News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Congressman Edwards says Moffitt bill to eliminate ‘50 percent’ rule ‘might not be completely thought out’ • Asheville Watchdog
Western North Carolina’s congressional representative and a state senator pushing a bold Helene-related recovery plan are at loggerheads over the bill’s potential effects, with both issuing barbed statements about the other’s take on the proposal.
U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards says a state bill sponsored by Republican state Sen. Tim Moffitt that would eliminate a provision requiring owners of flooded properties to rebuild to modern standards if the damage exceeds 50 percent, would circumvent federal flood policy and place North Carolina property owners out of compliance with the program.
“I think we’ll find that Senate Bill 266 might not be completely thought out,” Edwards, R-N.C., said in an emailed statement to Asheville Watchdog. “Since Helene hit, I’ve been engaged on the matter of reviewing the National Flood Insurance Program for the sole purpose of western North Carolina’s recovery. What I’ve discovered is circumventing federal flood policy that exists to protect the most vulnerably located structures in the 100-year floodplain from further damage is not the right approach.”
As The Watchdog reported May 7, Moffitt is shepherding the bill through the North Carolina state legislature, with the measure unanimously passing the state Senate that day and now headed to the state House. The House on May 8 passed the bill on first reading and referred it to the Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations.
The bill includes a plan that would waive for two years the state building code’s “50 percent rule,” which requires any building with flood damage costing more than half its value to be rebuilt to newer, stricter building codes. Moffitt says the measure would clear up uncertainty surrounding flooded properties and spur rebuilding in the region, which was hard hit by Tropical Storm Helene.
Moffitt said previously that once the bill passes the state house, he will have to work with the federal government, as its provisions will require approval through the National Flood Insurance Program. Moffitt, who represents Henderson, Polk and Rutherford counties in the state Senate, says Edwards is mistaken in his take on the bill.
“With all due respect to Congressman Edwards, it appears there has been a misunderstanding regarding Senate Bill 266,” Moffitt said via email. “These are complex issues, and it’s an easy mistake to make.”
Moffitt said one of the most significant obstacles to rebuilding in flood-damaged areas is the requirement to meet the new base flood elevation standards.
“This requirement is triggered when damage to a structure exceeds 50 percent of its pre-storm market value,” Moffitt said. “In many communities, entire neighborhoods were lost. In others, most properties surpassed that 50 percent damage threshold. As a result, this mandate now affects not just hundreds or thousands of structures and families, but potentially many more in terms of lost jobs and stalled economic recovery.”
Moffitt said policymakers have to be cautious “not to overcorrect in response to rare, catastrophic events.”
“Reactionary policies can inadvertently hinder recovery efforts,” Moffitt said. “It is equally our duty to identify and address obstacles standing in the way of that recovery.”
Edwards, who served in the state Senate from 2016 to 2023, said the bill would place the entire state “out of compliance with NFIP’s minimum floodplain management standards and jeopardizes its NFIP eligibility.
“From the mountains to the coast, all 595 participating North Carolina communities would be at risk of losing access to flood insurance coverage across more than 132,000 policies totaling $4.3 billion in coverage,” Edwards said. “Even worse, the bill would make it harder for North Carolina to recover from future flood disasters by making homeowners in the 100-year floodplain ineligible for disaster recovery aid, including FEMA Individual Assistance, which has been so heavily relied on by the folks of NC-11.”
The 11th Congressional District covers 17 mountain counties, including Buncombe.
A chilling effect on real estate?
Edwards said that perhaps the “most chilling” effect of Moffitt’s bill would be on real estate.
“Real estate transactions, such as closings and refinancings, with mandatory purchase requirements would be halted, and federal mortgage insurance or loan guarantees, including VA loans, would no longer be available to properties in the 100-year floodplain,” Edwards said. “Furthermore, the already-strained housing market would be frozen in the floodplain.”
Moffitt maintains that SB 266, which proposes a “Historic Flood Exemption,” would “challenge overreach” from the Stafford Act, which provides the framework for federal disaster relief. Also, the bill will “highlight the limitations of the National Flood Insurance Program.”
“The bill calls for a Congressional re-evaluation of these federal frameworks,” Moffitt said. “It acknowledges that no building codes — past or present — could have anticipated or prevented the devastation caused by a 1,000-year flood event. Some structures, despite being built to modern code within the 100-year floodplain, were still completely destroyed. Yet we continue to impose those same standards on others. Why?”
Moffitt acknowledges the state bill can’t take full effect without federal action, but he also said “its passage at the state level signals the need for change and sets the stage for federal involvement.”
In his statement, Edwards said the mountains are full of “resilient, strong people” and that he understands and supports “the urgency that folks feel to get back to normal.” But Edwards continued, “it cannot be at the expense of the long-term access to federal benefits and resilience of our entire state.
“I also understand that building to new code standards can be expensive, but that is exactly what the $110 billion disaster aid package I drafted and passed in December is meant to address,” Edwards said.
He also noted that North Carolina and the City of Asheville are slated to receive a total of $1.625 billion in Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery funding to help the region recover, “including for this exact reason — to help homeowners fund resilience and retrofit projects that conform with new codes.”
Moffitt said frequent use of terms like mitigation and resiliency may be well-intentioned, but they raise concerns.
“These efforts, if not carefully balanced, risk stripping rights from those already victimized by the storm, and may further harm them through inflexible regulation,” Moffitt said. “History has shown us, notably with Hurricane Katrina, that sweeping, one-size-fits-all policy changes don’t always yield the desired results and can create unintended consequences.”
Moffitt also noted that over the past few months he’s worked with members of the U.S. House and Senate, as well as the White House, on Helene response.
“I remain optimistic that we can build the momentum necessary to bring about the federal reforms that will make SB266 a reality,” Moffitt said. “After all, the barriers we face are not immutable laws of nature — they are man-made policies. And what lawmakers have created, lawmakers can also change.”
Western Carolina University political scientist Chris Cooper said that despite the bill’s easy passage in the Senate, that doesn’t mean it will sail through the House.
”Heavy lift’ is an apt phrase’
“There’s an old adage that says, ‘The other party is your opposition; the other chamber is your enemy,’” Cooper said. “And we see a lot of bills that get through one chamber and don’t ever see the light of day in the other.”
If it does get through both chambers, the measure will need that key federal approval, and Cooper doubts that will be easy to come by.
“As we can see from Edwards’ (response), the prospects are not particularly likely,” Cooper said, noting that Moffitt acknowledged the entire process would be a heavy lift. “‘Heavy lift’ is an apt phrase. It is unlikely to be successful.”
Cooper also noted that the bill has already created odd political bedfellows, as all Senate members voted in favor, including Democrats such as Julie Mayfield, D-Buncombe, and Sen. Phil Berger Sr., president pro tempore of the Senate and a longtime state Republican power broker.
“For Chuck Edwards to be on a different side than Phil Berger Sr. is unheard of,” Cooper said. “‘Strange bedfellows’ doesn’t begin to describe what’s happening here.”
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments on this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting during this crisis is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
Related
The post Congressman Edwards says Moffitt bill to eliminate ‘50 percent’ rule ‘might not be completely thought out’ • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
The article presents a debate between two political figures, U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards and state Sen. Tim Moffitt, over a proposed state bill regarding rebuilding standards for flood-damaged properties. The coverage includes both perspectives, with Edwards criticizing the bill’s potential impact on federal flood insurance compliance, while Moffitt defends it as a necessary step to address economic recovery. The language used in Edwards’ statements suggests caution toward federal flood policy, reflecting a more conservative viewpoint. Moffitt’s defense of the bill includes emphasizing local control and questioning federal overreach, signaling a more right-leaning stance. The article doesn’t exhibit strong partisan bias but aligns with Center-Right in tone due to the focus on federal policy skepticism and state autonomy.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Crops bountiful on NC farms in ’25, but recovery from ’24 still lags
The news about crops out of North Carolina farms is good this year: the corn is tall, the soybeans leafy, the cotton fluffy and the apples ripe.
Compared to last year’s disastrous summer, when it seemed flooding was the only relief from extreme drought, this summer has left farmers feeling hopeful. In Wayne County, extension agent Daryl Anderson says this is the best corn crop the county has seen in 50 years.
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]
That’s a major turnaround from last year, when dry conditions decimated cornfields from the coast to the mountains.
Still, no year in the fields is free of struggle. Rainy weather, delayed relief payments, market conditions and dramatic federal policy shifts have kept farmers on their toes.
It’s been a wet year — at times, too wet. Tropical Depression Chantal flooded fields in Central North Carolina in early July. Unusually wet conditions all summer hurt the tobacco crop across the state.
Plus, state relief money for the tribulations of 2024 is coming slow. The legislature just approved an additional $124 million to address last year’s agricultural disasters, but farmers still haven’t received the money originally allocated to the Ag Disaster Crop Loss Program in March.
For Henderson County extension director Terry Kelley, the money is an urgent matter. In Kelley’s neck of the woods, apple farmers are still recovering from the devastation Helene wrought on their orchards. Finances are starting to spiral out of control for many.
“Our farmers are really anxious to get that money,” Kelley told Carolina Public Press.
“They’ve got bills due from last year. They’ve used their credit up to their limit and beyond. We need that money. It’s been a long summer of waiting.”
Though Helene upped the ante in the West, Kelley’s anxieties are felt across North Carolina. In Bladen County, where many 2024 crops were devastated by Tropical Storm Debbie, extension agent Matthew Strickland says there’s been a dearth of information about how the program works.
“We are not sure when those payments will be issued and exactly how they will be calculated,” Strickland said. “We were told they’d go out mid-summer. There’s been no update. Who knows when they’ll go out? Nobody really knows.”
The financial pressure extends beyond those delayed relief payments. North Carolina farmers find themselves at the whim of unexpected shifts in both the market and federal policies.
Though both quality and yield are high for field crops this year, the price of those crops at market is low. Meanwhile, input costs continue to rise. This makes for an unsettling financial equation for farmers.
Plus, President Donald Trump’s tariffs have made American crops less desirable overseas, according to Strickland. Before recent tariff hikes, lots of North Carolina corn, soybeans and tobacco made its way to China. Now, not as much.
“With the political trade wars, we’re really worried when it comes to our soybeans and tobacco,” Surry County extension agent Ryan Coe told CPP. “A lot of farmers are still waiting to see what’s going to happen. We don’t have a crystal ball.”
The tariffs haven’t been all bad, though. While some crops suffer, others have found opportunities. Kelley says the lack of Mexican tomatoes on the market has created a higher demand for local Henderson County tomatoes, for example.
Labor, too, is giving farmers pause. Many rely on legal migrant workers, but the Trump administration’s strict immigration policies have tightened the market.
“It’s more difficult now to get labor, even with legal workers,” Kelley said. “It’s not available as it once was, and it’s terribly expensive.”
That’s because wages for migrant workers on legal H-2A visas continue to rise. In North Carolina, farmers must now pay migrant workers $16.16 per hour. This number is called an Adverse Effect Wage Rate, and it’s designed to ensure that wages for American workers don’t fall.
There’s a chance, however, that going forward, North Carolina farmers may have a bigger say in American agricultural policies.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving major operations to Raleigh, in an effort to bring the department closer to the nation’s farming hubs. Some North Carolina farmers are excited about it.
“Having the USDA in this area will be good for all farmers in North Carolina,” said Mikayla Berryhill, an extension agent in Person County, where farms were flooded by Chantal’s heavy rains. “We will be able to show them what specific problems we have here in North Carolina and get help with those.”
In the meantime, it looks like it will be a bountiful harvest of crops here in North Carolina. This fall’s agritourism attractions, from corn mazes and county fairs to hay rides and apple markets, should reflect that agricultural resilience.
This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The post Crops bountiful on NC farms in ’25, but recovery from ’24 still lags appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The content presents a balanced and factual overview of agricultural conditions in North Carolina, highlighting both challenges and positive developments without evident partisan framing. It discusses impacts of federal policies, including tariffs and immigration enforcement under the Trump administration, in a straightforward manner without overt criticism or praise. The article focuses on practical issues affecting farmers, such as weather, market conditions, and government relief efforts, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Federal tax credits, other awards spur development of more than 5,000 affordable apartments in NC
SUMMARY: North Carolina is addressing its affordable housing shortage through federal tax credits, tax-exempt bonds, and state loans to build and rehab 5,012 affordable apartments valued at nearly $1.5 billion across over two dozen counties. The N.C. Housing Finance Agency selected 50 projects from 74 applications, including units for families, seniors, and people with disabilities. The Workforce Housing Loan Program, crucial for rural and moderate-income areas, received $34.7 million for 28 projects but faces uncertain future funding. Advocates warn that without its restoration, developments may concentrate in urban areas, limiting rural housing options and disaster recovery efforts. The initiative supports thousands of jobs and significant tax revenue.
The post Federal tax credits, other awards spur development of more than 5,000 affordable apartments in NC appeared first on ncnewsline.com
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed
Epstein victims, family members speak exclusively with NBC
SUMMARY: Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and their families are meeting with lawmakers, demanding justice and the release of all DOJ files related to Epstein. Despite the Trump administration claiming no new information exists, survivors say they have been ignored and unprotected. The House Oversight Committee released over 30,000 pages of Epstein files, mostly public already, while a bipartisan petition seeks full disclosure. Survivors emphasize the need for accountability and urge President Trump to rule out a pardon for convicted co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year sentence but was recently moved to a lower-security prison. They seek justice and protection for victims.
Survivors of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and family members of those women are spending two days talking with lawmakers. Members of Congress are pushing for the DOJ to release all files related to Epstein — despite the Trump administration saying there’s nothing new in those files. In an NBC exclusive, one group of survivors shares what justice would look like for them
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
DEI, campus culture wars spark early battle between likely GOP rivals for governor in Mississippi
-
Local News Video7 days ago
08/29 Ryan's “Wet End to the Week” Friday Forecast
-
The Center Square7 days ago
Extended Secret Service protection canceled for Kamala Harris | National
-
News from the South - Louisiana News Feed4 days ago
‘They broke us down’: New Orleans teachers, fired after Katrina, reflect on lives upended
-
News from the South - South Carolina News Feed6 days ago
Trump revokes Secret Service protection for former Vice President Harris after Biden had extended it
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed3 days ago
Missouri joins dozens of states in eliminating ‘luxury’ tax on diapers, period products
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed7 days ago
Florida’s springs threatened by pollution, development and climate change
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
Appeals court backs Venezuelan migrants’ effort to keep protected status