Connect with us

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Abrego Garcia judge questions administration’s broad use of state secrets privilege

Published

on

georgiarecorder.com – Ariana Figueroa – 2025-05-16 15:50:00


A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration invoked the state secrets privilege to withhold information on its efforts to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man wrongly deported to El Salvador. Abrego Garcia was deported due to an administrative error, but the government has yet to comply with court orders to bring him back. The administration claims national security concerns, while legal representatives argue that the process has been mishandled. Protestors, including Rep. Glenn Ivey, gathered outside the court calling for his return. The Supreme Court had previously directed the U.S. to facilitate his return.

by Ariana Figueroa, Georgia Recorder
May 16, 2025

GREENBELT, MARYLAND — A federal judge said Friday the Trump administration has “pretty broadly” invoked the state secrets privilege to withhold information on its efforts — or, the judge indicated, a possible lack of effort — to return a wrongly deported Maryland man from a prison in El Salvador.

President Donald Trump’s administration moved last month to invoke the so-called state secrets privilege to shield information about its process to facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the United States after a top immigration official admitted his removal to a prison in El Salvador was an “administrative error.”

The judge handling the case, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, granted an expedited discovery process after she found last month that “nothing has been done” by the administration to return Abrego Garcia.

She did not make a public order regarding the state secrets privilege Friday afternoon before closing her courtroom to the public to discuss sensitive matters with attorneys for Abrego Garcia and the Department of Justice.

The state secrets privilege is a common-law doctrine that protects sensitive national security information from being released. The Trump administration has argued the need to invoke it in this case to protect diplomatic relationships.

‘He’ll never walk free in the United States’

During the public portion of Friday’s hearing, Xinis pressed the Department of Justice attorneys about Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s comment that Abrego Garcia “will not return” to the U.S.

“That sounds to me like an admission that your client will not take steps to facilitate the return,” Xinis said. “That’s about as clear as it can get.”

DOJ attorney Jonathan D. Guynn disagreed and said the Trump administration is complying with court orders. He said Noem’s comment meant that if Abrego Garcia was back in U.S. custody he would be removed either to another third country or back to El Salvador.

“He’ll never walk free in the United States,” Guynn said.

He added that the Trump administration is “currently complying and we plan to comply.”

Xinis said she disagreed, and then she clashed with Guynn over the legality of Abrego Garcia’s removal.

Guynn said that he was lawfully deported.

Xinis answered that she found months ago that Abrego Garcia was unlawfully detained and removed from the U.S.

Few documents produced

One of the attorneys for Abrego Garcia, Andrew J. Rossman, said the Trump administration has invoked the state secrets privilege for 1,140 documents relating to the case. From that request, Rossman said his team received 168 documents, but 132 were copies of court filings and requests made by him and his team.

Xinis seemed visibly stunned by Rossman’s report and had to clarify that his team had only received 36 new documents, which Rossman confirmed.

Rossman said that none of the documents for which the government is invoking the state secrets privilege are classified.

“There’s ways to do this right, and they haven’t done it,” he said, noting that he has attorneys on his team who have security clearances and can review classified and sensitive information.

Rossman said that he and his team are seeking answers to three questions: the status of Abrego Garcia, what steps the Trump administration has taken, if any, to facilitate his return, and the steps the federal government will take, if any, to comply with court orders.

Guynn said the Trump administration received an update from El Salvador on Thursday that Abrego Garcia was in “good health” and had “even gained weight.”

The U.S. Supreme Court ordered that the Trump administration must “facilitate” the return of Abrego Garcia.

Rossman, said that it’s “deeply disturbing” that administration officials, including the president, have made public statements that contradict court orders directing the government to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S.

President Donald Trump has said he could easily pick up the phone and order El Salvador to return him but won’t because he believes Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang.

Noem was pressed at a May 14 congressional hearing about a photo that appears altered to add letters across Abrego Garcia’s knuckles to indicate his inclusion in the gang. She said she was unaware of it.

A federal judge in the District of Columbia, in a separate case regarding Trump’s use of an archaic wartime law for deportations, questioned Department of Justice attorneys on the president’s claim that he could order Abrego Garcia to be returned. The attorney admitted that the president sometimes overstates his influence abroad.

El Salvador prison

Abrego Garcia has had protections from deportation since 2019, but he was one of nearly 300 men on three mid-March removal flights to a notorious prison in El Salvador known as CECOT.

Abrego Garcia has been moved to a lower security prison, according to Maryland Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who traveled to the country last month to meet with Abrego Garcia and inquire with Salvadoran officials about why he is being held there.

Those officials said Abrego Garcia was being held because of the agreement between the United States and El Salvador.

The U.S. has a $15 million agreement with El Salvador’s government to house immigrants removed from the U.S., mostly Venezuelans removed under the wartime law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.

Dozens of signs outside the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in support of Abrego Garcia before Friday’s hearing. (Photo by Ariana Figueroa/States Newsroom)

The Trump administration has argued that Abrego Garcia is a national of El Salvador and in that country’s custody and the U.S. cannot force another government to return him. 

Hours before Friday’s hearing, dozens of protestors gathered outside the court, calling for Abrego Garcia to be returned to the U.S., as well as criticizing the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown. 

U.S. Rep. Glenn Ivey, who represents the area in Maryland where Abrego Garcia and his family live, appeared outside the court and led chants calling for the release of Abrego Garcia from El Salvador.

“The president has to obey the orders of the Supreme Court,” Ivey said. “The Supreme Court has spoken here, and it’s time for him to follow it and bring him home.”

Last updated 5:20 p.m., May. 16, 2025

Georgia Recorder is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor John McCosh for questions: info@georgiarecorder.com.

The post Abrego Garcia judge questions administration’s broad use of state secrets privilege appeared first on georgiarecorder.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This content primarily critiques actions taken during the Trump administration, particularly around immigration enforcement and the use of state secrets privilege, emphasizing concerns of administrative error and disregard of court orders. It highlights the perspectives of Democratic officials and legal challenges, portraying the administration in a negative light. The focus on immigrant rights, judicial oversight, and criticism of a Republican administration’s immigration policy aligns with a center-left viewpoint without featuring extreme partisan language or ideological framing.

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Judge blocks Georgia’s new social media age verification law just before it was set to start

Published

on

georgiarecorder.com – Ross Williams – 2025-07-01 02:00:00


A federal judge has temporarily blocked Georgia’s Senate Bill 351, which required social media companies to verify minors’ ages and obtain parental consent before account creation. The ruling, favoring social media coalition NetChoice, cited First Amendment concerns, noting the law’s exemptions created content-based speech restrictions likely unconstitutional. Judge Amy Totenberg highlighted burdens on free speech and privacy risks. However, the law’s sponsor, Sen. Jason Anavitarte, pointed to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling supporting similar age verification laws, predicting SB 351 will eventually be enforced. Georgia’s Attorney General plans to appeal, emphasizing parental rights and child protection online.

by Ross Williams, Georgia Recorder
July 1, 2025

Georgia kids can continue liking, commenting and subscribing without notifying their parents this summer after a federal judge put a temporary hold on the state’s new social media age verification law while the case moves forward – but the bill’s author says a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling bodes well for the ban.

Senate Bill 351, which was set to go into effect July 1, would require social media companies to get a parent’s permission before they allowed a minor to create an account. All Georgians would also have to verify their age before accessing websites with material deemed harmful to minors.

On Thursday, Judge Amy Totenberg of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ruled in favor of NetChoice, a coalition of social media companies, who argued that the law as written would likely violate free speech protections.

“The Court does not doubt the dangers posed by young people’s overwhelming exposure to social media,” Totenberg wrote. “But, in its effort to aid parents, the Act’s solution creates serious obstacles for all Georgians, including teenagers, to engage in protected speech activities and would highly likely be unconstitutional.”

Totenberg said the law would curb the speech rights of young people, impose a burden on all Georgians to participate in online speech, potentially put Georgians’ private data at risk and step into parents’ decisions on how to raise their children.

But Totenberg said the law’s biggest downfall comes in its long list of exemptions, which include news, sports, and entertainment sites, interactive gaming platforms, streaming services and more.

“For example, SB 351 would presumably apply to the Georgia Bulldogs Reddit forum, which features user-generated content. But it would exempt Barstool Sports, which features provider-generated content. It would apply to news coverage posted by users on X, but not news coverage posted by The New York Times to its own liveblog.”

Totenberg found that amounts to a content-based restriction on speech, which triggers a higher level of scrutiny – which she said Georgia’s law doesn’t meet.

“Because of the enormous burdens imposed on the First Amendment rights of children, adults, and social media platforms — along with the significant tailoring issues inherent in the law — even the State’s serious interest here cannot justify SB 351 under the First Amendment’s rigorous standards,” she said.

NetChoice celebrated the win in a statement.

“This is a major victory for free speech, constitutional clarity and the rights of all Georgians to engage in public discourse without intrusive government overreach,” said Chris Marchese, NetChoice director of litigation. “We are grateful the court recognized what we’ve long argued: SB 351 isn’t just poorly crafted — it’s profoundly unconstitutional.”

But the bill’s author, state Sen. Jason Anavitarte, a Dallas Republican who is now the Senate majority leader, said their victory is likely to be short-lived.

In a statement, Anavitarte pointed to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that backed a Texas state law requiring age verification for pornographic websites.

“One day after liberal Obama Appointee, US District Court Judge, Amy Totenberg, issued an injunction preventing Georgia’s age verification law from taking effect, The Supreme Court found that laws like SB 351 ‘have only an incidental effect on protected speech and that The First Amendment leaves undisturbed States’ traditional power to prevent minors from accessing speech that is obscene from their perspective….Requiring proof of age is an ordinary and appropriate means of enforcing an age-based limit on obscenity to minors,’” Anavitarte said.

“Based on Friday’s ruling at The Supreme Court, Judge Totenberg should be left with no choice but to allow SB 351 to go into effect,” he added. “I am immensely grateful for Justice Clarence Thomas’ well written opinion and remain optimistic that SB 351 will go into effect in its entirety.”

Attorney General Chris Carr’s said Carr intends to appeal the ruling.

“We will continue to defend commonsense measures that empower parents and protect our children online,” said Carr spokesperson Kara Murray.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Georgia Recorder is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Georgia Recorder maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jill Nolin for questions: info@georgiarecorder.com.

The post Judge blocks Georgia’s new social media age verification law just before it was set to start appeared first on georgiarecorder.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article provides a balanced report on Georgia’s social media age verification law by presenting both the legal challenge emphasizing free speech concerns and the bill author’s perspective highlighting parental control and child protection. It quotes judicial reasoning against the law’s constitutionality alongside statements from the Republican bill sponsor and the Attorney General, showing arguments on both sides without overt editorializing. The tone and framing remain largely factual and neutral, aiming to inform readers about the ongoing legal and political debate without taking a partisan stance.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Piedmont uses boxing to help patients with Parkinson’s | FOX 5 News

Published

on

www.youtube.com – FOX 5 Atlanta – 2025-06-30 20:35:27

SUMMARY: Piedmont Wellness Center offers a boxing program called Rock Steady to help Parkinson’s patients manage symptoms and improve quality of life. Participants engage in boxing training focusing on hitting, footwork, balance, and coordination, which helps enhance the mind-body connection weakened by Parkinson’s-related dopamine loss. Coaches assess each participant and encourage them to push limits, resulting in improved balance, strength, and mobility after six months. The program also provides stress relief and camaraderie. Patients like Ken Almond and Kevin Lind report significant progress and motivation to continue. More information is available online about Piedmont’s Rock Steady program.

After the first six months, participants reported an improvement in balance, mobility and coordination.

Subscribe to FOX 5 Atlanta!: https://bit.ly/3vpFpcm

Watch FOX 5 Atlanta Live: https://www.fox5atlanta.com/live

FOX 5 Atlanta delivers breaking news, live events, investigations, politics, entertainment, business news and local stories from metro Atlanta, north Georgia and across the nation.

Watch more from FOX 5 Atlanta on YouTube:
FOX 5 News: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUgtVJuOxfqkmrF1fONNmi8nKI0Z-FPE-
FOX 5 Atlanta I-Team: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUgtVJuOxfqlb_I16wBwizoAoUsfKEeWB
Good Day Atlanta: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUgtVJuOxfqlKT5xsbsPFgr5EBzdsWTvG
FOX 5 Extras: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUgtVJuOxfqli-5MS_2X-i6bNGWvV0RYP
You Decide: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUgtVJuOxfqnCKb7UkRde2NXuaoPEAXut

Download the FOX 5 Atlanta app: https://www.fox5atlanta.com/app

Download the FOX 5 Storm Team app: https://www.fox5atlanta.com/storm

Follow FOX 5 Atlanta on Facebook: https://facebook.com/fox5atlanta

Follow FOX 5 Atlanta on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FOX5Atlanta

Follow FOX 5 Atlanta on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fox5atlanta/

Subscribe to the Morning Brief and other newsletters from FOX 5 Atlanta: https://www.fox5atlanta.com/email

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Austin House closes, several families displaced

Published

on

www.wsav.com – Kaley Fedko – 2025-06-30 19:42:00

SUMMARY: The Tom D. Austin House in Savannah, Georgia, is closing permanently due to loss of federal funding, displacing nearly six families who relied on its affordable housing. The 12-room building, operating since January 2017, sheltered formerly homeless families. Tenants were notified in March, and many, including pregnant mother Jessica Martin, are struggling to find new homes. Martin described the building’s eerie silence as residents packed up, with children confused by the situation. The government has offered no assistance to these families. Nonprofit Family Promise of Chatham County is aiding four displaced families, but many remain uncertain about their future.

Read the full article

The post Austin House closes, several families displaced appeared first on www.wsav.com

Continue Reading

Trending