Connect with us

The Center Square

Biden administration’s abortion-related rule challenged in litigation | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – 2024-05-14 13:01:00

(The Center Square) – The attorneys general of Louisiana and Mississippi have filed a lawsuit seeking to stop a new rule by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that they say could impose a national abortion regime.

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill and Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court in Lake Charles on Monday that seeks to challenge a rule that would require employers to accommodate employees’ abortions under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. 

This bipartisan bill was intended to provide protections for pregnant women in the workplace, including “reasonable accomodations” related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. 

The two Republican attorneys general are seeking an injunction to stop the rule, which goes in effect 60 days after it has been filed in the federal register. The rule is intended to implement the provisions of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act passed by Congress in 2022.

“This new action by the EEOC is another example of bureaucrats rewriting acts of Congress to their own liking, and it’s unconstitutional,” Murrill said in a news release. “We will continue to challenge this administration’s overreach and protect pregnant women.”

In the complaint, the two attorneys general say the new rule, which doesn’t require employers to pay travel costs for an abortion or an employee’s insurer to pay for an abortion, runs afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision and sent abortion policy back to the states.

The rule requires employers in states that have largely outlawed abortion such as Louisiana and Mississippi to accommodate abortions or else face federal lawsuits for monetary damages and injunctive relief as any violation of EEOC rules can draw.

“The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was a bipartisan effort to help women in the workplace while they are pregnant and following childbirth,” Fitch said in a news release. “But the Biden administration is threatening to derail commonsense measures, like adequate seating, bathroom and water breaks, and relaxed dress codes, by reading into the law required accommodations for elective abortion, even where that overrides the will of the people or the religious liberty of the employer. 

“This administration will stop at nothing to undo the Dobbs decision, which gave the people back their power over abortion policymaking and to impose a national abortion regime.”

Read More

The post Biden administration’s abortion-related rule challenged in litigation | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 14:16:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump picked an attorney in the Tennessee attorney general’s office for a spot on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Whitney Hermandorfer is currently the director of the Strategic Litigation Unit in the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office. If confirmed by the Senate, she will fill a judicial vacancy left by Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch, who announced in January she was taking senior status. The court is based in Cincinnati and hears cases from Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky and Michigan.

“The atate of Tennessee has trusted Whitney Hermandorfer over and over with complex cases of national significance. She has never let us down,” said Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti on Friday. “Her leadership of Tennessee’s Strategic Litigation Unit sets a high bar of excellence at every level of the federal judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Kentucky Attorney General Russel Coleman said Hermandorfer has been an advocate.

“As neighbors to the north, our office has been grateful for Whitney’s partnership as we uphold our laws and the Constitution. Whitney was one of the brilliant advocates behind our lawsuit to protect women’s sports, and her ability to see around legal corners led to key victories all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Coleman said in a statement.

Tennessee’s U.S. senators praised Trump’s nomination.

“She is a rising star in Tennessee, and she will be a fair-minded jurist who will apply our nation’s laws as they are written and defend the Constitution,” Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., said.

“Few can boast equal credentials, having clerked for Justices Alito and Barrett, as well as then-Judge Kavanaugh. Whitney graduated top of her law school class at the George Washington University Law School,” said Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn.

The post Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the nomination of Whitney Hermandorfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by President Donald Trump. It includes endorsements from Republican officials, highlighting her qualifications and conservative judicial credentials. The tone is positive and supportive of the nominee, with quotes praising her legal work on issues such as protecting women’s sports and upholding the Constitution, which are typically associated with conservative values. Although the article does not explicitly argue for a political position, the framing and selection of supportive quotes from Republican figures suggest a center-right bias. The content emphasizes her alignment with conservative judicial philosophy through mentions of her clerking for conservative Supreme Court justices and the praise from GOP senators, rather than presenting a neutral or balanced view including perspectives from other political sides.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Study: Georgians would have $2,680 tax increase if federal cuts expire | Georgia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 11:21:00

(The Center Square) – Georgians could have a $2,680 tax increase if Congress lets the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire by the end of the year, according to a study by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation.

The main issue facing Peach Stare businesses is a policy on full expensing, the authors of the report said.

“Georgia does not adopt full expensing business investments,” the report said. “State policymakers could adopt 100% full expensing regardless of whether federal full expensing is renewed.”

Florida has the highest possible tax burden among Georgia’s surrounding states at $3,650. Alabama is the lowest at $2,192.

Business groups are advocating for the tax cuts. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Greater North Fulton Chamber held a roundtable discussion on the tax cuts last week with U.S. Rep. Richard McCormick, R-Ga.

“Extending the pro-growth tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is critical to ensuring continued economic prosperity for Greater North Fulton,” said Kali Boatright, president and CEO of the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce, in a statement after the event. “Without action, this would prohibit job creation, investment, and growth.”

Groups are lobbying Georgia’s Democratic U.S. Senate delegation to support an extension. Sen. Jon Ossoff has indicated he will not support the tax cuts. Americans for Prosperity held a rally outside of his Atlanta office on April 15.

But there are also concerns about how the tax cuts could affect the federal deficit.

A letter sent to U.S. Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., from the Congressional Budget Office shows the tax cuts could add $37 trillion over the next 30 years, according to previous reporting by The Center Square.

The post Study: Georgians would have $2,680 tax increase if federal cuts expire | Georgia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the potential tax increase in Georgia if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is not extended, incorporating viewpoints from business groups and politicians. While it presents factual information, the emphasis on business group support for maintaining tax cuts and the use of terms like “pro-growth” reflect a center-right perspective that favors lower taxes and economic growth policies. The inclusion of opposition views is limited and somewhat framed around the deficit concern. Overall, the tone and framing lean slightly toward supporting continuation of the tax cuts, which aligns with center-right economic principles, though it maintains a largely factual report style without overt ideological promotion.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Trump signs executive order aiming to end taxpayer funding of NPR, PBS | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Morgan Sweeney – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 09:18:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump signed an executive order terminating government funding of National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service. 

As NPR and PBS have become “woke,” according to the administration, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, through which the outlets receive taxpayer funding, must abide by principles of impartiality, Trump directed the corporation and all agencies in the executive branch to stop funding the organizations to “the maximum extent allowed by law.”

Americans have many more news options today than in 1967, when the corporation was founded, and if tax dollars are going to go toward public broadcasting, it should be totally nonpartisan, according to the executive order.

“At the very least, Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage,” the order reads. “No media outlet has a constitutional right to taxpayer subsidies, and the Government is entitled to determine which categories of activities to subsidize.”

The administration described the outlets as “entities that receive tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds each year to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news’” and listed “examples of the trash that has passed for ‘news’” at the organizations in communications it sent out Friday morning.

NPR said the Declaration of Independence contained “flaws and deeply ingrained hypocrisies” in 2021, a year before it replaced its typical Independence Day reading of the founding document with a conversation about equality, according to the administration. The administration also criticized the outlets for promoting “gender-affirming care,” featuring drag queens in children’s programs and certain views on race and “white privilege.”

The executive order will likely be challenged in court, as many of Trump’s executive orders have been so far, for breaches of executive authority.

The president has signed over 140 executive orders thus far in his second term.

The post Trump signs executive order aiming to end taxpayer funding of NPR, PBS | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents the actions and statements of the Trump administration in a manner that largely reflects the administration’s critical perspective of NPR and PBS, using language that echoes conservative criticisms such as describing the outlets as “woke” and “spreading radical, woke propaganda.” The inclusion of terms like “trash that has passed for ‘news’” and emphasis on culturally conservative points of contention (e.g., gender-affirming care and drag queens in children’s programs) aligns the framing with right-leaning viewpoints. While the article reports on the executive order and the administration’s rationale, it does not provide counterpoints from NPR or PBS or additional context that might soften the critical tone, contributing to a perception of bias toward the right-leaning perspective. The tone and selected framing indicate a bias sympathetic to the Trump administration’s stance rather than maintaining neutral, balanced reporting.

Continue Reading

Trending