Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas may exempt police from deadly conduct charges

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Sneha Dey – 2025-04-28 05:00:00

Texas lawmakers want to exempt police from deadly conduct charges” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


When Austin police responded to a 911 call in a downtown high rise in 2019, they confronted Mauris DeSilva a few feet away from the elevator, in a mental health crisis holding a knife.

Christopher Taylor, an on-duty officer, shot and killed DeSilva that night. DeSilva’s father has said his son was not a threat to the police, only to himself. Prosecutors agreed.

Taylor last year was sentenced to two years in a prison for deadly conduct, a charge only a handful of officers have been convicted of in recent history. Lawyers for Taylor after the sentencing have called the prosecution an abuse of power.

Texas lawmakers are now working to make that kind of sentence impossible. House Bill 2436 would exempt law enforcement officers from being charged with deadly conduct for actions taken in the line of duty. The lower chamber is expected to vote on the bill Monday. The Senate approved a nearly identical bill, Senate Bill 1637, earlier this month.

The bill aims to strengthen protections for law enforcement officers. But critics say the bill gives officers unfettered authority to act recklessly and use an unjustifiable amount of force while on duty.

It’s one of several pieces of legislation this session that aim to increase protections for police officers five years after Texans took to the streets to protest police violence. The legislation aligns with the priorities of Gov. Greg Abbott and other GOP leaders who have been firm in maintaining local police budgets and have pushed Texas political candidates to sign pledges to “back the blue.”

Texas created the deadly conduct charge to help prosecutors around the state combat the rise of gang violence such as drive-by shootings in Texas. In recent years, a handful of police officers around the state like Taylor have been on trial for deadly conduct. Officers in Dallas were indicted on deadly conduct charges over how they launched rubber bullets against demonstrators in 2020. An ongoing case in Austin, where officer Daniel Sanchez shot Rajan Moonesinghe in his home while responding to a 911 call, hinges on the statute.

“It wasn’t intended for that at all,” Rep. Cole Hefner, the Mount Pleasant Republican who authored the bill, said in a committee hearing this month. “We want to protect [police officers] in doing the official duties of their job from these prosecutors that may be a little bit politically motivated sometimes.”

Republican lawmakers have clashed with local left-leaning prosecutors in recent years over their interpretations of the law and how they have used their discretion over which cases to pursue.

Jerry Staton was an Austin police officer for 25 years and now trains police officers in how and when to use firearms. Law enforcement officers regularly have to point and fire guns as part of the job. Staton said that means that officers are at risk of violating the deadly conduct statute everytime they go out and do their job.

Staton sat through much of Taylor’s trial, during which a grand jury went through 30 hours of deliberations before sentencing.

“I was in awe that this particular charge could be brought to a police officer … who did exactly what he was trained to do in a situation that he had very little flexibility in how to deal with it,” said Staton in committee testimony. “This has got to be fixed.”

Earlier versions of the House and Senate bills were written to be applied retroactively to cases like Taylor’s but that provision has since been removed.

Critics of HB 2436 argue an exemption like this shields police officers from accountability for recklessly discharging firearms. They worry the bill removes a mechanism for holding law enforcement accountable for misconduct or excessive use of force.

“Allowing police to shoot at people without justification will make our community and our law enforcement officers less safe,” said Travis County District Attorney José Garza.

“Bad actors and mistakes do happen in every profession and our police officers, our police force, is not an exception to that,” said Yasmine Smith, a vice president of justice and advocacy for the nonprofit Austin Area Urban League. “We must hold those bad actors accountable.”

Multiple critics raised concerns the legislation may have unintended consequences: Prosecutors may end up pursuing more severe charges against police officers, which come with harsher penalties.

The range of punishment is five to 99 years for murder, and two to 20 years for aggravated assault, compared to two to 10 years for deadly conduct. Taylor, the Austin officer, was initially indicted for murder over DeSilva’s death but that charge was later downgraded to deadly misconduct.

“If a police officer gets charged with murder now because he or she is a police officer, they don’t get the benefit of that very lesser offense because of this statute,” said John Creuzot, the Dallas County district attorney and a former judge. “That doesn’t make sense.”


Tickets are on sale now for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas’ breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Get tickets before May 1 and save big! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/04/28/texas-police-deadly-conduct-exempt/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Texas may exempt police from deadly conduct charges appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article from The Texas Tribune reports on a proposed Texas law that would exempt law enforcement officers from being charged with deadly conduct for actions taken in the line of duty. While the article presents information from both supporters and critics of the bill, the framing and inclusion of details, such as the reference to GOP leaders’ “back the blue” pledges and the concerns raised by the Travis and Dallas County District Attorneys, suggest a slight leaning towards skepticism of the bill and a focus on police accountability, which aligns with a center-left perspective.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas Senate advances $8.5 billion increase to public school funding

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Adam Schwager – 2025-05-22 23:48:00

SUMMARY: The Texas Senate advanced an amended House Bill 2, allocating $8.5 billion in public school funding over two years, focusing on teacher support, school safety, and student opportunities. Key investments include $1.3 billion for basic costs, $850 million for special education overhaul, $430 million for safety, and a fully funded full-day pre-K program. Teacher raises totaling $4.2 billion prioritize experienced staff, expand incentive programs, and offer bonuses for rural teachers. While praised for historic funding, critics like Rep. James Talarico argue the bill was a backroom deal restricting local control, insufficient for inflation impacts, and neglecting newer teachers, demanding broader raises amid a large state surplus.

Read the full article

The post Texas Senate advances $8.5 billion increase to public school funding appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas Legislature wants to stay on daylight saving time

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Berenice Garcia – 2025-05-22 17:28:00


Texas senators approved House Bill 1393 to adopt permanent daylight saving time, eliminating biannual clock changes in both the Central and Mountain Time zones. The bill, introduced by Rep. Will Metcalf and sponsored in the Senate by Paul Bettencourt, designates the new time as “Texas Time” and now awaits Gov. Greg Abbott’s signature. However, it cannot take effect until federal law, the Uniform Time Act, changes. Texas joins 18 states pushing for permanent daylight saving time, supported federally by senators including Ted Cruz, Patty Murray, and Rick Scott. Some lawmakers caution that standard time better supports health by aligning with natural circadian rhythms.

It’s “Texas Time”: Legislature OKs permanent daylight saving time, but Congress must also act” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Subscribe to The Y’all — a weekly dispatch about the people, places and policies defining Texas, produced by Texas Tribune journalists living in communities across the state.


Texas lawmakers want to stop changing the clocks.

Texas senators approved House Bill 1393 on Thursday, which adopts permanent daylight saving time, doing away with the current practice of changing the clocks by an hour every spring and autumn.

Introduced by state Rep. Will Metcalf, a Republican from Conroe who introduced a similar bill during the last legislative session, the bill would eliminate the biannual clock changes for both parts of the state on Central Standard Time and on Mountain Standard Time. The law requires that this new time standard be referred to as “Texas Time.”

The bill now heads to Gov. Greg Abbott to be signed into law.

However, the bill cannot yet take effect because of a superseding federal law, the Uniform Time Act, that states that daylight saving time must begin and end on federally mandated dates.

“This is effectively a trigger bill waiting for change with the federal government,” state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Houston Republican who sponsored the bill, said before a Senate debate.

With the bill’s passage, Texas joins 18 other states that have adopted similar laws and there is interest to make the change at the federal level.

Last month, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz advocated for eliminating the time changes during a Senate committee hearing on commerce, science, and transportation.

U.S. Sens. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, and Rick Scott, a Florida Republican, also introduced a bill adopting permanent daylight saving time, the Sunshine Protection Act, earlier this year.

This would not be the first time the U.S. adopted permanent daylight saving time. The country experimented with the lack of time changes in the 1970s during the Nixon administration as a way to conserve energy. But the experiment, which was meant to last two years, ended early as public opinion soured on permanent daylight saving time over concerns that children heading to school in the darkness were more susceptible to traffic accidents.

While polling shows most Americans support eliminating the time changes, state Sen. Nathan Johnson, a Dallas Democrat, urged lawmakers to rethink their support for the bill, pointing to studies that show that standard time is healthier as it aligns with the body’s natural circadian rhythms, which regulate sleep-wake cycles.

Reporting in the Rio Grande Valley is supported in part by the Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas, Inc.


First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/22/texas-daylight-saving-time/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Texas Legislature wants to stay on daylight saving time appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article presents factual reporting on Texas lawmakers’ efforts to adopt permanent daylight saving time, referencing bipartisan support including Republicans and Democrats at both state and federal levels. It quotes legislators from both parties and provides historical context and scientific concerns without editorializing or promoting a partisan perspective. The tone remains neutral and informative, simply outlining the legislative process and viewpoints without framing the issue through a clear ideological lens. Therefore, the content maintains a balanced and centrist stance.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas House passes abortion-related bills | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-22 17:02:00


The Texas House advanced two abortion-related bills previously passed by the Senate. SB 33, authored by Sen. Donna Campbell, bans taxpayer funds from supporting out-of-state abortion travel, targeting entities that provide logistical support for abortions. It allows lawsuits against violators to recover misused funds. SB 31, the Life of the Mother Act filed by Sen. Bryan Hughes, clarifies medical emergency exceptions to abortion bans, requiring uniformity and education on the topic. Texas bans elective abortions except to save the mother’s life. Since the Roe overturn, 157 medically necessary abortions occurred with no prosecutions of doctors, while illegal abortion facility operators face prosecution. The bans have reduced elective abortions by nearly 80,000 over two years.

(The Center Square) – The Texas House has advanced two abortion-related bills that already passed the Senate.

On Thursday, the House passed SB 33, filed by state Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels, which bans taxpayer money from being used to assist with travel outside of Texas to have an abortion. The bill passed the House by a vote of 87-57. It passed the Senate in April by a vote of 22-9.

Campbell filed the bill after officials in Austin and San Antonio allocated millions of taxpayer funds for “abortion travel” in violation of state law, The Center Square reported.

“Currently, ‘abortion providers’ may no longer commit legal abortion within the state. Even if they did, cities would be prohibited from engaging in business with them. However, cities have found a way to use taxpayer money to support abortion while skirting the law. Instead, they are giving money to entities that aid or abet abortions in some form but are not directly abortion providers themselves. So far, Austin has directly spent money to this end while the San Antonio city council has repeatedly attempted this blatant misuse of Texan taxpayer funds. Other cities are likely to follow suit without legislation that prohibits such actions explicitly,” Campbell’s bill analysis explains.

The bill explicitly prohibits governmental transactions with abortion assistance entities to ensure that taxpayer funds aren’t used to indirectly support or facilitate out-of-state abortion services. It amends state to law to expand the definition of “abortion assistance entities” to include any organization or individual that “provides financial support, travel arrangements, childcare, or other logistical services that facilitate access to abortions.”

It also empowers the Office of the Attorney General, state residents, or individuals within a political subdivision to sue “any entity engaging in prohibited transactions, with provisions for recovering misused funds, court costs, and attorney’s fees.”

The author of Texas’ Heartbeat Act, state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, filed the Life of the Mother Act, SB 31, which unanimously passed the Senate in late April. State Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, filed companion legislation, HB 44, in the Texas House.

It passed the House Wednesday by a vote of 89-57 after a heated debate.

Despite Gov. Greg Abbott saying earlier this year that there was no need to amend the state’s Human Life Protection Act, state lawmakers advanced the bill.

Abbott signed the Human Life Protection Act into law in June 2021, which became effective after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in 2022. Texas law prohibits all elective abortions of preborn children with the exception of saving the life of the mother. The law and other Texas abortion bans were challenged in court and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and Texas Supreme Court. Last May, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that doctors could use “reasonable medical judgment” when determining when a medical necessity justified performing an abortion. The Texas Medical Board also established rules and guidelines.

SB 31 “seeks to clarify existing medical emergency exceptions to otherwise prohibited abortions, which are spread throughout or implicated by multiple provisions in different codes, and provide uniformity among them.” It also establishes continuing medical education and continuing legal education courses about state abortion laws and the bill’s medical emergency exceptions, the bill analysis explains.

It revises state law “relating to exceptions to otherwise prohibited abortions based on a physician’s reasonable medical judgment,” which several Republicans argue creates a loophole to allow elective abortions.

SB 31 passed by a vote of 134-4 after heated debate. Four Republicans voting against it: Harrison; Hopper; Lowe; Pierson, according to an unofficial vote tally.

Seven Republicans voted “Present, not voting:” Holt; Money; Mr. Speaker; Olcott; Swanson; Tinderholt; Toth. Five members were absent and didn’t vote.

Democrats overwhelmingly voted for it.

According to the latest data published by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, zero elective abortions and 157 medically necessary abortions have been performed in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade and Texas’ abortion ban went into effect in August 2022. This is up from 145 medically necessary abortions performed that were reported in March, The Center Square reported.

If an average of 2,852 abortions performed per month in the first six months of 2022 were to have continued, an estimated 79,856 elective abortions would have been reported by October 2024, based on the data. Meaning, Texas abortion bans reduced elective abortion by nearly 80,000 in a roughly two-year time span.

No doctor has been prosecuted, sued, or sanctioned for performing any of the medically necessary abortions reported to the state. Several people have been arrested and are being prosecuted for operating illegal abortion facilities, The Center Square reported. Elective abortions performed at these facilities were not reported to the state.

The post Texas House passes abortion-related bills | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on Texas state legislation related to abortion restrictions, focusing on bills proposed and passed by Republican lawmakers. The tone and language tend to emphasize the legal and procedural aspects of the legislation while framing certain actions, such as the use of taxpayer funds for abortion travel, in a negative light by highlighting terms like “blatant misuse.” It presents legislative outcomes and voting splits, noting Democratic and Republican positions, but the selection of details—such as underscoring the reduction in elective abortions and citing prosecutions of illegal abortion facilities—aligns with a perspective favoring abortion restrictions. While it does not use overtly partisan language, the framing highlights Republican efforts to restrict abortion access and portrays these efforts as effective and justified, which suggests a Center-Right bias rather than neutral reporting on the ideological stances of the involved parties alone.

Continue Reading

Trending