Earlier this month, North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein vetoed House Bill 805, a bill that would codify sex-based definitions of “male” and “female” into state law. With his veto, Stein turns his back on vulnerable young people like me and jeopardizes the safety of those who have been led to believe they can change their sex characteristics.

By the young age of just 16 years old, I had started socially transitioning to appear as a boy. At 17, I started testosterone injections. A plastic surgeon in North Carolina cut off my healthy breasts when I was 18. My doctors said this was the only way to treat my mental illness.

Following in the footsteps of President Donald Trump’s “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” executive order, HB805 clearly defines sex-based terms like “female” and “girl” based on biological sex and prevents state funds from going toward the mutilation of minors under the guise of so-called “gender-affirming care.”

I’ve seen the harms of “gender-affirming” procedures and gender ideology firsthand. After I read about transgenderism online and saw a “gender specialist,” I was fast-tracked for medicalization. When the various procedures I was subjected to didn’t help me, I detransitioned and was left to navigate the aftermath alone. Now, I’ll never have the ability to breastfeed my son, my voice is permanently lowered, and my health is a constant battle.

Gov. Stein could have been the first Democratic governor to sign legislation aimed at protecting young adults like me. Instead, he refused to break ranks with his party and the other Democratic governors who have vetoed similar legislation in other states, setting the bill – and vulnerable children – back.

Now, the issue returns to the North Carolina Legislature, where lawmakers have the opportunity to override Stein’s dangerous veto and send a message to struggling youth that their voices have been heard and that their physical and mental well-being will not be sacrificed for the sake of ideology.

If North Carolina lawmakers choose to take this stand – overriding the governor’s veto of HB805 – they will join 17 other states that have adopted laws inspired by Independent Women’s Voice’s sex-definition model, making it clear that states will not sacrifice the truth, or children, for ideology.

Gender ideology has harmed far too many young adults. From detransitioners like me to female athletes forced to compete against trans-identifying males, our youth deserve to be protected.

For the sake of the millions of children who live in North Carolina, I hope the Legislature overrides Gov. Stein’s veto. My story should never have happened. And if this bill passes, North Carolinians are a step closer to ensuring it never happens again.

Prisha Mosley is an Independent Women ambassador and detransitioner. Independent Women Features, the storytelling platform of Independent Women, featured Prisha’s story as part of its “Identity Crisis” docu-series, which highlights the irreversible harms of gender ideology. Prisha’s story, including her pregnancy journey, was documented in two parts, which can be found here and here.

(The Center Square) – When hackers stole a rural school district’s computer system last year, students in the middle of midterm exams were left frustrated, but concerns went far beyond testing.

Cafeteria staff scrambled to help students who depended on school meals. Parents searched for childcare when district officials canceled classes. Seniors worried about college application deadlines while transcripts were inaccessible. 

A report from the Center for Internet Security found such attacks are becoming more sophisticated, more frequent and more damaging to K-12 schools. CIS runs the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center with the goal of better overall cybersecurity posture for governments at all levels through coordination and collaboration.

The 2025 CIS MS-ISAC K-12 Cybersecurity Report found 82% of K-12 organizations experienced cyber incidents. Of the nearly 14,000 security events, 9,300 were confirmed. It also found that attacks surge during high-stakes periods such as exams, disrupting education and forcing officials to make difficult decisions.

Randy Rose, vice president of security operations and intelligence at the Center for Internet Security, said cyber attacks at school can have “huge, broad implications.” He pointed to the unnamed rural school district highlighted in the report. Like many other schools, it serves as a central hub in the community and school disruption can create a cascade of community problems.

“Schools are really central to a community. So when they’re impacted, it’s far beyond just kids in classrooms,” he told The Center Square. “We’re talking about their kids who only eat when they’re in school. So if they’re out of school, there’s no food. There are parents whose lives are disrupted because they’re unable to work, and a lot of those parents don’t have jobs where they can take time off. So if they’re not working, they’re not making money, which has an impact on the local economy.”

Many districts have some form of insurance to cover cyber attacks, but those policies vary widely in what they cover after a breach, Rose said.

“Insurance will cover things like initial incident response. In some cases, they’ll cover ransomware payments. Sometimes they won’t,” he said. “Sometimes they’ll require you to have a particular provider that does ransomware negotiations with the actors. But sometimes they stop short of actual recovery and future implementation.”

What insurance doesn’t cover usually ends up on local taxpayers. 

“If you’re having to pay massive amounts of money for restoration and ransomware payments, guess whose taxes are going to go up next?” Rose said.

It can get more complicated when foreign state-backed groups are involved. Some policies might consider that an Act of War, which isn’t covered. 

Recovering from cyber attacks can take time, according to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report from 2023. That report found the loss of learning after an attack “ranged from 3 days to 3 weeks and recovery time ranged from 2 to 9 months.”

The GAO report found financial losses to school districts ranged from $50,000 to $1 million. The GAO also noted that the “precise national magnitude of cyberattacks on K-12 schools is unknown.”

Experts said many attacks are not reported. The issue isn’t limited to schools. It can affect the vendors that districts hire. In 2022, a cyber attack on Illuminate Education, an education technology company based in California, affected more than 1 million students, including students in New York, California, Connecticut, Washington, Oklahoma and Colorado.

Josh Bauman is the technology director at Festus R6 School District, located in Festus, Missouri. The district serves about 3,500 students at five schools near the Mississipi River and the state’s border with Illinois. It’s about 35 miles south of St. Louis. Outside of school, he hosts a K-12 Tech Talk podcast on cyberattacks, talking with school officials who have reported breaches. Most of the people on the podcast change details to protect the identity of the schools involved.

He said simple things such as public-facing school calendars can give hackers an advantage. Since they know what’s happening at the school, they can use information to make strikes more damaging, hit at key times, or wait until no one is in the building. 

Bauman said that ransomware attacks have morphed into double extortion-style attacks. First, the hackers will gain access, start extracting data, and then encrypt machines. They’ll then ask for a ransom to get the machines back. If the school district pays, the hackers will threaten to post all the information they downloaded to the dark web unless they get another ransom payment.

The latest trend has been hackers impersonating school vendors, which is also often public information that can be found on a district’s website, to switch accounts and steal the money. 

Bauman said that as the threats evolve, so must schools. In the case of a key vendor, for example, school officials may ask the company to come to the school in person to change any payment or account information. 

But unlike building a new cafeteria, gymnasium or upgrading sports facilities, money that goes into IT to prevent attacks isn’t very flashy. Rarely is it something that district’s are eager to spend money on, but some insurance policies require schools to have things like multi-factor authentication or procedures in place before they’ll offer coverage, Bauman said. 

A 2023 report from S&P Global Ratings found that cyberattacks have not affected schools’ credit quality or resulted in long-term operational problems. Successful attacks can prove costly, requiring technology investments, ransom payments, legal fees, cyber security consultant fees and costs associated with credit monitoring services for affected people, according to the S&P report. That report found 50% of providers paid to get data back.

One more problem: When Bauman and other technology directors discuss prevention efforts with school boards, those discussions often occur during public meetings streamed on the web. 

“We don’t want to be in a public setting and say, ‘Oh, hey, we’re using product X, Y, Z to protect our edge,’ and keeping in mind that the bad guys know our calendars, and if we’re streaming our board meetings, it’s a huge threat vector, we have to be very careful about what we say and where we say it,” Bauman said. 

(The Center Square) – Congress has created several programs to allow illegal border crossers claiming to be minors to remain in the U.S. Despite years of documented abuse of the programs, Congress continues to fund them to the tune of billions of dollars.

One is the failed unaccompanied minor program, with decades of documented reports of abuse and neglect of children, The Center Square has reported. Another is the Special Immigrant Juvenile Petition (SIJP) program that allows illegal foreign national minors already involved in the juvenile court system to remain in the U.S. and obtain a pathway to citizenship.

For decades, the SIJP has been exploited by criminal actors to enable thousands of violent gang members and suspected terrorists to obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and become U.S. citizens, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) says in a new report, “Criminality, Gangs, and Program Integrity Concerns in Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions.”

Instead of requiring that illegal foreign national minors be vetted, including conducting criminal background checks, locating and verifying family members, and implementing a repatriation process, Congress in 1990 established the SIJP process without any prohibitions. The primary requirement for a SIJP is for a state juvenile court to determine that the minor could not reunify with one or both parents due to abuse, neglect or abandonment.

Congress never included a prohibition for juveniles with criminal records or a moral character standard requirement.

Under current law, nearly all SIJP applicants are approved, allowing them to obtain lawful permanent resident (LPR) status and eventually U.S. citizenship.

The USCIS evaluated more than 300,000 SIJP applications filed between fiscal year 2013 through February 2025 and found that nearly 19,000 applicants had criminal arrests, including 120 for murder.

More than 500 were identified as known or suspected MS-13 gang members whose applications were approved; at least 70 had been charged with gang-related federal racketeering offenses.

At least 200 had been convicted of sex crimes and were registered in the National Sex Offender Registry.

From fiscal 2020 through 2024, 198,414 SIJP applications were approved. Among them, 52% weren’t even eligible because they were over age 18 and legally adults.

The overwhelming majority, 72%, were from Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras, where cartels and gangs recruit young boys into a life of crime.

The USCIS report also found that many SIJP applicants were gotaways – those who illegally entered the U.S. to evade detection and didn’t file immigration claims. A record more than two million gotaways were reported under the Biden administration, The Center Square exclusively reported.

The USCIS also found that 853 SIJP applicants were known or suspected gang members. Instead of being processed for deportation, their SIJP applications were approved. More than 600 were identified as MS-13 gang members; more than 500 of their applications were approved.

More than 100 known or suspected members of the 18th Street gang, at least three Tren de Aragua members, and dozens of Sureños and Norteños gang members applied for SIJP and were approved.

Of the MS-13 gang member SIJP applicants, at least 70 had already been charged with federal racketeering offenses; many others were charged with having already committed violent crimes in the U.S., the report found.

Common claims made by SIJP applicants were they were sent to the U.S. to live with a relative, they lived a life of poverty in their home country, they didn’t know one of their parents, their parents mistreated them with no corroborating evidence, their applications were “rubber stamped” by state juvenile courts, and USCIS found a repeated pattern of age and identity fraud, including falsifying names, birth dates and citizenship.

In June, the Trump administration implemented a new policy, eliminating automatically considering deferred action (and related employment authorization) for SIJP applicants who were ineligible to apply for LPR status, among other measures.

The administration and Congress have not terminated the SIJP and continue to fund it.