation and run down any additional leads. I should have additional updates for you shortly as I head back to FBI HQ,” Bongino posted to X.

Attorney General Pam Bondi was also on scene following the attack. According to a post from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, she had been in contact following the shooting.

President Donald Trump quickly condemned the attacks, also describing the attack as antisemitic.

“These horrible D.C. killings, based obviously on antisemitism, must end, NOW! Hatred and Radicalism have no place in the USA. Condolences to the families of the victims. So sad that such things as this can happen! God Bless You ALL!,” the president posted on his Truth Social account.

Netanyahu said in response that he was instructing security officials to “strengthen protection” for Israeli missions worldwide, while raising “the level of security for all state envoys.”

The shooting in D.C. follows a string of antisemitic uprisings and attacks, including violent protests at several universities across the country and a 2018 Tree of Life Synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh, Penn., killing 11 worshipers.

The post Two Israeli diplomats killed in D.C. ‘antisemitic’ attack | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports factual events related to the deadly shooting of Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, D.C., focusing on the incident itself, official responses, and the context of antisemitic violence in the U.S. It presents statements from multiple officials and includes direct quotes without using emotionally charged or partisan language. Although it references political figures such as President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the coverage is descriptive rather than advocative. The piece does not promote a particular ideological stance but rather aims to inform about a tragic event and its immediate aftermath, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Landry signs executive order for investigation of Orleans Parish jail break | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-21 16:27:00


Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signed an executive order addressing a major security breach at the Orleans Parish Correctional Facility, where 10 inmates escaped by removing a toilet and creating a hole in the wall. Five inmates have been recaptured, and the others remain at large. The order calls for an investigation by Attorney General Liz Murrill, audits by the state inspector general, and reviews of jail operations by the Department of Corrections. It also mandates judicial performance evaluations and the creation of a case-tracking system by the Metropolitan Crime Commission to improve the criminal justice system.

(The Center Square) — Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signed an executive order Wednesday that demands an “immediate and aggressive response across multiple state agencies to address a major breach at the Orleans Parish Correctional Facility. 

Ten inmates at the New Orleans facility escaped on Friday after removing a toilet and burrowing through a hole in the wall, even writing “to [sic] easy LOL” as a bit of parting graffiti.

Five of them have been caught, but the remainder are still at large. 

“Our criminal justice system is a three-legged bar stool. If one fails, the whole system collapses,” Landry said in a news release. “This brings us to where we are today – New Orleans willingly handed the jail keys to those leaders who vowed to keep criminals out of jail. Sadly, it worked.

“However, the state will not sit idly by. We are taking immediate, decisive action to ensure that this never happens again. The people of Louisiana deserve not only transparency and accountability, but also a justice system that is unyielding in its commitment to public safety – and our executive order demands it. Enough is enough.”

The executive order will task state Attorney General Liz Murrill with an investigation into the jail break. The order also requires the state inspector general to oversee audits of case files. The state Department of Corrections will review jail operations for compliance with jail standards and relocate any state inmates, for which the parish is paid by the DOC, to state facilities. 

The Louisiana Supreme Court will be asked to review the Orleans Criminal Court. His order also requires the state Judiciary Commission evaluate judicial performance in high-crime parishes.

Landry’s order also requires documentation of continuance requests by court clerks, and judges are encouraged to address unnecessary delays.

The Metropolitan Crime Commission will be asked to develop a system to track cases from arrest to conviction.

 

 

 

 

The post Landry signs executive order for investigation of Orleans Parish jail break | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article reports on Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry’s executive order following a jail break, focusing heavily on themes of law and order, public safety, and accountability within the criminal justice system. The framing emphasizes tough-on-crime rhetoric, including phrases like “enough is enough” and criticism of local leadership that “vowed to keep criminals out of jail,” which reflects a punitive, conservative approach to criminal justice issues. The coverage centers on the governor’s decisive actions and critiques of judicial leniency, which aligns with a right-leaning ideological stance. Although it largely presents facts and quotes the governor’s statements, the selected language and framing suggest a perspective supportive of stricter criminal justice policies, rather than a neutral or balanced reporting stance.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Court hands Texas a win on ‘pronoun police’ case | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-21 14:09:00


A North Texas district court ruled in favor of Texas in its lawsuit against the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) over Biden-era bathroom and pronoun policies. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton argued that EEOC guidance, which redefined “sex” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, was unlawful. The guidance required employers to accommodate “gender identity” preferences, such as bathroom and pronoun use. The court struck down both the 2021 and 2024 EEOC guidance, ruling it exceeded statutory authority and contradicted Supreme Court rulings. Paxton hailed the decision as a victory for common sense and the rule of law.

(The Center Square ) – A north Texas district court has ruled in favor of Texas in a lawsuit brought against the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission over its Biden-era Enforcement Guidance on bathroom and pronoun policies.

Last year, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the EEOC, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland and other federal officials to block an EEOC guidance that redefined the meaning of “sex” in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Center Square reported.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas Amarillo Division, the same court where Paxton filed a lawsuit in 2021 to block similar EEOC guidance, which the court struck down.

In 2021, the EEOC issued guidance requiring employers to allow exceptions for employees with stated “gender preferences and identities” to use bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, dress codes and personal pronouns contrary to their biological sex. Texas argued the guidance was unlawful and increased the scope of liability for all employers, including the state of Texas, which employed roughly 140,000 people in September 2022, according to the state comptroller’s office.

The lawsuit was later amended to include the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as a defendant after the agency promulgated a new rule threatening to cut federal funding to states that prohibit “sex-change” procedures on minors and classify the procedure as child abuse. Biden administration guidances would have allowed biological males to use women’s facilities and abolished sex-specific workplace dress codes.

The court struck down both rules, vacated the 2021 guidance and issued a binding declaratory judgment between the EEOC and Texas.

A similar ruling was issued on Thursday by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. The 2024 guidance sought to redefine “discrimination” to include “gender identity,” opening up private and state employers to lawsuits if they didn’t adopt sweeping “transgender inclusive policies” and comply with “pronoun police,” Paxton argued.

“The Biden Administration unlawfully tried to twist federal law into a tool for advancing radical gender ideology by attempting to force employers to adopt ‘transgender’ policies or risk being sued,” Paxton said. “The federal government has no right to force Texans to play along with delusions or ignore biological reality in our workplaces. This is a great victory for common sense and the rule of law.”

Kacsmaryk’s 34-page ruling says the EEOC exceeded its statutory authority and its guidance was “inconsistent with the text, history, and tradition of Title VII and recent Supreme Court precedent” and vacated it.

He also rejected EEOC’s arguments, said it misread the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v Clayton County, “cited no binding authority for its metastasized definition of ‘sex,’” and contravened Title VII by defining discriminatory harassment to include transgender bathroom, pronoun and dress preferences. He also said if Congress wanted to redefine “sex” in Title VII to include “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” it would have. “But it did not,” he wrote. “Congress has the power to amend statutes to add accommodations, EEOC does not. Yet that’s exactly what the enforcement guidance does.”

Kacsmaryk also listed sections of the guidance that he said are unlawful and vacated them.

The Trump administration EEOC is unlikely to appeal the ruling.

The post Court hands Texas a win on ‘pronoun police’ case | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article predominantly frames the EEOC and Biden administration policies regarding gender identity and workplace accommodations in a critical light, consistent with conservative perspectives on these issues. The use of phrases like “radical gender ideology,” “delusions,” and “pronoun police,” which are direct quotes from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, emphasizes a dismissive stance towards transgender-inclusive policies. The selection and presentation of legal arguments and rulings that invalidate federal guidance on gender identity also align with conservative legal interpretations. While the article reports facts about court rulings and legal disputes, the language and framing favor the Texas government’s viewpoint and legislative conservatism, contributing to a right-leaning ideological perspective rather than neutral, objective journalism.

Continue Reading

Trending