Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

APD says no charges coming after investigation of allegations that Edwards assaulted Rotary member • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – TOM FIEDLER – 2025-05-13 10:11:00


The Asheville Police Department declined to file charges after an alleged assault by Republican Congressman Chuck Edwards on a Rotary Club attendee during a heated encounter at a Rotary District 7670 convention. The incident followed Edwards’s controversial and partisan speech, which deviated from the expected post-storm recovery update and upset attendees. Edwards claimed the attendee was intoxicated and belligerent. Police conducted interviews and consulted the Buncombe County District Attorney before deciding no criminal charges were warranted. Rotary leaders emphasized their apolitical stance and disappointment with Edwards’s speech, which focused on defending President Trump’s tariffs, sparking unrest among the audience.

The Asheville Police Department declined Tuesday to file charges following allegations that Republican Congressman Chuck Edwards assaulted a Rotary Club convention attendee during a heated encounter Saturday evening after what witnesses say was the lawmaker’s inappropriately partisan speech. 

In a statement released Tuesday, the department confirmed that police responded to a call from “an individual” who reported having been “assaulted by Congressman Chuck Edwards.” The caller wasn’t identified in the statement, nor were the allegation’s details made public.  

A report of the incident at Asheville’s Embassy Suites hotel was filed by police who responded to the call at 6:37 p.m. Saturday. The report was heavily redacted before public release. Asheville Police spokesman Rick Rice told Asheville Watchdog in an email that the initial report doesn’t contain any narrative written by the responding police officers nor does it mention Edwards or contain the name of the caller.

The statement issued Tuesday characterized the encounter between Edwards and the unnamed Rotarian as a “disturbance”  and said the department “conducted a thorough investigation, which included interviews with the reporting party and multiple witnesses.

“After reviewing the findings and consulting with the Buncombe County District Attorney’s Office, it was mutually determined that no criminal charges against any party involved in the incident will be initiated.” 

In a statement released by his congressional office Sunday, Edwards said he was confronted by a member of the convention audience while leaving the room; he placed blame on the Rotarian.

“Immediately following a speaking event, I refused to engage with an intoxicated man that was cursing,” the congressman said.  “He became more belligerent and later called the police. His behavior was embarrassing to the people at the event and was duly noted by the police.”

Edwards didn’t respond to a follow-up text from The Watchdog asking that he address the Rotarian’s allegation that Edwards had struck him during the encounter. 

The congressman had been invited to the Rotary Club District 7670 convention to report on his efforts to assist western North Carolina in recovering from Tropical Storm Helene, a process that Rotary clubs have been deeply engaged in. 

The district convention included delegates from local clubs in the region’s 22 counties, much of those encompassing Edwards’s 11th Congressional District, which was hard hit by the storm.

The congressman was slotted to speak between the end of the two-day convention’s business meetings and a closing dinner. 

One Rotary member told The Watchdog that the speech didn’t go well from the outset and its partisan tone may have triggered the angry outburst Edwards faced.. 

“My impression was that [Edwards] caused the incident” by delivering partisan remarks, the member said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to speak for the civic organization. 

Rotary members are typically drawn from community leadership positions in a variety of fields and the civic organization takes steps to remain non-partisan and apolitical in its activities and selection of speakers.

Edwards “spent less than a minute or two on Helene, and [the speech] was mostly about how proud he was to fly on Air Force One and to be with the president,” the member said. He described the speech as focused on defending President Trump’s tariff policies. (Edwards has voted to support the president’s authority to impose tariffs citing a congressionally backed national emergency).

Many in the audience appeared to become agitated by Edwards’s remarks, the member said.  When Edwards left the room, the member said, the convention’s presiding officer went to the podium in tears and expressed her displeasure over the speech’s tone and content.  

She “made it clear that we are not here to be a political organization; it should never have happened,” the member said. 

In a text message, Rotary District Governor Connie Molland confirmed the member’s report and told The Watchdog that Edwards’s speech diverged from the post-storm report the organization had expected when he was invited.

“Rotary works hard to keep both religion and politics out of our meetings and events,” she wrote.  “We value diverse perspectives but to keep the peace, we create an environment where we can all work shoulder to shoulder helping our communities.

“The welcoming comments were meant to be about Hurricane Helene.”

“One of the things that’s very important in Rotary is to abide by a four-part test. And the very first one is [to speak] the truth,” the member said. “And everybody sitting around me when [Edwards spoke] was saying, ‘Wow, he blew that one.’”

One audience member noisily stood up while Edwards was speaking, walked out of the room and slammed the door, the member said, 

According to multiple posts on social media, although not verified by The Watchdog, the encounter occurred as Edwards made his way from the podium toward the exit. The congressman was holding a folder or briefing book in one hand as the attendee  yelled at him for refusing to answer his questions, according to social media posts. 

According to a Charlotte Observer report, a witness said Edwards touched the protester on a shoulder or back with the folder and continued walking. The Rotarian called police and alleged that this was tantamount to an assault. 


Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments about this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Tom Fiedler is a Pulitzer Prize-winning political reporter and dean emeritus from Boston University who lives in Asheville. Email him at tfiedler@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post APD says no charges coming after investigation of allegations that Edwards assaulted Rotary member • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article maintains a relatively neutral stance, largely reporting on the facts surrounding the alleged incident involving Congressman Chuck Edwards. While the content includes both his and the unnamed Rotarian’s perspectives, it does mention that Edwards’s speech was perceived as “partisan” by some attendees, which could imply some criticism. However, the reporting largely reflects the events without overt ideological leanings, focusing more on the incident and responses from law enforcement, Rotary members, and Edwards himself. The mention of Edwards defending Trump’s tariff policies is relevant but not framed in a highly partisan light, indicating a more factual approach.

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending