Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

A month in, FEMA has paid out $63 million in Buncombe, more than any other county • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – SALLY KESTIN – 2024-10-27 09:41:00

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has approved and paid more than $63 million to residents of Buncombe County in housing and financial assistance for Tropical Storm Helene.

FEMA had paid a total of nearly $174 million in North Carolina as of Oct. 26, one month into the disaster recovery, according to data provided to Asheville Watchdog. Buncombe, the hardest hit county, received the most, 36 percent of the total.

Nearly 77,000 applicants in Buncombe had been approved for assistance under FEMA’s Individuals and Households Program, which pays expenses not covered by insurance including rental assistance or lodging costs for those displaced from their homes, repair or replacement costs of owner-occupied homes, and repairs to privately-owned roads and bridges necessary to access homes.

FEMA assistance includes an initial payment of $750 per household for immediate expenses such as shelter, evacuation, food, hygiene products, and other basic needs.

Applicants may receive total assistance of up to $42,500 for housing and $42,500 for “other needs” such as replacement of vehicles or personal property and reimbursement for moving, medical and funeral expenses.

While far more assistance had been approved in Buncombe than elsewhere, the data show the average amount, $821 per applicant, is less than that of nine other counties, where the average payment ranged from $871 to $1,389 per applicant. FEMA is still processing applications so those averages will change.

FEMA had approved more than $173 million in individual assistance in North Carolina as of Oct. 26. The Watchdog calculated average awards based on FEMA data; those will change as more applications are processed. // Watchdog graphic by Sally Kestin; source FEMA data

FEMA had approved more than $173 million in individual assistance in North Carolina as of Oct. 26. The Watchdog calculated average awards based on FEMA data; those will change as more applications are processed. // Watchdog graphic by Sally Kestin; source FEMA data

The county totals FEMA provided do not break down the type of assistance or contain total applications, including the number that have been denied.

In Henderson County, more than 24,000 applicants had received nearly $24 million, the second highest total of the 39 counties and one tribe that have been approved for disaster assistance. In McDowell County, the third highest, nearly 10,000 applicants had received more than $10 million.

FEMA has been the subject of rampant rumors, disinformation, and misinformation about its response to Helene, particularly in North Carolina.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump falsely claimed that FEMA was out of money because it had diverted $1 billion to illegal immigrants. The disinformation centers on a federal grant program for immigrant housing that comes from a separate budget funded by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP); they are not FEMA funds. Conspiracy theorists said the storm was manufactured by Democrats and that FEMA was confiscating survivors’ property. There is no truth to either assertion.

A man was arrested in Rutherford County earlier this month after allegedly threatening to hunt down FEMA workers. FEMA temporarily stopped sending aid workers into neighborhoods to knock on doors until the threat passed. It also created a rumor response page to combat misinformation.

FEMA encourages those affected by Helene to apply for assistance. “If you have insurance, you should file a claim with your insurance company immediately,” according to the Helene disaster web page. “FEMA assistance cannot help with losses already covered by insurance.”

To apply, go to DisasterAssistance.gov, the FEMA mobile app or call the FEMA Helpline at 800-621-3362. 


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Sally Kestin is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter. Email skestin@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post A month in, FEMA has paid out $63 million in Buncombe, more than any other county • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending