avlwatchdog.org – JOHN BOYLE, LINUS SCHAFER-GOULTHORPE and PETER LEWIS – 2025-02-20 06:00:00
Part three of three
The man held out a red card he carries in his pocket at all times. One side is in his native Spanish. The other, English, the language of the country he entered illegally nearly 20 years ago. It reads:
“I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on my 5th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution.”
“I do not give you permission to enter my home based on my 4th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter, signed by a judge or magistrate with my name on it that you slide under the door.”
“I do not give you permission to search any of my belongings based on my 4th Amendment rights.”
He hopes — and prays — that neither he, nor any of his family or friends, will ever have to present these cards they all carry in the event they are questioned by immigration officials.
“I came here in 2006, 2007,” the man said. “I walked through the desert for four days and four nights to come here. It was terrifying.”
But the prospect of being separated from his family here, and possibly deported, is just as terrifying, he said.
The man works at an industrial enterprise in Buncombe County. He spokeon the condition that neither he nor his employer be identified so that he could speak candidly without fear of reprisals.
“I’ve been working here for more than 15 years,” the man said. “I have four kids. My wife is from a different country, and she has papers here, but mine haven’t been processed yet. I have a lawyer here to help me get a green card. It’s been three years since I applied, and we haven’t seen anything.”
The U.S. limits the number of employment-based green cards — officially known as Permanent Resident Cards — issued each year, and the backlog occurs because the demand far exceeds the available supply. At the start of fiscal year 2024, approximately 34.7 million green card applications were pending, according to the Cato Institute. Given the annual cap of about 1.1 million green cards, only about 3 percent of applicants were expected to receive permanent status last year.
The system for approving or rejecting applications is overburdened. Waits are often measured in years. It’s the same for applications for asylum. In North Carolina at the end of 2023, the most recent data available, there were 24,662 pending asylum applications in the state, and the average wait time for a hearing was more than four and a half years, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University.
“I was thinking, if people are here for more than 10 or 15 years, they should get papers, except if they have some kind of criminal record,” the man said.
“Each company has Latinos working, inside, outside, everywhere,” he said. “We work hard in this country, we do our best, and we don’t do bad things. I pay taxes, I do everything, everything, everything. When we do that, they should give us a solution to get papers.”
More paid in than paid out
Although some undocumented workers are paid “under the table” for temporary or infrequent jobs, like housekeeping, many others — despite not having legal status — pay federal, state, and local income taxes, as well as Social Security and Medicare taxes, through payroll deductions by their employers.
According to the American Immigration Council, undocumented immigrants in North Carolina paid an estimated $1.8 billion annually in federal, state, and local taxes. The Social Security Administration (SSA) estimates that undocumented immigrants and their employers nationally contribute around $12 billion per year to Social Security through payroll taxes, even though the workers are ineligible to collect Social Security benefits. They also contribute to Medicare through mandatory payroll deductions, but rarely receive benefits.
Undocumented immigrants also contribute billions of dollars in sales taxes through everyday purchases, such as gas, clothing, and groceries, and indirectly pay property taxes, through rent payments, that fund local services like schools and infrastructure.
The government does grant undocumented immigrants a handful of benefits that are deemed necessary to protect life or guarantee safety in dire situations, such as emergency Medicaid, access to treatment in hospital emergency rooms, or access to healthcare and nutrition programs under the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).
The immigrant community in the Asheville region is living in fear and anxiety over the Trump administration’s orders to deport “millions” of undocumented residents. Trump has instructed immigration agents to ignore Biden administration restrictions on conducting raids in churches, schools, hospitals, daycare centers, weddings, and funerals. // Watchdog photo by Starr Sariego
Latinos who risk their lives to come here are not expecting handouts, or the high life, the man said. In his case, he said, he had a nicer home in Mexico than the one he has here, and had attended college. His job in Buncombe requires physical labor every day, in a demanding environment. But his long-term prospects are better in America, he said.
Returning to his native country is not possible, he said.
“Where my family lives in Mexico, two cartels are fighting,” he said. “They take families out of houses and shoot them. A lot of people die, it’s terrible. I’m worried for my parents. I want to bring my parents here, but I can’t.”
“I don’t do anything bad, and I’m working hard. I love this country, and I want to stay here,” he said.
But he’s scared, he said. “Last night we went to church, and my friends were telling me, ‘You don’t want to go to church because of ICE.’”
Within hours of taking office, President Trump issued an executive order instructing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to ignore Biden administration restrictions against entering and arresting people in “sensitive” areas, including schools, churches, hospitals and doctor’s offices, daycare centers, funerals, and weddings.
Undocumented immigrants in Buncombe County, most of whom have lived in the region for years, often live in trailers or apartments, paying rent in cash, unable to lodge complaints to landlords without retribution. // Watchdog photo by Starr Sariego
His biggest fear, the man said, is being taken away, separated from his wife and children.
“If we don’t have papers here, we will always be scared,” he said. “But right now, when Trump’s president, we are more scared.”
“We are hiring them legally”
The man’s employer also spoke on condition of anonymity.
“Probably 60 percent of our workforce is Hispanic,” the employer said. “All of our employees are run through E-Verify. They have to have two forms of identification. So all of our employees have gone through all the legal proceedings to be qualified as legal employees of this company.”
E-Verify is an internet-based system through which businesses electronically confirm the employment eligibility of their workers. The employee fills out a verification form and that information is matched against U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Social Security Administration databases.
Undocumented immigrants use stolen or false names and Social Security numbers and forged documents to pass through the E-Verify system. In those cases, it’s unclear whether the worker or employer is exploiting the loophole.
“If their documents look legitimate and feel legitimate, and we question them beyond that, that’s considered discrimination,” the employer told Asheville Watchdog. “We don’t discriminate against our employees. We take their documents and we submit them, and then it’s E-Verify’s job to verify that those are legal documents.”
Once the employee is cleared, “all of their taxes get deducted from their paycheck,” the employer said. “All of that gets reported and deducted for their pay scale and everything. Their tax money goes to the government, just like any other employee’s would.”
Concern about workplace immigration raids in Buncombe is growing among area employers.
“If a police officer or an ICE agent shows up at our door, we’re not going to willingly aid them unless we are required to by the confines of the law,” the employer said. “This is private property, not government property. So if anyone shows up and wants to search our premises, they need a judicial warrant. If they don’t have a judicial warrant, they’re not necessarily welcome to come search our property and ask questions.”
Going after employers
The Trump administration has signaled that it intends to use the Internal Revenue Service and its agents to pursue undocumented immigrants and their employers.
In a Feb. 7 memo to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem requested the IRS pursue financial audits of businesses suspected of having undocumented workers, and to deputize IRS agents to assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement with apprehensions, detentions, and removals of individuals who are in the country without authorization.
The deportation of potentially hundreds or thousands of undocumented immigrants who are working in Buncombe County would have far-reaching consequences for local employers, some of whom are themselves undocumented.
In campaign speeches, Trump said he would deport “between 15 and 20 million individuals,” although the number of undocumented immigrants is generally estimated to be 11 million. Trump’s “border czar,” Tom Homan, clarified: “Bottom line is, under Trump he’s still going to prioritize national security threats and criminals. But no one’s off the table. If you’re in the country illegally, it’s not OK. If you’re in the country illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.”
Buncombe County GOP chairman Doug Brown
Doug Brown, chairman of the Buncombe County Republican Party, told The Watchdog via email that because the Trump administration is deporting only criminals, the impact on Buncombe County’s labor force will be minimal.
“Venezuelan gangs, pedifiles[sic], and criminals are not our workforce,” Brown wrote. “So, if you are working, such as landscaping or washing dishes, as opposed to being a criminal, your gamble to enter the USA illegally is probably a safe gamble.”
Removing people who entered the United States without authorization “would save us money spent combating the crime, treating the wounded victims, replacing the stolen merchandise, over-burdening our police and sheriff departments — costly consequences of letting millions of people illegally enter our country,” Brown wrote.
Rebecca Sharp, the founder and director of La Esperanza, an outreach program of the Episcopal Church of the Holy Spirit in Mars Hill that serves Latino families in Buncombe, Madison, and Yancey counties, said preparations are already under way to help immigrants deal with the expected increase in enforcement.
Rebecca Sharp, the founder and director of La Esperanza // Credit: Episcopal Church of the Holy Spirit
“We are preparing by educating them,” Sharp said. “We work with Pisgah Legal to do workshops so they can learn about their rights. You know, what are your rights if someone comes to your door? What are your rights if someone pulls you over? What rights do the police have, and not have, to ask you for immigration papers?”
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld that certain constitutional rights — excluding the right to vote — extend to everyone living within the U.S., not just natural-born citizens or legalized immigrants. This includes “due process” protections under the Fifth, 10th, and 14th amendments.
ICE enforcement officers typically use administrative removal warrants — signed by agency administrators, not judges or magistrates — to carry out their duties. Unlike a criminal warrant issued by the federal court, a removal warrant for civil violation of immigration laws does not authorize the ICE officer to enter into a home, school, church, or other restricted area to execute the warrant — unless invited to enter.
If refused entry, the ICE agents must obtain a judicial warrant or wait until the subject of the administrative warrant leaves the house or other private area. For many undocumented immigrants, that means every trip to the grocery store, to work, to take children to school — even to go to the doctor — becomes a frightening risk.
“I have heard that there are people that are too scared to leave their houses,” Sharp said. “For the most part, you can’t do that. You have to get food, you have to work, you have to pay the bills, but there are people that are definitely lying low more than in the past.”
La Esperanza also works with Pisgah Legal Services to help immigrants on the typically complex path to long-term lawful immigration status.
Originally called Mujeres Unidas en Fe (women united in faith), the nonprofit organization changed its name to La Esperanza (the hope) as the numbers of volunteers expanded. It now supports dozens of immigrant families in western North Carolina.
“We’re going to continue to support the community, and that includes people of all legal statuses,” Sharp said. “I’m not going to go up to people and say ‘Hey, by the way, are you undocumented or not?’ That’s not my concern. My focus is saying ‘Okay, you need help. You can’t pay your bills? Let’s get you some help. You have cancer? Let’s get you a doctor.’”
Rumors of ICE activity in western North Carolina — most of them untrue — spread via social media, Sharp said.
“We educate people that social media can overwhelmingly be evil,” Sharp said. “People say ‘Well, I saw on social media that ICE is here. I saw on social media that my neighbor can turn me in.’ So I’m telling people, get off social media. Really look for groups and gatherings with people that you trust.”
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle is a staff reporter and columnist. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. Peter H. Lewis is The Watchdog’s executive editor. Email plewis@avlwatchdog.org. Linus Schafer-Goulthorpe is a student reporting intern. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00
(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.
Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.
Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.
Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance
NCLeg.gov
“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”
SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.
“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”
The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.
“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”
Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.
SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00
(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.
The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”
With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.
Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.