fbpx
Connect with us

The Center Square

State prosecutors ask Supreme Court to protect veterans’ rights | Virginia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Sarah Roderick-Fitch | – 2023-04-17 11:16:00

(The Center Square) – Virginia Jason Miyares is leading a bipartisan group of attorneys general from 33 states and the District of Columbia in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case of a veteran denied certain educational benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Miyares and the coalition of attorneys general assert Virginia resident and decorated Army veteran Jason Rudisill was wrongly denied his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits.

Advertisement

After completing his first tour of duty, Rudisill, as an enlisted soldier, utilized his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to complete his undergraduate degree.

“[Rudisill] was twice honorably discharged, and relied on approximately 25 months of education benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill before November 2007 to obtain his undergraduate degree. He then reenlisted, was commissioned as an officer, and served a third tour from 2007 to 2011,” according to the brief filed by the state prosecutors.

After completing his third tour of duty, Rudisill was accepted into Yale Divinity School with hopes of returning to the armed forces as a chaplain.

Rudisill attempted to use his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits, but the VA denied his request. The VA defended its by saying Rudisill was not entitled to use both the Montgomery GI Bill and the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

Advertisement

The VA specifies veterans' preference in deciding which GI Bill they opt to utilize, “If you're eligible for more than one education benefit, such as the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the Montgomery GI Bill, you must choose which benefit to .”

Advocates for Rudisill argue veterans with “multiple requisite periods of service” are entitled up to 48 months of educational benefits.

During Rudisill's third tour of duty Congress passed the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

“He applied for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits based on his understanding that, under the Bill, he had approximately 22 months of education benefits remaining out of his 48 aggregate months,” the brief explained.

Advertisement

The VA determined Rudisill's Post-9/11 benefits would be limited to 10 months and 16 days, “because [Rudisill] had used some of his entitled benefits under the prior version of the GI Bill.”

The Montgomery GI Bill and the Post-9/11 GI Bill entitle eligible veterans to receive up to 36 months of tuition payouts. The Montgomery GI Bill offers up to a set monthly amount, which is sent directly to the student. The Post-9/11 GI Bill, pays the tuition to the school. Under the Post-9/11 GI Bill are eligible for housing or book stipends, which is not included under the Montgomery GI Bill.

The coalition of attorneys general  contends hundreds of thousands of veterans' “rights” are in “jeopardy” by the Federal Circuit's decision and are requesting the Supreme Court “secure” those rights by striking the lower court's decision.

The state prosecutors say the decision made by the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit to uphold the VA's decision in the case of Rudisill v. McDonough, could negatively impact post-9/11 veterans.

Advertisement

“The Federal Circuit took away both James Rudisill and thousands of other post 9/11 veterans' GI education benefits,” said Miyares. “This decision actively hurts veterans' reentry into civilian and deprives them of earned benefits.”

Miyares is concerned the decision will negatively impact veterans as they transition out of the military.

“Over 700,000 veterans in the Commonwealth of Virginia. This decision actively hurts veterans' reentry into civilian life and deprives them of earned benefits,” Miyares said.

The Center Square reached out to the VA for comment; it had yet to respond at the time of publication.

Advertisement

State prosecutors joining Miyares are from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, , Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, , Utah, Vermont, Washington, Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and the District of Columbia.

Source link

Advertisement

The Center Square

Six Southern governors push back against UAW unionization efforts at auto plant | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Jon Styf | – 2024-04-16 14:07:00

(The Center Square) – Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee joined five other governors in opposing the United Auto Workers' unionization campaign with a vote this of Chattanooga Volkswagen autoworkers on whether to unionize.

Lee is joined by Alabama Gov. Kay , Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster and Gov. Greg Abbott against what they call misinformation from the UAW.

Advertisement

“The reality is companies have choices when it to where to invest and bring and ,” Lee and the governors wrote. “We have worked tirelessly on behalf of our constituents to bring good-paying jobs to our states. These jobs have become part of the fabric of the automotive manufacturing industry. Unionization would certainly put our states' jobs in jeopardy – in fact, in this year already, all of the UAW automakers have announced layoffs.”

Tennessee Senate Democratic Caucus Chairwoman London Lamar, on the other hand, offered her of the Chattanooga workers and UAW, saying that Lee has a history of “anti-worker” legislation such as a removal of automatic Tennessee Education Association deduction options from Tennessee teacher paychecks and an incentive restriction for businesses that allow card check union elections.

“Unlike Tennessee's governor, we applaud Volkswagen workers for engaging in the democratic and we would welcome the UAW's expansion in Chattanooga,” Lamar said in a statement. “We aren't surprised to see Gov. Bill Lee join with other anti-union states to tip the scales against workers. Lee, who inherited a company that made him a millionaire, has signed more anti-worker laws than any governor in Tennessee history.”

Lee and the governors, however, believe a vote to unionize would jeopardize those auto manufacturing plants' future.

Advertisement

“In America, we respect our workforce and we do not need to pay a third party to tell us who can pick up a box or flip a switch,” the governors said. “No one wants to hear this, but it's the ugly reality. We've seen it play out this way every single time a foreign automaker plant has been unionized; not one of those plants remains in operation. And we are seeing it in the fallout of the Detroit Three strike with those automakers rethinking investments and cutting jobs. Putting businesses in our states in that position is the last thing we want to do.”

Read More

The post Six Southern governors push back against UAW unionization efforts at auto plant | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

The Center Square

Mississippi’s Medicaid reimbursement plan gets federal approval | Mississippi

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | – 2024-04-11 12:10:00

(The Center Square) – Mississippi's second part of a Medicaid reimbursement plan that the says will more than $700 million in additional funds for the state's hospitals has been approved by federal officials.

Gov. Tate Reeves, on social , said the approval will result in an additional $160 million for hospitals across Mississippi, which is $23 million more than originally projected.

Advertisement

“This additional $160 million will go a long way toward further strengthening hospitals across our state,” Reeves said. “I'd like to thank all of the medical professionals and care leaders who helped get us to today.”

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services still has to approve the rest of the $708 million plan, which would be funded by annual assessments hospitals pay to the state's Medicaid program. These assessments are calculated using a formula provided under state .

The $708 million figure is reached after considering the funds the hospitals make to finance the initiative.

Under the plan, Medicaid base payment rates are supplemented by the reimbursement of inpatient and outpatient hospital services in the fee-for-service system up to the Medicare upper payment limit.

Advertisement

The first component of the plan was approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in December. Hospitals were reimbursed near the average commercial rate for services provided through the managed care delivery system. 

According to a news release, the Mississippi Division of Medicaid will be delivering the first round of payments to hospitals in the next few weeks. 

The approval as lawmakers could be expanding the state's Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act. Under the ACA, the federal reimburses states with 90% of expansion costs, with state taxpayers picking up the rest of the tab. 

A conference committee will take up House Bill 1725, known as the Healthy Mississippi Works Act. The legislation, passed by the House by a veto-proof 99-20 vote on Feb. 28 and rewritten and passed by the Senate 36-16, would expand Medicaid eligibility with a work requirement if approved by the federal government.

Advertisement

The bill also would expand Medicaid even if the Biden administration refused to approve a work requirement.

KFF, formerly known as the Kaiser Foundation, says the administration will likely not approve such a requirement. It also says 123,000 could become eligible for Medicaid if a plan is signed into law.

Any Medicaid expansion plan will likely face a veto from Reeves, who ran against expansion in his gubernatorial reelection campaign. 

Advertisement

Read More

The post Mississippi's Medicaid reimbursement plan gets federal approval | Mississippi appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

The Center Square

Republican AGs investigate investment company over anti-Israel policies | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | contributor – 2024-04-10 12:24:00

(The Center Square) – A coalition of Republican attorneys general has launched an investigation into MSCI, a New York-based investment company managing roughly more than $5 in assets, after allegations surfaced of its boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) policies against Israel.

The coalition, led by Florida Ashley Moody, gave MSCI chairman and CEO Henry Fernandez until April 18 to respond.

Advertisement

They contacted Fernandez after the Jewish Syndicate reported that MSCI's ESG policies appear to downgrade dozens of companies “that it said committed ‘human rights violations' simply for conducting business in Judea and Samaria and eastern Jerusalem.”

JNS reported that it found “that MSCI has tagged nine companies that generated ESG controversy ratings at Morningstar for doing business in Judea and Samaria with its own such ratings” and contacted Florida officials.

In a letter to Fernandez, the AGs express “great concern” over the report saying, “the states we represent unequivocally support Israel's right to exist and oppose the BDS movement.”

The coalition represents the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, , Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Virginia.

Advertisement

“While the BDS movement ‘markets itself as a nonviolent movement' designed to pressure Israel to ‘withdraw to its pre-1967 borders,' its leadership in reality ‘seeks nothing less than the elimination of Israel as a Jewish ,'” they said. “According to a cofounder of the BDS movement, it is ‘but the first stage on the road to fulfilling the vision of the dismantling of Israel.' The movement often focuses on pressuring large investment portfolios – such as those by municipality or university – to divest from companies that ‘aid Israel's occupation.'”

They also said the BDS movement has two goals: “to economically cripple Israel and create a false narrative of Israel's occupation and colonization.”

MSCI has not released a statement in response to the inquiry. In a report released last month, it states that according to data analyzed in two indexes, companies with higher MSCI ESG ratings outperformed their lower-rated counterparts over the last 11 and 17 years, according to when the indexes were launched. MSCI also has several Israel indexes created to “measure the performance of the large and mid and small cap segments of the Israeli equity market.”

The AGs' inquiry into MSCI followed a similar inquiry in 2022 into Chicago-based Morningstar and its subsidiary, Sustainalytics. The AGs of Kentucky and West Virginia led a coalition raising concerns about Sustainalytics, an ESG ratings and research firm that manages roughly $264 billion in assets, allegedly providing financial ratings and creating a “watchlist” of financial companies located in “occupied territories” in Israel. Last October, Florida placed Morningstar-Sustainalytics on its list of “Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel.”

Advertisement

Morningstar then conducted an internal investigation and subsequently committed to implementing seven recommendations made by the end of 2024 after working with a coalition of Jewish organizations, Jewish Federations of North America says. The recommendations involve Morningstar changing its business practices and eliminating anti-Israel bias in company ratings. A review of Morningstar-Sustainalytics' policies found that it rated a disproportionate percentage of Israeli companies or companies operating in Israel based on “faulty assumptions, poor sourcing, and flawed models [which] threatened to deny these companies access to capital from ESG funds and mar their reputations.”

A result of the coalition's work with Morningstar “has already resulted in significant change,” Jewish Federations said. “Last year, Morningstar unfair controversy ratings from over 100 firms operating in or doing business with Israel, a 94% decrease.”

Pointing to its efforts against Morningstar, the AG coalition said, “we oppose the BDS movement in all forms, especially given the recent rise in antisemitism across the United States.” They also raised concerns about an “egregious” allegation that MSCI deducted ESG points from an Israeli company because it constructed security and surveillance barriers to protect Israeli from terrorists.

So far, at least 38 states have taken actions to oppose the BDS movement, according to the Jewish virtual library, a of the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise.

Advertisement

According to a recent report, in the three months after Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, antisemitic incidents increased throughout the U.S. by 360% – after the total number of antisemitic incidents were already at a historic high in 2022, The Center Square reported.

Read More

The post Republican AGs investigate investment company over anti-Israel policies | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending