News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Costs of NC health care skewed in national rankings
North Carolina is the most expensive state in the nation for health care, according to a highly cited claim made by Forbes magazine, at least. But how true are those claims about costs?
Not very, according to a new analysis that challenges both the methodology and conclusions of the Forbes ranking. The reality, researchers from Ascendient Healthcare say, is much more nuanced.
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]
But Forbes did get something right about health care costs — just not exactly what they set out to prove. In doing so, the publication revealed an under-researched issue in North Carolina health care policy.
Dubious methodology to judge costs
Which state has the most expensive health care? The answer depends on how you measure “expensive.”
That’s where things get complex. And those complexities have important implications.
The Forbes ranking relies on a weighting system devised by the authors of the study. The system puts 85% of the weight on what folks with employee-sponsored health insurance pay in premiums and deductibles each year.
Here’s one problem: less than half of North Carolinians have employee-sponsored health care.
“Somebody made some determination about the relative importance of each of these elements to be able to spit out an overall metric,” Brad Wright, former UNC Sheps Center researcher who now works at University of South Carolina, told Carolina Public Press.
“Without seeing a justification for how they did that, that’s concerning. If you gave me the same data set and I just changed those weight percentages, I’d get a different answer, and would be writing a different story.”
Forbes’s method addresses insurance shopping concerns rather than health care system performance, according to Dawn Carter, a North Carolina health care consultant who co-wrote the Ascendient analysis of health care costs in the state.
The methodology results in some interesting aberrations. Some of the least-expensive states for health care, according to Forbes, are Hawaii, California, and Massachusetts.
“Those cheapest states are states I don’t think of as being least expensive in anything,” State Treasurer Brad Briner told CPP. “Once you see that, you have to ask yourself the questions: What is the methodology here? What is the ulterior motive here?”
Briner’s skepticism of the Forbes costs ranking is a break from his predecessor.
Former State Treasurer Dale Folwell, a Republican like Briner, frequently cited North Carolina’s ranking to argue against North Carolina’s Certificate of Need laws, which regulate hospital construction.
The politicization of the Forbes data shows how powerful — and potentially arbitrary — statistics can be.
“The issue, of course, is that every data set is filtered through whatever lens the authors choose: pro-insurance, pro-state regulations, etc.,” UNC law professor Joan Krause told CPP.
Forbes defended its approach when CPP pressed about the methodology.
Forbes Advisor Editor Michelle Megna wrote: “We felt access and outcomes were most important, so gave them the most weight in our scoring.”
Other ways to measure health care costs
Ascendient’s chosen data points paint a very different picture.
“When I saw those headlines, I just thought: ‘Wait a minute. This is just not this is not consistent with what I know to be true,’” Carter told CPP.
“Let’s check their data and understand where this is coming from. And then let’s check back with the other data points that we are more familiar with.”
A common way of measuring health care costs, according to Carter, is to aggregate all health care spending — think hospitals, nursing homes, doctors — within the state and divide by total population.
Using this method, which accounts for people on all kinds of health care plans, North Carolina has the 10th-lowest health care costs in the nation.
North Carolina health care spending per capita comes out at $8,917 annually, while nationally, the average is $10,191.
Another way to rank costs is to measure hospital prices, since hospitals tend to be the most expensive option for health care. According to Ascendient, North Carolina had the 13th-lowest net price per inpatient discharge nationally.
Plus, when one looks at total insurance premiums rather than employee contributions, North Carolina drops from second to 45th-most expensive, according to Wright.
But all this does not mean that Forbes didn’t point out something true.
What Forbes got right
What Forbes proved is this: more than in any other state, NC employers shift higher portions of insurance costs onto employees.
This is a real data point, proven out by Forbes.
“There’s two different things going on here. One is ‘How much does health care cost?,’ and then the other is ‘Who pays?’” Treasurer Briner said.
“If the question is: ‘Who pays?,’ that is a very different discussion. In North Carolina, we have made the choice to have the individual pay more than the companies. In Massachusetts, for example, they’ve had the state pay a lot more than the individual.”
Though this doesn’t necessarily equate to NC’s overall health care costs being the highest, it is a salient point.
North Carolina employees contributed $1,806 for single coverage, the 14th-highest in the nation, while employers paid $5,937, the 10th-lowest.
If the issue is cost-shifting rather than expensive health care delivery, the potential policy solutions are different.
“If you don’t really look at what your data point is and what it’s measuring, then you’re going to look for policy solutions that don’t fix the root cause of the problem,” Carter said. “To generalize that one correct data point to make a claim about health care costs doesn’t paint a clear picture.”
But why do North Carolina employers do this? The answer isn’t entirely clear, even to experts who study the state’s health care system.
Carter guesses it might have something to do with North Carolina’s “business-friendly” stance.
Briner views it as a necessary balance to the low taxes and low cost-of-living North Carolina provides to its residents.
More research is needed to understand why companies shift more insurance costs onto their employees in North Carolina than in any other state. It is likely a combination of state policy decisions, labor market dynamics and regulatory choices.
Once that is understood, the real conversation begins.
This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The post Costs of NC health care skewed in national rankings appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This content presents a balanced, fact-based analysis of health care cost rankings in North Carolina without evident partisan rhetoric. It critiques the methodology of a Forbes study while providing alternative data and viewpoints from experts and officials across the political spectrum, including both current and former state treasurers from the Republican Party. The article acknowledges complexities in health care costs and cost-shifting between employers and employees, avoiding advocacy for any particular policy or ideological agenda. Overall, it aims to inform readers by dissecting data and interpretations fairly, reflecting a centrist perspective.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Flesh-eating screwworm parasite confirmed in US
SUMMARY: The flesh-eating New World screwworm parasite, which feeds on living flesh of warm-blooded animals, has been confirmed in the US for the first time in a human case in Maryland, involving a traveler from El Salvador. This parasite causes severe infections as larvae burrow into wounds, posing a major threat to livestock and wildlife. While no cases have been reported in Texas, concerns persist due to infections in Mexico, including human deaths. Texas officials are working to control the parasite using fly bait and sterile flies from Panama to prevent reproduction and stop its spread, aiming to protect both animals and humans.
The first human case of the flesh-eating screwworm parasite has been confirmed in the U.S. Federal health officials say the risk to the public is low but concerns are growing in Texas, where the agriculture community is already on alert.
WRAL App: https://www.wral.com/download-wral-apps/5787234/
The Latest Weather: https://www.wral.com/weather/page/1010362/
News Tips:
Online – https://www.wral.com/report-it/
Email – assignmentdesk@wral.com
Subscribe to WRAL:
https://youtube.com/c/wral5
Follow WRAL:
Facebook: https://facebook.com/WRALTV
X: https://twitter.com/WRAL
IG: https://instagram.com/wral
About WRAL-TV:
WRAL is your Raleigh, North Carolina news source. Check out our videos for the latest news in Raleigh, local sports, Raleigh weather, and more at https://WRAL.com
#localnews #northcarolina
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
To require full Social Security numbers to register to vote, NC would need to hurdle a federal law
SUMMARY: North Carolina’s proposed House Bill 958 would require voters to provide their full Social Security numbers when registering, a move experts say violates the 1974 federal Privacy Act, which prohibits denying rights for refusing to disclose full SSNs. Current law accepts less sensitive identifiers like driver’s license numbers or the last four SSN digits. Critics, including privacy advocates and voting rights groups, warn this requirement risks identity theft and creates barriers to voting without enhancing security. Legislators sponsoring the bill have yet to justify the full SSN demand, and the measure faces legal and procedural challenges as it advances through the House.
Read the full article
The post To require full Social Security numbers to register to vote, NC would need to hurdle a federal law appeared first on ncnewsline.com
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Man killed in train crash at Clayton railroad crossing
SUMMARY: A man, 62-year-old Bryant Alton, died after his car was struck by a Norfolk Southern cargo train at the Clayton railroad crossing near Central and East Maine around 10:45 a.m. Alton reportedly tried to bypass lowered crossing arms with flashing lights when the collision occurred. The crash severely damaged his Toyota Corolla, and police closed nearby streets for investigation and cleanup. This is the second fatal train incident in Clayton this month, following the death of a 21-year-old UNCW student hit by an Amtrak train. Local residents expressed shock, and officials have yet to respond about potential safety improvements.
A Clayton man died after attempting to drive around crossing gates at a railroad crossing on Monday morning.
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed7 days ago
First of its kind clinical trial offers new hope for Kentuckians at risk of dementia
-
Our Mississippi Home6 days ago
MSU Unveils Mixed-Use Development Featuring Boutique Hotel, Cultural Landmark
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed6 days ago
‘Alligator Alcatraz’ probed by Dems as ICE detention centers multiply in states
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
Grants to boost local emergency alert systems in question as public media agency closes
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed5 days ago
New I-55 bridge between Arkansas, Tennessee named after region’s three ‘Kings’
-
Local News6 days ago
Winged ferry that glides like a pelican tested for coastal transportation
-
News from the South - West Virginia News Feed7 days ago
WV groups call on Morrisey, McCuskey to push against end of federal solar program
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed3 days ago
DEA agents uncover 'torture chamber,' buried drugs and bones at Kentucky home