Connect with us

The Center Square

Colorado governor signs controversial gun control bill | Colorado

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Dave Mason – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-10 18:40:00

(The Center Square) – Colorado Gov. Jared Polis Thursday signed a controversial gun control bill that requires a permit and safety training to buy firearms that accept detachable magazines.

Senate Bill 25-003 was originally a ban on the sale or purchase of most semi-automatic rifles or shotguns that take detachable magazines. But it was amended to allow for purchases if the buyer gets a “firearms safety course eligibility card” from their sheriff department and completes a firearm education course.

The bill also prohibits the purchase and sale of all rapid fire conversion devices, like bump stocks and binary triggers.

“I am focused on improving public safety and making Colorado one of the top 10 safest states in the country,” the Democratic governor said in a statement. “This bill ensures that our Second Amendment rights are protected and that Coloradans can continue to purchase the gun of their choice for sport, hunting, self-defense or home defense. I am confident that this bill contributes to improving public safety in our state by helping to ensure an educated and trained gun owner community, including gun safety and safe storage.”

Polis said the law isn’t a ban.

“High-capacity magazines are what put the ‘mass’ into mass shootings, which is why over a decade ago Colorado Democrats passed legislation to prohibit magazines that hold over 15 rounds of ammunition,” bill sponsor Sen. Tom Sullivan, D-Centennial, whose son was killed in the 2012 Aurora theater shooting, said a news release Thursday. “This legislation is another in the list of policies I have worked on to develop evidence-based solutions and reduce gun violence of all types. The people of Colorado have mandated that we do something about the public health crisis that is gun violence, so that’s what we’re going to do.”

Rep. Meg Froelich, D-Englewood, who also sponsored SB 25-003, said the law requires purchasers  to complete “a rigorous safety training course and acquire a permit to purchase the most deadly weapons on the market to ensure that they are not a danger to themselves or our communities.”

Republicans in the legislature and the California State Shooting Association had urged Polis to veto SB 25-003. The association Thursday condemned Polis’ decision to sign the bill and said the new law represents “a direct assault on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Coloradans.”

The law “imposes unprecedented restrictions on the purchase of semi-automatic firearms through a burdensome permit-to-purchase scheme,” the association said in a statement sent to The Center Square.

The California State Shooting Association said Polis was aligning with anti-gun radicals over the will of the people.

“The Colorado State Shooting Association is actively exploring every legal option to challenge this unconstitutional law,” CSSA President Ray Elliott said. “Our legal team is preparing to contest Senate Bill 3, and we are committed to pursuing justice through every available avenue.”

Additionally, the association will work to elect pro-Second Amendment legislators in 2026 to replace those who voted for SB 25-003, CSSA Executive Director Huey Laugesen said.

The post Colorado governor signs controversial gun control bill | Colorado appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

Trump softens tariffs for U.S. automakers through complex rules | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 15:45:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump took measures to lessen the impact of tariffs on U.S. automakers, but vehicle prices are expected to increase. 

“We just wanted to help them during this little transition, short term,” Trump said. “We didn’t want to penalize them.”

The 25% tariff on imported cars remains, and a new 25% tariff on auto parts will go into effect May 3. But Trump’s latest executive order allows reimbursements for U.S. producers importing car parts, which will be subject to 25% tariffs starting May 3. The maximum reimbursement will be 3.75% of the value of domestically produced cars. The cap falls to 2.5% for the second year and is phased out entirely after that.

Trump’s executive order also means that automakers that pay tariffs on imported cars won’t be required to pay other import duties, such as those on steel and aluminum.

“They all want to come back to Michigan and build cars again. You know why? Because of our tax and tariff policy,” Trump said Tuesday during his rally in Michigan. “We’re giving them a little time before we slaughter them if they don’t do this.”

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the goal was to get automakers to create more U.S. jobs.

“President Trump has had meetings with both domestic and foreign auto producers, and he’s committed to bringing back auto production to the U.S.,” Bessent said. “So we want to give the automakers a path to do that, quickly, efficiently and create as many jobs as possible.”

Still, vehicle prices are expected to increase as tariffs reshape the market.

Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke said “uncertainty remains acute, especially regarding what will happen with the tariffs.” 

“Supply has since tightened and prices have moved higher,” he said. “With higher prices, urgency has diminished.”

Smoke said the next two months could set the stage for the rest of the year. 

“Instead of putting China first, I’m putting Michigan first and I’m putting America first,” Trump said at the Macomb County Rally.

Even before Trump’s auto tariffs, cars were too expensive for many Americans. The average price of a new vehicle in the U.S. is above $48,000, according to Cox Automotive. Real median household income was $80,610 in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. However, more than 40% of new-vehicle sales by volume in 2024 were priced below $40,000.

The post Trump softens tariffs for U.S. automakers through complex rules | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article predominantly reports on actions taken by President Donald Trump regarding tariffs on U.S. automakers with largely neutral language, including direct quotes from Trump and officials, as well as commentary from a chief economist. However, the framing subtly aligns with a center-right perspective by emphasizing Trump’s economic policies favoring U.S. industry and job creation, and by using language that reflects his own nationalist and protectionist rhetoric (“putting Michigan first and I’m putting America first”). The article presents these policies without overt criticism, thus reflecting a viewpoint sympathetic to the administration’s economic nationalism rather than a strictly neutral or critical stance. This suggests a center-right bias, leaning towards support for Trump’s economic agenda.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

U..S attorneys in Texas file nearly 600 immigration cases in week | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 15:02:00

(The Center Square) – As U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers continue to make arrests in the interior of the U.S., U.S. attorneys in Texas are prosecuting illegal border crossers, including previously deported convicted felons.

In one week, they filed nearly 600 immigration related cases, the most of any district in southwest border states.

In the Southern District of Texas, 216 cases were filed from April 11 through 17.

The majority, 119, face illegal entry charges; 11 cases involve human smuggling.

Another 86 illegal border crossers face felony illegal reentry charges. The majority already have felony narcotics, firearms or sexual offense charges.

Those charged with felony reentry face up to 20 years in federal prison if convicted, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Examples include convicted felons and Mexican nationals who were previously deported and illegally reentered the country. Those charged include Alejandro Contreras-Zapata after he was apprehended near Roma, Texas. He was previously sentenced to 20 years in prison for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. He was deported in March, and illegally reentered the U.S., according to the charges.

Also arrested in Roma, Erika Camacho-Rodriguez, a convicted felon found guilty of human smuggling, was deported in March and again illegally reentered the U.S., according to the charges. Cesar Garcia-Rivas was arrested in Rio Grande City after being deported in 2020 and sentenced to 70 months in prison for kidnapping.

In other cases, juries handed guilty convictions and indictments in human smuggling cases.

A Laredo jury convicted a 25-year-old Laredo woman of attempting to smuggle a 3-year-old boy into the U.S. by claiming he was her biological son and using her son’s Texas birth certificate. She later told investigators she didn’t know his name and picked him up in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, in exchange for $2,500.

A jury also delivered a guilty verdict in 15 minutes against a Lyford man who was arrested on human smuggling charges and found in possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM). Authorities found 150 CSAM images on his phone, including of sexual assault of children.

In another case, two illegal foreign nationals and a Laredo man were indicted on various firearms offenses, including possession of two machine gun conversion devices.

In the Western District of Texas, federal prosecutors filed 378 immigration-related criminal cases from April 11 through 17. Those charged also include convicted felons who were previously deported.

In one case, Mexican national Netsai Moreno-Suarez illegally reentered the U.S. after being deported in 2023. She was previously convicted of conspiracy to transport illegal aliens.

In another case, Border Patrol agents arrested Mexican national Arturo Mendoza-Yerbafria near Sanderson for illegal re-entry after he was previously deported three times. He was convicted in 2018 of “bringing in and harboring aliens,” according to the charges.

In another case, Honduran national Efrain Antonio Corroto-Herrera was arrested near Eagle Pass after previously being deported twice. He was previously convicted in Austin two months ago of assault causing bodily injury.

In another case, Border Patrol agents arrested Mexican national Zacarias Bautista-Emiliano on illegal reentry charges after previously being deported five times. His criminal history includes a 2013 felony conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under age 14 and two felony convictions in New Mexico in 2014 and Arizona in 2022.

In Austin, Honduran national Elvin Alexis Canelas-Morillo was taken into federal custody this month after he pleaded guilty to assault causing bodily injury in a 2023 Travis County case. He was previously deported four times; his criminal history includes burglary and evading arrest.

Also in Austin, Mexican national Heber Vivero-Martinez was taken into federal custody after previously being deported twice and voluntarily returning four times. His criminal history includes convictions of assault causing bodily injury and a DWI.

In El Paso, Mexican national Adolfo Martinez-Padron was arrested and charged with illegal re-entry after previously being deported six times. His criminal history includes two felony convictions of possession of a controlled substance, two DWIs, and assault causing bodily injury to a family member.

Also in El Paso, Mexican national Santa Cruz Garcia-Morales was arrested after previously being deported four times and voluntarily departing twice. His criminal history includes a domestic violence conviction in Salt Lake, Utah, and aggravated assault in West Jordan, Utah.

Multiple law federal, state and local enforcement agencies were involved in the cases.

The post U..S attorneys in Texas file nearly 600 immigration cases in week | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the actions of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. attorneys in Texas, detailing the prosecution of illegal border crossers, including previously deported convicted felons. The tone and framing of the article focus on the enforcement of immigration laws, with specific attention to criminal histories of the individuals being prosecuted. While the article presents factual information, the emphasis on criminal behavior and the legal consequences for those involved in illegal reentry or human smuggling may align more closely with a center-right perspective, which tends to prioritize strict immigration enforcement and public safety. The article does not appear to offer an explicit ideological stance but highlights the government’s law enforcement efforts, which are often supported by conservative viewpoints. It reports on events with a focus on illegal immigration as a criminal issue rather than discussing broader immigration reform or humanitarian perspectives, which could indicate a slight right-leaning tone.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Proposed amendment could allow lawmakers to remove protected state jobs | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 13:50:00

(The Center Square) − A proposed constitutional amendment would give Louisiana lawmakers new authority to remove jobs from the state’s protected civil service system, while also shortening terms and tightening limits for members of the State Civil Service Commission.

Under the current system, most rank-and-file state employees — like social workers at the Department of Children and Family Services or accountants at the Department of Transportation — are considered as part of the classified civil service.

These employees are hired based on merit, often through competitive exams, and enjoy job protections that shield them from political interference or arbitrary firing.

Others, such as agency heads, the governor’s staff or university presidents, are considered unclassified — appointed positions that serve at the pleasure of elected officials.

Currently, the state employs 37,000 full time classified employees and nearly 25,000 full time unclassified employees. State Civil Service has governing authority over classified employees only.

State agencies are required to submit annual performance evaluations to the Director of State Civil Service. From 2019 to 2024, the number of employees classified as unsuccessful grew from 1.09% to 1.26%. At the same time, employees deemed exceptional also grew from 13.65% to 14.78%, according to the State Civil Service’s annual report.

“Today, we need a system based more on merit,”  Sen. Jay Morris, R-Grant, told the Senate & Governmental Affairs committee, adding that law currently “prioritizes seniority over performance, endless appeals and often court actions.” 

A similar sentiment is shared at the federal level. Just last week, the Office of Personnel Management proposed a rule to strengthen employee accountability, while addressing long-standing performance management issues in the federal workforce.

That proposed rule cites chapter 43 and 75 of U.S. civil service law, which govern how agencies handle poor performance and misconduct, are described as cumbersome and slow-moving — often ending in lengthy appeals with uncertain outcomes. 

According to the rule, surveys suggest many supervisors lack confidence in their ability to remove employees for serious infractions, a dynamic critics say erodes the federal merit system’s commitment to high performance and accountability.

Morris’ amendment would allow the Legislature to remove positions from the classified service by law, potentially instituting a shorter leash for those employees.

The measure would also shorten the term of Civil Service Commission members — from staggered six-year terms to four years — and limit service to two full terms, eliminating an exception that allowed long-serving members to stay on. 

The bill was not without opposition.

Though Berry Erwin, President and CEO of Council for a Better Louisiana, supports a more efficient civil service, “we’re also mindful of Louisiana’s history with political patronage — it’s been part of our past, part of our DNA. We recognize we’re no longer in that era, and times have certainly changed. But when we talk about reforming civil service, we think it’s important to strike a balance.”

Dr. Douglas Bordelon, an employee at the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, argued the bill threatens to replace objective public service with politically influenced employment practices, and he dismissed claims that converting jobs to unclassified status would lead to better pay. 

“The solution to addressing this disparity is to ensure adequate funding of our positions, rather than converting us to unclassified civil servants,” Bordelon said.

Bordelon cautioned that the sweeping changes proposed in the bill could harm morale and make it harder for the state to attract and retain qualified employees.

The post Proposed amendment could allow lawmakers to remove protected state jobs | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on a legislative proposal in Louisiana regarding changes to the state’s civil service system, presenting viewpoints from both supporters and opponents of the amendment. While it maintains a largely factual tone, the inclusion of supportive statements from a Republican senator and references to similar federal initiatives to enhance worker accountability suggest a center-right leaning. However, it also fairly presents concerns from civil service advocates who warn against politicization and morale issues, which balances the coverage. Overall, the framing of the article leans moderately towards advocating for accountability and reform, typical of center-right perspectives on government efficiency, without overt ideological language or partisan bias. It is not purely neutral reporting, but rather subtly inclined towards a center-right stance.

Continue Reading

Trending