Connect with us

The Center Square

Cruz proposes bill to help military hurt by vaccine mandate | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-08 12:00:00

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has filed another bill to help U.S. service members negatively impacted by the Biden administration’s COVID vaccine mandate at the Department of Defense.

Under former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, active-duty service members were required to take an experimental COVID vaccine, and nearly all who submitted Religious Accommodation Request (RAR) exemptions were denied. This led to service members being dishonorably discharged, demoted or other negative consequences, prompting multiple lawsuits in which federal judges ruled against all four branches of the U.S. military, The Center Square reported.

On Thursday, Cruz introduced the Reaffirming Every Servicemember’s Trust Over Religious Exemptions (RESTORE) Act to require the DOD to establish a Special Review Board to audit all four branches to investigate how and why nearly all RARs were denied.

The bill, which has multiple cosponsors, follows through on a commitment Cruz made to U.S. military members years ago. It also follows a bill he filed in January, the Allowing Military Exemptions, Recognizing Individual Concerns About New Shots (AMERICANS) Act, to ensure protections against any similar future mandates, The Center Square reported.

Although the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023 terminated the DOD COVID-19 vaccine mandate, an ultimatum Republicans made in order to pass it, it didn’t help service members who’d already been punished, demoted and discharged after their RARs were denied. Approximately 28,000 RARs were submitted. Fewer than 400 were approved in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Those who weren’t discharged for refusing to take the COVID shots still faced “cruel and unusual punishment,” demotion and dishonorable discharge, according to attorneys with Liberty Counsel representing service members who sued over the mandate, The Center Square reported.

Members of the Coast Guard were still seeking relief in a lawsuit filed by Thomas More Society, who two years after the mandate were still being denied promotions because they wouldn’t comply, The Center Square reported.

“American servicemembers are still facing unjust consequences for personal religious decisions that caused them to reject the Biden administration’s coercive COVID-19 vaccine mandates, including being denied promotions and receiving negative performance reviews,” Cruz said. “Under the RESTORE Act, these wrongs would be corrected for the men and women in uniform.”

The bill requires the secretary of defense to create a special review board to audit RARs and review the personnel records of every service member who filed one specifically for the COVID mandate. The audit requires the DOD to determine how service members’ careers were negatively impacted and to take corrective action.

Corrective action includes backdating promotions to the rank that service members would have achieved absent the adverse impact; correcting their date of rank; restoring lost pay and benefits, including back pay, retirement contributions and applicable bonuses; and reinstating them to service if they were forced out because the COVID mandate.

It also requires that all adverse administrative actions related to a service member’s refusal to take the experimental COVID drug or other protected religious accommodation are expunged from their record, including administrative reprimands, negative or inconsistent evaluations, promotion delays or denials, among others.

The bill requires the DOD to conduct the audit within one year of the bill becoming law and to provide compensation and remedies within 60 days of case resolution. It also requires transparency, including reporting findings to Congress and an audit by the inspector general.

U.S. Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, filed companion legislation in the U.S. House.

“President Trump and (Defense) Secretary (Pete) Hegseth are on a mission to fix what [former President] Joe Biden and [former Defense Secretary] Lloyd Austin did to our brave men and women in uniform,” Jackson said in a news release. “This bill gives the Trump Administration the authority to investigate and finally deliver justice to the thousands of servicemembers who stood their ground and stayed in uniform after filing Religious Accommodation Requests from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“These heroes were wrongfully punished for their religious convictions — passed over for promotions, slapped with unfair evaluations, and pressured to cave,” Jackson continued. “Those actions were absolutely wrong, and Congress must provide Secretary Hegseth with the authorities and tools he needs to make it right!”

Through years of litigation, federal judges ruled against U.S. military branches and the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly ruled against state lockdown policies, The Center Square reported.

In one case, Judge Steven Merryday rebuked Navy and Marine Corps leaders, saying they must comply with federal law because it applies to “everyone from the President to a park ranger … from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to a military recruiter – even if they don’t like it and even if they don’t agree with it. The Free Exercise Clause and RFRA are the law of the land.”

The post Cruz proposes bill to help military hurt by vaccine mandate | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The content is focused on the introduction of legislation by Senator Ted Cruz aimed at addressing the consequences of the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for military personnel. The tone is critical of the administration’s policies, with multiple mentions of the negative impact on service members due to their refusal to comply with the mandate. The article highlights support from conservative figures such as Cruz and Representative Ronny Jackson, who frame the issue in terms of protecting religious freedom and correcting injustices. This framing, along with the specific references to legal battles and efforts to restore the affected service members’ status, aligns with a right-leaning perspective, as it emphasizes opposition to the Biden administration’s policies and promotes a conservative legal stance on religious accommodation. The article does not offer a balanced viewpoint or explore opposing views, which contributes to its right-leaning bias.

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Caddo Parish official says May has most admissions for juvenile detention | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Emilee Calametti | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-08 07:00:00

(The Center Square) — As school wraps up in the summer months, juvenile crime in Caddo Parish slightly increases starting in May according to Director of Juvenile Service Andrew Randall Jr.

He said May is the highest admissions month for the detention center. 

The Center Square spoke with Randall about upcoming efforts and partnerships in the parish that are ongoing to combat juvenile crime. 

“We’re always, of course, working to not just be responsive to crime, particularly among juveniles, but to be preventative as well,” Randall said. “When we look at this time of year, school is letting out or getting ready to let out, and the summer will begin. That kind of intensifies our efforts. If we track just from the data points, even of last year, our highest month of admissions to the detention center was actually May.”

With children being out of school for the summer, Randall said they are putting in place events to keep kids busy and engaged. Juvenile services partners with parks and recreation as a means to give children in Caddo parish a summer experience. 

The Be S.A.F.E. crime prevention initiative stands for Summer Activities in a Friendly Environment and seeks to support neighborhoods and communities in the area by offering free community events. As of now, a summer curfew is in place each night from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. for those 17 and younger until August 31. 

Apart from the summer programs, probation officers work with churches and other community organizations. These efforts can include Big Brother and Big Sister type programs “that help with kids who are just looking to get plugged in, or even parents, frankly, who are looking for activities for their kids,” said Randall. 

According to Randall, the first quarter report for 2025 showed four top offenses for children arrested.

“We had 11 arrests for simple burglary, and 10 each for the domestic abuse battery and illegal possession of stolen things in the first quarter of this year,” Randall said. “The fourth one, I guess, because it’s related to the third, is illegal possession of a handgun by a juvenile. We had eight arrests for that.”

As of May 5, reported juvenile numbers showed 14 in detention, two 17-year-olds, six in the Office of Juvenile Justice, 23 CCC and 456 probation cases. Parish Administrator Erica Bryant also reported one spot left in the Caddo Corrections Center with 1,499 filled.

With efforts still ongoing to decrease juvenile crime, statistics are reporting lower than at the beginning of the year for Caddo Parish. 

Emilee Ruth Calametti currently serves as Staff Reporter for The Center Square covering the Northwestern Louisiana region. She holds her M.A. in English from Georgia State University and an additional M.A. in Journalism from New York University. Her articles have been featured in DIG Magazine, Houstonia Magazine, Bookstr, inRegister, EntertainmentNOW, AOL, MSN, and more. She is a Louisiana native with over seven years of journalism experience.

The post Caddo Parish official says May has most admissions for juvenile detention | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on juvenile crime trends and preventative efforts in Caddo Parish without expressing a clear ideological stance or promoting a particular viewpoint. It focuses on factual information, including statistics, quotes from local officials, and descriptions of community programs aimed at reducing juvenile crime. The tone is neutral and informational, adhering to straightforward reporting rather than framing the issue in a way that favors a specific political ideology. This makes the content centrist in nature, as it neither leans left nor right but provides an objective account of the situation.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Arizona, Oregon lead court motion to stop Trump’s tariffs | Arizona

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Dave Mason – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-07 17:10:00

(The Center Square) – A halt to President Donald Trump’s tariffs was sought by a court motion filed Wednesday by a coalition led by Arizona and Oregon.

The motion for a preliminary injunction was filed by Democratic attorneys general from the two states as well as Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York and Vermont. The states filed the motion in the U.S. Court of International Trade, which is primarily based in New York City. They’re asking the court to order federal agencies to stop collecting what the states call Trump’s “illegal tariffs.”

The motion is part of a lawsuit that the states filed in late April in the same court. The suit named Trump, the United States, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its acting commissioner, Peter Flores, as defendants.

The Democratic attorneys general’s lawsuit challenges the Republican president’s executive orders calling for higher tariffs on most products around the world. The tariffs include a 145% tariff on most goods from China, a 25% tariff on most products from Canada and Mexico, and 10% tariffs on most products from the rest of the world.

In addition to seeking a pause on those tariffs, the motion filed Wednesday calls for the U.S. Court of International Trade to block Trump’s plans to impose tariffs on 56 additional international trading partners on July 9.

Trump has contended he had the power to impose the tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, but the states’ lawsuit and Wednesday’s motion disagree. The states also contend the constitutional authority rests with Congress, not the president. 

“These tariffs weren’t approved by Congress, violate the Constitution, and are already driving up costs for Arizona families, small businesses and local governments,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said Wednesday.

“The law is clear. Only Congress can impose taxes like these, and the President’s attempt to sidestep that authority is both unconstitutional and economically disastrous,” Mayes said in a news release.

It’s important to pause the tariffs before they do any damage, she stressed.

The states in the lawsuit submitted an economic analysis to the court. The analysis said state and local governments in the states filing Wednesday’s motion stand to pay at least $3.4 billion per year in additional costs because of the tariffs.

“Unless this Court intervenes, the States will suffer irreparable harm,” Wednesday’s motion reads. “President Trump’s tariffs are already disrupting procurement by state agencies and universities and impairing state budgeting processes. States will have no practical ability to recover the enormous expenses they will incur when buying vital goods and equipment as importers inevitably raise prices because of the IEEPA Tariff Orders.”

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said the tariffs are hurting Oregonians and small businesses.

“Families cannot be expected to pay more at the store at a time when they’re already struggling to afford the basics.” Rayfield said in a news release. “The President can’t just slap on tariffs that hurt working people without following the law.

“I don’t know many families who can afford an extra $3,800 a year,” Rayfield said, referring to a figure his office previously published on the estimated impact on the average Oregon family. 

The post Arizona, Oregon lead court motion to stop Trump’s tariffs | Arizona appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article generally reports on the actions and positions of Democratic attorneys general filing a lawsuit against tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump, a Republican. While the piece primarily focuses on presenting the details of the lawsuit and statements from Democratic officials, the language and framing emphasize criticism of Trump’s tariffs, describing them as “illegal,” “unconstitutional,” and economically harmful. The inclusion of direct quotes from Democratic attorneys general portraying the tariffs negatively adds a critical tone toward Trump’s policies. However, the article does not explicitly promote a partisan agenda beyond reporting these perspectives. Therefore, the content leans center-left by highlighting opposition to a Republican policy through the lens of Democratic officials, without strong editorializing or overt bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Farmers’ protection from discriminating environmental policies approved | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-07 16:47:00

(The Center Square) – Protection from discrimination in financing for North Carolina farmers is poised to reach the finish line at the General Assembly.

The Senate on Wednesday evening gave final passage to a proposal that makes it illegal for a banks “denying or canceling service for agricultural producers based on greenhouse gas emissions or use of fossil-fuel derived fertilizer or powered machinery,” says the digest from the UNC School of Government in concert with the state legislative site. Environmental, social, and governance policies in investments are often called ESG.

The Farmers Protection Act, known also as Senate Bill 554 and with a companion House Bill 62, was approved 36-11 in the upper chamber with seven Democrats in favor. House Bill 62 has been in the lower chamber’s Committee on Commerce and Economic Development since March 17.

Sens. Buck Newton and Lisa Barnes of neighboring Wilson and Nash counties, respectively, shepherded the bill. No Republicans were against it. Democrats in favor were Sens. Gale Adcock and Dan Blue of Wake County; Woodson Bradley, Mujtaba Mohammed and Joyce Waddell of Mecklenburg County; Paul Lowe of Forsyth County; and Gladys Robinson of Guilford County,

If enacted, the bill becomes law immediately.

The post Farmers’ protection from discriminating environmental policies approved | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on legislative developments regarding the Farmers Protection Act in North Carolina without expressing an explicit ideological stance. It presents factual information about the bill’s content, legislative process, and voting outcome, naming both Republicans and Democrats who supported it. The language is neutral and straightforward, avoiding loaded terms or partisan framing. This adherence to balanced reporting indicates that the piece is focused on informing readers about the issue rather than advocating for a particular political perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending