Connect with us

The Center Square

Districts brace for growing costs as cyber criminals target schools | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-27 08:18:00


A 2025 report by the Center for Internet Security reveals 82% of K-12 schools experienced cyber incidents, with attacks increasing during high-stakes exam periods. These breaches disrupt education, impact food access for students reliant on school meals, and unsettle families, affecting entire communities. Cyber insurance varies, often leaving local taxpayers to cover recovery costs, especially when foreign state-backed hackers target schools. Recovery can take months and cost schools up to $1 million. Evolving attacks include double extortion and vendor impersonation. Experts urge improved cybersecurity measures despite funding challenges. Public discussions on security risk exposing sensitive information to hackers.

(The Center Square) – When hackers stole a rural school district’s computer system last year, students in the middle of midterm exams were left frustrated, but concerns went far beyond testing.

Cafeteria staff scrambled to help students who depended on school meals. Parents searched for childcare when district officials canceled classes. Seniors worried about college application deadlines while transcripts were inaccessible. 

A report from the Center for Internet Security found such attacks are becoming more sophisticated, more frequent and more damaging to K-12 schools. CIS runs the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center with the goal of better overall cybersecurity posture for governments at all levels through coordination and collaboration.

The 2025 CIS MS-ISAC K-12 Cybersecurity Report found 82% of K-12 organizations experienced cyber incidents. Of the nearly 14,000 security events, 9,300 were confirmed. It also found that attacks surge during high-stakes periods such as exams, disrupting education and forcing officials to make difficult decisions.

Randy Rose, vice president of security operations and intelligence at the Center for Internet Security, said cyber attacks at school can have “huge, broad implications.” He pointed to the unnamed rural school district highlighted in the report. Like many other schools, it serves as a central hub in the community and school disruption can create a cascade of community problems.

“Schools are really central to a community. So when they’re impacted, it’s far beyond just kids in classrooms,” he told The Center Square. “We’re talking about their kids who only eat when they’re in school. So if they’re out of school, there’s no food. There are parents whose lives are disrupted because they’re unable to work, and a lot of those parents don’t have jobs where they can take time off. So if they’re not working, they’re not making money, which has an impact on the local economy.”

Many districts have some form of insurance to cover cyber attacks, but those policies vary widely in what they cover after a breach, Rose said.

“Insurance will cover things like initial incident response. In some cases, they’ll cover ransomware payments. Sometimes they won’t,” he said. “Sometimes they’ll require you to have a particular provider that does ransomware negotiations with the actors. But sometimes they stop short of actual recovery and future implementation.”

What insurance doesn’t cover usually ends up on local taxpayers. 

“If you’re having to pay massive amounts of money for restoration and ransomware payments, guess whose taxes are going to go up next?” Rose said.

It can get more complicated when foreign state-backed groups are involved. Some policies might consider that an Act of War, which isn’t covered. 

Recovering from cyber attacks can take time, according to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report from 2023. That report found the loss of learning after an attack “ranged from 3 days to 3 weeks and recovery time ranged from 2 to 9 months.”

The GAO report found financial losses to school districts ranged from $50,000 to $1 million. The GAO also noted that the “precise national magnitude of cyberattacks on K-12 schools is unknown.”

Experts said many attacks are not reported. The issue isn’t limited to schools. It can affect the vendors that districts hire. In 2022, a cyber attack on Illuminate Education, an education technology company based in California, affected more than 1 million students, including students in New York, California, Connecticut, Washington, Oklahoma and Colorado.

Josh Bauman is the technology director at Festus R6 School District, located in Festus, Missouri. The district serves about 3,500 students at five schools near the Mississipi River and the state’s border with Illinois. It’s about 35 miles south of St. Louis. Outside of school, he hosts a K-12 Tech Talk podcast on cyberattacks, talking with school officials who have reported breaches. Most of the people on the podcast change details to protect the identity of the schools involved.

He said simple things such as public-facing school calendars can give hackers an advantage. Since they know what’s happening at the school, they can use information to make strikes more damaging, hit at key times, or wait until no one is in the building. 

Bauman said that ransomware attacks have morphed into double extortion-style attacks. First, the hackers will gain access, start extracting data, and then encrypt machines. They’ll then ask for a ransom to get the machines back. If the school district pays, the hackers will threaten to post all the information they downloaded to the dark web unless they get another ransom payment.

The latest trend has been hackers impersonating school vendors, which is also often public information that can be found on a district’s website, to switch accounts and steal the money. 

Bauman said that as the threats evolve, so must schools. In the case of a key vendor, for example, school officials may ask the company to come to the school in person to change any payment or account information. 

But unlike building a new cafeteria, gymnasium or upgrading sports facilities, money that goes into IT to prevent attacks isn’t very flashy. Rarely is it something that district’s are eager to spend money on, but some insurance policies require schools to have things like multi-factor authentication or procedures in place before they’ll offer coverage, Bauman said. 

A 2023 report from S&P Global Ratings found that cyberattacks have not affected schools’ credit quality or resulted in long-term operational problems. Successful attacks can prove costly, requiring technology investments, ransom payments, legal fees, cyber security consultant fees and costs associated with credit monitoring services for affected people, according to the S&P report. That report found 50% of providers paid to get data back.

One more problem: When Bauman and other technology directors discuss prevention efforts with school boards, those discussions often occur during public meetings streamed on the web. 

“We don’t want to be in a public setting and say, ‘Oh, hey, we’re using product X, Y, Z to protect our edge,’ and keeping in mind that the bad guys know our calendars, and if we’re streaming our board meetings, it’s a huge threat vector, we have to be very careful about what we say and where we say it,” Bauman said. 

The post Districts brace for growing costs as cyber criminals target schools | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a detailed, fact-based report on the increasing threat of cyberattacks on K–12 schools, citing expert commentary, institutional reports, and firsthand accounts. It avoids politically charged language, partisan framing, or ideological perspectives. While it mentions the financial burden on taxpayers and insurance limitations, it does so through a neutral, explanatory lens rather than advocating policy changes or assigning blame. The tone remains informative and balanced throughout, presenting cybersecurity as a public concern rather than a partisan issue. This adherence to neutral reporting and focus on factual detail supports a centrist rating.

The Center Square

Report: Feds allowed 1,000s of juvenile gang members, criminals to become citizens | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-26 06:07:00


Congress funds programs allowing illegal border crossers claiming to be minors to stay in the U.S., including the Special Immigrant Juvenile Petition (SIJP) program. Despite documented abuse and neglect, these programs remain active. The USCIS report reveals that thousands of violent gang members, including MS-13 and others, have exploited SIJP to gain lawful permanent resident status and citizenship. Many applicants had criminal records, including murder and sex crimes. Over half of approved applications were ineligible due to age fraud. The program lacks criminal background checks or moral character standards. Though the Trump administration introduced policy changes, Congress continues funding SIJP.

(The Center Square) – Congress has created several programs to allow illegal border crossers claiming to be minors to remain in the U.S. Despite years of documented abuse of the programs, Congress continues to fund them to the tune of billions of dollars.

One is the failed unaccompanied minor program, with decades of documented reports of abuse and neglect of children, The Center Square has reported. Another is the Special Immigrant Juvenile Petition (SIJP) program that allows illegal foreign national minors already involved in the juvenile court system to remain in the U.S. and obtain a pathway to citizenship.

For decades, the SIJP has been exploited by criminal actors to enable thousands of violent gang members and suspected terrorists to obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and become U.S. citizens, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) says in a new report, “Criminality, Gangs, and Program Integrity Concerns in Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions.”

Instead of requiring that illegal foreign national minors be vetted, including conducting criminal background checks, locating and verifying family members, and implementing a repatriation process, Congress in 1990 established the SIJP process without any prohibitions. The primary requirement for a SIJP is for a state juvenile court to determine that the minor could not reunify with one or both parents due to abuse, neglect or abandonment.

Congress never included a prohibition for juveniles with criminal records or a moral character standard requirement.

Under current law, nearly all SIJP applicants are approved, allowing them to obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and eventually U.S. citizenship.

The USCIS evaluated more than 300,000 SIJP applications filed between fiscal year 2013 through February 2025 and found that nearly 19,000 applicants had criminal arrests, including 120 for murder.

More than 500 were identified as known or suspected MS-13 gang members whose applications were approved; at least 70 had been charged with gang-related federal racketeering offenses.

At least 200 had been convicted of sex crimes and were registered in the National Sex Offender Registry.

From fiscal 2020 through 2024, 198,414 SIJP applications were approved. Among them, 52% weren’t even eligible because they were over age 18 and legally adults.

The overwhelming majority, 72%, were from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, where cartels and gangs recruit young boys into a life of crime.

The USCIS report also found that many SIJP applicants were gotaways – those who illegally entered the U.S. to evade detection and didn’t file immigration claims. A record more than two million gotaways were reported under the Biden administration, The Center Square exclusively reported.

The USCIS also found that 853 SIJP applicants were known or suspected gang members. Instead of being processed for deportation, their SIJP applications were approved. More than 600 were identified as MS-13 gang members; more than 500 of their applications were approved.

More than 100 known or suspected members of the 18th Street gang, at least three Tren de Aragua members, and dozens of Sureños and Norteños gang members applied for SIJP and were approved.

Of the MS-13 gang member SIJP applicants, at least 70 had already been charged with federal racketeering offenses; many others were charged with having already committed violent crimes in the U.S., the report found.

Common claims made by SIJP applicants were they were sent to the U.S. to live with a relative, they lived a life of poverty in their home country, they didn’t know one of their parents, their parents mistreated them with no corroborating evidence, their applications were “rubber stamped” by state juvenile courts, and USCIS found a repeated pattern of age and identity fraud, including falsifying names, birth dates and citizenship.

In June, the Trump administration implemented a new policy, eliminating automatically considering deferred action (and related employment authorization) for SIJP applicants who were ineligible to apply for LPR status, among other measures.

The administration and Congress have not terminated the SIJP and continue to fund it.

The post Report: Feds allowed 1,000s of juvenile gang members, criminals to become citizens | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a critical perspective on immigration programs, specifically targeting policies that allow illegal border crossers claiming to be minors to remain in the U.S. It emphasizes alleged abuses, criminal exploitation, and program failures, highlighting negative statistics about gang members and criminals benefiting from these programs. The tone and framing suggest skepticism toward current congressional funding and immigration enforcement, aligning with a more conservative or right-leaning viewpoint that favors stricter immigration controls. While it cites official reports and statistics, the selection and emphasis of facts lean toward a critical stance rather than neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

WATCH: Newsom accuses Trump of gerrymandering in Texas | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Dave Mason | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-25 18:08:00


California Governor Gavin Newsom warned of a “five-alarm fire for democracy” amid Texas Republican-led efforts to redraw congressional districts following former President Trump’s push to gain five House seats. Newsom suggested California might respond by redrawing its own districts through a ballot measure to counteract what he called an unfair partisan power grab. He criticized Trump’s administration for tactics like illegal tariffs and immigration raids. Texas Democrats condemned the redistricting as harmful to minority communities. California Republicans, including Sen. Tony Strickland, opposed mid-decade redistricting, calling it a slippery slope and accusing Newsom of political posturing ahead of a possible 2028 presidential run.

(The Center Square) – Warning of a “five-alarm fire for democracy,” Gov. Gavin Newsom Friday suggested the possibility of California redrawing its congressional districts in response to actions in Texas.

“We’re looking at different pathways. There are no maps drawn,” Newsom told reporters as he stood outside the Capitol in Sacramento with Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives.

Newsom Meets with Texas Democrats Amid Redistricting Battles

Courtesy of the Office of the Governor


The Republican-dominated Texas Legislature is holding redistricting hearings in response to Republican President Donald Trump’s call for new congressional districts. Trump, who discussed the matter with Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, told reporters the GOP could gain five more seats in the U.S. House. 

Republicans currently have a narrow majority in the House with 219 seats. Democrats could take control by flipping a few seats. Republicans also face the historic pattern of the party in control of the White House losing control of one chamber of Congress during the first midterm.

In determining the number of congressional seats, all states should play by the same rules, Newsom, a Democrat, said.

“That’s no longer the case, not with Donald Trump, not when he makes a call to the governor of Texas and talks about finding five additional seats so he can hold the line and control the majority of the House of Representatives,” Newsom said. 

“The people of California realize what’s at stake if we don’t put a stake into the heart of this administration,” Newsom said. “There may not be an election in 2028.”

In a post on X, Newsom warned of Trump trying to redistrict the GOP to victory in 2026.

Opponents of the administration’s policies can’t afford not to act, Newsom said at the news conference. “We have to fight fire with fire.”

Later at the outdoor press conference, as a fire engine coincidentally rushed by with its siren blaring, the governor added, “It’s a five-alarm fire for democracy.”

Texans are experiencing an assault on their democracy, Newsom said.

If Texas redraws congressional district lines, California has the option of bringing a ballot measure to ask voters to do likewise, Newsom said, but added various pathways are being considered. What might go on the ballot hasn’t been determined, he said.

“This is a fluid conversation that came in reaction to the phone call from Donald Trump to Greg Abbott,” Newsom said.

The governor also criticized the administration for what he called illegal tariffs, threats of conditioning disaster aid on the basis of politics and what he called the “warrantless raids” across California by U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

Before Newsom spoke, Texas state Rep. Rafael Anchía accused Trump of trying to dismantle congressional districts that historically consists of African-American and Latino communities.

“It will create great harm, not only to Texas, but all Americans,” Anchía said.

Before Newsom’s press conference, state Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, said states shouldn’t consider redistricting at any point other than the traditional 10 years between censuses.

“I think it’s a long, slippery slope for a state to do it,” Strickland told The Center Square Friday. He noted it should only be done when there’s a voting rights issue.

“What will happen is every two years, you’re going to have a power grab from all the states within the union, and I don’t think that’s good for democracy,” Strickland said.

When asked if a redistricting attempt in Texas would amount to gerrymandering, Strickland said, “I think gerrymandering happens all the time. The difference between Texas and California is Texas doesn’t have an independent citizens’ commission.”

Since 2010 in California, redistricting has been handled by an independent commission.

“By the way, I think our lines are gerrymandered,” Strickland said. “Republicans get 40 to 42% of the vote, yet we have 20% of legislative seats.

“I think he (Newsom) will have egg on his face” if California is redistricted, Strickland said. He predicted that if Newsom got California four more seats in Congress, those seats would be held by Republicans.

While noting Texas and California shouldn’t do redistricting, Strickland was critical of Newsom for focusing on national issues instead of matters related to the state.

Strickland said he believes Newsom’s attention is on running for president in 2028. The governor hasn’t announced his candidacy, but is widely believed to be eyeing the White House.

“He’s not addressing the issues that the people of California expect us to address: gas prices, affordability,” Strickland said. “Our crime is on the rise.” 

The post WATCH: Newsom accuses Trump of gerrymandering in Texas | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article reports on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s criticism of Republican-led redistricting efforts in Texas and his suggestion that California might respond with its own redistricting. The piece includes direct quotes and perspectives from both Newsom and Republican critics, presenting their views without overt editorializing. However, the focus on Newsom’s warnings, his framing of the issue as a “five-alarm fire for democracy,” and emphasis on alleged Trump administration misconduct subtly align the article with a center-left perspective. The inclusion of Republican counterpoints provides balance, keeping the overall tone mostly factual but leaning slightly toward the Democratic viewpoint.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Whatley, Cooper to vie for Tillis’ U.S. Senate seat | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-24 07:59:00


North Carolina voters will likely choose between Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley and former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper to replace Republican Sen. Thom Tillis in 2026. Neither has officially announced but are expected to do so within 10 days. Whatley, backed by former President Trump, was previously North Carolina GOP chair and is credited with recent Republican victories. Cooper, a two-term governor, boasts wins on Medicaid expansion and teacher pay but faced losses on school choice and voter ID laws. The Senate seat is seen as vulnerable, with Republicans historically dominating statewide races since 2008. Voter registration trends currently favor Republicans.

(The Center Square) – North Carolina voters will choose between Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley and former two-term Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper to succeed Republican U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, multiple reports say.

Politico on Thursday morning at dawn was first to report Whatley, based on “two people familiar with the decision.” Cooper has long been the desired option for the state’s party supporters, and WRAL in Raleigh said “people familiar” with his plans confirmed Cooper’s intention.



Gov. Roy Cooper meets his supporters after winning election for a second term as governor on Nov. 3, 2020.




Neither man has publicly announced himself a candidate. The seat is one of two held by the Grand Old Party in the chamber considered most vulnerable in the 2026 midterms. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, has the other.

Whatley’s inclusion comes with Lara Trump, daughter-in-law of President Donald Trump, saying she will not move from Florida to her native North Carolina and make a run. The two were hand-picked by the now two-term president to lead the 2024 election for the Republican National Committee, and Politico reports he’ll support Whatley for the seat.

Former U.S. Rep. Wiley Nickel is the lone Democrat to declare intention for the election. No Republicans with name recognition have given intent. On each side, there have been a number of names bandied about.

Both candidates are expected to formally announce their campaigns within 10 days. Cooper is a headliner at this weekend’s state party convention for Democrats in Raleigh.

The formal filing period is in December, and March 3 is the date for primaries. However, past patterns indicate a candidate backed by Trump and one as popular for his party as Cooper could lead to little or no competition. That would allow each to generate campaign funding for November.

President Trump on Dec. 4 chose Whatley to continue as the chairman of the national committee. He’ll be unable to run for a third term in 2028. As was done with Trump before him, the national candidate for president is expected to name the RNC chairman – though Whatley did get a formal elected vote in March 2024.

Whatley, 56, is the former chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party. When first chosen in March to succeed Ronna McDaniel, he said, “We are already well on our way to making Joe Biden a one-term president, and I look forward to working with every Republican to deliver victories up and down the ballot!”

He delivered in many places, none larger than the federal trifecta – Trump in the White House, the U.S. Senate flipped to a 53-47 majority for Republicans, and the U.S. House stayed with the GOP 220-215.

Cooper, a 68-year-old born and raised in the Nash County community of Nashville, claimed gubernatorial wins of Medicaid expansion, cumulative raises of 19% for teachers, and dismantling of the infamous bathroom bill, also known as House Bill 2, that now appears about eight years ahead of its time. The legislation didn’t allow boys and men to enter private spaces of the opposite sex by saying they were girls or women.

His losses are led by universal school choice, photo identification for voting, deregulation and abortion. The national move on the protection of women’s spaces is poised to erode a similar battle he won on HB2.

The potential battle of Whatley and Cooper will test trends. Cooper is 13-0 in elections for state House of Representatives, state Senate, state attorney general and governor. Republicans in statewide races for this decade – 2020, 2022 and 2024 – are 32-10 against Democrats.

Republicans are 5-for-5 in U.S. Senate races since losing to the late Kay Hagan in 2008. Democrats chase back to 1998 for the last time winning a Senate seat at the midterms.

Since Hagan’s win, nearly 1.3 million voter registrations have been added to the state rolls. Democrats have 555,811 fewer than they did then and Republicans have 289,657 more – an 845,468-registration difference.

The post Whatley, Cooper to vie for Tillis’ U.S. Senate seat | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a factual overview of the upcoming Senate race in North Carolina between Republican Michael Whatley and Democrat Roy Cooper without promoting a particular ideological stance. It reports on the candidates’ backgrounds, party affiliations, past achievements, and political context in a neutral tone. The language used is straightforward and descriptive, presenting information such as election timelines, endorsements, and historical voting patterns. While it references partisan issues and policies to explain each candidate’s record and challenges, it refrains from evaluative or emotionally charged language. Overall, the piece adheres to neutral reporting by covering both parties’ perspectives and facts without apparent bias or endorsement.

Continue Reading

Trending