When Norfolk’s City Council approved the permit for the controversial Armed Forces Brewing Company over some neighborhood objections, several members said let the marketplace decide its fate.
It didn’t take long.
A year after opening its doors, Armed Forces is closing, after a raucous launch when hundreds of community members opposed what they said was a divisive business whose marketing glorified violence, threatened LGBTQ people and said those with different views don’t love America.
Early Thursday afternoon, Nicole Couch, the taproom manager, got a call from Alan Beal, the company’s chief executive officer, with the news employees had been expecting. The company had been bleeding red ink for years. A reconfigured board had met that morning and told Beal to “lock it up” and close the Norfolk facility after only 13 months.
Couch, a local beer industry veteran who had worked to revitalize what she called grim taproom attendance after being hired in June, realized she couldn’t tell her staff the news by text. She sent an emergency message saying the taproom would not open that day. Minutes later, they agreed to meet at Smartmouth Brewing in Norfolk that night.
There, she told them they had lost their jobs. She’d hoped Beal would issue an official statement after their phone call, as he’d told her he would in 30 minutes. He didn’t. Employees discovered the news and his statement by checking Facebook during the meeting. They were appalled that Beal was blaming Norfolk residents for the failure.
“There was no thank you (to the staff). It was all woe is me,” she said.
“Our ability to profitably operate in Norfolk was severely affected by the local woke mob – a few individuals in the area who have no love for the traditional American values we hold as a company,” Beal wrote, concluding that the taproom and brewery would go up for sale. “These people spread outright lies about our company, our employees and our shareholders before we even opened our doors.”
But interviews with nine former employees and contractors for Armed Forces suggest that local opposition played a smaller part than Beal’s claims. They said the Norfolk taproom, where customers ebbed and flowed depending upon events, did not reach its revenue potential partly because of the controversy. But Armed Forces ultimately suffered setbacks selling beer, notably losing market share after failing last year to pay Brew Hub, a Florida contract brewery it had been using since before the Norfolk purchase.
“The closing of AFBC had nothing to do with a “woke mob,” former mid-Atlantic sales manager Tim Labbe wrote on Facebook, saying he was part of a team growing sales in seven states. “We had great relationships with the major chain grocery stores in those states as well as big distributors. When Alan (Beal) stopped paying bills and stopped complying with the agreements in place that all dried up.”
Former employees were believers until they weren’t
The stories from former employees are strikingly similar. They joined Armed Forces believing in the mission to support veterans and first responders. They stayed even though paychecks occasionally were late, their suggestions to improve the business were ignored, bills were not paid, some charitable obligations were not met, and key repairs and improvements to the brewing operation languished for weeks because Beal said there was no money. The few employees covered by health insurance paid by the company learned in November it would be canceled on Feb. 1.
Beal, they said, focused more on marketing and luring investors than making the brewery profitable, funding promotions with NASCAR, the Norfolk Tides and numerous other events while improvements and repairs to the brewery languished.
Beal did not respond to a voicemail message or messages sent to two of his Facebook profiles requesting comment.
Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced Armed Forces’ move to Virginia in July 2023, touting $300,000 in incentives. A spokesman for the Virginia Economic Development Partnership said Armed Forces qualified for $24,500 in hiring support, but did not apply for it. It’s not clear if any other incentives were paid. Sean Washington, Norfolk’s head of economic development, said the city did not provide any funding to the company.
As it ramped up the Norfolk operation, the company raised about $8.5 million from more than 10,000 investors who ponied up a minimum of $200 in what was essentially a crowdfunding campaign. Contributors got rewards ranging from stickers to hats, although some former employees who invested said they never arrived. Those investors have no voting rights, and the company says it is uncertain if it will ever issue dividends. The stock cannot be sold on the open market.
Armed Forces suffered a net loss of $1.76 million for the first six months of 2024, according to a recent Securities and Exchange filing. The company lost $2.4 million in 2023. According to the filing, the company had net cash of $12,239 on June 30, 2024, down from an originally unaudited reporting of $381,370 and down from $282,549 on Dec. 31, 2023.
It appears from SEC filings that Armed Forces burned through the majority of cash from investors over two years to cover operating losses.
Failure to pay contractors signals problems
John Galanti, who has worked in beer sales for nearly four decades, came aboard Armed Forces in March 2022 as national sales director. Galanti left the company in July 2024 after learning it pulled back from pricing and promotional agreements with Publix, a chain of 900 stores in Florida, and had failed to pay Brew Hub, a contracting brewery in the state.
“You can’t survive in Florida without having Publix,” he added.
Galanti said he’d heard rumors about the failure to pay and the refusal of Brew Hub to release beer to distributors but there always were excuses. When he confirmed that was the case, he gave notice.
“I didn’t want any part of anything like that,” he said.
He advised the company against purchasing the former O’Connor Brewing facility for $3 million in 2023, far above the $1.86 million assessed value, according to city records.
“I would have gotten something a lot smaller,” Galanti said. “I’ve been doing this 37 years, so my advice was find some small locations of some brewers that were looking to sell. It would have probably been about a quarter of the price of what they paid (for O’Connor). But again, I stayed out of that because they were just like, ‘We’ll handle this part.’”
A $549,000 annual rent
Armed Forces Brewing does not own the former O’Connor property, according to SEC filings. It is owned 72% by a third party, Ironbound AFBC Properties, LLC. Armed Forces has a 10-year lease and an option to purchase after the first year.
The third-party owners include Evan Almeida, listed as a principal in Ironbound. He has a property investment firm in New Jersey and is also an owner of EmpireATM, a company with multimillion-dollar revenues. He and his brother, Michael, are listed as $50,000 to $99,000 investors on the Armed Forces site.
Ironbound, according to city records, is overdue on a $4,600 tax bill and owes nearly $13,000 overall.
According to the SEC filing, Armed Forces’ lease with Ironbound calls for $549,600 payments in 2024 and 2025 with increases after that. Galanti called that rent “an insane amount of money.”
Galanti thinks the company could have been successful by dominating a few grocery store markets rather than opening a taproom and focusing on attracting investors.
“It’s great if you’re trying to get investors, but the bottom line is you have to sell beer because investors can come and go,” he added.
Beal is paid an $87,000 salary. The rent on his Norfolk apartment is covered by the company. He uses a leased company vehicle. He now owns 7% of the voting stock, down from 27.5% according to SEC filings, including an amended one that appeared on Monday reporting the Norfolk closure. He said in his announcement the company would relocate to friendlier territory, but Galanti and others formerly involved with the company said that’s unlikely.
Civil actions filed in Norfolk, Portsmouth and Henrico seek payment of bills, but the brewery’s former employees say the problem is much deeper. A hops provider from the Midwest posted that the company owes him $2,600. Allen Fabijan, who runs an advertising and marketing company, connected with the company following the initial controversy when Armed Forces’ impending arrival in Virginia was announced.
The controversy centered on social media posts by Robert O’Neill, a former board member and brand ambassador, which criticized the Navy for using a drag queen in a recruitment ad, mocked transgender people and refused to wear a mask on an airplane during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shortly after the company’s purchase, he was arrested in a Dallas suburb for public intoxication and misdemeanor assault after a security guard who attempted to help him from a bar to his room told police he called him a racial slur. O’Neill was removed from the company’s website, but later reinstalled.
Fabijan said he often works supporting veterans and first responders so he was eager to partner with Armed Forces.
“I was like, wow, what a great partner this will be for the community because they’re going to give back to the causes that I feel matter,” he said. He orchestrated their opening and did other work, but was only paid a deposit.
“It was always an excuse, another excuse, another excuse. ‘Oh, we’ll get it taken care of,’” Fabijan added. He estimated that Armed Forces owes him about $20,000.
Charity work questions
In a March 2024 press release, Armed Forces reported that a portion of sales were distributed through the AFBC Veterans’ Foundation to organizations “that help homeless veterans, combat PTSD, and address the veteran suicide crisis.”
The latest SEC filing reports that Armed Forces made $176 in charitable donations during the first six months of 2024.
When charity events he proposed began to fall apart, Fabijan started recommending other veteran-owned breweries in the area (Beal is not a veteran).
“I’m one person of many that they screwed over,” Fabijan added. “Do I understand the pushback that was coming from certain members of the community that didn’t want to support the brand? Do I think that it was slightly over the top? Sure. But overall, the issue there wasn’t the community. The issue was that he (Beal) burned the bridges of the people that could help.”
What could have been
Galanti is a religious man and a veteran who is on the board of DDSVets, a nonprofit that provides service dogs to veterans, active-duty military and first responders. He thought Armed Forces handled the LGBTQ+ controversy poorly.
“I’m a big, firm believer in God,” he said. “You accept everybody.”
He saw Armed Forces as a way to merge his passion for beer and helping veterans.
“They actually had a great concept,” he said. “It really is a shame, because it could have really benefited a lot of people, a lot of veterans.”
Couch, a military spouse, stayed through delayed paychecks and denials to fund little things like a $200 bingo set that might improve taproom attendance. She believed the narrative with the neighborhood could be changed by talking face to face and revising the tenor on social media. She grew protective of her team and thought the taproom was turning a corner. The first few days of March yielded revenue equal to the first half of February. She had events – retirements, fundraisers, celebrations of life – scheduled for March and April.
Taproom employees, including her, have been told they will not receive their final paychecks. They have not heard directly from Beal and they have not been let into the brewery to get their personal items.
They deserved better, she said. “We had a really cool team,” Couch added. “We had a really great team.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
SUPPORT
Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: info@virginiamercury.com.
In Virginia’s 2025 gubernatorial race, immigration enforcement is a key issue. Democratic nominee Abigail Spanberger pledges to rescind Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s February executive order requiring local law enforcement to assist federal immigration crackdowns, arguing it wastes resources and harms community trust. She advocates keeping immigration enforcement federal with judicial oversight. Republican nominee Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears supports Youngkin’s policies, emphasizing rule of law and border security, drawing on her immigrant background. The debate highlights contrasting views on public safety, resource allocation, and immigration reform, with immigration remaining a top concern among voters and shaping the campaign’s direction.
Democratic nominee for governor Abigail Spanberger says one of her first acts if elected would be to undo Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s February directive requiring Virginia law enforcement to help carry out federal immigration crackdowns — a policy she argues wastes local resources and undermines community trust.
“I would rescind his executive order, yes,” Spanberger told The Mercury in a lengthy policy interview earlier this month, referring to Youngkin’s Executive Order 47 issued in February. The order gave state police and corrections officers authority to perform certain immigration duties and also urged local jails to fully cooperate with federal deportation operations.
The governor said at the time the measure was meant to keep “dangerous criminal illegal immigrants” off Virginia’s streets. Spanberger countered that Youngkin’s approach illustrates how immigration enforcement can pull local agencies away from their core responsibilities while pushing state agencies into federal civil enforcement.
“Our immigration system is absolutely broken,” she said. “The idea that we would take local police officers or local sheriff’s deputies in amid all the things that they have to do, like community policing or staffing our jails or investigating real crimes, so that they can go and tear families apart … that is a misuse of those resources.”
Spanberger’s stance sets up a sharp contrast with her opponent — Republican nominee Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, who has embraced the order and tied it to her own story as a legal immigrant from Jamaica.
Democratic gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger during an interview with editors and reporters of the Virginia Mercury at her campaign headquarters in Richmond on Aug. 5., 2025. (Photo by Marcus Ingram for the Virginia Mercury)
The divide between the two candidates underscores how immigration has become one of the most combustible issues in Virginia’s 2025 campaign for governor — and how Youngkin’s policies continue to shape the race even as he prepares to leave office in January.
That influence stretches beyond Youngkin’s executive order. In late February, Youngkin also launched the Virginia Homeland Security Task Force, a sweeping federal-state operation staffed with more than 200 personnel from agencies such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the FBI, state police and corrections, which has claimed hundreds to thousands of immigration and gang-related arrests in Virginia.
Keep enforcement federal, Spanberger says
Spanberger, who represented Virginia’s 7th Congressional District in Congress before launching her gubernatorial bid, argued that immigration enforcement should be handled by federal officials with judicial oversight, not by local police diverted from their own duties.
She said Democrats are often wrongly portrayed as opposing law enforcement when they object to policies like Youngkin’s that conscript local agencies into immigration sweeps.
“If someone has a criminal violation at the state level or at the federal level … local resources are required to arrest that person or put them in a local jail before transferring them to federal custody. Absolutely the locality should participate in that,” she said.
But Spanberger insisted the standard should be the same for immigration cases as for any other criminal matter.
“They have to have a warrant to pick somebody up off the street, so they meet that same standard,” she said. “And they can easily go get that detention order signed by a judge or a magistrate, if they want that local support.”
Without those safeguards, Spanberger argued, local cooperation with ICE undermines community policing, creates constitutional concerns and strains already tight budgets. She pointed to her former district of Prince William County, which she said spent more than $1 million housing detainees under a prior partnership with federal immigration authorities.
Earle-Sears emphasizes rule of law
Earle-Sears, who initially agreed to a similar policy interview with The Mercury but canceled minutes before it was to take place, has publicly and repeatedly defended Youngkin’s executive order.
“I am a legal immigrant and now a naturalized citizen. Working together, the governor, attorney general, and I have made Virginia safer,” she said in February when announcing the policy. “Now, working with President Trump, we can take on the scourge of dangerous and violent illegal immigrants.”
Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears speaks at the state Capitol earlier this year. The Republican nominee for governor has defended Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s immigration policies while offering few details on her own. (Photo by Charlotte Rene Woods/Virginia Mercury)
In December, while unveiling a “No Sanctuary Cities” budget proposal, she described the bureaucratic hurdles her own family went through when immigrating to the U.S. and argued that others should follow the same path.
“My father and I had to file documents and wait to be granted permission to enter the United States. Under Governor Youngkin’s leadership, Virginia stands firm: we are not a sanctuary state,” she said.
“The rule of law is not negotiable — it is the foundation of our safety, our freedom, and the promise of opportunity that defines America,” she added.
Earle-Sears’ broader ideas on immigration remain unclear, as she has not gone beyond a handful of public statements and her campaign website offers no issue page outlining her positions.
Dispute over Youngkin’s deportation claims
The candidates also diverge sharply on Youngkin’s claim in July that all 2,500 immigrants arrested and deported by the Virginia Homeland Security Task Force are “violent criminals.”
Spanberger said she has seen no evidence to support the governor’s sweeping assertion.
“If they were violent criminals, presumably, they were arrested on those charges for the violent crime that they committed, in which case, there would be clear documentation,” she said. “Frankly, as somebody who believes in upholding the law, I want people to be arrested for the crimes that they are committing.”
Civil rights groups have also raised alarms, arguing that Youngkin’s mandate is “playing politics with people’s lives.”
“For years, Virginia’s governor has been pushing the same dangerous, false narrative as the Trump administration that immigrants commit crime at higher rates than people who were born here, despite the fact that no data exists to support that conclusion,” the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia said in a statement.
Earle-Sears has not directly addressed the governor’s 2,500 figure but has frequently pointed to grim cases of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants in arguing for tougher enforcement.
“We’ve seen too many tragic stories after dangerous criminals in this country illegally were put back on the streets, and this executive order will make sure we send them back to where they came from,” she said earlier this year.
The Laken Riley Act
The immigration debate has also touched on Spanberger’s record in Congress.
Earle-Sears has faulted her for initially voting against the Laken Riley Act, named for a Georgia college student killed by a Venezuelan national who entered the country unlawfully. The law, which eventually passed after Spanberger left Congress, requires federal authorities to detain immigrants accused of theft and burglary while their cases proceed.
Spanberger said she opposed the bill in its first iteration because it “was essentially putting incredible burdens on localities removing any form of due process” and would not have prevented Riley’s murder.
“As a mother of three daughters, I was deeply offended that they would utilize that young woman’s murder as a political talking point,” she said. “At the time of that vote, her father was in the press saying that he was deeply distressed by the fact that her murder was being utilized in the way that it was.”
David Richards, a political science professor at the University of Lynchburg, said Spanberger has staked out a position that balances criticism of Trump-era immigration policies with support for reforms viewed as moderate.
“Spanberger has been fairly vocal in criticizing the Trump administration’s methods of dealing with undocumented immigration,” Richards said.
“Her voting record on bills centered around immigration has been mixed, supporting some of the more moderate bills, but voting ‘no’ on some key GOP bills like the No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act. … It falls in line with her presenting herself as a pragmatic candidate.”
By contrast, he said, Earle-Sears has been relatively quiet on immigration, surfacing the issue primarily when it intersects with her biography or when amplifying President Donald Trump’s agenda.
“She did talk about the issue back in June, saying that she, as an immigrant, did things the ‘right way.’ But overall, she has skirted the issue,” Richards said.
“She may feel that the issue is not one she can really win with in Virginia, although, as more immigration related arrests happen in the commonwealth, she may have to start talking about this.”
The bigger picture
The fight over immigration in Virginia is inseparable from national politics. Youngkin has aligned himself closely with Trump on enforcement strategies, boasting of joint operations with ICE and staging press events around courthouse raids and “gang and immigration sweeps” that have drawn criticism from Democrats and civil liberties groups.
Spanberger, while denouncing Youngkin’s executive order, has also argued governors should play a more constructive role in pushing Congress to modernize immigration law. She cited bipartisan bills like the Farm Workforce Modernization Act and the Dignity Act as examples of incremental progress, even if they fell short.
“There are many places where the governors of states can bang on the table and tell Congress, ‘Stop making this such a political issue that you campaign on every two years and just fix it,’” she said.
She added that immigration is not only a humanitarian concern but also a pressing economic issue for Virginia, from hospitals seeking visas for foreign-trained nurses to seafood producers dependent on seasonal guest workers.
Earle-Sears, meanwhile, has emphasized border security and public safety, drawing a bright line between legal immigrants like herself and those who arrive unlawfully.
“Any local elected official who instructs law enforcement to defy efforts to keep Virginians safe abandons their duty and breaks the trust of the people they swore to protect,” she said last year.
Looking ahead
With polls showing immigration remains a top concern among Republican voters — and a complicated one among independents — the issue is likely to stay at the forefront of this year’s election cycle.
Activists gathered outside the Chesterfield County courthouse in June to protest against the arrests of immigrants by federal agents. (Photo by Markus Schmidt/Virginia Mercury)
Spanberger is betting Virginians will see Youngkin’s executive order as overreach that diverts local resources and harms public safety by discouraging immigrant communities from reporting crimes. Earle-Sears is counting on voters to view strict enforcement as common sense, framed by her own story of navigating the legal immigration system.
“Maybe she is waiting for a Trump endorsement,” Richards said of Earle-Sears. “But if immigration remains in the headlines, she may not be able to avoid it.”
For now, voters face a stark choice between a Democrat who vows to unwind the governor’s crackdown and press Congress for broader reforms, and a Republican who pledges to double down on enforcement in the name of law and order.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
SUPPORT
Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: info@virginiamercury.com.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
The content presents a detailed examination of immigration policy debates in Virginia, highlighting Democratic nominee Abigail Spanberger’s criticism of Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin’s enforcement measures. It emphasizes concerns about local law enforcement resources, community trust, and civil rights, while portraying Spanberger’s approach as pragmatic and reform-oriented. The Republican perspective, represented by Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, is included but less elaborated, focusing on law and order and strict enforcement. The overall tone and framing lean slightly left of center, favoring a more moderate Democratic viewpoint on immigration reform without dismissing conservative concerns entirely.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Esther Wickham | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-25 18:15:00
The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) found George Mason University (GMU) violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act by implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies favoring race in hiring and promotions. OCR’s probe, prompted by faculty complaints, concluded GMU’s leadership under President Gregory Washington promoted discriminatory practices. OCR proposed a Resolution Agreement requiring GMU to commit publicly to nondiscrimination and a personal apology from Washington. The GMU Board of Visitors is reviewing the findings, but Washington’s attorney rejected OCR’s conclusions, citing flawed investigation methods and denying discrimination. GMU must comply by September 1.
(The Center Square) — The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced George Mason University violated federal law by hiring and promoting staff based on race and other characteristics.
In July, OCR launched an investigation into GMU due to multiple complaints filed by professors alleging that university leadership had adopted unlawful diversity, equity and inclusion policies from 2020 that give preferential treatment to prospective and current faculty, the department said in a press release.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in education programs and activities receiving federal funding. Institutions that are found in violation of Title VI can lose federal funds.”
OCR notified GMU President Gregory Washington that under his leadership, the Fairfax, Virginia-based university violated Title VI by supporting DEI practices and policies.
“In 2020, University President Gregory Washington called for expunging the so-called ‘racist vestiges’ from GMU’s campus. Without a hint of self-awareness, President Washington then waged a university-wide campaign to implement unlawful DEI policies that intentionally discriminate on the basis of race,” said Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor. “Despite this unfortunate chapter in Mason’s history, the University now has the opportunity to come into compliance with federal civil rights laws by entering into a Resolution Agreement with the Office for Civil Rights.”
OCR has issued a proposed Resolution Agreement to GMU to resolve the civil rights laws violations.
The department’s agreement requires GMU to publicly commit to nondiscrimination in hiring and promotion, including a personal apology from the president for promoting unlawful discriminatory practices.
The school’s Board of Visitors said Friday it was reviewing the steps outlined in the resolution and will “continue to respond fully and cooperatively to all inquiries from the Department of Education, the Department of Justice and the U.S. House of Representatives and evaluate the evidence that comes to light,” the board said in a statement on Friday. “Our sole focus is our fiduciary duty to serve the best interests of the University and the people of the Commonwealth of Virginia.”
But on Monday, Washington rejected the Department of Education’s demands.
In a 10-page letter to GMU’s board on Monday, Washington’s attorney, Douglas Gansler, alleged that OCR cut corners and only interviewed two university deans, Inside Higher Ed reports.
“To be clear, per OCR’s own findings, no job applicant has been discriminated against by GMU, nor has OCR attempted to name someone who has been discriminated against by GMU in any context. Therefore, it is a legal fiction for OCR to even assert or claim that there has been a Title VI or Title IX violation here,” Gansler wrote.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
The article primarily reports on the findings and actions of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights regarding George Mason University’s alleged violations of federal law related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. While it includes statements from both the OCR and the university’s leadership, the language used—such as quoting the OCR’s strong criticism of GMU’s DEI efforts and highlighting the university president’s rejection of the findings—frames DEI policies in a negative light. This framing, along with the focus on alleged unlawful discrimination against non-minority groups, aligns with a center-right perspective that is often critical of DEI initiatives. The article does not merely neutrally report the facts but subtly emphasizes the controversy around DEI, suggesting a center-right ideological stance rather than a purely neutral or balanced report.
www.youtube.com – NBC4 Washington – 2025-08-25 09:28:12
SUMMARY: As summer ends, students and teachers at Raymond Elementary in D.C. prepare excitedly for the new school year. The school boasts a brand-new playground and courtyard, with dedicated staff like Miss Tracee Robinson, a second-grade teacher known for her “Not Like Us” rap parody. Teacher Alexandria Henderson has a DonorsChoose wishlist totaling over $1,100, including carpets, headphones, and snacks. Thanks to Pepco’s $1,100 donation, her wishlist is fully funded. Principal Miss Hubbard and the community express gratitude as the school gears up for Monday’s first day, celebrating support from NBC4, Telemundo 44, and corporate partners.
News4’s Molette Green helps get Raymond Elementary hyped for school with a longtime teacher’s rap and a big donation for supplies.
_______
NBC4 Washington / WRC-TV is the No. 1 broadcast television station and the home of the most-watched local news in Washington, D.C. The station leads the market in providing timely and breaking news and information in text, video and graphics across more than 15 platforms including NBCWashington.com, the NBC4 app, NBC4 streaming news channel, newsletters, and social media.
