Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Arizona lawmakers: Trade decision could result in 50K jobs lost | Arizona

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Zachery Schmidt | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-27 17:30:00


Five Arizona congressional members, alongside colleagues, urged the Trump administration to reconsider exiting the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement (TSA) with Mexico, fearing job losses, higher consumer prices, and supply chain harm. The TSA, established in 1996 and renewed in 2019, regulates Mexican tomato imports, supporting US economies like Arizona and Texas, which risk losing over 50,000 jobs. Citing studies from Texas A&M and University of Arizona, the lawmakers emphasized Mexican tomatoes’ significant economic contribution. Despite Department of Commerce concerns about unfair pricing, Mexican tomatoes have a 99% inspection pass rate. They warn that terminating the TSA disrupts trade, domestic industry protections, and bilateral relations.

(The Center Square) – Five Arizona congressional members and their colleagues have sent a letter to the Trump administration asking it to reconsider its decision to leave the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement

The TSA is an agreement between the United States and Mexico regarding the regulation of imported Mexican tomatoes. 

In their letter last week to Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, the congressional members said terminating this agreement would cause Americans to lose jobs, increase consumer prices and hurt the country’s agricultural supply chain.

Specifically, they are concerned about how this decision will impact state economies like Arizona, Texas, Utah and California. 

The congressional members stated that the termination of this agreement could result in more than 50,000 job losses in Arizona and Texas alone.

They said international trade is “critical” for the country’s food supply and ability to meet Americans’ expectations for “affordable, healthy, and quality fresh produce year-round.” 

They added that numerous sectors have become dependent on year-round access to tomatoes and other non-American crops. 

 The letter cited a Texas A&M University study that shows Mexican tomato imports contribute more than $8 billion yearly to America’s economy. 

Furthermore, the congressional members referenced a University of Arizona study that said Mexican tomato imports contribute almost $3.5 billion to the country’s GDP. 

This agreement between the two countries began in 1996 to help inspect tomatoes coming from Mexico. That year, America started an antidumping investigation against Mexico to determine whether its imported tomatoes were sold at a lower than fair value. 

After launching the investigation, America suspended it, and both countries agreed to the TSA. Both countries have adjusted it, with the latest iteration coming in 2019.

However, the Department of Commerce announced last month that it was leaving this deal because the current agreement did not properly protect “U.S. tomato growers from unfairly priced Mexican imports.” According to the agency’s press release, it received many comments saying that America should withdraw from the agreement. 

The DOC said this move will let “U.S. tomato growers to compete fairly in the marketplace.” 

As a result of withdrawing from the agreement, the United States will impose a 20.91% tariff on imported Mexican tomatoes starting July 14.

Regarding inspection, the elected officials said that since the TSA went into effect, America has heavily regulated Mexican tomatoes. They stated that since 2020, Mexican tomatoes at ports of entry have passed inspection at a 99% success rate. 

“These metrics demonstrate how Mexican growers, their selling agents, and customers in the U.S. overwhelmingly comply with every facet of the agreement,” they wrote.

Moreover, the congressional members said they recognized the importance of American trade law and antidumping orders. Despite this, they said the one-size-fits-all approach risks undermining a domestic tomato industry that has benefited from “over two decades of protection via minimum floor prices under successive suspension agreements.”

Addressing the DOC’s complaints about TSA, the congressional members asked for more information about them.

In addition, the members said the current “tact” will jeopardize cross-border commerce and harm Mexico’s economy.

“Terminating the TSA now would be profoundly disruptive and run counter to the administration’s goals,” they said.

U.S. Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego, both D-Arizona, with U.S. Reps. David Schweikert, R-Scottsdale; Greg Stanton, R-Prescott;  and Yassamin Ansari, D-Phoenix, signed the letter with 11 other congressional members.

The post Arizona lawmakers: Trade decision could result in 50K jobs lost | Arizona appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article reports on a bipartisan group of Arizona congressional members expressing concerns about the Trump administration’s decision to exit the 2019 Tomato Suspension Agreement with Mexico. It presents factual information about the agreement, the economic impact of Mexican tomato imports, and the arguments from both sides—the congressional members urging reconsideration due to job losses and supply chain issues, and the Department of Commerce defending the withdrawal to protect U.S. growers from unfair pricing. The tone remains neutral, refraining from endorsing either perspective, focusing instead on the reported positions and cited studies without framing an ideological bias.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

LIST: What to know about every Texas DPS alert

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Hannah Walker – 2025-07-20 08:27:00

SUMMARY: The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) runs a statewide alert program to quickly inform the public about urgent local threats. Alerts include AMBER Alerts for child abductions, created in memory of Amber Hagerman; Silver Alerts for missing elderly with mental conditions; Blue Alerts to apprehend violent criminals harming law enforcement; Endangered Missing Persons Alerts for those with intellectual disabilities; CLEAR Alerts for missing or endangered adults; Power Outage Alerts for electrical grid emergencies; and Active Shooter Alerts to warn nearby residents. Each alert type has specific issuance criteria. Texans can subscribe to these alerts via the Texas DPS website for timely safety information.

Read the full article

The post LIST: What to know about every Texas DPS alert appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Could Obama face charges?

Published

on

www.youtube.com – FOX 7 Austin – 2025-07-20 07:39:26

SUMMARY: The director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, referred declassified documents to the Justice Department, alleging the Obama administration influenced the 2016 election interference report. The documents suggest officials initially doubted Russia’s ability to affect election infrastructure via cyber means. After a December 2016 National Security Council meeting, leaks claimed Russian interference favored Trump. Gabbard called this a manufactured intelligence report that fueled a coup against Trump. Democrats reject these claims, citing a 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report confirming Russian interference but no vote manipulation. Meanwhile, Fox News also covered unrelated breaking news, including lawsuits, prisoner swaps, and a car attack in Los Angeles.

A look at some of the top headlines from across the country, including Tulsi Gabbard’s claims against Barack Obama and his …

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ ordinances

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Colleen DeGuzman and Joshua Fechter – 2025-07-18 15:46:00


Two years after a court ruled Texas’ 2023 House Bill 2127 (“Death Star” bill) unconstitutional for weakening local urban policies, the Third Court of Appeals overturned that decision. The law restricts cities like Houston, Austin, and San Antonio from enacting ordinances conflicting with state laws, targeting progressive policies such as worker protections. Republican lawmakers and Gov. Greg Abbott argue it streamlines regulations to boost business, while cities claim it limits self-governance. Houston, San Antonio, and El Paso had sued to block the law. The appeals court ruled cities lack standing as no ordinance challenges have yet arisen, but cities plan to explore future legal options.

Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ enforcement of local ordinances” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


Two years after a district court declared that a new state law diluting the policy-making power of blue urban areas was unconstitutional, an appeals court on Friday overruled that decision.

Texas lawmakers in 2023 passed House Bill 2127, dubbed the “Death Star” bill by opponents, which aims to overturn cities’ progressive policies and prevent them from enacting future ordinances that aren’t aligned with broad swaths of state law.

The law prevents cities and counties from creating local ordinances that overstep state laws, such as those passed in Dallas and Austin mandating water breaks for construction workers.

The bill, long sought by Gov. Greg Abbott, marks Texas Republicans’ biggest attempt to undercut the power of the state’s largest metropolitan areas, home to the most Democratic-leaning constituents and leaders.

A month after the bill passed, Houston, later joined by San Antonio and El Paso, sued the state to block the new law, arguing that it deprived elected officials of the power to enact local ordinances on a broad range of issues, such as noise regulations and mask mandates. They also were concerned that the law made it so difficult for local leaders to self-govern that it would push them to propose fewer policy changes.

“What this means is that cities like the city of Houston cannot pass ordinances in these areas unless the state of Texas explicitly gives us permission to do so,” late Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner said in 2023. “That is a total reversal from the way things have been in this state for more than a century.”

A Travis County judge ruled in August 2023 that the law was unconstitutional, but on Friday the Third Court of Appeals overturned that decision.

In its ruling, the appeals court said it agrees with the state largely for two reasons: the cities failed to point to “sufficient concreteness” of how the bill would hurt them, and made a weak case for how the state is to blame for their concerns.

The San Antonio city attorney’s office, however, noted that the court dismissed the case because “cities don’t have standing to challenge” the law because “at this point, there have been no challenges to any of our ordinances under this statute.”

Texas Republicans and business lobbyists argued that the law works to untangle a confusing patchwork of local regulations that burden businesses and slow economic growth. After the bill passed, Abbott said the law prevents cities from being “able to micromanage businesses” which are “especially driving up the costs for local businesses.”

“We are going to have one regulatory regime across the entire state on massive subject areas that will make the cost of business even lower, the ease of business even better,” Abbott later added.

Earlier this year, lawmakers failed to pass Senate Bill 2858, which sought to add teeth to the 2023 law by giving the Texas attorney general the power to sue cities and counties for adopting local rules overstepping state laws.

The San Antonio city attorney’s office said it is in the process of reviewing legal options and is coordinating with Houston and El Paso to plan out next steps.

“While this decision dismissed the current case, it doesn’t prevent us from raising these constitutional issues again in the future if a specific challenge arises under HB 2127,” the office said.

Joshua Fechter contributed to this report.


The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!

TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/18/texas-legislature-death-star-law-city-ordinances-limits/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ ordinances appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article presents a detailed examination of a Texas state law that restricts local ordinances primarily in Democratic-leaning urban areas, highlighting critics’ concerns about the law undermining local governance and progressive policies. The coverage includes statements from Democratic city officials opposing the law and references to Republican lawmakers defending it, but the overall tone emphasizes the conflict predominantly from the perspective of local government opposition to state control. The Texas Tribune is known for thoughtful, fact-driven reporting with a slight progressive lean, reflected here in the framing and selection of quotes that underscore the challenges faced by urban areas under this legislation.

Continue Reading

Trending