Connect with us

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas religious rights bill augurs more than just a clarifying guide

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Sonny Albarado – 2025-02-27 01:30:00

Arkansas religious rights bill augurs more than just a clarifying guide

by Sonny Albarado, Arkansas Advocate
February 27, 2025

Sen. Alan Clark told his colleagues Tuesday he was initially skeptical about Senate Bill 223, which would “Create the Religious Rights at Public Schools Act.” 

I too was skeptical. But unlike the Republican senator from Lonsdale, who ultimately voted for the bill, I remain skeptical.

The legislation would require public school districts and open charter schools to distribute at the beginning of each school year a copy of the act alerting students, parents and staff that they have “broad religious freedom” under the U.S. Constitution and First Amendment case law under the U.S. Supreme Court.

Among the rights the bill spells out are the ability to pray silently or out loud, individually or in groups and through other activities permitted to other groups by the school, including forming clubs. Also enumerated in the bill is the right to “display, print, recite or discuss religious texts and religious beliefs” when a student has the discretion to choose a topic or person of interest.

The bill further makes clear that students and staff can “give a Bible or other religious text to any other person at the school.”

Sen. Mark Johnson, R-Ferndale (Arkansas Secretary of State)

Bill sponsor Sen. Mark Johnson, R-Ferndale, assured his fellow senators that the legislation merely serves as a guide “to clarify religious rights at public schools” and doesn’t introduce any new rights.

Republican Sen. Breanne Davis of Russellville echoed Johnson, saying the bill is “solidifying what’s already law.”

“Students, parents and staff want to know what their religious freedoms are. There are situations … where teachers are fired, students get in trouble, and it’s because people do not know where these things are in law. … Nobody knows what their rights are,” Davis said.

If people don’t know what their rights are, it could be because schools aren’t teaching civics. But I suspect what’s going on here is that certain religious sects want free rein to inject their particular brand of religion into public schools.

Despite the senators’ assurances that the bill is innocuous and not insidious, I remain concerned that if the bill becomes law, certain deeply religious people will use it to browbeat students and teachers into accepting their version of Christianity as the one true religion.

And like Democratic Sen. Stephanie Flowers of Pine Bluff, I see the bill as potentially disruptive to public education and public schools.

In speaking against the bill, Flowers delivered a disquisition on Article 14 and Amendment 53 of the Arkansas Constitution, which promise the state will “ever maintain a general, suitable and efficient system of free public schools.”

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

“It’s a bill that lends itself to indoctrinating young vulnerable, impressionable children,” she said. “When I talk about the possibility of indoctrination, I’m concerned about these documents of historical significance that are of a religious nature.”

She cited as an example a 1956 publication, Arkansas Faith, published by the White Citizens Council of Arkansas, noting that the subscription form declares subscribers to be white Christians who will oppose integration by any legal means necessary.

Flowers also said she didn’t think the bill was appropriate for public schools. 

“It emboldens us to have religious rights outweigh and overpower our educational rights for our children.”

Sen. Stephanie Flowers (right), D-Pine Bluff, speaks against Senate Bill 223, sponsored by Sen. Mark Johnson (left), R-Ferndale, on the Senate floor on Tuesday, February 25, 2025. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)

Johnson disagreed with Flowers, saying, “What we have here is a failure to communicate.” The bill “simply affirms existing religious rights. It’s not attacking anyone’s beliefs or establishing any beliefs.”

Republican Sen. Missy Irvin of Mountain View described herself as a deeply Christian person, but opposed the bill.

Irvin remembered being told by a fellow fifth-grader in her Catholic school that her parents weren’t going to heaven because “it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to go to heaven.”

“That deeply offended me,” she said.

“Growing up Catholic, do you know how many times I was told I was going to hell because we were baptized as babies? From people that went to Baptist churches?” Irvin asked.

“I’m sorry but I just don’t think you bring people to Christ by beating them over the head with a Bible. I don’t think that’s right.”

She also described the bill as unnecessary: “You can do this already.” Her four children, who attend public schools, “pray all the time,” she said. “They carry Bibles in their backpacks. … This is not a problem, and it should not be in this law.”

While SB 223 carefully notes that “other religious texts” can be studied or read and shared in schools as well as the Bible, the language of the bill is clearly Christian-centric.

Johnson maintained that the legislation stays true to the First Amendment and is inclusive of all faiths.

“The First Amendment is messy,” Clark said. “We are a messy country. … Sometimes we don’t just disagree, we really disagree.

“I am very against the establishment of religion. [But] saying you can pray and this is what you will pray are two very different things.”

Clark is right about that, but SB 223 leaves too much room for someone in authority to tell students and teachers what they must pray.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

  

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post Arkansas religious rights bill augurs more than just a clarifying guide appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Tess Vrbin – 2025-04-30 05:15:00

by Tess Vrbin, Arkansas Advocate
April 30, 2025

Gender-nonconforming Arkansans might not meet the state’s requirements to obtain a REAL ID in order to board flights or enter certain federal buildings, which is a week away from being required by federal law.

Applicants for REAL IDs need to provide the Department of Finance and Administration with four different forms of identification:

A current driver’s license, state-issued ID, or school or work ID as proof of identityA passport or birth certificate as proof of legal presence in the United StatesA government-issued social security cardTwo documents providing proof of address, such as utility bills or bank statements, issued within the last six months

The documents “all have to sync up,” Finance Secretary Jim Hudson said last week.

Transgender and nonbinary Arkansans might have changed their names or gender information on some but not all legal documents, and state policies have made it difficult for these groups of people to obtain documents that accurately reflect who they are, advocates say. Birth certificates can be legally altered, and until this year, the federal government allowed gender-neutral information on U.S. passports.

“The government has played politics with people’s lives and upended people’s ability to accurately and properly identify themselves,” said Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas. “This has created much chaos and turmoil for no good reason while making life harder and more unsafe for all of us.”

Last year, the ACLU of Arkansas led a lawsuit against the DFA’s decision to stop issuing gender-neutral driver’s licenses. The case was dropped after Arkansas officials permanently adopted the new policy, which prohibits the use of an “X” to indicate someone’s gender in place of “M” or “F.”

Arkansans urge state finance department not to reverse gender-neutral driver’s license policy

Several transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, including Maggs Gallup of Little Rock, urged the finance department to maintain the previous policy, which had been in place for 14 years. Gallup said in an interview Monday that they are putting off obtaining a REAL ID in case doing so requires the state to remove the X gender marker from their driver’s license.

Hudson told lawmakers that a driver’s license is “not a platform for speech” and “not a platform for personal identity.” Gallup disagreed, saying their gender-neutral ID is important to them and putting incorrect information on an ID is “a deeply incongruent thing to do.”

“In an ideal world, it would be great to have the state and officials recognize our gender,” Gallup said. “They don’t get to determine who we are, no matter what letters we put on our IDs.”

REAL IDs began with a law passed by Congress in 2005 as a response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Instituting REAL IDs statewide “will help fight terrorism and reduce identity fraud,” according to the finance department website.

The federal Transportation Security Administration accepts passports in place of REAL IDs as identification to board a flight. Miss Major Griffin-Gracy, a well-known transgender advocate who lives in Little Rock, said last week on Facebook that she was initially denied access to a flight because she has an X on her driver’s license, but she was allowed to board after displaying her passport containing a male gender marker.

Griffin-Gracy is 78 years old and gender-nonconforming, and she was present at the 1969 Stonewall riot between LGBTQ+ people and police in New York City. In her Facebook video, she expressed disbelief that her passport was accepted even though she did not appear masculine. She also said “we the people” should “stand up and fight” President Donald Trump’s administration, which does not recognize gender-neutral IDs.

Gallup said they are also concerned about potential limits on travel, both domestic and international, with or without a REAL ID. Their teenage child is old enough to learn to drive but is putting off obtaining a learner’s permit because of potential bureaucratic obstacles due to their gender-nonconforming identity, Gallup said.

Bill regulating transgender Arkansans’ bathroom use heads to House despite public pushback

“This is just one part of a larger, really complicated network of new rules and legislation that are challenging to navigate” for transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, Gallup said.

State lawmakers and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders approved a law this month that will allow Arkansans to sue for damages if they encounter someone in a bathroom, changing room, shelter or correctional facility who does not align with the “designated sex” of the space.

The state has also enacted laws in the past few years that ban transgender girls from playing girls’ sports, require public school students to use bathrooms that match their gender assigned at birth, regulate pronoun use in schools and allow doctors who provide transgender minors’ health care to be sued for medical malpractice.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article appears to adopt a Center-Left perspective primarily through its focus on issues affecting transgender and nonbinary individuals, particularly with regard to identity documentation requirements in Arkansas. It emphasizes the challenges faced by gender-nonconforming individuals in obtaining accurate identification and highlights criticisms from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) regarding the state’s policy changes. The language used is sympathetic toward these groups, portraying the state’s actions as creating unnecessary turmoil and being politically motivated. Although the article provides factual information about the REAL ID process and relevant legal actions, its framing leans toward advocacy for the rights of transgender individuals, positioning the state’s policies in a critical light. This reflects a broader pattern of liberal advocacy for gender inclusivity in government identification practices. However, the piece does offer direct quotes from state officials, which helps balance the presentation of opposing views. Thus, the overall tone remains more supportive of progressive policies on gender identification, hence the Center-Left categorization.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas Army vet uses experience to help other veterans

Published

on

www.youtube.com – THV11 – 2025-04-29 20:03:22

SUMMARY: Arkansas Army veteran Jared Eeken uses his military experience and counseling background to help struggling veterans through his nonprofit, Scars and Stripes. Recognizing gaps in existing support systems, Eeken assists veterans in navigating mental health challenges, finding jobs, healthcare, and transportation, ensuring they don’t fall through the cracks. His own struggles with mental health inspired him to create this organization alongside his wife. Eeken emphasizes the importance of camaraderie and continuous support, often advocating for veterans to receive the services they’re entitled to. Recently, he was honored with the Saluting Heroes Award for his impactful work aiding Arkansas veterans.

YouTube video

One Arkansas Army veteran is showcasing how he uses his knowledge of social work and his own experiences to help other veterans in the state.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Latest updates on Conway park shooting

Published

on

www.youtube.com – THV11 – 2025-04-29 07:43:35

SUMMARY: Two suspects remain on the run after the Conway Park shooting, while two others are in custody. One of the arrested suspects, Ryan Goens, was free on bond for a previous gun charge at the time of the shooting. He had posted a $75,000 bond for an alleged February gun crime, including possession of a machine gun, and was scheduled for a hearing the same week as the shooting, but it was postponed. This case has raised concerns about the state’s bail system and balancing public safety with the presumption of innocence. Goens faces 11 counts of aggravated assault.

YouTube video

As the search continues for two additional suspects in the Conway park shooting, here’s the latest information from police.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending