Connect with us

The Center Square

East Palestine schools sue Norfolk Southern for $30M | Ohio

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – J.D. Davidson – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 13:12:00

(The Center Square) – Citing broken promises and unpaid response costs, the East Palestine City District Board of Education sued Norfolk Southern on Wednesday.

The board’s lawsuit wants $30 million to recover losses it says it incurred as a result of the Feb. 3, 2023, train derailment that led to a toxic chemical burn and economic and environmental concerns across two states.

“This disaster upended our students’ lives,” East Palestine Superintendent James Rook said in a statement. “Norfolk Southern promised it would not ‘walk away’ and would help our community ‘recover and thrive.’ But Norfolk Southern did walk away from our students. East Palestine has not recovered from the perception of contamination and long-term health consequences. Student enrollment fell significantly in 2024 and will continue to fall because Norfolk Southern has broken its promises to ‘make it right.’ The impact on our students is heartbreaking. Our district will hold Norfolk Southern to its promises so we can continue to give our students the education they deserve.”

The Center Square was unsuccessful before publication getting comment from Norfolk Southern on the lawsuit.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, says Norfolk Southern did not live up to its commitment to reimburse emergency response costs, including using school facilities as a command center.

The school system also helped house and transport residents during mandatory evacuation orders.

The district says Norfolk Southern backed out of building a $30 million community wellness center at the school. The lawsuit says Norfolk Southern’s contractor established the cost.

Finally, the district says the derailment lowered property values and residents’ incomes in the area, which directly impacts school finances.

The school lawsuit follows another federal lawsuit filed in early February by 744 current and former East Palestine residents against Norfolk Southern, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other state agencies.

Those plaintiffs say the defendants have downplayed the impact of the chemical contamination.

As previously reported by The Center Square, the village and Norfolk Southern announced in January a settlement to resolve all claims from the derailment. Norfolk Southern agreed to pay $22 million for priorities identified by the village in connection with the derailment.

In September, also as previously reported by The Center Square, a federal judge approved a $600 million settlement that covered residents, property owners and businesses within 20 miles of the derailment site and chemical release.

That settlement called for personal injury payments of $25,000 for those within 2 miles of the derailment and about $1,000 for those 5-10 miles away.

Also, those within 2 miles of the site were scheduled to receive $70,000 per household in direct payments, lowering by distance to about $250 per household for those from 15-20 miles away from the derailment site.

That settlement was separate from the U.S. Department of Justice’s $310 million settlement with Norfolk Southern. That deal came in the National Transportation and Safety Board’s final report.

At about 9:30 p.m. on Feb. 3, 2023, 53 Norfolk Southern train cars derailed in East Palestine, leading to a vent and burn of toxic chemicals.

At a public hearing in June 2024 in East Palestine, National Transportation and Safety Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy called Norfolk Southern’s attempts to sway the investigation unprecedented and reprehensible.

She reiterated the board’s finding that the eventual vent and burn following the crash was unnecessary, and the report said the crash could have been avoided.

It blamed the crash that forced the evacuation of more than 2,000 residents on the wheel bearing of rail car 23, which caught fire, causing the axle to fall off and derail the train.

The final report confirmed initial findings released a year ago and previously reported by The Center Square.

The post East Palestine schools sue Norfolk Southern for $30M | Ohio appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily focuses on factual reporting regarding the lawsuit filed by the East Palestine City District Board of Education against Norfolk Southern in the aftermath of the 2023 train derailment. The piece highlights the board’s claims, including broken promises, unpaid response costs, and the negative impact on the community and students. The article maintains a neutral tone, with no discernible ideological stance. It reports the legal proceedings and includes statements from officials involved, but does not advocate for any political viewpoint. It does, however, provide context for the environmental and public health concerns related to the incident. The inclusion of both sides, including the failed attempts to obtain comment from Norfolk Southern, further supports the neutral stance of the article. It reports on actions and legal matters without pushing a specific political agenda, reflecting a centrist approach.

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Erin: Coastal flooding at high tides forecast in Carolinas, Virginia | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-20 07:40:00


Hurricane Erin, a Category 2 storm with 100 mph winds, is generating high tide storm surges of 1-3 feet from South Carolina to Virginia, and 2-4 feet on North Carolina’s Outer Banks. The storm, located 645 miles southeast of Cape Hatteras, has a vast wind field with hurricane-force winds extending 90 miles from its center. Rainfall is expected to be light, with most damage from storm surge causing flooding and water over dunes and the key N.C. 12 highway. Mandatory evacuations are in place for parts of the Outer Banks, with emergency declarations in Hyde and Dare counties. The hurricane’s path moves northward, affecting tides and flooding risks along the coast through Thursday and into Maine by Friday. Recent rescues from rip currents have been high, and the storm’s near miss is a relief amid ongoing recovery from deadly Hurricane Helene last year.

(The Center Square) – High tide peak storm surges from Hurricane Erin are forecast from 1 to 3 feet between South Carolina and Virginia, and 2 to 4 feet on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.

Erin at 8 a.m. Wednesday was Category 2 at 100 mph maximum sustained winds and moving 13 mph to the north-northwest, having started to make the turn away from the mainland as expected. The National Hurricane Center, an arm of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said the storm’s center was 645 miles south-southeast of Cape Hatteras, and 900 miles west-southwest of Bermuda.

Veteran meteorologists have marveled at the size of the storm.

Hurricane force winds (74 mph or greater) extend outward 90 miles from the center, and tropical storm force winds (39 mph or greater) extend 265 miles from the center. Rain for the Carolina coast is just 1 to 2 inches Wednesday and into Thursday, with damage coming more from storm surge than rain or wind.

The next high tides on the Outer Banks are 6:18 p.m. Wednesday, and Thursday at 6:45 a.m. and 7:10 p.m. Erin has already sent Atlantic Ocean water over dunes and N.C. 12, the famed 148-mile roadway linking peninsulas and islands of the Outer Banks.

Mandatory evacuations have been issued for Ocracoke Island in Hyde County and Hatteras Island in Dare County. Each county has declared an emergency.

Storm surge warnings were in effect from Cape Lookout to Duck; a tropical storm warning was in effect from Beaufort Inlet to the Virginia border inclusive of the Pamlico and Albemarle sounds; and a tropical storm watch was in effect from the North Carolina-Virginia border to Chincoteague, Va.

The Wednesday evening high tide for coastal South Carolina, including Charleston, and southern North Carolina is being closely watched for flooding. Early Thursday evening is the expected time of coastal flooding from the southern Delmarva Peninsula and southern Chesapeake Bay down to eastern North Carolina.

The storm’s projected path through the weekend skirts parallel to moving more away from the Atlantic Seaboard. Thursday’s pass is by the Carolinas and Virginia, and Friday the storm will be moving by Maine.

Coastal rescues from rip currents in North Carolina, according to published reports, have numbered between 75 and 100 over Monday and Tuesday.

As often happens with hurricanes, water began to run over N.C. 12 on Tuesday. The highway begins at U.S. 70 at the community of Sea Level and runs to a point just north of Corolla and south of the Currituck Banks North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve. Two ferries, Hatteras Island to Ocracoke Island and Cedar Island to Ocracoke Island, are part of the route.

The storm’s landfall miss of the state is particularly welcome in light of Hurricane Helene. Recovery from that storm is in its 47th week. Helene killed 107 in the state, 236 across seven states in the South, and caused an estimated $60 billion in damage to North Carolina.

The post Erin: Coastal flooding at high tides forecast in Carolinas, Virginia | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a straightforward report on Hurricane Erin, including storm forecasts, evacuation orders, and impact assessments. It strictly focuses on factual information from official sources, such as the National Hurricane Center and local emergency declarations, without expressing opinions or framing the content to favor any particular political ideology. The language is neutral and informative, adhering to objective reporting standards. While it references the impact of a previous storm for context, it does so only to highlight the potential severity of the current situation, without commentary or political framing. Overall, the content reports on the actions of governmental agencies and the meteorological facts without promoting an ideological stance, maintaining a centrist bias through purely factual coverage.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Tate Miller – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-20 06:29:00


President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he claims is prone to fraud, is supported by the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) and election attorney Greg Teufel. AFPI called Trump’s efforts essential for protecting the republic, arguing that mass mail-in voting leads to fraud, chaos, and disenfranchisement, citing issues like permanent absentee voter status and ballot trafficking. Teufel emphasized that mail-in ballots are vulnerable to coercion and fraud since they are not completed under official supervision. Trump plans an executive order to eliminate mail-in ballots and costly voting machines, promoting more secure methods like Watermark Paper for the 2026 midterms.

(The Center Square) – While most Democrats are opposed, President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he says is ripe for fraud, has been met with approval from both an election attorney as well as the America First Policy Institute.

“President Trump should be applauded for leading the charge to ensure that every American’s vote matters and is not undermined by corruption,” the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) told The Center Square by email.

“This is not just a policy fight,” AFPI said. “This is a fight for the survival of our republic.”

AFPI is a non-profit and non-partisan research institute aiming to “advance policies that put the American people first,” according to its website.

Election attorney and founder of law firm OGC Law, LLC Greg Teufel told The Center Square that “eliminating mail-in balloting would go a long way toward restoring confidence in our election procedures.”

“Mail-in voting has long been recognized as the most vulnerable type of voting for election fraud,” Teufel said.

“Because ballots are not completed in front of election officials, coercion, bribery, and voting on behalf of people of limited competence is all possible,” Teufel told The Center Square.

AFPI likewise told The Center Square that “President Trump is right in saying that our elections will never be secure so long as we have widespread use of mail-in ballots.”

“With rare exception, mass mail-in voting is a recipe for fraud and chaos,” AFPI said. “Other nations recognize this, and many abandoned this broken system decades ago.”

“The United States of America is the greatest nation in the world, and our electoral system should set the global standard for security and transparency,” AFPI said.

AFPI listed to The Center Square examples of the issues of mail-in voting.

For instance, “in some states, one now can apply to be on the voter rolls as a ‘permanent absentee voter,’ which means one automatically gets an absentee ballot application every election,” AFPI said.

Additionally, “reliance solely on mail-in voting may lead to the disenfranchisement of America’s eligible citizen class and could also lead to fraud through ballot trafficking,” AFPI told The Center Square.

“Mass mail-in voting presents vulnerabilities with the chain of custody of a ballot and increases the prevalence of error in states that do not maintain clean voter rolls,” AFPI said.

The Center for Election Innovation and Research did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Trump posted on his Truth Social account Monday: “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS.”

“ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,” Trump said.

The president further said that “while we’re at it,” he will get rid of “Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election.”

Trump said the efforts to protect elections will be brought about by an executive order “to help bring honesty to the 2026 Midterm Elections.”

The post Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents statements and perspectives primarily from sources supportive of former President Donald Trump’s stance on ending mail-in voting, including the America First Policy Institute and an election attorney who express concerns about election fraud associated with mail-in ballots. The language used to describe these perspectives, such as quoting the claim that mail-in voting is “a recipe for fraud and chaos” and highlighting Trump’s critical social media post, indicates a framing that favors this viewpoint. While the article does mention opposition from “most Democrats,” it does so briefly and without similar elaboration or counterarguments from sources that support mail-in voting. The overall tone and choice of sources suggest an endorsement or at least a sympathetic presentation of the Trump-aligned position on election integrity issues, aligning the article with a right-leaning bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Oklahoma to require teachers pass political belief test | Oklahoma

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Andrew Rice | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-19 17:06:00


Oklahoma will require teachers relocating from California or New York to pass a 50-question certification exam on American citizenship, religion, gender, and government to ensure their values align with the state’s. Oklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters criticized New York and California’s teaching standards as opposing Oklahoma’s, citing California’s stance on biological sex differences. The exam, developed with Prager University—a nonprofit used by ten other states—covers constitutional knowledge and U.S. government structure. Teacher union leaders, including Randi Weingarten and Cari Elledge, condemned the move as politically motivated, arguing Walters should prioritize student education over political agendas.

(The Center Square) – Oklahoma will begin requiring teachers who move to the state from California or New York to pass certification exams proving their values align with Oklahoma’s.

The test reportedly contains 50 questions on American citizenship, religion, gender and makeup of the U.S. government.

Ryan Walters, the Oklahoma superintendent of public instruction, said teaching standards in New York and California are “antithetical” to Oklahoma’s standards. He said an example of this is California requiring teachers to assert there are no biological differences between sexes.

“We want to make sure, as we are recruiting the best and the brightest in the country, that they align with our values,” Walters said.

Walters said the state is working with the nonprofit organization Prager University, which produces educational materials, to conduct the exam. Ten other states, including Florida, Idaho and South Carolina, use educational materials provided by PragerU.

Some of the questions on the exam reportedly include:

What are the first three words of the Constitution?

Why is freedom of religion important to American identity?

What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?

How many U.S. Senators are there?

Why do some states have more Representatives than others?

Randi Weingarten, president of the union American Federation of Teachers, criticized Walters’ decision in a statement.

“His priority should be educating students,” Weingarten said of Walters. “But instead, it’s getting Donald Trump and other MAGA politicians to notice him.”

Cari Elledge, president of the Oklahoma Education Association, agreed. She told USA Today the decision by the Oklahoma Department of Education was made as a “political stunt.”

The post Oklahoma to require teachers pass political belief test | Oklahoma appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the new teacher certification exam in Oklahoma and includes statements from both supporters and critics of the policy. While the piece presents factual information about the exam and quotes from Oklahoma’s superintendent of public instruction, it also highlights the involvement of PragerU, a conservative educational organization, and includes critical responses from union leaders who frame the policy as politically motivated. The language used to describe the exam and the inclusion of critiques suggest a slight lean toward a Center-Right perspective, as it emphasizes conservative values and the alignment with Oklahoma’s standards, but it also fairly presents opposing viewpoints without overt editorializing. Overall, the article reports on ideological positions without strongly promoting one side, though the framing and source choices indicate a moderate conservative bias.

Continue Reading

Trending