News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Federal actions threaten Arkansans’ employment, more job cuts expected
Federal actions threaten Arkansans’ employment, more job cuts expected
by Antoinette Grajeda, Arkansas Advocate
February 24, 2025
Some Arkansans working for the National Park Service and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs were fired as a result of efforts to shrink the federal workforce, and a Saturday email sparked concern that more cuts are on the way. Meanwhile, jobs are at risk as other organizations cope with funding freezes.
Stacy Ramsey was “caught completely off guard” when she was one of four Buffalo National River employees terminated on Valentine’s Day. Ramsey had worked for the park service for five years, first in part-time positions before becoming a full-time river ranger last March.
Ramsey was swept up in the layoffs as a probationary worker — new hires or long-time workers who’ve started a new role that subjects them to a probationary status of one to two years.
“Thousands of federal workers have lost their positions, many of them in much more critical, more important roles than I was in, and the problem with all of those indiscriminate cuts was that the positions weren’t reviewed to see how critical they were,” Ramsey said.
Of the federal government’s 2.4 million-person workforce, roughly 220,000 are probationary employees. About 80% are employed outside the District of Columbia, including about 13,000 who worked in Arkansas in 2023, according to Partnership for Public Service.
Prior to probationary worker firings, federal employees received an email offering a deferred resignation that would allow them to be paid through September if they quit working now. While some co-workers close to retirement took the offer, Ramsey said she didn’t because she didn’t think her “dream job” was at risk.
Her termination was “very sudden, very swift,” and Ramsey said her supervisors “were all just as shocked and upset” when she arrived at headquarters in Harrison to sign paperwork the day she was fired.
“I just kept telling myself, ‘be stoic, don’t cry, it’s going to be okay,’ but when I walked in, I could feel so much sadness from them that I was a little overcome,” she said.
Recreation fees technician Leah Saffian was prepping a campsite for spring visitors when she was notified of her firing. Saffian was a new hire with just a few weeks under her belt.
The termination was so chaotic that when Saffian arrived at headquarters to turn in her things, she was already locked out of her account. Staff couldn’t access her termination paperwork, so Saffian said she had to return a few days later to complete the process.
“It was such a mess. It just wasn’t handled professionally in my opinion, not by the park service but by whoever is making these decisions,” she said. “…I was in shock, but mostly I was really, really angry, and I still am just because there’s absolutely zero consideration for everything I did to make myself available for this job.”
Saffian was working several part-time jobs in Northwest Arkansas when she applied to work at the Buffalo National River in September. After hearing nothing for months, she received an interview in December and an official offer for her “ideal job” on Jan. 17, three days before the presidential inauguration.
Because of a lack of housing in the area, Saffian said she spent much of her savings to buy a camper, rent a campsite and move herself and her rescue dog to Newton County. She also bought camper accessories and items to complete her uniform before starting her job on Jan. 27th, only to be fired three weeks later.
Saffian’s whirlwind experience has left her with much uncertainty about where to live and whether she’ll be able to find work nearby. As of Thursday, she’d yet to receive an answer about whether she qualifies for unemployment benefits because her employment was so brief.
Health care resources limited for income-constrained, working Arkansans, especially in rural areas
“The emotions surrounding this are very complex because I have no direct contact with the people who are making these decisions,” Saffian said. “So I have all this frustration, but I can’t even address it to the people that make these decisions, and I’m just in a really difficult position.”
Ramsey also is unsure what comes next. Ramsey grew up and still lives in Searcy County, one of Arkansas’ poorest counties where she said jobs are limited and people are forced to drive an hour away for work.
“It’s so hard to find work with pay that is enough to cover a mortgage and utilities and have health insurance benefits,” she said. “…I’m just hoping to find a good job soon.”
Emails and voicemails sent last week to National Park Service sites in Arkansas and the federal office were not returned by Monday.
Veterans affairs
Following the initial round of layoffs, federal workers began sharing their stories on LinkedIn and Facebook, but official tallies have been difficult to come by.
Spokespeople at the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System and the Veterans Health Care System of the Ozarks emailed the Advocate similar statements late last week confirming they had “dismissed a small number of probationary staff,” but couldn’t discuss specific personnel matters due to privacy concerns.
“This decision will have no negative effect on Veteran health care, benefits or other services and will allow VA to focus more effectively on its core mission of serving Veterans, families, caregivers and survivors,” VHSO spokesperson Scott Whittington said.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has more than 43,000 probationary employees and approximately 1,000 were dismissed, a move expected to save the department more than $98 million per year, according to a press release.
Whittington noted that the VA worked with the White House and the Office of Personnel Management to identify more than 130 occupations within the agency that would not be eligible for the deferred resignation program so the VA can continue providing “mission-critical” services.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 2201 is the union for VHSO, which has a main campus in Fayetteville and satellite campuses in western Arkansas, eastern Oklahoma and southwest Missouri.
Union President Bruce Appel said it’s been difficult to get a straight answer about how many workers have been let go, in part because VA leaders are “being blindsided” like everyone else. Appel said he was told about a dozen local people opted for the original deferred resignation option.
While nonunion members were affected by the Feb. 14 layoffs, Appel said he learned late Thursday that probationary workers within his union were at risk of another round of cuts. VHSO has about 2,300 workers in the entire system, and Appel estimated 200-300 of his members could be at risk.
Federal employees received an email Saturday requesting they reply by midnight Monday with five bullet points of what they accomplished last week. Presidential adviser Elon Musk, a billionaire who’s been leading the federal employee cuts, posted on X, a social media site he owns, that “failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”
U.S. senators criticize staffing cuts in health care program for Sept. 11 responders
The email created further confusion among federal workers and agency supervisors over the weekend with some agency heads telling employees not to respond just yet, according to the New York Times.
If the presidential administration ignores workers’ contract rights, Appel said it would “put us in a position of having to litigate it,” which he noted AFGE did during the president’s first term.
The VA last year announced a settlement with the union resolving litigation over “adverse reactions taken against former VA employees” under the Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017. The settlement addressed a finding by the Federal Labor Relations Authority that the VA failed to bargain with AFGE regarding the impact and implementation of the law, according to a press release.
Appel said VHSO provides a high standard of care, but he’s concerned continued layoffs will have a negative effect on services.
“My federal employees are being demonized like we’re some kind of parasite, and that’s not the case,” Appel said. “We are not the public’s enemy during this, and with the destruction that’s going on right now, the layoffs, the changes in working conditions, everything else, their family members are not going to get the care that they’ve come to expect when they come to this facility.”
Funding freezes
An inauguration day executive order that suspended the country’s refugee resettlement program directly affected Canopy Northwest Arkansas, one of two resettlement agencies in Arkansas. The nonprofit was also hit by a “stop-work order” that halted funding for basic services provided to refugees who arrived within the last 90 days, Executive Director Joanna Krause said.
Arkansas faith groups worried about federal policies hindering immigrant, refugee ministries
Typically, refugee resettlement agencies provide services that are then reimbursed, but as of last week, Krause said Canopy NWA was still waiting on $584,000 to be reimbursed. Housing is one of the largest costs for refugee agencies because you have to pay a deposit, plus first and last month’s rent, Krause said. That can be particularly expensive in Northwest Arkansas where housing prices have skyrocketed in recent years as the region’s population has exploded.
The nonprofit organization has been able to continue operations due to community support, but Krause said she’s “very, very worried” about having to lay off members of Canopy NWA’s roughly 40-person staff.
“We are taking it day by day,” she said. “Again, we wouldn’t be where we are today without the support that’s come through with our community, and we absolutely remain committed to our mission.”
Krause said they’ve not received any updates about whether or when the federal refugee resettlement program will resume, and the waiting “is really hard.”
Refugee status is a legal immigration status that may be granted to people who may have been persecuted or fear they will be due to race, religion, nationality or membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Since the Refugee Act in 1980, the U.S. has admitted more than 3.2 million refugees, according to the U.S. State Department. Of the roughly 100,000 refugees who came to the U.S. in fiscal year 2024, nearly 350 resettled in Arkansas, according to the Refugee Processing Center.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.
The post Federal actions threaten Arkansans’ employment, more job cuts expected appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Friends mourn and rally support after death of 6-year-old Odin Upton
SUMMARY: The community mourns the death of 6-year-old Odin Upton, whose body was found near his Gentry home after a full-scale search involving K-9s and helicopters. Although foul play is not suspected, the investigation remains open. Friends and neighbors are rallying to support the grieving family, organizing donations through an online meal train to help with groceries, funeral costs, and daily essentials. Bethany Cain, a family friend, highlights Odin’s playful spirit and notes the family has another child starting school soon. The Benton County Sheriff’s Office expresses deep sympathy for the family during this heartbreaking time.
Friends mourn and rally support after death of 6-year-old Odin Upton
Subscribe to 40/29 on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/PTElbK
Get more Northwest Arkansas news: http://www.4029tv.com
Like us: http://facebook.com/4029news
Follow us: http://twitter.com/4029news
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/4029news/
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Trump EPA claws back $7B in solar funding already promised to states
by Jacob Fischler, Arkansas Advocate
August 8, 2025
Several congressional Democrats on Friday slammed the Trump administration’s announcement it will cancel nearly $7 billion in grants to fund solar energy projects for low-income households, saying the move was illegal and would raise families’ energy prices if allowed to proceed.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sent notices to states and other recipients of grants through the Solar for All program, which Democrats created in their massive 2022 taxes, energy and domestic policy law, that the agency was canceling all unspent funds from the initiative.
The EPA said Republicans eliminated the federal fund that distributed the program’s money in the “one big, beautiful” law President Donald Trump signed on July 4.
On Thursday, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said on social media the law terminated the agency’s legal ability to distribute the funds.
Low-income communities priority for Arkansas’ $93.6 million federal solar grant
“The bottom line again is this: EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive,” Zeldin said in a video posted to X. “With clear language and intent from Congress in the one big, beautiful bill, EPA is taking action to end this program for good. We are committed to the rule of law and being a good steward of taxpayer dollars.”
The move sparked a backlash from Democrats in Congress and the states, who said that rescinding the already-obligated funding violated the law.
“We are appalled and outraged at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) blatant and unlawful termination of $7 billion in federal funding for the 60 organizations that received awards through the Solar for All program,” the five Democratic members of Oregon’s congressional delegation wrote in a Friday letter to Zeldin and White House Budget Director Russell Vought.
“Solar for All funding has been approved by Congress and signed into law, and cancelling or rescinding these obligated funds is a violation of the law and the Constitution.”
Letters to 60 states, organizations
The 60 recipients of the grant awards, mostly state governments but also tribes and some multistate projects, received letters from the EPA on Thursday informing them the grants were being cancelled.
The letter sent to Oregon’s Department of Energy said the reconciliation bill Trump signed on July 4 rescinded the authorization and appropriations for the fund.
“Any attempt to continue the program’s administration, in the absence of any authorizing legislation or appropriated funds for that purpose, is no longer legally permissible,” the letter said.
“The EPA has been weighing options for the future of the Solar for All program and has made the decision to terminate the SFA program and existing grants because the EPA no longer has a statutory basis or dedicated funding to continue administering and overseeing the nearly $7 billion outlay to approximately 60 grant recipients.”
The letter said the EPA realized that recipients “may have begun to rely” on the program for preliminary budgeting and staffing decisions. But it said that “due to the early nature of such expenditures, we expect any harms to interests suffered to be remedied and remediable.”
In a statement Friday, the Oregon Department of Energy said it had already spent “significant administrative funds” to launch the program later this year, and hinted a legal challenge may come soon.
“The federal funding has already been obligated to Oregon, and the Oregon Solar for All Coalition,” the department statement read. “We are surprised and disappointed to hear the U.S. EPA is moving to rescind these already-obligated funds. ODOE will work with our partners, the Governor’s Office, and Oregon’s Attorney General to consider next steps to ensure these funds continue to serve Oregonians as intended.”
‘A betrayal’
Like the Oregon Democrats, New Jersey Democratic Rep. Frank Pallone, the ranking member on the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the move was illegal and predicted it would raise energy prices.
“The Trump Administration is stealing from working families in broad daylight,” Pallone said in an early Friday statement. “This money was intended for our constituents and communities to help lower energy bills. Clawing these funds back isn’t just brazenly illegal – it’s a betrayal by this Administration of working families who will now pay higher energy bills just so Republicans can grind their axe against clean energy.”
Other Democrats, including Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, also focused on the economic impact.
“President Trump ran on lowering costs and creating jobs,” Hobbs wrote on X. “Gutting Solar for All will do the exact opposite. It makes our air dirtier, our energy bills higher, and our economy weaker. I will continue to fight for the clean and affordable energy future Arizonans want and deserve.”
Democrats created the Solar for All fund as part of the $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund in the law they passed without any GOP support in either chamber and President Joe Biden signed in August 2022.
The Solar for All fund was meant to bring the benefits of solar power to 900,000 households in low-income communities, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
According to a list on the EPA website, the awardees included the Executive Office of the State of New Hampshire; Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources; the Maine Governor’s Energy Office; the Alaska Energy Authority; the Oregon Department of Energy; Washington State Department of Commerce; Bonneville Environmental Foundation in Idaho; Tanana Chiefs Conference in Alaska; New Jersey Board of Public Utilities; Maryland Clean Energy Center; Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority; Virginia Department of Energy; West Virginia Office of Energy; Department of Environment and Conservation Tennessee; Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet; North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality; South Carolina Office of Resilience; the Solar and Energy Loan Fund of St. Lucie County, Inc., in Florida; the Capital Good Fund in Georgia; Minnesota Department of Commerce; the State of Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy; the State of Ohio Office of Budget and Management State Accounting; Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation; Indiana Community Action Association Inc.; New Mexico Energy, Minerals, & Natural Resources Department; State of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources; Hope Enterprise Corporation in Arkansas; the Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority; the Center for Rural Affairs in Nebraska; Colorado Energy Office; Utah Office of Energy Development; Bonneville Environmental Foundation in Montana; Coalition for Green Capital in North Dakota; Coalition for Green Capital in South Dakota; Executive Office of the State of Arizona; Nevada Clean Energy Fund; Hopi Utilities Corporation in Arizona; and other programs that covered multiple states and tribes.
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.
The post Trump EPA claws back $7B in solar funding already promised to states appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This content primarily presents a perspective aligned with Democratic viewpoints, emphasizing criticism of a Trump administration decision to cancel funding for a solar energy program aimed at low-income households. It highlights concerns about legal and economic impacts raised by Democrats, while providing context about the program’s origins in Democratic-led legislation. The coverage is generally supportive of clean energy initiatives and frames the cancellation as harmful, reflecting a center-left bias without extreme partisanship or overtly ideological language.
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed
Arkansas courts director elected to national board of judicial administrators
by Tess Vrbin, Arkansas Advocate
August 7, 2025
Arkansas Administrative Office of the Courts Director Marty Sullivan began serving on a national board of judicial administrators July 30, according to a Thursday AOC news release.
Sullivan’s term on the board of directors for the Conference of State Court Administrators (COSCA) will last three years. COSCA consists of the chief executives of the court systems in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories.
Sullivan has worked for AOC since 2003 and served as Judicial Branch Education Director from 2007 to 2017, when he was appointed director by the state Supreme Court’s then-Chief Justice, John Dan Kemp.
He has a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Arkansas and master’s degrees from Michigan State University and the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, according to Thursday’s news release.
Sullivan’s “vast experience” in judicial administration makes him “a valued addition to the COSCA Board of Directors,” COSCA President Corey Steel said in the release.
In a statement, Sullivan said he is “honored” to serve on the board of “an institution that plays a vital role in strengthening the administration of justice in our country.”
“I have deep respect for my colleagues and am humbled by the trust they have placed in me,” Sullivan said. “I look forward to contributing to policy efforts that positively impact the lives of citizens who rely on our nation’s courts.”
Arkansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Karen Baker attempted to fire Sullivan and nine other AOC employees in January. Five of the other six justices blocked Baker’s attempted unilateral decision, calling it “retaliatory” and beyond the scope of her authority.
The same five justices made an employment agreement with Sullivan in December, guaranteeing him job security until the end of 2032 and nearly $1.6 million in pay over that time. The agreement came after Baker, who had been elected but not sworn in as the state’s first female chief justice, entered Sullivan’s office without his permission when he was absent on Dec. 4.
Arkansas Supreme Court chief justice says dispute over her authority could lead to litigation
Baker “was observed looking throughout Mr. Sullivan’s office, including the area behind his desk” and harassed AOC staff, according to a human resources report on the incident made public in March.
On Jan. 13, Sullivan asked Baker to stay away from the AOC offices and not to communicate with his staff, pending the conclusion of a review by the state’s judicial discipline commission.
Baker filed an administrative civil appeal with the Supreme Court against Sullivan later in January; the litigation is still pending.
COSCA works closely with state Supreme Court chief justices “on issues of mutual interest,” according to Thursday’s news release.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.
The post Arkansas courts director elected to national board of judicial administrators appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The content presents a factual and balanced report on the professional achievements of Marty Sullivan and the internal disputes within the Arkansas judicial system. It avoids partisan language or ideological framing, focusing instead on institutional roles, official statements, and documented events. The coverage of conflict between judicial figures is presented with references to multiple perspectives and official sources, reflecting a neutral tone without favoring any political side.
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
After 30 years in prison, Mississippi woman dies from cancer she says was preventable
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed5 days ago
Texas redistricting: What to know about Dems’ quorum break
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Woman charged after boy in state’s custody dies in hot car
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed3 days ago
Two people unaccounted for in Spring Lake after flash flooding
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
Warning for social media shoppers after $22K RV scam
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed6 days ago
Georgia lawmakers to return this winter to Capitol chambers refreshed with 19th Century details
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed6 days ago
Op-Ed: U.S. District Court rightfully blocked Arkansas’ PBM ban | Opinion
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed7 days ago
Chapel Hill family starts nonprofit after twin daughters diagnosed with rare disease