News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Federal judge declares Arkansas social media age-verification law unconstitutional
by Sonny Albarado, Arkansas Advocate
April 1, 2025
A federal judge declared an Arkansas law requiring age verification to create new social media accounts unconstitutional late Monday and permanently blocked the law.
The law, Act 689 of 2023, was the first of its kind in the nation and was a priority of Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in her first year in office. It required social media platforms to verify the age of all account holders in Arkansas. Those under 18 could only access sites with parental permission.
U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks of the Western District of Arkansas said in Monday’s ruling that Act 689 “would violate the First Amendment rights of Arkansans” because it is a “content-based restriction on speech that is not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.” The law also would violate the due process rights of the plaintiffs, the judge wrote.
The ruling marked the first permanent injunction that NetChoice, the nonprofit trade association for large tech companies that brought the suit, has obtained against similar laws it has challenged as violating free speech and enterprise online, according to a press release.
NetChoice filed its lawsuit against the state in June 2023, and Brooks issued a preliminary injunction that August, about two weeks before the law was set to take effect on Sept. 1.
The court’s ruling confirms NetChoice’s argument that restricting access to protected speech violates the First Amendment, the group’s litigation director, Chris Marchese, said in a statement.
“This ruling protects Americans from having to hand over their IDs or biometric data just to access constitutionally protected speech online,” Marchese said. “It reaffirms that parents — not politicians or bureaucrats — should decide what’s appropriate for their children.”
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said in a statement Tuesday that he respects the court’s decision, adding that his office is evaluating its options.
Sanders called for lawmakers to amend Act 689 during her January State of the State address “so that it’s no longer held up in court and can begin to be enforced.”
To date, no such amendments to the law have been proposed, but Sen. Bart Hester, R-Cave Springs, told the Advocate last week he expects it to “happen one way or another” since the governor said it’s important to her.
Brooks’ 41-page opinion on Monday granted NetChoice’s motion for summary judgment and declared that “NetChoice members and their users will suffer irreparable harm” if Act 689 takes effect because it “abridges the First Amendment rights of Arkansans who use social media and contains terms too vague to be reasonably understood.”
“The Court does not doubt the reality, well supported by the record, that unfettered social media access can and does harm minors,” Brooks wrote, adding that the state does have a compelling interest in protecting minors.
“The state does not, however, have ‘a free-floating power to restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed,’” he said, quoting from another court’s opinion.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
The law is “maximally burdensome” on both the social media platforms and the users it targets, the judge wrote.
“It erects barriers to accessing entire social media platforms rather than placing those barriers around the content or functions that raise concern,” he said. “It not only hinders adults’ ability to speak and receive protected speech online, it excludes minors whose parents do not consent (or cannot prove their consent)” from accessing forums on the internet.
If the Legislature’s intent “was to protect minors from materials or interactions that could harm them online, there is no evidence that the Act will be effective in achieving that goal,” the judge said.
“Rather than targeting content that is harmful to minors, Act 689 simply impedes access to content writ large.”
The law also “is unclear which NetChoice members are subject to regulation,” forcing some companies “to choose between risking enforcement penalties … and implementing age-verification requirements that burden their users’ First Amendment rights,” Brooks wrote.
NetChoice members whom the Act clearly regulates “would be pressed into service as the private censors of the State,” Brooks noted. “No legal remedy exists to compensate Arkansans for the loss of their First Amendment rights.”
The state argued that the act’s language made it clear that it covers Meta, Twitter (now X) and TikTok, but NetChoice argued that members like Snapchat, Nextdoor and Pinterest couldn’t be certain the law does not apply to them, according to the ruling. The state responded that the law didn’t apply to Snapchat because “it’s ‘different from a traditional social media platform.’” The law also specifically exempted YouTube and Google from having to verify users’ age.
The act is unconstitutionally vague because “it fails to adequately define which entities are subject to its requirements, risking chilling effects and inviting arbitrary enforcement,” according to the ruling.
Brooks concludes by stating “Act 689 is a content-based restriction on speech, and it is not targeted to address the harms the State has identified. Arkansas takes a hatchet to adults’ and minors’ protected speech alike though the Constitution demands it use a scalpel.”
Deputy Editor Antoinette Grajeda contributed to this story.
Your donations help us shine a light on Arkansas government.
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.
The post Federal judge declares Arkansas social media age-verification law unconstitutional appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate
by Tess Vrbin, Arkansas Advocate
April 30, 2025
Gender-nonconforming Arkansans might not meet the state’s requirements to obtain a REAL ID in order to board flights or enter certain federal buildings, which is a week away from being required by federal law.
Applicants for REAL IDs need to provide the Department of Finance and Administration with four different forms of identification:
A current driver’s license, state-issued ID, or school or work ID as proof of identityA passport or birth certificate as proof of legal presence in the United StatesA government-issued social security cardTwo documents providing proof of address, such as utility bills or bank statements, issued within the last six months
The documents “all have to sync up,” Finance Secretary Jim Hudson said last week.
Transgender and nonbinary Arkansans might have changed their names or gender information on some but not all legal documents, and state policies have made it difficult for these groups of people to obtain documents that accurately reflect who they are, advocates say. Birth certificates can be legally altered, and until this year, the federal government allowed gender-neutral information on U.S. passports.
“The government has played politics with people’s lives and upended people’s ability to accurately and properly identify themselves,” said Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas. “This has created much chaos and turmoil for no good reason while making life harder and more unsafe for all of us.”
Last year, the ACLU of Arkansas led a lawsuit against the DFA’s decision to stop issuing gender-neutral driver’s licenses. The case was dropped after Arkansas officials permanently adopted the new policy, which prohibits the use of an “X” to indicate someone’s gender in place of “M” or “F.”
Arkansans urge state finance department not to reverse gender-neutral driver’s license policy
Several transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, including Maggs Gallup of Little Rock, urged the finance department to maintain the previous policy, which had been in place for 14 years. Gallup said in an interview Monday that they are putting off obtaining a REAL ID in case doing so requires the state to remove the X gender marker from their driver’s license.
Hudson told lawmakers that a driver’s license is “not a platform for speech” and “not a platform for personal identity.” Gallup disagreed, saying their gender-neutral ID is important to them and putting incorrect information on an ID is “a deeply incongruent thing to do.”
“In an ideal world, it would be great to have the state and officials recognize our gender,” Gallup said. “They don’t get to determine who we are, no matter what letters we put on our IDs.”
REAL IDs began with a law passed by Congress in 2005 as a response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Instituting REAL IDs statewide “will help fight terrorism and reduce identity fraud,” according to the finance department website.
The federal Transportation Security Administration accepts passports in place of REAL IDs as identification to board a flight. Miss Major Griffin-Gracy, a well-known transgender advocate who lives in Little Rock, said last week on Facebook that she was initially denied access to a flight because she has an X on her driver’s license, but she was allowed to board after displaying her passport containing a male gender marker.
Griffin-Gracy is 78 years old and gender-nonconforming, and she was present at the 1969 Stonewall riot between LGBTQ+ people and police in New York City. In her Facebook video, she expressed disbelief that her passport was accepted even though she did not appear masculine. She also said “we the people” should “stand up and fight” President Donald Trump’s administration, which does not recognize gender-neutral IDs.
Gallup said they are also concerned about potential limits on travel, both domestic and international, with or without a REAL ID. Their teenage child is old enough to learn to drive but is putting off obtaining a learner’s permit because of potential bureaucratic obstacles due to their gender-nonconforming identity, Gallup said.
Bill regulating transgender Arkansans’ bathroom use heads to House despite public pushback
“This is just one part of a larger, really complicated network of new rules and legislation that are challenging to navigate” for transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, Gallup said.
State lawmakers and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders approved a law this month that will allow Arkansans to sue for damages if they encounter someone in a bathroom, changing room, shelter or correctional facility who does not align with the “designated sex” of the space.
The state has also enacted laws in the past few years that ban transgender girls from playing girls’ sports, require public school students to use bathrooms that match their gender assigned at birth, regulate pronoun use in schools and allow doctors who provide transgender minors’ health care to be sued for medical malpractice.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.
The post REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
The article appears to adopt a Center-Left perspective primarily through its focus on issues affecting transgender and nonbinary individuals, particularly with regard to identity documentation requirements in Arkansas. It emphasizes the challenges faced by gender-nonconforming individuals in obtaining accurate identification and highlights criticisms from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) regarding the state’s policy changes. The language used is sympathetic toward these groups, portraying the state’s actions as creating unnecessary turmoil and being politically motivated. Although the article provides factual information about the REAL ID process and relevant legal actions, its framing leans toward advocacy for the rights of transgender individuals, positioning the state’s policies in a critical light. This reflects a broader pattern of liberal advocacy for gender inclusivity in government identification practices. However, the piece does offer direct quotes from state officials, which helps balance the presentation of opposing views. Thus, the overall tone remains more supportive of progressive policies on gender identification, hence the Center-Left categorization.
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Arkansas Army vet uses experience to help other veterans
SUMMARY: Arkansas Army veteran Jared Eeken uses his military experience and counseling background to help struggling veterans through his nonprofit, Scars and Stripes. Recognizing gaps in existing support systems, Eeken assists veterans in navigating mental health challenges, finding jobs, healthcare, and transportation, ensuring they don’t fall through the cracks. His own struggles with mental health inspired him to create this organization alongside his wife. Eeken emphasizes the importance of camaraderie and continuous support, often advocating for veterans to receive the services they’re entitled to. Recently, he was honored with the Saluting Heroes Award for his impactful work aiding Arkansas veterans.

One Arkansas Army veteran is showcasing how he uses his knowledge of social work and his own experiences to help other veterans in the state.
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Latest updates on Conway park shooting
SUMMARY: Two suspects remain on the run after the Conway Park shooting, while two others are in custody. One of the arrested suspects, Ryan Goens, was free on bond for a previous gun charge at the time of the shooting. He had posted a $75,000 bond for an alleged February gun crime, including possession of a machine gun, and was scheduled for a hearing the same week as the shooting, but it was postponed. This case has raised concerns about the state’s bail system and balancing public safety with the presumption of innocence. Goens faces 11 counts of aggravated assault.

As the search continues for two additional suspects in the Conway park shooting, here’s the latest information from police.
-
Mississippi Today2 days ago
Trump appoints former Gov. Phil Bryant to FEMA Review Council as state awaits ruling on tornadoes
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed5 days ago
Missouri lawmakers on the cusp of legalizing housing discrimination
-
Mississippi Today3 days ago
Derrick Simmons: Monday’s Confederate Memorial Day recognition is awful for Mississippians
-
Mississippi Today7 days ago
Struggling water, sewer systems impose ‘astronomic’ rate hikes
-
Mississippi News6 days ago
Events happening this weekend in Mississippi: April 25-27
-
News from the South - West Virginia News Feed7 days ago
Is West Virginia — and the rest of the country — prepared to care for our seniors?
-
Mississippi Today6 days ago
Tyler Perry comedy about a Mississippi lieutenant governor ‘She The People’ set to stream on Netflix
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
Florida woman accused of setting fires during burn ban