Federal court might revive Georgia lawsuit claiming mass challenges violate Voting Rights Act

by Stanley Dunlap, Georgia Recorder
May 14, 2025

A three-judge federal court panel spent an hour in a downtown Atlanta courthouse Tuesday hearing arguments from attorneys about whether a conservative Texas organization’s mass voting challenges during a 2021 runoff violated the federal Voting Rights Act by intimidating minority voters.

Plaintiff Fair Fight Action, founded by Stacey Abrams, argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit that U.S. District Court Judge Steve C. Jones erred in ruling last year that True the Vote’s challenge to 365,000 Georgia voters’ eligibility did not constitute intimidation prior to historic Democratic Senate victories in Georgia when Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff prevailed in the Jan. 5, 2021 runoff.

At least one of the judges expressed skepticism about the soundness of the lower court ruling.

Mass voter challenges have been a mainstay in Georgia since the 2020 presidential election, when Democrat Joe Biden narrowly defeated Republican Donald Trump by about 12,000 votes in the state.

According to Fair Fight Action and others who filed suit, True the Vote’s actions likely violated the Voting Rights Act by using inaccurate voter registration information and voter intimidation tactics such as posting citizen watchdogs to monitor people casting ballots.

On Tuesday, the federal panel peppered the attorneys with questions while acknowledging the case’s national significance on voting rights protections.

Attorney Jake Evans, representing True the Vote, asserted that the intent behind the mass challenges was to protect election integrity.

Evans said that the mass challenging of voters’ eligibility prior to the 2021 runoff did not amount to voter intimidation.

Fair Fight’s attorney, Uzoma Nkwonta of the Elias Law Group, argued that although Jones acknowledged recklessness in his ruling, the district court erred in not following the generally accepted standard for taking a substantial step towards the course of action that led to the injury.

Nkwonta referenced the Muscogee County election board having to take up more than 4,000 challenged ballots from the 2020 November general election based on faulty national change of address data.

“Not only was it foreseeable, it’s exactly what True the Vote wished for and exactly what True the Vote demanded,” Nkwonta said. “True the Vote issued press releases, prepared one-pagers, considered suing counties and did everything in their power to force (Muscogee) County to take the very action that they took.”

“The voter intimidation statutes have been enforced since the 1960s and even earlier, and they often involve cases in which individuals were applying laws or taking actions that were permissible in every other scenario, but were impermissible because they were intimidating voters,” Nkwonta said.

Evans said that over the course of a seven-day trial the voters who testified did not provide proof of how they were intimidated by True the Vote. He argued the plaintiffs have failed to prove a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

“An attempted act has to be traceable to the alleged intimidation,” Evans said. “Here, there are three individual voters where there is no connection. There is no alleged challenger that’s submitted to challenge these individuals. It’s completely untraceable.”

Judge Federico Moreno said he disagreed with Evans stating it was an “open and shut appeal.”

“I don’t know about the substantive 11 B claims, but I think the district court committed legal error with regard to the attempt,” Moreno said, referencing a section of the act that bars voter intimidation. “Attempt is generally defined, both in civil and criminal law, as the intent to carry out an objective and taking a substantial means toward doing that.”

Moreno provided an anecdote about how a bank robber told a teller, “Give me the money in your drawer” before then being thwarted by a security officer.

“That person has attempted to commit bank robbery, even though he has not stolen the money because he was stopped by a third-party intermediary,” Moreno said.

In addition, Moreno questioned Evans about whether an organization that filed several hundred frivolous voter challenges could be considered an attempt to intimidate voters.

Evans said that True the Vote did not use tactics to intimidate voters like other cases where robocalls were used to threaten voters or Native Americans were targeted by sending people to follow them into polling places.

“Judge Jones looked at the evidence,” Evans said. “He evaluated the demeanor of the witnesses. He saw the witnesses testify, evaluated the totality of the evidence, and he made a factual finding in his order that said that there was no intent by True the Vote to intimidate any voter, any witness.”

Georgia Recorder is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor John McCosh for questions: info@georgiarecorder.com.

The post Federal court might revive Georgia lawsuit claiming mass challenges violate Voting Rights Act appeared first on georgiarecorder.com

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article presents a legal case surrounding allegations of voter intimidation during the 2021 Georgia runoff election. It highlights the arguments from Fair Fight Action, a voting rights group founded by Stacey Abrams, as well as True the Vote, a conservative organization. The language and framing emphasize the significance of protecting voting rights, and the article provides detailed accounts from both sides. However, the presence of Fair Fight, a prominent Democratic-backed organization, along with a critical view of True the Vote’s actions, gives the article a lean towards the left, advocating for the protection of minority voters and questioning the motives of conservative groups.

SUMMARY: Cassava, a starchy vegetable popular in Caribbean, African, and South American dishes, is increasingly found in gluten-free U.S. foods like chips and breads. However, a Consumer Reports investigation revealed that over two-thirds of tested cassava products contained dangerous lead levels, posing health risks especially to children and pregnant women. Lead exposure can harm the brain, nervous system, immune function, and kidneys. Cassava flour was notably problematic. Some brands are removing cassava or adding lead warnings, while others are making changes. Consumers are advised to limit cassava intake and diversify gluten-free alternatives like buckwheat, corn, millet, and sorghum to reduce lead exposure.

Here is what you should know.

Source

SUMMARY: A local family in North Augusta, SC, is seeking help after their 9-month-old son, Theo Johnson, was diagnosed with End Stage Renal Disease. Born with Posterior Urethral Valves, Theo needs a kidney transplant to survive. His mother, Auburn Johnson, cannot donate due to her prior Pre-Eclampsia diagnosis. Despite numerous surgeries, Theo has defied expectations, never needing dialysis yet. He is now starting growth hormones and physical therapy. The family is seeking a donor with O-positive or O-negative blood. For information or to help, contact transplant coordinator Kate Hefner at 706-721-3773 or [Kathryn.hefner@wellstar.org](mailto:Kathryn.hefner@wellstar.org).

Read the full article

The post North Augusta family looking for help finding a kidney for one of their 9-month-old twins appeared first on www.wjbf.com