Connect with us

The Center Square

Cruz proposes bill to help military hurt by vaccine mandate | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-08 12:00:00

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has filed another bill to help U.S. service members negatively impacted by the Biden administration’s COVID vaccine mandate at the Department of Defense.

Under former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, active-duty service members were required to take an experimental COVID vaccine, and nearly all who submitted Religious Accommodation Request (RAR) exemptions were denied. This led to service members being dishonorably discharged, demoted or other negative consequences, prompting multiple lawsuits in which federal judges ruled against all four branches of the U.S. military, The Center Square reported.

On Thursday, Cruz introduced the Reaffirming Every Servicemember’s Trust Over Religious Exemptions (RESTORE) Act to require the DOD to establish a Special Review Board to audit all four branches to investigate how and why nearly all RARs were denied.

The bill, which has multiple cosponsors, follows through on a commitment Cruz made to U.S. military members years ago. It also follows a bill he filed in January, the Allowing Military Exemptions, Recognizing Individual Concerns About New Shots (AMERICANS) Act, to ensure protections against any similar future mandates, The Center Square reported.

Although the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023 terminated the DOD COVID-19 vaccine mandate, an ultimatum Republicans made in order to pass it, it didn’t help service members who’d already been punished, demoted and discharged after their RARs were denied. Approximately 28,000 RARs were submitted. Fewer than 400 were approved in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Those who weren’t discharged for refusing to take the COVID shots still faced “cruel and unusual punishment,” demotion and dishonorable discharge, according to attorneys with Liberty Counsel representing service members who sued over the mandate, The Center Square reported.

Members of the Coast Guard were still seeking relief in a lawsuit filed by Thomas More Society, who two years after the mandate were still being denied promotions because they wouldn’t comply, The Center Square reported.

“American servicemembers are still facing unjust consequences for personal religious decisions that caused them to reject the Biden administration’s coercive COVID-19 vaccine mandates, including being denied promotions and receiving negative performance reviews,” Cruz said. “Under the RESTORE Act, these wrongs would be corrected for the men and women in uniform.”

The bill requires the secretary of defense to create a special review board to audit RARs and review the personnel records of every service member who filed one specifically for the COVID mandate. The audit requires the DOD to determine how service members’ careers were negatively impacted and to take corrective action.

Corrective action includes backdating promotions to the rank that service members would have achieved absent the adverse impact; correcting their date of rank; restoring lost pay and benefits, including back pay, retirement contributions and applicable bonuses; and reinstating them to service if they were forced out because the COVID mandate.

It also requires that all adverse administrative actions related to a service member’s refusal to take the experimental COVID drug or other protected religious accommodation are expunged from their record, including administrative reprimands, negative or inconsistent evaluations, promotion delays or denials, among others.

The bill requires the DOD to conduct the audit within one year of the bill becoming law and to provide compensation and remedies within 60 days of case resolution. It also requires transparency, including reporting findings to Congress and an audit by the inspector general.

U.S. Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, filed companion legislation in the U.S. House.

“President Trump and (Defense) Secretary (Pete) Hegseth are on a mission to fix what [former President] Joe Biden and [former Defense Secretary] Lloyd Austin did to our brave men and women in uniform,” Jackson said in a news release. “This bill gives the Trump Administration the authority to investigate and finally deliver justice to the thousands of servicemembers who stood their ground and stayed in uniform after filing Religious Accommodation Requests from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“These heroes were wrongfully punished for their religious convictions — passed over for promotions, slapped with unfair evaluations, and pressured to cave,” Jackson continued. “Those actions were absolutely wrong, and Congress must provide Secretary Hegseth with the authorities and tools he needs to make it right!”

Through years of litigation, federal judges ruled against U.S. military branches and the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly ruled against state lockdown policies, The Center Square reported.

In one case, Judge Steven Merryday rebuked Navy and Marine Corps leaders, saying they must comply with federal law because it applies to “everyone from the President to a park ranger … from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to a military recruiter – even if they don’t like it and even if they don’t agree with it. The Free Exercise Clause and RFRA are the law of the land.”

The post Cruz proposes bill to help military hurt by vaccine mandate | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The content is focused on the introduction of legislation by Senator Ted Cruz aimed at addressing the consequences of the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for military personnel. The tone is critical of the administration’s policies, with multiple mentions of the negative impact on service members due to their refusal to comply with the mandate. The article highlights support from conservative figures such as Cruz and Representative Ronny Jackson, who frame the issue in terms of protecting religious freedom and correcting injustices. This framing, along with the specific references to legal battles and efforts to restore the affected service members’ status, aligns with a right-leaning perspective, as it emphasizes opposition to the Biden administration’s policies and promotes a conservative legal stance on religious accommodation. The article does not offer a balanced viewpoint or explore opposing views, which contributes to its right-leaning bias.

The Center Square

U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Elyse Apel – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-27 10:33:00


The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will stop providing hormonal therapies and puberty blockers to minors amid criminal and civil investigations triggered by the Trump Administration into transgender treatments for children. The decision, citing legal risks and external threats, impacts patients under 19, though care for those over 19 continues. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel condemned the move as “shameful” and potentially illegal, warning it may constitute discrimination under Michigan law and pledging to explore legal options. Her office also reissued guidance supporting transgender care amidst a multi-state lawsuit defending minors’ access. Conservative groups praised the administration’s actions.

(The Center Square) – The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will no longer provide hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors.

This came in response to the Trump Administration opening criminal and civil investigations into those providing transgender treatments for minors throughout the country

“In light of that investigation, and given escalating external threats and risks, we will no longer provide gender affirming hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors,” said a statement from Michigan Medicine released Monday.

“We recognize the gravity and impact of this decision for our patients and our community,” it continued. “We are working closely with all those impacted, and we will continuously support the well-being of our patients, their families, and our teams.”

Michigan Medicine was just one of more than 20 doctors and clinics that were subpoenaed by the Department of Justice in early July.

They were subpoenaed for their part in “performing transgender medical procedures on children,” according to the department.

“Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

On Michigan Medicine’s webpage which previously listed its transgender treatments, it posted more details about its decision to end those for all patients under the age of 19.

“In response to unprecedented legal and regulatory threats to our clinicians and our institution, we have made the difficult decision to stop prescribing puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones for patients under age 19,” it stated. “We will continue to care for our gender diverse patients, providing all appropriate care other than puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones. Care for patients age 19 and over is not affected by this change.”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel pushed back against Michigan Medicine’s decision to end those transgender treatments, calling it “shameful, dangerous, and potentially illegal.”

In response to Michigan Medicine’s decision, Nessel’s office reissued an open letter to all Michigan health care providers.

The letter outlines that to refuse these health care services might be discrimination under Michigan law.

“This cowardly acquiescence to political pressure from this president and his administration is not what patients have come to expect from an institution that has labeled itself, ‘the leaders and the best,’ and my department will be considering all of our options if they violate Michigan law,” Nessel said. “UM has chosen instead to sacrifice the health, well-being, and likely the very lives of Michigan children, to protect itself from the ire of an administration who, oftentimes, engages in unlawful actions itself.”

Earlier this month, Nessel also joined a multi-state lawsuit seeking to protect transgender health care for minors.

Others have applauded this move and the Trump Administration’s push to end these treatments nationwide.

“Pressure from the Trump Administration is working,” said a statement from the American Principles Project, a conservative policy group that has been outspoken against transgender treatment for minors. “Thank you, POTUS.”

Elyse Apel is a reporter for The Center Square covering Colorado and Michigan. A graduate of Hillsdale College, Elyse’s writing has been published in a wide variety of national publications from the Washington Examiner to The American Spectator and The Daily Wire.

The post U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on the decision by Michigan Medicine to cease providing hormonal and puberty blocker treatments to minors, contextualizing it within investigations led by the Trump Administration and responses from various political figures. While it includes statements from both sides—Michigan Medicine, the Trump Administration, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and conservative groups—the selection and framing of quotes lean toward a right-wing perspective. For example, the article highlights language such as “mutilated children” from the Department of Justice and presents opposition to transgender treatments in largely unchallenged terms. It also notes praise from a conservative policy group without equivalent emphasis on supportive arguments for transgender healthcare. Furthermore, the reporter’s associations with conservative outlets and institutions provide subtle context but do not alone define bias. Overall, the article’s tone and framing suggest a Right-Leaning bias, as it frames the issue largely around legal and moral objections to transgender treatments for minors, aligning more with conservative viewpoints.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Chris Wade – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-26 08:22:00


New York Gov. Kathy Hochul opposes President Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from states allowing cashless bail, arguing it misunderstands New York’s bail reforms. Trump claims cashless bail endangers public safety by releasing suspects who commit further crimes. Hochul’s office counters that New York hasn’t eliminated cash bail, but reformed laws to hold violent offenders accountable, contributing to a historic low in violent crime rates. Republicans praise Trump’s stance, blaming bail reform for rising crime. NYC Mayor Eric Adams criticized rivals who support bail reform, while Cuomo’s camp defended the changes and questioned the legality of Trump’s order.

(The Center Square) — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is pushing back on President Donald Trump’s “reckless” push to do away with cashless bail, saying the move to withhold federal funding would undermine public safety. 

Trump signed an executive order Monday threatening to withhold federal funding from states and cities that allow cashless bail, arguing the policies pose a threat to public safety. The White House also released a memo with the new order highlighting several cases where suspects in New York and other cities were released without bail but later accused of committing other crimes, including murder, drug dealing and sexual assault. 

“Maintaining order and public safety requires incarcerating individuals whose pending criminal charges or criminal history demonstrate a clear ongoing risk to society,” Trump’s directive states. “When these individuals are released without bail under city or State policies, they are permitted — even encouraged — to further endanger law-abiding, hard-working Americans because they know our laws will not be enforced.” 

However, a Hochul spokesperson issued a statement blasting Trump for misunderstanding how New York’s bail law works and pointing to changes in the law that strike a balance between due process and protecting public safety. 

“New York has not eliminated cash bail. His reckless threat to withhold federal funds would only undercut law enforcement and make our communities less safe,” the statement said. “The fact is Governor Hochul changed New York’s bail laws so violent offenders are held accountable, and as a result rearrests are down. New York now has one of the lowest violent crime rates in six decades.” 

New York eliminated bail for most nonviolent felony charges in 2020 as part of overhauling the criminal justice system. A series of high-profile murders and shootings across the state prompted Hochul and others to call for tightening pre-detention bail laws. A provision in the two-year $229 billion budget signed by Hochul in April included changes to the system that gave New York state judges more discretion to keep dangerous suspects locked up ahead of trial.

But Trump’s order drew praise from New York Republicans, who have sought unsuccessfully for years to do away with the state’s bail law. 

“Kathy Hochul and NY Democrats’ failed bail reform has been a catastrophic disaster leading to a crime crisis in New York making every family and community less safe,” U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, a New York City Republican, said in a statement. “Again and again, Kathy Hochul has prioritized violent criminals over law-abiding New Yorkers. Enough is enough.” 

New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who has pushed for changes to the state’s bail law, used Trump’s order to criticize his main rivals in the upcoming election, Democratic nominee and Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who signed the original bail reform law. 

“Zohran Mamdani wants to finish what Andrew Cuomo started,” Adams, who is running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary, said in a statement. “Cuomo signed the reckless bail reform law that unleashed violent criminals into YOUR neighborhoods. Now Mamdani wants to take it even further by defunding the NYPD and leaving YOUR city — especially Black and Brown communities — defenseless.” 

A Cuomo campaign spokesman defended the 2020 bail reforms and criticized Adams for claiming that he is the “law and order” candidate in the mayoral race.

“As New York has cash bail for violent offenses, and repeat offender arrests have been decreasing, it’s clear that the drafters of this executive order don’t know the facts about New York’s law,” Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in the statement. “But it doesn’t matter as it’s very likely that this order — like many of this administration’s EOs — won’t stand up in court.”

The post Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the differing ideological positions and actions of political figures regarding bail reform without endorsing a particular viewpoint. It presents statements from both Governor Kathy Hochul and former President Donald Trump, as well as responses from other political actors across the spectrum, including Republicans and Democrats. The language remains factual and balanced, focusing on quotes and policy descriptions rather than using emotionally charged or persuasive language that would indicate a clear bias. Thus, the content adheres to neutral reporting by outlining the debate and contrasting perspectives without promoting one side over the other.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-25 14:47:00


State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee, succeeding Michael Whatley, a 2026 Senate candidate from North Carolina. Both appointments were influenced by former President Donald Trump. Gruters, 48, an accountant and current state senator, won the post unopposed and emphasized the party’s alignment with Trump’s vision, aiming for a strong 2026 midterm showing. Trump praised Gruters for his role in significant Florida Republican victories since 2016. Gruters’ political career includes serving in the Florida House (2016-18) and Senate (since 2018). He remains in his Senate seat unless running for state CFO in 2026.

(The Center Square) – State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee.

He succeeds Michael Whatley, the North Carolinian running for a U.S. Senate seat in 2026. Both were tapped by Donald Trump, Whatley as the 2024 presidential cycle heated up and Gruters in Atlanta on Friday as Trump’s wingman for the party in the 2026 midterms.

Gruters, 48, is an accountant by trade. He is not required to resign his state Senate post; in the “resign-to-run” state law, he would need to if still planning to run for state chief financial officer in 2026.

That post was given to state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia on July 16 by second-term Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. Jimmy Patronis resigned the position and Ingoglia serves until the 2026 midterms.

Trump, a Palm Beach resident when not at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., had encouraged DeSantis to choose Gruters for CFO.

In a network broadcast interview after elected, Gruters said, “This is the president’s party. This is the president’s vision, overall. The party fully embraces the president. We’re going to ride the president all the way to victory in the midterms, and we are going to win big.”

Whatley called his time as chairman “the honor of a lifetime.”

“I am immensely proud of the work we accomplished, and I am excited to pass the torch on to Chairman Gruters,” he said. “Now, it’s time to get to work and fight for the people of North Carolina.”

Gruters had no opposition for election. On social media, Trump called Whatley “incredible” and again pledged his support for the senatorial campaign.

“As state senator and chairman of the Republican Party of Florida,” Trump said of Gruters, “Joe helped us deliver massive and historic victories across the state, including my big six wins, including primaries, in 2016, 2020 and 2024, and has helped us turn Florida red as red can be!”

The connection between Gruters and Trump dates more than a decade. History traces it in earnest to a Sarasota County Statesman of the Year dinner in 2012. He followed with support in 2015 while Marco Rubio, now secretary of state in the Trump administration, and Gov. Jeb Bush were presidential candidates.

Gruters is a former member (2016-18) of the state House of Representatives. He has served in the state Senate since 2018.

The post Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the election of Joe Gruters as chairman of the Republican National Committee, detailing his background, connections to Donald Trump, and statements made by involved parties. The tone is factual and descriptive, focusing on events and quotes without overtly endorsing or criticizing the subjects. However, the content centers on Republican figures and includes positive language from Trump and associates, which may reflect a slight center-right perspective due to the subject matter and source. Overall, it adheres mostly to neutral reporting by presenting information and direct quotes rather than promoting a particular ideological viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending