Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Arizona lawmakers: Trade decision could result in 50K jobs lost | Arizona

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Zachery Schmidt | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-27 17:30:00


Five Arizona congressional members, alongside colleagues, urged the Trump administration to reconsider exiting the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement (TSA) with Mexico, fearing job losses, higher consumer prices, and supply chain harm. The TSA, established in 1996 and renewed in 2019, regulates Mexican tomato imports, supporting US economies like Arizona and Texas, which risk losing over 50,000 jobs. Citing studies from Texas A&M and University of Arizona, the lawmakers emphasized Mexican tomatoes’ significant economic contribution. Despite Department of Commerce concerns about unfair pricing, Mexican tomatoes have a 99% inspection pass rate. They warn that terminating the TSA disrupts trade, domestic industry protections, and bilateral relations.

(The Center Square) – Five Arizona congressional members and their colleagues have sent a letter to the Trump administration asking it to reconsider its decision to leave the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement

The TSA is an agreement between the United States and Mexico regarding the regulation of imported Mexican tomatoes. 

In their letter last week to Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, the congressional members said terminating this agreement would cause Americans to lose jobs, increase consumer prices and hurt the country’s agricultural supply chain.

Specifically, they are concerned about how this decision will impact state economies like Arizona, Texas, Utah and California. 

The congressional members stated that the termination of this agreement could result in more than 50,000 job losses in Arizona and Texas alone.

They said international trade is “critical” for the country’s food supply and ability to meet Americans’ expectations for “affordable, healthy, and quality fresh produce year-round.” 

They added that numerous sectors have become dependent on year-round access to tomatoes and other non-American crops. 

 The letter cited a Texas A&M University study that shows Mexican tomato imports contribute more than $8 billion yearly to America’s economy. 

Furthermore, the congressional members referenced a University of Arizona study that said Mexican tomato imports contribute almost $3.5 billion to the country’s GDP. 

This agreement between the two countries began in 1996 to help inspect tomatoes coming from Mexico. That year, America started an antidumping investigation against Mexico to determine whether its imported tomatoes were sold at a lower than fair value. 

After launching the investigation, America suspended it, and both countries agreed to the TSA. Both countries have adjusted it, with the latest iteration coming in 2019.

However, the Department of Commerce announced last month that it was leaving this deal because the current agreement did not properly protect “U.S. tomato growers from unfairly priced Mexican imports.” According to the agency’s press release, it received many comments saying that America should withdraw from the agreement. 

The DOC said this move will let “U.S. tomato growers to compete fairly in the marketplace.” 

As a result of withdrawing from the agreement, the United States will impose a 20.91% tariff on imported Mexican tomatoes starting July 14.

Regarding inspection, the elected officials said that since the TSA went into effect, America has heavily regulated Mexican tomatoes. They stated that since 2020, Mexican tomatoes at ports of entry have passed inspection at a 99% success rate. 

“These metrics demonstrate how Mexican growers, their selling agents, and customers in the U.S. overwhelmingly comply with every facet of the agreement,” they wrote.

Moreover, the congressional members said they recognized the importance of American trade law and antidumping orders. Despite this, they said the one-size-fits-all approach risks undermining a domestic tomato industry that has benefited from “over two decades of protection via minimum floor prices under successive suspension agreements.”

Addressing the DOC’s complaints about TSA, the congressional members asked for more information about them.

In addition, the members said the current “tact” will jeopardize cross-border commerce and harm Mexico’s economy.

“Terminating the TSA now would be profoundly disruptive and run counter to the administration’s goals,” they said.

U.S. Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, both D-Arizona, with U.S. Reps. David Schweikert, R-Scottsdale; Greg Stanton, R-Prescott;  and Yassamin Ansari, D-Phoenix, signed the letter with 11 other congressional members.

The post Arizona lawmakers: Trade decision could result in 50K jobs lost | Arizona appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article reports on a bipartisan group of Arizona congressional members expressing concerns about the Trump administration’s decision to exit the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement with Mexico. It presents factual information about the agreement, the economic impact of Mexican tomato imports, and the arguments from both sides—the congressional members urging reconsideration due to job losses and supply chain issues, and the Department of Commerce defending the withdrawal to protect U.S. growers from unfair pricing. The tone remains neutral, refraining from endorsing either perspective, focusing instead on the reported positions and cited studies without framing an ideological bias.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas high school football scores for Friday, Sept. 5

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Billy Gates – 2025-09-05 23:02:00

SUMMARY: Vann Hopping led No. 5 Lake Travis to a 28-20 victory over Rockwall in Central Texas high school football, scoring four touchdowns, including a spectacular 95-yard run. The game was delayed nearly an hour at halftime due to lightning. Lake Travis trailed 20-14 late in the third quarter before Hopping’s run energized the team. Lake Travis, now 2-0, will host Midland Legacy next week. Other notable local results include Anderson’s 42-0 shutout of Elgin, Dripping Springs’ 55-0 win over SA Wagner, Buda Hays’ 35-31 victory over Pflugerville, and Vandegrift’s 35-14 win against Cedar Park. The article also lists scores from across Texas.

Read the full article

The post Texas high school football scores for Friday, Sept. 5 appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

US added 22,000 jobs in August, short of expectations

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Tobias Burns – 2025-09-05 12:52:00

SUMMARY: In August, the U.S. economy added 22,000 jobs with the unemployment rate rising to 4.3%, below economists’ expectations of 75,000 jobs. This report follows President Trump’s controversial firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) head Erika McEntarfer after a weak July report and accusations of fabricated data, which experts widely condemned. The BLS attributed July’s downward revisions to late public education job reports and pandemic-related survey challenges. Private sector hiring slowed, with layoffs surging nearly 40% in August, and job openings fell to 7.18 million, the first time since 2021 that job seekers outnumbered vacancies.

Read the full article

The post US added 22,000 jobs in August, short of expectations appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Appeals court reverses ruling, allows restraining orders against O’Rourke | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-09-05 09:21:00


The Fifteenth Court of Appeals has reinstated restraining orders against former U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke, his group Powered by People, and partners like ActBlue, preventing them from moving funds out of Texas. The case involves fundraising for Texas House Democrats who fled the state opposing a redistricting law. Initially, O’Rourke ignored the orders, prompting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to seek contempt charges. After a controversial appellate ruling paused the contempt hearing, the court reversed itself to allow full review, keeping the orders active. O’Rourke denies wrongdoing, faces criminal contempt and bribery accusations, and urges supporters to continue fundraising.

(The Center Square) – In yet another reversal in an ongoing case against former U.S. Rep. Robert (Beto) O’Rourke, D-El Paso, the Fifteenth Court of Appeals has ordered that existing restraining orders already issued against him, his organization, Powered by People, and other groups remain in effect.

The case stems from O’Rourke, his group, and others raising millions of dollars for Texas House Democrats who left the state in opposition to a redistricting bill that passed the legislature and has now been signed into law.

The case was filed in Tarrant County District Court, 348th Judicial District, then appealed to the Fifteenth Court of Appeals, then an emergency filing was made with the Texas Supreme Court. Initially, Tarrant County Judge Megan Fahey issued a restraining order against O’Rourke and Powered by People, The Center Square reported. She later expanded it to include Act Blue, a Democratic Party online fundraising platform, and any other platforms or organizations they were working with that are transferring funds.

However, O’Rourke ignored the orders and continued to fundraise, prompting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to file a motion for contempt against O’Rourke, The Center Square reported.

Prior to a Sept. 2 hearing on the contempt motion, O’Rourke filed a mandamus petition with the Fifteenth Court of Appeals challenging Fahey’s orders.

In response, the appellate court halted the contempt hearing, effectively allowing Fahey’s orders to expire in an “historically unprecedented decision,” Paxton said. He then appealed to the Texas Supreme Court to reverse its decision.

In his appeal, Paxton points out that the appellate court requested his office respond to a 75-page petition in less than 24 hours, an “impossible deadline.” After his office filed a mandamus petition with the court, the appellate court issued an administrative stay of the Sept. 2 hearing “without providing the State an opportunity to respond,” he argued.

The court’s actions would have enabled O’Rourke to continue fundraising, “without even allowing the State to respond and prove to the court how he’s hurting Texans,” Paxton said. The appellate court’s ruling was an “insult to the people of Texas, an affront to our judicial system, and a disastrous precedent if allowed to continue without being reversed,” he added.

A week later, the appellate court reversed its ruling “to preserve this court’s ability to fully review” the original proceedings, it said in a one paragraph order. It also put back into effect Fahey’s orders issued against O’Rourke, Powered by People and ActBlue. It said her temporary restraining order and emergency temporary restraining order “shall remain in effect” until the appellate court reaches a decision.

Paxton said the reversal was “a welcome development.”

He also said House Democrats who left the state “abandoned Texas at the behest of financial backers who promised them money for fleeing the state and abdicating their responsibilities. Texas is not for sale, and Beto must face justice for his illegal bribery scheme.” 

The appellate court’s order prevents O’Rourke, Powered by People, and any of its institutional partners, including ActBlue, from removing any property or funds out of Texas.

O’Rourke said in a social media post that he faces criminal contempt charges, bribery accusations, his Texas-based assets have been frozen, and he and his organization have “racked up over $300,000 in legal fees” in the last two weeks of August.

He denies that he has broken any laws after he continued to fundraise and post videos of him doing so, including posting links to fundraising appeals.

He is also encouraging his followers and supporters to “continue the fight by whatever means necessary.”

The post Appeals court reverses ruling, allows restraining orders against O’Rourke | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the legal actions involving Robert (Beto) O’Rourke and Texas officials without explicitly endorsing a particular viewpoint. However, the language and framing lean toward a Center-Right perspective by emphasizing the criticisms and accusations from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, and highlighting O’Rourke’s alleged legal troubles and fundraising activities in a negative light. The article quotes Paxton’s strong condemnations and uses phrases like “illegal bribery scheme” and “abandoned Texas,” which convey a critical tone toward O’Rourke and his allies. While it includes O’Rourke’s denials, the overall framing and selection of details suggest a subtle bias favoring the state’s legal actions and skepticism of O’Rourke’s conduct, aligning the piece more with a Center-Right viewpoint rather than neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

Trending