Connect with us

The Center Square

Big tech giants battle over competing age verification bills | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Nolan McKendry – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-09 12:09:00


A battle is intensifying between app stores like Google and Apple and app developers like Meta, with both lobbying heavily for favorable legislation. Bills across the U.S. are being introduced, with a Louisiana bill requiring app stores to verify user age and obtain parental consent for those under 18, shifting some responsibility from developers like Meta. While Meta supports such legislation, Google opposes it, arguing that it could violate privacy and increase risks to children. Meta has ramped up its lobbying efforts, spending millions to influence legislation, while both companies advocate for different approaches to platform accountability and user privacy.

(The Center Square) — A feisty battle is happening in states between app stores like Google and Apple and app developers like Meta. Both are spending and lobbying fiercely.

Currently, there are bills around the country working in favor of both interests. While each lobby and legislator agrees that social media is threatening child safety and that something must be done, none can agree on who ought to bear the responsibility.

In Louisiana, for instance, a bill passed committee which would require Google and Apple to verify the age of users and confirm parental consent for anyone under age 18, which would alleviate app developers — such as Meta — of some responsibility. 

Last year, Louisiana Rep. Kim Carver, R-Mandeville, introduced similar legislation. His current bill functions to do what a provision of his 2024 bill would have done, but was snuffed out by Apple, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. Now, that provision has earned its own legislation — and this time Google is working against his measure. 

Meta, on the other hand, has been working to secure legislation themselves and have indicate previous support of legislation similar to Carver’s. The social media conglomerate owned by Mark Zuckerberg is spending millions to push legislation in states and in Washington, D.C.

According to OpenSecrets, Meta currently has 63 federal lobbyists and has spent $7,990,000 at the federal level. It has spent more in the first quarter of 2025 than in any previous first quarter.

In Louisiana, Meta employs 12 lobbyists who have been paid at least $324,992 in total, according to Louisiana’s Ethics Administration — a very conservative estimate.

Meta has 13 lobbyists in Texas, 14 lobbyists in Ohio and four lobbyists in Alabama, all according to their state ethics administrations.

All of these states have had bills related to platform accountability, mostly incorporating Meta’s framework.

“There’s not enough attention on the real risks that these proposals create,” Kareem Ghanem, Google’s director of public policy, said in an interview with The Center Square. “These bills would do nothing to address people’s concerns. And in the process, they’re letting Zuckerberg and Meta off the hook by providing this false sense of security that no amount of age verification at an app store level can really solve.”

Google is urging legislators to reject the one-size-fits-all mandates like Utah’s App Store Accountability Act, warning such bills could actually increase risks to children and violate user privacy.

“Under these laws, they’d be required to collect age data from every user,” Ghanem said. “That’s unnecessary, it’s an invasion of privacy, and it creates all kinds of problems for small and medium-sized businesses. They don’t want to collect that data because it’s not relevant or necessary to providing a good experience—like, say, a weather app.”

Meta, X (formerly Twitter), and Snapchat disagree, and applauded the Utah bill.

“Parents want a one-stop shop to oversee and approve the many apps their teens want to download, and Utah has led the way in centralizing it within a device’s app store,” the companies said in a letter obtained by Fox.

The Utah bill would require app stores to share whether a user is a child or teen with all app developers.

“This level of data sharing isn’t necessary—a weather app doesn’t need to know if a user is a kid,” Google wrote in a blog post. “By contrast, a social media app does need to make significant decisions about age-appropriate content and features.”

In response, Google has responded with its own lobbying and a legislative framework focused on what it calls a more balanced, privacy-first approach. Federally, Google has spent $3,805,000 this year, according to OpenSecrets. According to Google, a bill that incorporates their framework has been introduced in Ohio, where the company is represented by 14 lobbyists.

Google’s framework would allow app stores to provide age signals only to developers who require them for safety reasons—and only with user or parental consent. The company says developers, not platforms, should be responsible for applying appropriate safety features when minors use their apps.

Meanwhile, in Louisiana, the bill under consideration would require app stores to enforce age restrictions and bar minors from accessing certain apps altogether. Whether that bill survives the full legislative process may depend on which tech titan gains the upper hand.

The post Big tech giants battle over competing age verification bills | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a balanced overview of an ongoing legislative and lobbying conflict between major tech companies, Google and Apple, and app developers including Meta. It reports on the positions and actions of the involved parties without promoting any particular viewpoint. The tone is factual and neutral, covering arguments from both sides, details of the bills, and lobbying expenditures without emotionally charged language or loaded framing. This approach suggests the content is focused on informing the reader about the issue rather than advocating a specific ideological stance.

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Judge grants preliminary injunction to pause $11 billion in public health cuts | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Dave Mason | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-16 16:40:00


A federal judge issued an indefinite freeze on the Trump administration’s plan to cut \$11 billion in public health funding, following a lawsuit filed by 23 states and the District of Columbia. Judge Mary McElroy ruled that the federal government overstepped its authority by terminating the funds, which supported programs like infectious disease control, immunization, and mental health services. She determined that Congress, not the Health and Human Services Department, had the authority to decide on such cuts. California co-led the lawsuit and praised the ruling, noting the state stood to lose over \$972 million without the challenge.

(The Center Square) – A federal judge Friday put an indefinite freeze on the Trump administration’s plan to terminate $11 billion in public health funding.

The U.S. District Court for Rhode Island granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed April 1 by the District of Columbia and 23 states, including California, Colorado, Nevada and Washington. The court on April 3 granted a temporary restraining order. Preliminary injunctions can last longer, until the court says otherwise.

In her ruling Friday, Judge Mary McElroy determined the federal government “clearly usurped Congress’s authority to spend and allocate funds” when it suddenly terminated $11 billion of public health grants on March 24. The lawsuit contends the grants were terminated with no advance notice.

The federal grants addressed everything from infectious disease outbreaks to immunization and mental and substance abuse services, McElroy said. “Without the funds, these programs could not continue.”

Congress instructed the Health and Human Services Department to spend various amounts of money in certain ways, McEloy said. She added Congress didn’t give the department the power to decide against spending the money.

“If Congress intended to charge HHS with such a determination, it would have done so at some point — like in June 2023, when it went line-by-line and rescinded some COVID-era funding but left other funding in place,” McElroy wrote in her ruling. She added states are likely to succeed in court on their argument supporting Congress on this point.

“The Court presumes that ‘Congress intends to make policy decisions itself’ rather than leaving those decisions to agencies,” McEloy said, citing the 2022 precedent West Virginia v. EPA. She cited other cases as well.

California co-led the coalition that is suing the U.S. Health and Human Services Department and its leader, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta Friday praised the preliminary injunction and said the state would have lost more than $972 million if the cuts weren’t challenged.

“Critically, the court also noted that we are likely to succeed on the merits of our claims,” Bonta said in a news release.

Besides California, the other states filing the suit are Colorado, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Washington, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Wisconsin. Plaintiffs also include the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

The post Judge grants preliminary injunction to pause $11 billion in public health cuts | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article primarily reports on a legal decision against the Trump administration’s action to cut $11 billion in public health funding, focusing on the perspective of the states and the judge’s ruling. While it provides factual details and citations, the tone and framing emphasize the criticism of the Trump administration’s move and highlight the states’ success in challenging it, which aligns more with a center-left viewpoint that generally supports government-funded public health programs. The absence of counterarguments or defenses from the administration and the positive language toward the injunction and plaintiff states suggest a subtle lean toward a center-left bias rather than strictly neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Reversing from losses in March, Texas oil and gas industry adds jobs in April | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-16 15:50:00


In April, Texas’s oil and natural gas industry reversed March job losses, adding 1,700 upstream jobs, including 900 in services and 800 in extraction. From April 2024 to 2025, the sector gained over 206,000 upstream jobs, a 1% rise. Since September 2020, upstream jobs increased by 31.2%. Jobs pay an average $128,000. Despite fewer unique job postings in April (8,826) versus March (10,120), Texas leads U.S. states in energy job postings. The industry paid $669 million in production taxes in April and a record $27.3 billion in fiscal 2024. Growing U.S. power demand highlights the need for domestic oil and gas development.

(The Center Square) – Reversing from job losses in March, the Texas oil and natural gas industry posted job gains in April, according to the latest employment data.

The industry contributed to the state’s job gains, which again led the U.S. in job creation and broke multiple employment records last month, The Center Square reported.

Upstream oil and natural gas employment climbed by 1,700 in April over the month, representing an increase in 900 jobs in the services sector and 800 jobs in oil and natural gas extraction. In March, the industry reported job losses of 800 after reporting gains in January and February of 2,600 and 1,600, respectively, The Center Square previously reported.

From April 2024 to April 2025, the industry added more than 206,000 upstream jobs, a 1% increase. The upstream sector involves oil and natural gas extraction and some types of mining. It excludes other industry sectors like refining, petrochemicals, fuels wholesaling, oilfield equipment manufacturing, pipelines, and gas utilities that support hundreds of thousands of additional jobs statewide. Industry jobs pay among the highest wages in Texas, with an average salary of $128,000 in 2024.

“The oil and natural gas industry continues to demonstrate resiliency while facing uncertainty with underlying demand concerns,” Texas Oil & Gas Association President Todd Staples said. “These positive job numbers are a tremendous benefit to the families who are supported by this industry and are important for the communities in which they occur. Sound policies that support fair business practices and laws that keep our state competitive are necessary if Texas is going to continue to benefit from oil and natural gas activity.”

Since the COVID-era low point of September 2020, the industry has added 49,000 Texas upstream jobs, a 31.2% increase, averaging monthly growth of 891 jobs, TXOGA notes. Over the same time-period, months with upstream oil and gas employment increases outnumbered those with decreases by 39 to 15.

While there were new job postings, there was a decline in overall unique postings in April compared to March, according to an analysis of the employment data by the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO). Last month, there were 8,826 active unique jobs postings for the Texas oil and natural gas industry, compared to 10,120 in March.

Texas still had more postings than other states by far. California had 2,611 unique job postings in April, followed by New York’s 2,392, Florida’s 1,744, and Colorado’s 1,290, according to the data.

The top three companies posting the greatest number of unique jobs in April were Love’s (665), Cefco (655) and John Wood Group (280), TIPRO found. Of the top ten companies listed by unique job postings last month, five were in the services sector; two were in a gasoline station/convenience store category, two in midstream and one in the oil and gas operator category.

In April, Texas energy producers paid $436 million in oil production taxes and $233 million in natural gas production taxes, according to Texas comptroller data.

This is after the industry paid a record $27.3 billion in state and local taxes and state royalties in fiscal 2024, The Center Square reported.

According to a recent U.S. Energy Information Administration Short-Term Energy Outlook report, U.S. power consumption is expected to reach record highs in 2025 and 2026. “The forecasts for surging power demands underscore the need for reliable power generation from domestic energy sources, including oil and natural gas,” TIPRO said. “Energy policies that support greater oil and gas development will continue to prove critical to keep up with the rising power generation needs in the U.S.”

The post Reversing from losses in March, Texas oil and gas industry adds jobs in April | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The content provides a factual, data-driven account of Texas’s oil and natural gas industry job performance. However, the inclusion of quotes from industry representatives, such as Todd Staples of the Texas Oil & Gas Association, and the emphasis on the industry’s positive economic impact, including high wages and tax contributions, suggests a framing that aligns more with a pro-industry perspective. The article highlights policies favorable to the industry and advocates for continued support of the sector, which subtly leans toward a center-right viewpoint. The reporting largely focuses on the economic benefits of the oil and gas industry without delving into environmental or regulatory concerns, a common characteristic of center-right coverage on energy topics.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Casada, Cothren convicted on long list of charges related to kickback scheme | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-16 13:53:00


Former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada and his chief of staff, Cade Cothren, were convicted on multiple charges including conspiracy to commit theft from federal programs, bribery, kickbacks, wire fraud, and money laundering. Prosecutors revealed Cothren impersonated a fictitious consultant, “Matthew Phoenix,” to secure state payments and political funds totaling over $220,000 through fraudulent services. Casada and former state representative Robin Smith promoted these services in exchange for kickbacks. Smith pleaded guilty in 2022 and testified at trial. Casada served as Speaker in 2019 and represented Franklin from 2003 to 2023. Both men face up to 20 years in prison and sentencing is pending.

(The Center Square) – Former Republican Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada and his chief of staff, Cade Cothren, face up to 20 years in prison after their conviction on a list of charges related to what prosecutors called a scheme to defraud the state.

The men were convicted by a jury on charges of conspiracy to commit theft from programs receiving federal funds; bribery and kickbacks concerning programs receiving federal funds; honest services wire fraud; conspiracy to commit money laundering; using a fictitious name to carry out a fraud; theft concerning programs receiving federal funds; eight counts of money laundering; and two counts of bribery and kickbacks, according to Robert E. McGuire, acting United States attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee.

Both were found guilty on additional charges. Cothren was also convicted of an additional six counts of honest services wire fraud. The jury acquitted Casada of two counts of honest services wire fraud but convicted him of two more counts.

The plan involved Cothren posing as a “Matthew Phoenix,” a fictional experienced political consultant, according to prosecutors.

Casada and former Republican state representative Robin Smith of Hixson would encourage colleagues to use Phoenix’s services in exchange for kickbacks from Cothren, according to the office. Those services included printing and designing legislative updates and survey mailers for members of the Tennessee General Assembly, federal prosecutors said.

Phoenix Solutions received $51,947 in state payments and more than $170,000 from political organizations, campaigns and candidates, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Smith pleaded guilty to one count of honest services wire fraud in 2022 and was a witness in the trial. She also faces up to 20 years in prison and will be sentenced June 9. She was first elected to the House in 2018 and resigned in 2022.

Casada was House speaker from January 2019 to August 2019. He was a member of the House, representing Franklin, from 2003 to 2023. He and Cothren will be sentenced at a later date, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. 

“Tennesseans have a right to expect honest services from their elected leaders and their staffs,” McGuire said. “Our office will continue to pursue justice on behalf of our community in cases involving public corruption and fraud committed by elected officials or their staffs.”

The post Casada, Cothren convicted on long list of charges related to kickback scheme | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a straightforward report on the legal charges and convictions involving former Republican Tennessee officials without inserting subjective commentary or opinion. It focuses on factual details such as the nature of the crimes, the individuals involved, the amounts of money, and court proceedings. The language is neutral and primarily cites official statements and legal outcomes, without editorializing or framing the story to favor or criticize any ideological perspective. Thus, it adheres to neutral, factual reporting rather than presenting a clear ideological stance or bias.

Continue Reading

Trending