Connect with us

The Center Square

Biden administration partnered with private companies, USAID to combat ‘disinformation’ | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-18 12:19:00

(The Center Square) – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has declassified a document from the Biden administration showing that the federal government used taxpayer dollars to collaborate with foreign and private entities to counter what it called domestic terrorism activity.

The document, distributed in the wake of the sometimes violent Jan. 6 protests at the U.S. capitol, called for “improve[d] information sharing across all levels within, as well as outside, the Federal Government,” including with private sector and foreign partners, to “combat online disinformation” and domestic terrorism narratives.

The declassified document also laid out plans to develop and channel funding toward “digital literacy programs … to foster resiliency to disinformation,” calling on federal agencies and technology companies to mutually share information relating to what it characterized as online disinformation and “radicalization” activities.

Multiple investigations throughout 2022 and 2023 revealed that the federal government indeed took a whole-of-government approach to censor Americans posting information the Biden Administration deemed false or harmful online, as The Center Square reported.

The United States Agency for International Development and the departments of Homeland Security, State, and Education were among the agencies tasked to carry out the plans.

Republicans, along with conservative groups like America First Legal, which requested the information, say the blueprint showcases the “weaponization” of the intelligence community under the previous presidency.

“Until yesterday, the Biden Administration’s ‘Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism’ was classified,” Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., said on X. “Now, thanks to @DNIGabbard, it’s public. It’s a roadmap for left-wing ideological warfare.”

During the Biden administration, the Department of Homeland Security provided at least $90 million taxpayer dollars to state, local, and tribal governments through the Targeted Violence and Terrorism Prevention Grant Program. 

Gabbard released the documents the same day Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the closure of the State Department’s Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference.

“Under the previous administration, this office, which cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year, spent millions of dollars to actively silence and censor the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving,” Rubio said in a news release. “This is antithetical to the very principles we should be upholding and inconceivable it was taking place in America.”

The post Biden administration partnered with private companies, USAID to combat ‘disinformation’ | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

S&P economists say 90-day trade pact with China brings limited relief | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-17 08:51:00


S\&P Global Ratings viewed the recent U.S.-China trade pact as a positive, though temporary, development. The deal, which slashes tariffs from 145% to 30% for the U.S. and from 125% to 10% for China, is set to last 90 days. While it improves the macroeconomic outlook, S\&P warns that without a permanent agreement, tariffs could rise again. The agency noted that the U.S. has only secured two bilateral deals so far and must make further trade agreements by July. S\&P also highlighted potential negative effects on U.S. consumer and retail sectors, including increased costs from tariffs.

(The Center Square) – A top credit-rating agency said the short-term deal the U.S. struck with China on trade is a positive sign, but only temporary.

“The U.S.-China tariff reduction improves our macroeconomic outlook,” said Paul Gruenwald, global chief economist at S&P Global Ratings. “This reflects a combination of factors including the direct effects of lower bilateral tariffs on the world’s two largest economies, a reduction – though not elimination – of policy uncertainty, more buoyant asset prices, and some reopening of previously frozen markets.”

China and the U.S. released details Monday of a trade pact reached over the weekend after talks in Geneva. The two global superpowers agreed to slash tariffs so high that nearly all trade between the two nations stopped. The U.S. reduced its tariffs on China from 145% to 30% while the two nations continue to talk. China cut its levies on U.S. imports from 125% to 10%. The deal will be in place for 90 days.

S&P said the de-escalation “brings only temporary relief.” It noted that if the world’s two largest economies can’t reach a broader, more permanent trade deal in the next three months, tariffs are likely to increase again, perhaps sharply. 

S&P also noted that the U.S. has only secured two bilateral trade deals so far (one with China and one the U.K.). That means the administration has until July to make deals with 16 other major U.S. trading partners.

“A template for scaling these agreements has yet to appear, although the minimum tariff appears to be the 10% flat rate,” S&P noted. 

That could continue to affect trade around the world. 

“We believe that the global trade environment will continue to weigh on credit conditions and our rating outlook, but tail risks have eased somewhat,” said Alexandre Birry, global head of credit research and insights. “The possible impact continues to be uneven across sectors and countries.”

Businesses are likely to remain cautious about hiring in the meantime, according to the S&P report. It further said that consumer spending could remain subdued.

“Given their global supply chain exposure and a weakening consumer environment, we believe there could still be negative implications for U.S. consumer and retail sectors,” according to the report. 

Walmart, the world’s largest retailer, said Thursday that it plans to raise prices because of tariffs. Walmart CEO Doug McMillan said that tariffs will increase consumer costs no matter how hard the giant retailer tries to keep them down. He also said the company plans to move production to the U.S., where possible, building on a years-long effort to bolster supply chains. Given its size and reach, Walmart has more price flexibility and is better positioned to move supply chains than small businesses.

S&P said that while trade progress was a win, the rating agency wasn’t yet ready to update its economic forecasts.

“While this turn of events is positive for economies, we are not providing updated growth forecasts at this juncture,” S&P noted. “This decision takes into account the unpredictability of policy developments, particularly out of the U.S., and our approaching regular quarterly forecasting round.”

The post S&P economists say 90-day trade pact with China brings limited relief | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article maintains a neutral and factual tone throughout, reporting on the trade deal between the U.S. and China from the perspective of a credit-rating agency without endorsing or criticizing any party involved. It includes direct quotes and data to explain the economic implications and uncertainty tied to the agreement, presenting information clearly without emotive or loaded language. The content reports on the ideological positions and actions (such as tariff negotiations and trade policies) without promoting a particular political viewpoint or framing the situation through an ideological lens. This adherence to balanced, informational coverage indicates a centrist bias, focused on objectively conveying facts rather than persuading readers toward a political stance.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Judge grants preliminary injunction to pause $11 billion in public health cuts | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Dave Mason | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-16 16:40:00


A federal judge issued an indefinite freeze on the Trump administration’s plan to cut \$11 billion in public health funding, following a lawsuit filed by 23 states and the District of Columbia. Judge Mary McElroy ruled that the federal government overstepped its authority by terminating the funds, which supported programs like infectious disease control, immunization, and mental health services. She determined that Congress, not the Health and Human Services Department, had the authority to decide on such cuts. California co-led the lawsuit and praised the ruling, noting the state stood to lose over \$972 million without the challenge.

(The Center Square) – A federal judge Friday put an indefinite freeze on the Trump administration’s plan to terminate $11 billion in public health funding.

The U.S. District Court for Rhode Island granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit filed April 1 by the District of Columbia and 23 states, including California, Colorado, Nevada and Washington. The court on April 3 granted a temporary restraining order. Preliminary injunctions can last longer, until the court says otherwise.

In her ruling Friday, Judge Mary McElroy determined the federal government “clearly usurped Congress’s authority to spend and allocate funds” when it suddenly terminated $11 billion of public health grants on March 24. The lawsuit contends the grants were terminated with no advance notice.

The federal grants addressed everything from infectious disease outbreaks to immunization and mental and substance abuse services, McElroy said. “Without the funds, these programs could not continue.”

Congress instructed the Health and Human Services Department to spend various amounts of money in certain ways, McEloy said. She added Congress didn’t give the department the power to decide against spending the money.

“If Congress intended to charge HHS with such a determination, it would have done so at some point — like in June 2023, when it went line-by-line and rescinded some COVID-era funding but left other funding in place,” McElroy wrote in her ruling. She added states are likely to succeed in court on their argument supporting Congress on this point.

“The Court presumes that ‘Congress intends to make policy decisions itself’ rather than leaving those decisions to agencies,” McEloy said, citing the 2022 precedent West Virginia v. EPA. She cited other cases as well.

California co-led the coalition that is suing the U.S. Health and Human Services Department and its leader, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta Friday praised the preliminary injunction and said the state would have lost more than $972 million if the cuts weren’t challenged.

“Critically, the court also noted that we are likely to succeed on the merits of our claims,” Bonta said in a news release.

Besides California, the other states filing the suit are Colorado, Rhode Island, Minnesota, Washington, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon and Wisconsin. Plaintiffs also include the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

The post Judge grants preliminary injunction to pause $11 billion in public health cuts | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article primarily reports on a legal decision against the Trump administration’s action to cut $11 billion in public health funding, focusing on the perspective of the states and the judge’s ruling. While it provides factual details and citations, the tone and framing emphasize the criticism of the Trump administration’s move and highlight the states’ success in challenging it, which aligns more with a center-left viewpoint that generally supports government-funded public health programs. The absence of counterarguments or defenses from the administration and the positive language toward the injunction and plaintiff states suggest a subtle lean toward a center-left bias rather than strictly neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Reversing from losses in March, Texas oil and gas industry adds jobs in April | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-16 15:50:00


In April, Texas’s oil and natural gas industry reversed March job losses, adding 1,700 upstream jobs, including 900 in services and 800 in extraction. From April 2024 to 2025, the sector gained over 206,000 upstream jobs, a 1% rise. Since September 2020, upstream jobs increased by 31.2%. Jobs pay an average $128,000. Despite fewer unique job postings in April (8,826) versus March (10,120), Texas leads U.S. states in energy job postings. The industry paid $669 million in production taxes in April and a record $27.3 billion in fiscal 2024. Growing U.S. power demand highlights the need for domestic oil and gas development.

(The Center Square) – Reversing from job losses in March, the Texas oil and natural gas industry posted job gains in April, according to the latest employment data.

The industry contributed to the state’s job gains, which again led the U.S. in job creation and broke multiple employment records last month, The Center Square reported.

Upstream oil and natural gas employment climbed by 1,700 in April over the month, representing an increase in 900 jobs in the services sector and 800 jobs in oil and natural gas extraction. In March, the industry reported job losses of 800 after reporting gains in January and February of 2,600 and 1,600, respectively, The Center Square previously reported.

From April 2024 to April 2025, the industry added more than 206,000 upstream jobs, a 1% increase. The upstream sector involves oil and natural gas extraction and some types of mining. It excludes other industry sectors like refining, petrochemicals, fuels wholesaling, oilfield equipment manufacturing, pipelines, and gas utilities that support hundreds of thousands of additional jobs statewide. Industry jobs pay among the highest wages in Texas, with an average salary of $128,000 in 2024.

“The oil and natural gas industry continues to demonstrate resiliency while facing uncertainty with underlying demand concerns,” Texas Oil & Gas Association President Todd Staples said. “These positive job numbers are a tremendous benefit to the families who are supported by this industry and are important for the communities in which they occur. Sound policies that support fair business practices and laws that keep our state competitive are necessary if Texas is going to continue to benefit from oil and natural gas activity.”

Since the COVID-era low point of September 2020, the industry has added 49,000 Texas upstream jobs, a 31.2% increase, averaging monthly growth of 891 jobs, TXOGA notes. Over the same time-period, months with upstream oil and gas employment increases outnumbered those with decreases by 39 to 15.

While there were new job postings, there was a decline in overall unique postings in April compared to March, according to an analysis of the employment data by the Texas Independent Producers and Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO). Last month, there were 8,826 active unique jobs postings for the Texas oil and natural gas industry, compared to 10,120 in March.

Texas still had more postings than other states by far. California had 2,611 unique job postings in April, followed by New York’s 2,392, Florida’s 1,744, and Colorado’s 1,290, according to the data.

The top three companies posting the greatest number of unique jobs in April were Love’s (665), Cefco (655) and John Wood Group (280), TIPRO found. Of the top ten companies listed by unique job postings last month, five were in the services sector; two were in a gasoline station/convenience store category, two in midstream and one in the oil and gas operator category.

In April, Texas energy producers paid $436 million in oil production taxes and $233 million in natural gas production taxes, according to Texas comptroller data.

This is after the industry paid a record $27.3 billion in state and local taxes and state royalties in fiscal 2024, The Center Square reported.

According to a recent U.S. Energy Information Administration Short-Term Energy Outlook report, U.S. power consumption is expected to reach record highs in 2025 and 2026. “The forecasts for surging power demands underscore the need for reliable power generation from domestic energy sources, including oil and natural gas,” TIPRO said. “Energy policies that support greater oil and gas development will continue to prove critical to keep up with the rising power generation needs in the U.S.”

The post Reversing from losses in March, Texas oil and gas industry adds jobs in April | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The content provides a factual, data-driven account of Texas’s oil and natural gas industry job performance. However, the inclusion of quotes from industry representatives, such as Todd Staples of the Texas Oil & Gas Association, and the emphasis on the industry’s positive economic impact, including high wages and tax contributions, suggests a framing that aligns more with a pro-industry perspective. The article highlights policies favorable to the industry and advocates for continued support of the sector, which subtly leans toward a center-right viewpoint. The reporting largely focuses on the economic benefits of the oil and gas industry without delving into environmental or regulatory concerns, a common characteristic of center-right coverage on energy topics.

Continue Reading

Trending