Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ ordinances

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Colleen DeGuzman and Joshua Fechter – 2025-07-18 15:46:00


Two years after a court ruled Texas’ 2023 House Bill 2127 (“Death Star” bill) unconstitutional for weakening local urban policies, the Third Court of Appeals overturned that decision. The law restricts cities like Houston, Austin, and San Antonio from enacting ordinances conflicting with state laws, targeting progressive policies such as worker protections. Republican lawmakers and Gov. Greg Abbott argue it streamlines regulations to boost business, while cities claim it limits self-governance. Houston, San Antonio, and El Paso had sued to block the law. The appeals court ruled cities lack standing as no ordinance challenges have yet arisen, but cities plan to explore future legal options.

Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ enforcement of local ordinances” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


Two years after a district court declared that a new state law diluting the policy-making power of blue urban areas was unconstitutional, an appeals court on Friday overruled that decision.

Texas lawmakers in 2023 passed House Bill 2127, dubbed the “Death Star” bill by opponents, which aims to overturn cities’ progressive policies and prevent them from enacting future ordinances that aren’t aligned with broad swaths of state law.

The law prevents cities and counties from creating local ordinances that overstep state laws, such as those passed in Dallas and Austin mandating water breaks for construction workers.

The bill, long sought by Gov. Greg Abbott, marks Texas Republicans’ biggest attempt to undercut the power of the state’s largest metropolitan areas, home to the most Democratic-leaning constituents and leaders.

A month after the bill passed, Houston, later joined by San Antonio and El Paso, sued the state to block the new law, arguing that it deprived elected officials of the power to enact local ordinances on a broad range of issues, such as noise regulations and mask mandates. They also were concerned that the law made it so difficult for local leaders to self-govern that it would push them to propose fewer policy changes.

“What this means is that cities like the city of Houston cannot pass ordinances in these areas unless the state of Texas explicitly gives us permission to do so,” late Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner said in 2023. “That is a total reversal from the way things have been in this state for more than a century.”

A Travis County judge ruled in August 2023 that the law was unconstitutional, but on Friday the Third Court of Appeals overturned that decision.

In its ruling, the appeals court said it agrees with the state largely for two reasons: the cities failed to point to “sufficient concreteness” of how the bill would hurt them, and made a weak case for how the state is to blame for their concerns.

The San Antonio city attorney’s office, however, noted that the court dismissed the case because “cities don’t have standing to challenge” the law because “at this point, there have been no challenges to any of our ordinances under this statute.”

Texas Republicans and business lobbyists argued that the law works to untangle a confusing patchwork of local regulations that burden businesses and slow economic growth. After the bill passed, Abbott said the law prevents cities from being “able to micromanage businesses” which are “especially driving up the costs for local businesses.”

“We are going to have one regulatory regime across the entire state on massive subject areas that will make the cost of business even lower, the ease of business even better,” Abbott later added.

Earlier this year, lawmakers failed to pass Senate Bill 2858, which sought to add teeth to the 2023 law by giving the Texas attorney general the power to sue cities and counties for adopting local rules overstepping state laws.

The San Antonio city attorney’s office said it is in the process of reviewing legal options and is coordinating with Houston and El Paso to plan out next steps.

“While this decision dismissed the current case, it doesn’t prevent us from raising these constitutional issues again in the future if a specific challenge arises under HB 2127,” the office said.

Joshua Fechter contributed to this report.


The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!

TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/18/texas-legislature-death-star-law-city-ordinances-limits/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Appeals court upholds Texas law limiting cities’ ordinances appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article presents a detailed examination of a Texas state law that restricts local ordinances primarily in Democratic-leaning urban areas, highlighting critics’ concerns about the law undermining local governance and progressive policies. The coverage includes statements from Democratic city officials opposing the law and references to Republican lawmakers defending it, but the overall tone emphasizes the conflict predominantly from the perspective of local government opposition to state control. The Texas Tribune is known for thoughtful, fact-driven reporting with a slight progressive lean, reflected here in the framing and selection of quotes that underscore the challenges faced by urban areas under this legislation.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Bystander shot during 2023 police shooting in Austin files lawsuit

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Brianna Hollis – 2025-09-09 13:25:00

SUMMARY: In December 2023, Nakole Curry, 24, filed a lawsuit after being struck in the eye by a bullet during a police shooting outside Soho Lounge on Austin’s Sixth Street, resulting in permanent blindness. The shooting occurred when a man attempted to illegally bring a gun into the bar, prompting police to intervene. The suit alleges insufficient de-escalation efforts and names the City of Austin, APD, and Soho Lounge. The officers involved were not charged, and the internal investigation closed in October 2024. Curry seeks a jury trial and damages capped by Texas law. The APD offers victim support through the Crime Victims’ Compensation Fund.

Read the full article

The post Bystander shot during 2023 police shooting in Austin files lawsuit appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Israeli military urges full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of expanded military operation

Published

on

www.kxan.com – WAFAA SHURAFA, SAMY MAGDY, and MELANIE LIDMAN, Associated Press – 2025-09-09 07:15:00

SUMMARY: The Israeli military urged a full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of an expanded offensive targeting Hamas’ stronghold amid severe famine conditions. Despite warnings, few Palestinians have left due to exhaustion, overcrowded displacement sites, and high evacuation costs. Israel demolished 50 high-rise buildings, claiming they housed Hamas military infrastructure. Emergency responders rescued some survivors but faced equipment shortages. Protests erupted in Gaza against the evacuation, with medical staff refusing to leave. Hostage families in Jerusalem urged a diplomatic resolution. The UN highlighted the humanitarian crisis, noting displaced families lack shelter and basic needs. Meanwhile, violence continues in the West Bank, with recent killings and retaliatory Israeli measures.

Read the full article

The post Israeli military urges full evacuation of Gaza City ahead of expanded military operation appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

‘Resilience and hope’ in Galveston: 125 years after greatest storm in US history | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-09-09 06:00:00


The Great Storm of 1900 devastated Galveston on September 8, killing over 8,000 people and causing $30 million in damages. Winds reached 100 mph, tides rose 16 feet, and nearly all buildings were destroyed, leaving thousands homeless. The aftermath involved severe challenges, including corpse disposal by burning to prevent epidemics, martial law, and widespread suffering. Yet, survivors, led by local leaders, rebuilt the island with seawalls, enabling it to withstand future hurricanes. On the 125th anniversary, the Bryan Museum unveiled “The Emotional Trinity,” a painting symbolizing hope amid tragedy. The storm remains the deadliest U.S. natural disaster in history.

(The Center Square) – Hope remains 125 years after the Great Storm of 1900 decimated Galveston Island.

On Sept. 8, 1900, a massive hurricane tore through Galveston, creating an estimated $30 million worth of damages at the time.

The last wind speed measured 100 miles an hour before instruments were blown away. The tide reached roughly 16 feet above sea level; the barometric pressure at 7:30 PM “was the lowest ever recorded in the United States to that day,” according to accounts in a Rosenberg Library exhibit in Galveston.

An estimated more than 8,000 people were killed in Galveston and north on the mainland, although total deaths are unknown and believed to be much higher. At least 8,000 were left homeless; nearly all buildings and churches were destroyed. Bridges, train tracks, utilities and telegraph lines were wiped out. Ocean steamers were stranded; boats were destroyed. No fresh water and a limited food supply created a desperate situation for survivors.

Corpses were strewn on land and floating in the Gulf. Dead animals, rotting vegetation and fragments of houses were piled stories deep, stretching across the east end of the island.

“There is hardly a family on the island whose household has not lost a member or more, and in some instances entire families have been washed away or killed. Hundreds who escaped from the waves did so only to become the victims of a worse death, being crushed by falling buildings,” one account describes in “Galveston in Nineteen Hundred,” published in 1900 and edited by Clarence Ousley of the Galveston Tribune.

After extensive looting and price gouging ensued among the living, the mayor declared martial law, enforced by the military and local police. All able-bodied men were required to collect the corpses to bury. The volume was so great there wasn’t enough land, men, horses and carts to bury them. Attempts to bury corpses at sea resulted in them washing back ashore. The only solution left was to burn bodies, which lasted for months. Identification of the dead was impossible, according to multiple accounts.

“Bonfires are burning all over the city. They are the funeral of a thousand festering corpses cast back upon the shore at high tide,” another account from Galveston in Nineteen Hundred reads. “Cremation has become a necessity to prevent an epidemic. The townspeople are paralyzed with fright and suffering, or are making preparations to leave the doomed island.”

After appeals were made by the governor and Clara Barton, founder of the Red Cross, relief money, supplies, volunteers and messages of hope poured in from across the country.

“In the wake of the disaster of 1900, the determined majority of the survivors stayed on Galveston Island and turned their eyes to the future,” the library states. They were led by a group of businessmen resolved to rebuild. Among them was W. L. Moody, Sr., who said, “Galveston will be rebuilt stronger and better than ever before.”

Within a few years, part of the east end of the island was raised and a seawall was built. The island survived a massive hurricane in 1915 and every subsequent hurricane. In 125 years, the island’s population increased roughly 35%; more than 8 million visit a year.

Among the many commemorative events on Sept. 8, was the unveiling of the Bryan Museum’s first grand scale outdoor painting, “The Emotional Trinity: Hope, Fear and Awe,” painted by Vickie McMillan-Hayes. It’s available to view for free.

“In the world’s great tragedies that of Galveston stands remarkable. In no other case in history has a disaster met with such courage and fortitude; in no other case in history were the people of the whole world so responsive to the call for help for the helpless,” the museum states.

Its founder, J.P. Bryan, another instrumental leader in Texas and descendent of Stephen F. Austin’s sister, encouraged the public at the unveiling, “in all things great or small, never give in. … Hope abides abundantly regardless of the tragedy and the magnitude of it that you might face like we faced here in Galveston. God’s amazing grace is available for all of us who seek it, and it abides abundantly in our lives.”



Native Texan and wildlife conservation artist Vickie McMillan-Hayes painted “The Emotional Trinity: Hope, Fear and Awe,” in commemoration of the 125 year anniversary of the Great Storm, which killed more than 8,000 people in Galveston on Sept. 8, 1900. It remains the greatest natural disaster in U.S. history. The painting is permanently displayed at the Bryan Museum in Galveston and is free to the public to view.




The painting depicts a woman holding her baby, with her son clinging to her legs, looking at sunlight with the ruins of Galveston below. The baby represents awe; the boy, fear and comfort. The mother “isn’t looking down at destruction but is gazing at hope,” Hayes said. “She has fixed her eyes upon something beautiful. She is looking to the future, renewal, rebirth. She had a choice to look down at the devastation and distraction or to lift her gaze up … in hope.

“This is a question we can all ask ourselves when faced with difficult circumstances, what are my eyes fixed on? Does it lead me on a path of peace and hope for myself? It is the Lord Jesus Christ who gives me great hope,” she said. “It is fixing my eyes on him and him alone.”

The painting was collaborative, with members of the public brushing strokes. “We all came together and added our stroke of paint to this piece, and we were a community at large coming together, making a statement of resilience and hope faced with tragedy,” she said.

The Storm of 1900 remains the deadliest natural disaster in U.S. history.

The post ‘Resilience and hope’ in Galveston: 125 years after greatest storm in US history | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the historical event of the Great Storm of 1900 in Galveston, focusing on the facts, human impact, and community response without promoting a particular political ideology. The tone is factual and commemorative, emphasizing resilience and hope in the face of tragedy. While it includes references to faith and community values, these elements are presented as part of personal perspectives rather than a political stance. Overall, the content adheres to neutral reporting by recounting historical events and public reactions without endorsing or criticizing any political viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending