Connect with us

The Center Square

AAMC sued by student for alleged monopoly in medical school applications | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Tate Miller – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-07 09:29:00


A medical student has filed a class-action lawsuit against the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), alleging it maintains an illegal monopoly on medical school application platforms, charging over $50 million annually in fees. The complaint accuses AAMC of violating antitrust laws by overcharging applicants and using funds to benefit member schools. Do No Harm, a group opposing identity politics in medicine, criticizes AAMC for prioritizing diversity initiatives over merit and education quality. AAMC, a nonprofit focused on medical education and research, stated it will vigorously defend the lawsuit and remains committed to a fair application process.

(The Center Square) – A doctor says the Association of Medical Colleges needs to start solely focusing on education as the organization faces a lawsuit from a medical student who claims that the group participates in a monopoly associated with medical school applications.

“This lawsuit makes the case that the AAMC maintains an illegal monopoly on the market for potential medical students, raking in more than $50 million in application fees every year,” Chairman at Do No Harm Stanley Goldfarb, MD, said in a statement obtained by The Center Square.

Do No Harm is a group of “physicians, nurses, medical students, patients, and policymakers focused on keeping identity politics out of medical education, research, and clinical practice,” according to its website.

Goldfarb said that “the AAMC has profited off of aspiring medical students all while pushing an identity politics agenda that is destructive to what should be the singular aim of producing the most prepared and qualified crop of medical professionals.”

“The AAMC should be focused solely on the quality of medical education and not on identity politics or on creating money-making schemes,” Goldfarb said.

When reached, the AAMC told The Center Square that “the AAMC is aware of the lawsuit that has been filed.”

“While we cannot comment on ongoing litigation, we remain committed to a fair and convenient application process for all medical school applicants and will vigorously defend this lawsuit,” the AAMC said.

The AAMC is a nonprofit association “dedicated to transforming health through medical education, health care, medical research, and community collaborations,” according to its website.

In the class action complaint filed against the AAMC, plaintiff and medical student Nirvana Durbal alleges that the organization “illegally maintains a monopoly in the market for medical school application platforms and uses the millions in annual overcharges to kickback money to member medical schools.”

The complaint finds the AAMC guilty of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act and the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act and alleges that these violations are in order to “gouge medical school applicants attempting to follow their dreams.”

The complaint explained that the two-part medical school application process of Primary and Secondary Applications – the former of which the AAMC has a hand in – can end up costing students thousands of dollars in fees.

“AAMC takes advantage of students’ aspirations to be doctors by fixing exorbitant prices for medical school Primary Applications,” the complaint stated.

Additionally, the complaint alleges that the “ostensible not-for-profit” AAMC “annually collects more than $50 million in Primary Application fees from applicants who have no other choice in this monopolized and restrained market.”

The complaint stated that “injunctive relief, treble damages, and other remedies are appropriate to rectify AAMC’s wrongdoing.”

One of the plaintiff’s lawyers – Will Burgess of Hilgers Graben – referred The Center Square to the allegations in the complaint and said “we don’t have any further comment.”

Do No Harm has covered many of the AAMC’s diversity, equity, and inclusion-related initiatives in the past, such as its “DEI manifesto” for medical students as well as a webinar instructing pediatricians to be “antiracist” activists.

Do No Harm has stated that the AAMC “should not sacrifice merit for ideology” and that as of June 2025 DEI is still present at the organization despite its efforts to scrub the evidence away.

The post AAMC sued by student for alleged monopoly in medical school applications | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on a lawsuit against the Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) and includes statements from the group Do No Harm, which explicitly opposes “identity politics” and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in medical education. While the article presents factual information about the lawsuit and the positions of the involved parties, the selection and emphasis on Do No Harm’s criticism of DEI and the framing of the AAMC’s actions as a “monopoly” and “money-making schemes” reflect a right-leaning perspective. The language used by Do No Harm, such as “keeping identity politics out” and “should not sacrifice merit for ideology,” signals a conservative critique of current medical education policies. The article does not offer counterpoints beyond the AAMC’s brief defense, which contributes to a tone that aligns more with the right-leaning viewpoint rather than a fully neutral stance.

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Federal judge puts restraining order on ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-07 16:07:00


A federal judge in Miami issued a temporary restraining order halting construction of Florida’s migrant detention facility, “Alligator Alcatraz,” due to potential environmental harm. The site, located on the former Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport near the Everglades, can still operate and accept migrants. Florida Governor DeSantis confirmed ongoing operations and deportations, with 600 migrants processed so far. The lawsuit, filed by environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe, alleges violations of environmental laws, citing the facility’s rapid development and infrastructure causing ecological damage. The airport site was originally intended for Miami’s airport before construction stopped in 1970.

(The Center Square) — A federal judge in Miami imposed a temporary restraining order on Thursday on construction of the migrant detention facility dubbed by Florida officials as “Alligator Alcatraz.”

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, a President Barack Obama appointee, issued the restraining order, which stops any construction at the site, but allows it to continue to accept migrants.

The reasoning was possible environmental damage from the site, which is built on the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport.

Florida Gov. DeSantis said on X that “Operations at Alligator Alcatraz are ongoing and deportations are continuing.”

He also said on Aug. 1 that 600 migrants have been processed through the facility, which has drawn protests from human rights groups and Democrats concerned over rights violations and poor treatment of detainees at the facility. 

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is named in the lawsuit filed by two environmental groups, the Friends of the Everglades and the Center For Biological Diversity, along with the Miccosukee Tribe. The lawsuit says the facility is in violation of National Environmental Protection Act and the Administrative Procedure Act because no environmental impact statement was sought for the facility.

“The hasty transformation of the site into a mass detention facility, which includes the installation of housing units, construction of sanitation and food services systems, industrial high-intensity lighting infrastructure, diesel power generators, substantial fill material altering the natural terrain, and provision of transportation logistics (including apparent planned use of the runway to receive and deport detainees) poses clear environmental impacts,” the complaint reads. 

The 30-square mile airport owned by Miami-Dade County is located roughly 60 miles east of Miami near the Everglades National Park. Its 10,000-foot-long asphalt runway was used for military training exercises and was intended to be part of Miami’s new airport before a public outcry halted construction in 1970.

The post Federal judge puts restraining order on ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article reports on the facts surrounding the temporary restraining order against construction at the “Alligator Alcatraz” migrant detention facility. It primarily presents information from multiple perspectives: the federal judge’s legal reasoning, statements by Florida Governor DeSantis, the concerns of human rights groups and Democrats, and the lawsuit from environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe. The language remains neutral and factual, avoiding emotionally charged terms or partisan framing. The article does not promote a particular ideological stance but rather conveys the contentious positions of various stakeholders, adhering to objective reporting rather than advocacy or bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Overrides: History says chances higher on school choice than freedom to carry | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-17 08:01:00


North Carolina’s Legislature faces challenges overriding several gubernatorial vetoes, including a proposed $1,700 tax credit for schoolchildren and permitless concealed carry. While eight vetoes were overridden on July 29, including immigration and firearms measures, others tied to diversity policies and gun laws remain contentious. Bipartisan support helped override some bills, notably the Educational Choice for Children Act, but permitless carry lacks Democratic backing and faces Republican absences. Diversity-related bills saw no Democratic support and mixed Republican attendance. Overrides require three-fifths majorities in both chambers, with vote shifts common. Legislative leaders aim to time override efforts strategically amid ongoing political dynamics.

(The Center Square) – Establishing a tax credit program of up to $1,700 in 2027 for North Carolina school children has a historical pathway to overcoming gubernatorial veto, according to pattern analysis by The Center Square.

No permits for concealed carry, however, is quite a bit more challenging.

Outside of the fatigued question on the Legislature putting forth a full two-year spending plan, those two vetoes and three others tied to diversity policies are creating the main storylines for the Legislature’s return next week. The pre-Labor Day session has no guarantees of movement on any; rather, all will depend on chamber leaders having members present and their votes known as to what opportunities will be taken.

Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, in the House of Representatives have pledged to get the timing right, whether next week or later.

Eight vetoes were overridden into law by both chambers on July 29. They included measures on immigration, what was known as the REINS Act, environmental goals, powers of the state auditor, clarifying men and women, donor privacy, and firearms.

Senators completed the override on four more – two related to diversity policy, one on permitless concealed carry and another on immigration. If the House can get the override for a third diversity bill that originated in its chamber, the Senate is expected to follow suit.

The other two vetoes involve a squatters bill that went an alternative route to first-term Democratic Gov. Josh Stein’s signature, and the federal school choice initiative championed by second-term Republican President Donald Trump.

Plenty of attention was rightly thrust upon the four Democrats in the House of Representatives helping move the Grand Old Party agenda this summer. Reps. Shelly Willingham of Edgecombe County six times and Carla Cunningham of Mecklenburg County five times were most instrumental. Twice each, Reps. Cecil Brockman of Guilford County and Nasif Majeed of Mecklenburg County were on board to get the chamber’s overrides to 72 votes or higher.

For each of the eight vetoes that got an override, at least one Democrat in the House had voted for the measure at passage. Only once – Brockman on donors – did a yes vote switch to no. And once – Rep. Ben Moss, R-Richmond, on the power bill – a Republican changed a no vote to yes at override.

That would bode well for the push – Educational Choice for Children Act (House Bill 87) – to make North Carolina the first in the nation codifying the signature education initiative of the president. Cunningham and Willingham were each on board, though Republicans had three excused and another – Rep. Neal Jackson, R-Moore – choosing not to vote.

It doesn’t bode well for becoming the 30th state to be without permit for concealed carry.

Freedom to Carry NC, known also as Senate Bill 50, not only had no Democrats in the House at passage, but it also has Republican Reps. William Brisson of Bladen County and Ted Davis Jr. of New Hanover County with no votes at passage. Ten other Republicans took excused absences, including notably Rules Chairman John Bell of Wayne County, Rep. Tricia Cotham of Mecklenburg County and Rep. Allen Chesser of Nash County.

The North Carolina Border Protection Act, known also as Senate Bill 153, was straight party line. The 11 excused absences among Republicans included notables Cotham and Rep. Erin Pare, R-Wake.

For the package of bills on diversity, equity and inclusion, the proposals would respectively take them out of state agencies, K-12 education, and higher education. None drew a Democrat’s vote in either chamber.

On the Republican side, Reps. Jackson, John Blust of Guilford County, Brenden Jones of Columbus County and John Sauls of Lee County had excused absences for all three votes; Hall and Rep. Edwin Goodwin of Chowan County chose not to vote on the higher ed bill; and Rep. Mike Clampitt of Swain County chose not to vote on the state agencies bill.

Six other Republicans also had excused absences mixed among the three votes.

Three-fifths majorities are needed in each chamber to get an override, both chambers must accomplish it, and there’s only one override vote per bill. Republicans have majorities of 30-20 in the Senate and 71-49 in the House.

And votes at passage are not guaranteed through veto override. Never was that clearer than the 2023-24 session when a bill related to evictions sailed through the chambers 44-0 and 113-1, only to be vetoed by former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper. It became law on the strength of override votes of 27-17 and 72-44.

Already on the eight overrides this session, six senators and 12 House members have changed votes at least once from yes at passage to no at override. Respective chamber leaders at three each are Sen. Dan Blue, D-Wake, and Rep. Charles Smith, D-Cumberland. One senator and four House members have already made such changes twice each.

In the 2023-24 session, all 29 vetoes by Cooper were overridden amid 19 senators and 34 House members changing votes at least once between passage and override.

The post Overrides: History says chances higher on school choice than freedom to carry | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article predominantly reports on legislative actions and veto override efforts in North Carolina with an emphasis on bills favored by Republican lawmakers, such as tax credits for school children, permitless concealed carry, border protection, and anti-diversity policies. While it maintains a largely factual tone, the selection and framing of issues—highlighting GOP achievements and describing Democratic opposition without similar context—suggests a subtle center-right leaning. The language is generally neutral but implicitly supports the Republican legislative agenda by focusing attention on successful overrides and the challenges Democrats face, rather than critically examining the content or broader implications of the policies. Overall, the piece reports on political events and positions but does so through a lens sympathetic to conservative priorities.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Poll: Even with a slip, Stein overwhelmingly favorable | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-16 08:01:00


A recent Carolina Journal/Harper Poll shows North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein with a solid 50.5% job approval among likely voters, down 15% from March. Stein, a first-term Democrat and former attorney general, has issued 15 vetoes and proposed a budget $2 billion above the legislature’s offer, with eight vetoes overridden and the budget delayed by 46 days. Opinions on his vetoes are split: 36% see them as cautious policy checks, 33% as political obstruction, and 31% undecided. President Trump holds a 47.8% approval in the state, slightly above national averages, despite a general disapproval majority nationally.

(The Center Square) – Job approval by likely North Carolina voters for Gov. Josh Stein is robustly high and for President Donald Trump running just a tick better than national polling.



Gov. Josh Stein, of North Carolina




Stein, the first-term Democrat with eight years experience as attorney general prior, has dropped a net 15% in five months to 50.5% approving against 30.1% disapproving. In March, approval was 55.6% to 20.4% disapproving, according to a poll taken Monday and Tuesday and released Thursday by Carolina Journal in conjunction with Harper Polling.

His most significant actions in that time have been 15 vetoes and a two-year budget proposal about $2 billion higher than either chamber of the General Assembly. Eight of his vetoes have been overturned, and Friday marked the 46th day late on the spending plan.

Given choices for what Stein’s vetoes reflect, respondents said “a careful approach to policy that checks overreach by the legislative branch” (36%); “a politically motivated obstruction that blocks legislative priorities” (32.9%); and 31% were unsure.

The statewide sampling gave the second-term Republican president an approval of 47.8% and disapproval of 50.3%. In March, he was at 49.5% approval and 48.7% disapproval. Nationally this week, the RealClear Polling average for the time period of July 16 to Thursday is 45.5% approval and 51.5% disapproval.

Trump has won the state in presidential races three consecutive times.

The Carolina Journal/Harper polling of 600 likely voters’ responses were given a 95% confidence level and a margin of error of +/= 3.98%.

The post Poll: Even with a slip, Stein overwhelmingly favorable | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents polling data and factual information about the approval ratings of North Carolina Governor Josh Stein and former President Donald Trump without using language that promotes a particular ideological viewpoint. It reports on the actions and public perceptions of the political figures, including details such as vetoes and budget proposals, as well as polling statistics, in a straightforward manner. The tone is neutral and descriptive, focusing on presenting the data and differing opinions from respondents rather than advocating for or against any political stance. This adherence to factual reporting without editorializing indicates a centrist, unbiased approach.

Continue Reading

Trending