Connect with us

The Center Square

East Palestine schools sue Norfolk Southern for $30M | Ohio

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – J.D. Davidson – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 13:12:00

(The Center Square) – Citing broken promises and unpaid response costs, the East Palestine City District Board of Education sued Norfolk Southern on Wednesday.

The board’s lawsuit wants $30 million to recover losses it says it incurred as a result of the Feb. 3, 2023, train derailment that led to a toxic chemical burn and economic and environmental concerns across two states.

“This disaster upended our students’ lives,” East Palestine Superintendent James Rook said in a statement. “Norfolk Southern promised it would not ‘walk away’ and would help our community ‘recover and thrive.’ But Norfolk Southern did walk away from our students. East Palestine has not recovered from the perception of contamination and long-term health consequences. Student enrollment fell significantly in 2024 and will continue to fall because Norfolk Southern has broken its promises to ‘make it right.’ The impact on our students is heartbreaking. Our district will hold Norfolk Southern to its promises so we can continue to give our students the education they deserve.”

The Center Square was unsuccessful before publication getting comment from Norfolk Southern on the lawsuit.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, says Norfolk Southern did not live up to its commitment to reimburse emergency response costs, including using school facilities as a command center.

The school system also helped house and transport residents during mandatory evacuation orders.

The district says Norfolk Southern backed out of building a $30 million community wellness center at the school. The lawsuit says Norfolk Southern’s contractor established the cost.

Finally, the district says the derailment lowered property values and residents’ incomes in the area, which directly impacts school finances.

The school lawsuit follows another federal lawsuit filed in early February by 744 current and former East Palestine residents against Norfolk Southern, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other state agencies.

Those plaintiffs say the defendants have downplayed the impact of the chemical contamination.

As previously reported by The Center Square, the village and Norfolk Southern announced in January a settlement to resolve all claims from the derailment. Norfolk Southern agreed to pay $22 million for priorities identified by the village in connection with the derailment.

In September, also as previously reported by The Center Square, a federal judge approved a $600 million settlement that covered residents, property owners and businesses within 20 miles of the derailment site and chemical release.

That settlement called for personal injury payments of $25,000 for those within 2 miles of the derailment and about $1,000 for those 5-10 miles away.

Also, those within 2 miles of the site were scheduled to receive $70,000 per household in direct payments, lowering by distance to about $250 per household for those from 15-20 miles away from the derailment site.

That settlement was separate from the U.S. Department of Justice’s $310 million settlement with Norfolk Southern. That deal came in the National Transportation and Safety Board’s final report.

At about 9:30 p.m. on Feb. 3, 2023, 53 Norfolk Southern train cars derailed in East Palestine, leading to a vent and burn of toxic chemicals.

At a public hearing in June 2024 in East Palestine, National Transportation and Safety Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy called Norfolk Southern’s attempts to sway the investigation unprecedented and reprehensible.

She reiterated the board’s finding that the eventual vent and burn following the crash was unnecessary, and the report said the crash could have been avoided.

It blamed the crash that forced the evacuation of more than 2,000 residents on the wheel bearing of rail car 23, which caught fire, causing the axle to fall off and derail the train.

The final report confirmed initial findings released a year ago and previously reported by The Center Square.

The post East Palestine schools sue Norfolk Southern for $30M | Ohio appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily focuses on factual reporting regarding the lawsuit filed by the East Palestine City District Board of Education against Norfolk Southern in the aftermath of the 2023 train derailment. The piece highlights the board’s claims, including broken promises, unpaid response costs, and the negative impact on the community and students. The article maintains a neutral tone, with no discernible ideological stance. It reports the legal proceedings and includes statements from officials involved, but does not advocate for any political viewpoint. It does, however, provide context for the environmental and public health concerns related to the incident. The inclusion of both sides, including the failed attempts to obtain comment from Norfolk Southern, further supports the neutral stance of the article. It reports on actions and legal matters without pushing a specific political agenda, reflecting a centrist approach.

The Center Square

U.S. Senate prepares for passage of One Big Beautiful Bill Act | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Dan McCaleb and Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-29 09:03:00


President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed a key Senate procedural vote 51-49, with two Republicans—Thom Tillis and Rand Paul—joining all Democrats in opposition. Democrats forced a full reading of the 940-page bill to delay the final vote, expected Sunday night or Monday. Trump praised Republicans who supported the bill, highlighting goals like economic growth, reducing wasteful spending, border security, military support, Medicaid reform, and protecting the Second Amendment. The bill extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, with the House having passed its version 215-214. Trump aims to sign it by July 4.

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act cleared a Senate hurdle late Saturday, with a final vote in the upper chamber coming as early as Sunday night or Monday.

The procedural vote was 51-49, with two Senate Republicans – U.S. Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. – joining all Democrats in voting against.

To delay a final vote in the Senate, Democrats forced a full reading of the 940-page bill on the floor.

Trump celebrated the vote in posts on Truth Social.

“They, along with all of the other Republican Patriots who voted for the Bill, are people who truly love our Country!” Trump wrote. “As President of the USA, I am proud of them all, and look forward to working with them to GROW OUR ECONOMY, REDUCE WASTEFUL SPENDING, SECURE OUR BORDER, FIGHT FOR OUR MILITARY/VETS, ENSURE THAT OUR MEDICAID SYSTEM HELPS THOSE WHO TRULY NEED IT, PROTECT OUR SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO MUCH MORE. GOD BLESS AMERICA &, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

The budget reconciliation bill, upon final passage, will implement Trump’s tax, energy, border, and defense policies, including an extension of the tax cuts he delivered during his first term, which are scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025 without action.

Assuming final passage in the Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives – where its version passed 215-214 – would need to agree to changes. Trump has said he wants the measure on his desk by July 4.

The post U.S. Senate prepares for passage of One Big Beautiful Bill Act | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on the legislative progress of President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” with largely factual language, but the framing and selected quotes reflect a sympathetic perspective toward Trump and his policies. The article highlights Trump’s positive statements about the bill and its benefits—such as growing the economy, reducing wasteful spending, and securing the border—without presenting critical viewpoints or counterarguments. The use of phrases like “Republican Patriots” (quoted from Trump) and emphasis on policy goals aligned with conservative priorities contribute to a right-leaning tone. Overall, the piece leans toward supporting the Republican legislative effort while minimally covering opposing perspectives, indicating a right-leaning bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Tillis: Projected Medicaid costs to North Carolina budget too much | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-29 05:46:00


U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act due to substantial cuts to Medicaid, which he says would harm North Carolina hospitals and rural communities. He criticized the bill’s impact on Medicaid coverage, urging a return to the House’s Medicaid approach with reforms to prevent waste and implement work requirements. Despite supporting elements like tax cuts and increased child tax credits, Tillis voted no to protect vulnerable populations. The bill narrowly passed the Senate and heads back to the House. Tillis faces potential primary challengers, with former President Trump seeking a candidate to better represent North Carolina and the U.S.

(The Center Square) – Improvements in the budget reconciliation bill, the North Carolina senator ultimately decided, were not satisfactory to “pass the president’s agenda” as he said one month ago.



U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.




U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., was one of two votes from his party late Saturday night against passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. House Resolution 1, he said, had tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina hospitals and rural communities.

“This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population,” Tillis said. “The Senate should return to the House’s Medicaid approach. That plan includes commonsense reforms to address waste, fraud and abuse; and implements work requirements for some able-bodied adults to ensure taxpayer-funded benefits are going to our most vulnerable neighbors.”

Tillis wanted to vote for the measure.

“There is a lot for North Carolinians to love about the rest of the One Big Beautiful Bill, including extending the historic Trump tax cuts, increasing the child tax credit, providing historic funding for border security, and ending wasteful spending,” he said after his no vote. “We can and must accomplish this without hurting our rural communities and hospitals, and without jeopardizing access to care for hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians who need it the most.”

The Congressional Budget Office, in an analysis shared by Democrats of the Finance Committee on Saturday, estimated cuts to Medicaid to reach $930 billion. Tillis released a Finance Committee report specific to the state saying the state’s budget would have a $32 billion impact to cover hospitals over the next decade.

Other published reports had the figure closer to $40 billion.

For more than a decade after passage of Obamacare, Republican majorities of the Legislature flatly rejected expansion of Medicaid because of costs. Finally passing it two years ago was historic in multiple storylines.

North Carolina became the 41st state to expand Medicaid in 2023 as part of a deal by a Republican majority General Assembly and former Democratic-Gov. Roy Cooper. It was Cooper’s chief campaign and gubernatorial priority. The deal cemented when a separate standalone bill on expansion mandated a two-year budget bill was required to be enacted with or without the governor’s signature.

In the $60.7 billion package 84 days late of the July 1 start to the fiscal year, the General Assembly included universal school choice for all K-12 students – known as opportunity scholarships – including private schools. It also did not provide funding Democrats have long sought related to what is known as the three-decades running Leandro litigation. Cooper didn’t sign or veto, and both became law.

The state got a $1.6 billion bonus from the federal government for enacting Medicaid.

Passed 51-49 just before midnight Saturday evening with Vice President J.D. Vance in the building just in case of a tie, the vote was procedural and begins debate. A final vote could come Sunday or Monday.

The House of Representatives – where its version passed 215-214 – would need to agree to changes. President Donald Trump hopes to sign it on or before Friday.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was the other Grand Old Party vote against.

All 45 Democrats and two independents caucusing with them also voted no. Sens. Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, R-Fla., Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Cynthia Lee, R-Wyo., were among late votes swinging in favor. Sens. R-Wis., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, swung sooner.

Tillis and Collins are considered most dangerous Republican seats to flip or change in the 2026 midterms.

“Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,” Trump wrote overnight on social media. “I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the great people of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.”

Rumors of Trump hopeful to primary Tillis are not new. Candidate filing period opens at noon Dec. 1 and runs through noon Dec. 19, and the state’s senior senator – and third-longest tenured among the state’s 16 in the Beltway – has $5.6 million cash on hand. That’s 11th-highest of senators’ reeelection bids.

In late May, Tillis had said, “Republicans must extend the Trump tax cuts and pass the president’s agenda. Failure is not an option. Here’s what needs to happen next in the Senate: We will make some improvements to the Big, Beautiful Bill, push for more spending cuts, and get the job done.”

Tillis has taken heat back home in western North Carolina for comments related to the embattled Federal Emergency Management Agency. And it’s only part of potential opponents’ early campaign fodder.

He has agreed in principle with Trump on reducing health care costs but not on the means to the end. Tillis was the last to agree for confirmation of Pete Hegseth to lead the Pentagon. And on a 12-10 GOP majority panel, it was Tillis in the Judiciary Committee who stalled Ed Martin’s confirmation route for a U.S. attorney seat in the District of Columbia.

The post Tillis: Projected Medicaid costs to North Carolina budget too much | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s opposition to a significant budget reconciliation bill, presenting his arguments and concerns in detail. The tone is factual and largely neutral, providing context on Medicaid expansion in North Carolina, budgetary impacts, and legislative processes. It includes direct quotes, official data, and references to bipartisan actions without overt editorializing. The framing highlights Republican perspectives, especially on fiscal responsibility and healthcare reform, reflecting a center-right viewpoint through the choice of focus and language. However, it refrains from explicitly endorsing or opposing these views, maintaining overall balanced reporting with a slight tilt toward conservative policy emphasis.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Rollins backs North Carolina, nation’s pork producers in California tiff | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-28 07:01:00


California’s Proposition 12, which sets space requirements for farm animals, including pigs, is supported by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and North Carolina Rep. David Rouzer as enforceable within California but not beyond its borders. Rouzer emphasized the importance of fair, science-based regulations for North Carolina’s pork producers, a major industry worth \$111.1 billion nationally. Rollins expressed concern over Proposition 12’s negative effects on pork producers outside California, highlighting the need to protect other states’ industries from extraterritorial regulations. Both leaders support balancing state rights with preventing adverse impacts on interstate agriculture.

(The Center Square) – California, says the leader of the USDA and a North Carolina congressman, has the right to enforce its Proposition 12.

The state line, however, is where that enforcement should end.

In the battle of pork production, U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins affirmed that position in a congressional hearing this month. This week, U.S. Rep. David Rouzer, R-N.C., reminded Tarheel State farmers of her allegiances.

“North Carolina pork producers have a friend at USDA in Secretary Brooke Rollins,” Rouzer said, expressing gratitude for her push back against Prop 12. “Secretary Rollins is right, California has the right to do what California wants to do, but NC-07 farm families feed the nation, and they deserve fair, science-based regulations, not California mandates.”

Proposition 12 is the colloquial term for the Farm Animal Confinement Initiative. Egg-laying hens, breeding pigs and veal calves have space requirements, and sale of products from the animals is prohibited if not meeting the standard.

Rouzer comes from the 7th Congressional District, the southeastern portion of the state where trips on country roads often mean getting behind a hog truck hauling to the world’s largest pork production facility in the Bladen County crossroads community of Tar Heel. North Carolina’s $111.1 billion agriculture industry includes a No. 3 national ranking in pork production behind Iowa and Minnesota.

California’s market includes about 40 million people and 15% of domestic pork consumption. Compliance with the Golden State’s law can require new construction or retrofits with enormous fiscal impact.

In the Committee on Agriculture, Rollins told panelists, “No one is more of a believer in federalism, the 10th Amendment, and our Founders vision of the state’s rights to be able to be their own laboratories of innovation. When those ideas, those rules and laws begin to impact other states in such a negative way, that is not what our Founders intended.

“The extreme impact of Prop 12, especially on our pork producers – I believe this is a bipartisan question. We may not all agree in this room, but I think most agree even on the Democrat side of the House, that it cannot stand. I stand in full support of your effort.”

Rollins said her department may be able to inject something toward a solution.

“California has a right to do what California wants to do,” she said. “The minute that crosses the border and begins to compromise, in such a significant way, our pork producers we need to act.”

The post Rollins backs North Carolina, nation’s pork producers in California tiff | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the opposition by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and Representative David Rouzer to California’s Proposition 12, presenting their viewpoints and framing the issue around state rights and impacts on North Carolina pork producers. The language used by the quoted officials emphasizes federalism, economic harm to farmers, and resistance to California’s regulatory reach. While it reports statements and positions from officials without overt editorializing, the selection and presentation of these perspectives align more closely with a Center-Right viewpoint, highlighting concerns common among conservative and agricultural constituencies about state regulatory overreach and business impacts. The absence of counterbalancing views or perspectives from proponents of Proposition 12 further emphasizes this lean.

Continue Reading

Trending