Connect with us

The Center Square

U.S. attorneys in border states charge 1,220 with immigration crimes in a week | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-01 10:47:00

(The Center Square) – In one week, U.S. attorneys for four border states charged more than 1,220 defendants with immigration crimes.

The Trump administration is prosecuting illegal entry and illegal reentry cases in accordance with federal law. The base sentence for illegal reentry is two years in federal prison. Those with felony convictions who were previously deported face up to 10 years in prison, and those convicted with aggravated felonies face up to 20 years in federal prison.

The greatest number of illegal foreign nationals charged, nearly 600, were in Texas, followed by 329 in Arizona, 169 in California and 133 in New Mexico.

In the Southern District of Texas, 216 cases were filed from April 11 through 17. The majority, 119, face illegal entry charges; 11 involve human smuggling; 86 face felony illegal reentry charges after previously being deported, with the majority having felony narcotics, firearms or sexual offense convictions.

Juries also recently handed guilty convictions and indictments in human smuggling cases, including smuggling of children and possessing child sexual abuse material.

In the Western District of Texas, federal prosecutors filed 378 immigration-related criminal cases from April 11 through 17. Those charged also include convicted felons who were previously deported multiple times. Their convictions include lewd or lascivious acts with a child under age 14, assault causing bodily injury, DWI, possession of a controlled substance, domestic assault, aggravated assault, among others.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona charged the next greatest number of 329 over the same time period. The most were charged with illegal entry, 179, followed by 130 with illegal reentry and 18 with “smuggling illegal aliens” into Arizona.

One was charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding a Border Patrol agent. One Mexican national was arrested after refusing to register with the federal government after being arrested for driving under the influence and previously being deported five times.

Many charged were previously deported, including a Latin Kings and MS-13 transnational criminal gang member who’d been deported seven times and convicted of racketeering and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine.

In another case, an alleged human smuggler was charged after authorities uncovered a scheme using the Telegram phone app and burner phones to recruit alleged smugglers in the U.S. to travel to the Arizona-Mexico border to drive illegal border crossers to Phoenix. In another case, a Mexican national was arrested after illegally reentering the U.S. after he was previously deported and convicted for trafficking heroin.

The next greatest number charged, 169, were in California. The Southern District of California filed 135 border-related cases, including for “transportation of illegal aliens, bringing in aliens for financial gain, reentering the U.S. after deportation, deported alien found in the United States, and importation of controlled substances.”

Prosecutors are prioritizing charging drug and firearms offenses, drug, firearm, and human smugglers, those with serious criminal records, those with active warrants, and those who endanger and threaten the local communities and law enforcement officers, the office said.

In a separate case, four indictments were unsealed charging 16 people in San Diego County with distributing large quantities of methamphetamine, fentanyl and heroin and laundering the drug-trafficking proceeds. In a coordinated takedown, more than 115 federal, state and local law enforcement officials executed search warrants and made arrests in three San Diego neighborhoods after a 16-month investigation.

Using court-authorized wiretaps, undercover agents and confidential sources, the investigation uncovered a distribution network of drugs, including fentanyl, throughout the U.S., including in Ohio and Kansas. The San Diego County-based drug trafficking organization used shell companies to gather and launder the proceeds from other states, including Colorado, Minnesota and Nebraska, according to the indictment.

In the Central District of California criminal charges were filed against 34 defendants for illegal reentry after they’d been previously deported. Many are felons with domestic violence, unlawful sex with a minor and assault with a deadly weapon convictions, are registered sex offenders, and served prison time.

In one case, four illegal foreign nationals were charged with stealing $10,000 in cash from a victim at a gas station in East Hollywood after following the victim from a Los Angeles bank branch. Law enforcement officers engaged in a high-speed pursuit, eventually caught them even after two bailed out and fled on foot. Officers recovered the $10,000 hidden in one defendant’s underwear as well as several fake passports.

In the District of New Mexico, 133 were charged with immigration crimes. The most, 68, were charged with illegal reentry after deportation, 55 with illegal entry and 10 with “alien smuggling.” Many charged are felons convicted of possession of a dangerous weapon by a restricted person, aggravated driving under the influence and possession of a forgery writing/device.

“Enhanced enforcement both at the border and in the interior of the district have yielded aliens engaged in unlawful activity or with serious criminal history, including human trafficking, sexual assault and violence against children,” the U.S. Attorney for New Mexico said.

The post U.S. attorneys in border states charge 1,220 with immigration crimes in a week | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on the Trump administration’s prosecution of immigration crimes in border states and details the charges brought against over 1,220 individuals. The tone is largely factual, with a focus on the types of crimes committed, such as illegal entry, human smuggling, and serious felonies. However, the framing emphasizes the severity of crimes linked to illegal immigration, particularly violent crimes and drug trafficking. This approach can be seen as aligning with a center-right viewpoint, as it supports stronger border enforcement policies while highlighting criminal activities, a typical narrative favored by conservative political perspectives. The article does not appear to endorse a particular policy but rather reports on the actions being taken in the context of current law enforcement priorities.

The Center Square

California Democrats gut bill making it a felony to solicit child prostitutes | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Kenneth Schrupp – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 17:28:00

(The Center Square)  California Democratic legislators gutted a bill that would have made it a felony to solicit any children for sex, despite support for the measure from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis. 

Assembly Bill 379, a bipartisan bill from Assemblywoman Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento, and State Sen. Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, would have closed the loopholes left open by the forced amendments to Grove’s Senate Bill 1414, which passed last year and made it a felony to pay all minors for sex except for those 16 and 17 years old. 

National outrage on the bill’s near-shelving put the bill back onto the legislative schedule, and led Newsom and Kounalakis to come out in support of the bill’s existing provisions. 

However, Assembly Public Safety Chairman Nick Schultz, D-Burbank, has instead opted “to host info hearings on the issue in the fall” as Democratic legislators voted to forcefully gut the bill against Krell’s wishes to remove the provision making it a felony to purchase sex from all minors.

Republicans responded by proposing a “hostile” amendment to restore the provision, which Krell officially endorsed, saying she does not consider the restoration amendment “hostile” and would be voting to support it. 

In one notable exchange on the Assembly floor session on AB 379, Assemblyman Mark Gonzalez, D-Los Angeles, took aim at Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego for his support of making it a felony to buy sex from children.

“SB 357, which this bill is trying to fix, legalized loitering for the purpose of sex work and prostitution. Why? Because somehow it was spun as anti-LGBT to try and enforce laws against sex trafficking,” said DeMaio on the Assembly floor. “I will tell you as a gay Republican it is offensive, and a supermajority of the gay community disavow the LGBTQ caucus claiming that somehow this bill is anti-gay. It’s offensive to use the gay community as window dressing for sex trafficking.”

“What’s offensive is when you stand on this floor and call yourself gay, but yet you vote down the same civil rights for gay people every single day,” said Gonzalez.

SB 357 author State Sen. Scott Wiener argued at the time that decriminalization of loitering to commit prostitution “contributes to “discrimination on the basis of gender, race, class and perceived sex worker status – in particular, targeting Black women and members of the transgender community.”

Since SB 357 has come into law, vast swathes of urban areas in California have become open prostitution zones. In Los Angeles, a 40 block area of South Central is covered by hundreds of prostitutes, some charging as little as $40 for some acts, with “10 girls on the corner, condoms on the ground,” many of whom are minors, all in “broad daylight.” 

Sacramento Sheriff Jim Cooper, who previously was a Democratic Assemblyman, condemned the changes to the bill, and cited his department’s high volume of cases regarding the sex trafficking of minors. 

“In my agency, we currently have 17 open cases of juveniles being trafficked for sex. This year, we have already rescued seven juveniles from the sex trade,” said Cooper. “They are currently getting sexually exploited, and the Legislature made a decision today that the exploitation of these children is acceptable collateral damage.”

The post California Democrats gut bill making it a felony to solicit child prostitutes | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a right-leaning bias, primarily through its framing and tone. It criticizes Democratic legislators for “gutting” a bill intended to make solicitation of minors for sex a felony, portraying their actions as obstructive and harmful. The language used, such as “forcefully gut the bill” and describing Democratic decisions as making “the exploitation of these children acceptable collateral damage,” is strongly negative toward the Democrats’ position. The article highlights Republican efforts to restore the provisions and portrays Democratic opposition in a harsh light, often quoting Republicans sympathetically while framing Democrats as dismissive or offensive. While it reports on the ideological conflict, the selective emphasis and charged language suggest advocacy rather than neutral reporting. This framing indicates a clear ideological stance aligned more with conservative or right-leaning perspectives.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 14:16:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump picked an attorney in the Tennessee attorney general’s office for a spot on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Whitney Hermandorfer is currently the director of the Strategic Litigation Unit in the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office. If confirmed by the Senate, she will fill a judicial vacancy left by Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch, who announced in January she was taking senior status. The court is based in Cincinnati and hears cases from Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky and Michigan.

“The atate of Tennessee has trusted Whitney Hermandorfer over and over with complex cases of national significance. She has never let us down,” said Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti on Friday. “Her leadership of Tennessee’s Strategic Litigation Unit sets a high bar of excellence at every level of the federal judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Kentucky Attorney General Russel Coleman said Hermandorfer has been an advocate.

“As neighbors to the north, our office has been grateful for Whitney’s partnership as we uphold our laws and the Constitution. Whitney was one of the brilliant advocates behind our lawsuit to protect women’s sports, and her ability to see around legal corners led to key victories all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Coleman said in a statement.

Tennessee’s U.S. senators praised Trump’s nomination.

“She is a rising star in Tennessee, and she will be a fair-minded jurist who will apply our nation’s laws as they are written and defend the Constitution,” Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., said.

“Few can boast equal credentials, having clerked for Justices Alito and Barrett, as well as then-Judge Kavanaugh. Whitney graduated top of her law school class at the George Washington University Law School,” said Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn.

The post Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the nomination of Whitney Hermandorfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by President Donald Trump. It includes endorsements from Republican officials, highlighting her qualifications and conservative judicial credentials. The tone is positive and supportive of the nominee, with quotes praising her legal work on issues such as protecting women’s sports and upholding the Constitution, which are typically associated with conservative values. Although the article does not explicitly argue for a political position, the framing and selection of supportive quotes from Republican figures suggest a center-right bias. The content emphasizes her alignment with conservative judicial philosophy through mentions of her clerking for conservative Supreme Court justices and the praise from GOP senators, rather than presenting a neutral or balanced view including perspectives from other political sides.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Study: Georgians would have $2,680 tax increase if federal cuts expire | Georgia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 11:21:00

(The Center Square) – Georgians could have a $2,680 tax increase if Congress lets the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire by the end of the year, according to a study by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation.

The main issue facing Peach Stare businesses is a policy on full expensing, the authors of the report said.

“Georgia does not adopt full expensing business investments,” the report said. “State policymakers could adopt 100% full expensing regardless of whether federal full expensing is renewed.”

Florida has the highest possible tax burden among Georgia’s surrounding states at $3,650. Alabama is the lowest at $2,192.

Business groups are advocating for the tax cuts. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Greater North Fulton Chamber held a roundtable discussion on the tax cuts last week with U.S. Rep. Richard McCormick, R-Ga.

“Extending the pro-growth tax provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is critical to ensuring continued economic prosperity for Greater North Fulton,” said Kali Boatright, president and CEO of the Greater North Fulton Chamber of Commerce, in a statement after the event. “Without action, this would prohibit job creation, investment, and growth.”

Groups are lobbying Georgia’s Democratic U.S. Senate delegation to support an extension. Sen. Jon Ossoff has indicated he will not support the tax cuts. Americans for Prosperity held a rally outside of his Atlanta office on April 15.

But there are also concerns about how the tax cuts could affect the federal deficit.

A letter sent to U.S. Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., from the Congressional Budget Office shows the tax cuts could add $37 trillion over the next 30 years, according to previous reporting by The Center Square.

The post Study: Georgians would have $2,680 tax increase if federal cuts expire | Georgia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the potential tax increase in Georgia if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is not extended, incorporating viewpoints from business groups and politicians. While it presents factual information, the emphasis on business group support for maintaining tax cuts and the use of terms like “pro-growth” reflect a center-right perspective that favors lower taxes and economic growth policies. The inclusion of opposition views is limited and somewhat framed around the deficit concern. Overall, the tone and framing lean slightly toward supporting continuation of the tax cuts, which aligns with center-right economic principles, though it maintains a largely factual report style without overt ideological promotion.

Continue Reading

Trending