Connect with us

The Center Square

Appeals court allows Trump to continue collecting tariffs | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-11 07:52:00


An appeals court ruled that President Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs can remain in place during ongoing legal challenges to his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted the administration’s request to stay a lower court ruling that had ordered the tariffs removed, citing potential economic harm if lifted. Trump hailed the decision as an “important win.” The tariffs, aimed at protecting U.S. jobs and reducing the national debt, have faced opposition from states and businesses citing economic harm. Trump initially imposed tariffs on nearly all trading partners but later suspended some while pursuing trade deals.

(The Center Square) – An appeals court ruled late Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs can remain in place while a legal challenge over his authority to impose import taxes continues. 

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Trump administration’s request for a longer pause after temporarily staying the lower court’s ruling in May.

Trump called it an “important win.”

“A Federal Appeals Court has just ruled that the United States can use TARIFFS to protect itself against other countries,” Trump wrote in a social media post on Wednesday morning. “A great and important win for the U.S.”

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals said a stay was allowed.

“Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits,” according to the ruling. “Having considered the traditional stay factors … the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances.”

On Monday, the Trump administration asked an appeals court to let the president’s tariffs remain in place while the court considered the legal challenges, saying that lifting them would “catastrophically harm our economy.”

The administration appealed after a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade unanimously ruled that Congress did not give the president tariff authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.

The Court of International Trade gave Trump 10 days to unwind all the tariffs he issued under IEEPA. The appeals court granted the administration’s request for a stay, putting the Court of International Trade ruling on hold while the appeal moves forward.

Trump announced reciprocal tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners on April 2, which he dubbed “Liberation Day” for American trade. Seven days later, Trump suspended those higher rates for 90 days to give his trade team time to cut deals.

Since then, the president has announced a limited trade deal with the United Kingdom and a tariff truce with China while talks continue. Trump kept other tariffs, including a 10% baseline tax on all imports, in place.  

A group of states and small businesses that challenged Trump’s tariff authority previously asked an appeals court to dump Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs while legal challenges play out. The companies, represented by the Liberty Justice Center, said their livelihood is on the line.

Economists, businesses and some publicly traded companies have warned that tariffs could raise prices on a wide range of consumer products.

Trump has said he wants to use tariffs to restore manufacturing jobs lost to lower-wage countries in decades past, shift the tax burden away from U.S. families, and pay down the national debt.

A tariff is a tax on imported goods paid by the person or company that imports the goods. The importer can absorb the cost of the tariffs or try to pass the cost on to consumers through higher prices.

The post Appeals court allows Trump to continue collecting tariffs | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the legal and political developments surrounding former President Donald Trump’s tariffs without overt editorializing, but the tone and framing lean slightly toward a Center-Right perspective. It highlights Trump’s “important win” and includes his positive framing of tariffs as protective economic measures. The piece emphasizes the administration’s economic rationale and strategic trade actions, with less focus on opposing arguments except to mention concerns from states, businesses, and economists. While it maintains factual reporting, the selection and presentation subtly align with a pro-Trump, pro-tariff viewpoint common to Center-Right outlets.

News from the South - Florida News Feed

DeSantis lauds improvements in Florida school accountability ratings | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 14:30:00


The Florida Department of Education released accountability scores showing no school districts failed. The percentage of A-rated schools rose from 38% in 2024 to 44% in 2025, while failing schools dropped by 39.3% to 71. Only 2.05% of 3,451 public schools received failing grades. High schools had 49% A ratings, middle schools 42%, and elementary schools 40%. Districts saw 28 A’s, 31 B’s, and 8 C’s. Progress monitoring reforms continue to improve performance. Education Commissioner Anastasios Kamoutsas highlighted gains in civics, with 70% of students on grade level, crediting Governor DeSantis’s policies focused on basics and student success.

(The Center Square) – The Florida Department of Education released its accountability scores for individual public schools and districts on Monday and no school district received a failing score. 

Grades for individual schools were also up, as the number of A-rated schools increased from 38% in 2024 to 44% this year and the number of failing schools decreased from 117 to 71, a decrease of 39.3%. 

It marked the third year for Florida’s progress monitoring, which continually assesses student and school performance throughout the school year rather than with one end of the year test. 

“I think the progress monitoring reform was the right reform to do,” Gov. Ron DeSantis said at an event at Oceanway Elementary School in Jacksonville, which improved from a C to an A. “I think it is providing dividends, but we all say we have more work to do.” 

Only 71 out of Florida’s 3,451 public schools (2.05%) received a failing grade (a D or an F), with 44% of them receiving an A and 27% received a B. 

There were only 49 elementary, six middle and only two high schools that received unsatisfactory scores. A scores were awarded to 49% of high schools (250), 42% of middle schools (237) and 40% of the state’s elementaries (717).

Of the state’s combined schools, 322 (55%) earned top ratings and only 14 received failing marks. 

For districts, 28 scored an A, 31 received a B and only eight received a C. 

Florida Department of Education Commissioner-designate Anastasios Kamoutsas, who replaced Manny Diaz Jr., spotlighted the improvement in civics education with 70% of Florida students on grade level in that subject. 

“Florida schools are improving across the board, and this is a direct result of the governor’s innovative policies and his mandate to school board members and superintendents across the state to bring education back to the basics and focus on student success,” Kamoutsas said. “Indoctrination, whether it’s critical race theory or sexually explicit materials, has no place in Florida schools.”

Diaz is now the interim president of the University of West Florida in Pensacola. 

The state Department of Education uses 12 components to assess individual school performance, which include achievement components, learning gains, middle school acceleration, graduation rate and college and career acceleration. 

The post DeSantis lauds improvements in Florida school accountability ratings | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on Florida’s Department of Education accountability scores and highlights improvements in school ratings with factual data. However, the inclusion and framing of remarks from Governor Ron DeSantis and Commissioner-designate Anastasios Kamoutsas introduce a clear ideological perspective associated with recent Florida education policies. The language used, particularly Kamoutsas’ statements opposing “indoctrination” and terms like “critical race theory” and “sexually explicit materials,” aligns with the education policy agenda promoted by conservative and right-leaning political figures. While the article provides factual information, the selection and emphasis of quotations and policy framing suggest a right-leaning bias that implicitly supports the current administration’s educational reforms and ideological stance on school content. The coverage does not merely report on these ideological positions neutrally but appears to endorse or positively highlight them.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 09:21:00


A federal judge in Massachusetts, Brian Murphy, attempted to block deportation of violent criminal foreign nationals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court. On July 4, eight convicted felons from countries including Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam, and South Sudan were deported to South Sudan under new agreements allowing detention of criminal foreign nationals. These individuals had extensive criminal records and final removal orders but remained in the U.S. due to previous diplomatic refusals by their home countries. Justice Elena Kagan affirmed the Trump administration’s authority to deport such criminals, rejecting Murphy’s injunction that contradicted federal law.

(The Center Square) – A federal district judge in Massachusetts, Judge Brian Murphy, sought to prevent deportation of violent criminals but was overruled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

On July 4, eight convicted felons, citizens of Burma, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Vietnam and South Sudan, were deported to South Sudan. The country’s leaders have entered into an agreement with the U.S. to detain criminal foreign nationals, including those who aren’t their citizens. El Salvador and others have entered into similar agreements, with the U.S. government agreeing to pay for detention costs.

U.S. deportation efforts rely on diplomacy with foreign governments, many of which won’t accept their own citizens. Under previous administrations, federal efforts to deport criminal illegal foreign nationals failed because many countries wouldn’t take back their citizens. As a result, they illegally remained in the U.S. even though they had deportation orders from a federal immigration judge, authorities have explained to The Center Square. Under the Trump administration, this has changed.

Those deported to South Sudan were all men illegally in the U.S. with extensive criminal histories, including felony convictions and prison sentences in the U.S. They all received due process in federal immigration court and received final removal orders from federal immigration judges that were never enforced, including one dating back to 1999.

Burmese national Kyaw Mya was convicted of lascivious acts with a child-victim under age 12 and sentenced to 10 years in prison and paroled after four years. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued March 17, 2022.

Burmese national Nyo Myint was convicted of first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting and sentenced to 12 years in prison. He was also charged with aggravated assault-nonfamily strongarm and a registered sex offender. ICE- St. Paul officers arrested him; his final removal order was issued August 17, 2023.

Cuban national Enrique Arias-Hierro was convicted of homicide, armed robbery, false impersonation of official, kidnapping, and robbery strong arm. His final removal order was issued September 13, 1999. Due to Cuban authorities refusing to take him, he remained illegally in the U.S.

Cuban national Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones was convicted of attempted first-degree murder with a weapon, battery and larceny, and cocaine possession and trafficking. ICE Miami officers arrested him in April; his final removal order was issued Dec. 4, 2012.

Laos national Thongxay Nilakout was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Los Angeles officers arrested him in January. His final removal order was issued July 12, 2023.

Mexican national Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. ICE Miami officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 16, 2005.

Vietnamese national Tuan Thanh Phan was convicted of first-degree murder and second-degree assault and sentenced to 22 years in prison. ICE Seattle officers arrested him in May. His final removal order was issued June 17, 2009.

The only South Sudan national in the deportation group was Dian Peter Domach, who was first encountered by ICE in 2011 and received a final removal order on July 19, 2011. He wasn’t deported and remained in the U.S. illegally and committed a range of crimes. He was convicted of robbery and possession of a firearm, possession of defaced firearm, possession of burglar’s tools, and driving under the influence.

Murphy, born in 1979, a former public defender and a criminal defense attorney, was appointed by former President Joe Biden less than six months ago. Murphy argued a Supreme Court ruling didn’t apply to his injunction, seeking to keep convicted felons, including sex offenders and murderers, in the U.S. in violation of federal law. His order violated due process, critics argue, because the convicted felon illegal foreign nationals already appeared multiple times before federal immigration judges who issued judgements against them and final orders of removal.

Justice Elena Kagan chastised Murphy in the court’s July 3 ruling, affirming the Trump administration’s authority to deport illegal foreign nationals to third-party countries.

The post Here are the violent criminals Judge Murphy tried to block from deportation | Massachusetts appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article predominantly presents facts about the deportation of convicted foreign criminals and the associated legal proceedings, but it is framed in a manner that aligns with a law-and-order, tough-on-crime perspective commonly associated with right-leaning viewpoints. The language emphasizes the criminality of the individuals, the failure of previous administrations (implicitly the Biden administration) to enforce deportations effectively, and the positive framing of the Trump administration’s policies as a corrective measure. The piece also characterizes Judge Murphy’s injunction as an obstruction of justice and highlights criticism of his ruling, which reflects a particular ideological stance favoring stricter immigration enforcement and portrays judicial resistance as misguided. While it reports on judicial and executive actions, the tone and selective details contribute to a bias that leans toward supporting hardline immigration enforcement policies typical of conservative perspectives, rather than maintaining strictly neutral or centrist reporting.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-07 07:52:00


On Independence Day, Elon Musk proposed creating the America Party as an alternative to the traditional two-party system, supported by a social media poll showing 2-1 favorability. For recognition in North Carolina, the party must meet criteria such as achieving 2% of votes in the last general election, collecting signatures from 0.25% of registered voters by May 16, or fielding candidates in 70% of states during presidential elections. The America Party could qualify for the 2025 municipal elections. Musk’s platform emphasizes debt reduction, tech advancement, free speech, and centrist policies. Currently, four parties are recognized in North Carolina, with a large unaffiliated voting bloc.

(The Center Square) – After an Independence Day question on his social media platform, the world’s richest man offered Americans an alternative political party independent of Democrats and Republicans.

For North Carolinians, that means one of three criteria will have to be met before the America Party – or any other creations – can be officially recognized for purposes of being on the ballots.

Musk, a 53-year-old space and automotive industry phenom, served Republican second-term President Donald Trump in the Department of Government Efficiency. Reviews were mixed. On Friday, the 249th celebration of the Fourth of July, Musk asked on social media, “Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party?”

His poll, he reported the next day, was 2-1 in favor and he wrote, “Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.”

Registration with the Federal Election Commission would be necessary on the national level.

For recognition by the North Carolina State Board of Elections, as outlined in the General Statutes, the three ways involve the options of a party’s voters getting at least 2% of the entire vote cast in the most recent general election; signature petition of at least 0.25% of all registered voters who voted in the most recent gubernatorial election; or a group of voters showing documentation the group had their candidate on the general election ballot in 70% of the states (35) in the most recent presidential election.

The first and third of those are moot at this point; the America Party was not in existence for the 2024 cycle. In fact, Musk was a significant campaign piece for Trump.

For petitions, they must be filed with the state board before noon on June 1 of the year of the election the party wishes to participate in. There’s also a stipulation that, so that counties can verify, the signatures must go to them 15 days before being due to the state. That’s May 16.

The 2025 cycle is known as municipal elections in the state, and 2026 is the midterms – second-longest ballot of the four cycles for the state. The America Party could get into place for next year.

Last year’s governor’s race drew 5,591,547 votes among Democrat Josh Stein, Republican Mark Robinson, Libertarian Mike Ross, Vinny Smith (Constitution Party) and Wayne Turner (Green Party). A quarter of 1% would be 13,979 (rounded up).

More than once, Musk reposted a question on party platform that listed reduce debt, responsible spending only; modernize military with artificial intelligence/robotics; pro tech, accelerate to win in artificial intelligence; less regulation across the board but especially in energy; free speech; “pro natalist,” a form of pronatalism or belief in human reproduction and a high birth rate; and centrist policies everywhere else.

Among other posts through the weekend from Musk, estimated Monday morning by Forbes at more than $405 billion, was one that included the following:

• Tesla will never succeed.

• Elon can’t start a space company.

• Neuralink will never work.

• SpaceX will never reuse a rocket.

• Elon can’t run a social media.

Three political parties lost recognition through the last cycle and North Carolina has four recognized today. Alphabetically, they are the Democratic Party, the Green Party, the Libertarian Party, and the Republican Party.

By registrations through Saturday, those unaffiliated (more than 2.8 million, or 38.3%) have the largest bloc, followed by Democrats (2.3 million, or 30.6%), Republicans (nearly 2.3 million, or 30.4%), Libertarians (only 45,986, or 0.6%) and Green (just 4,024, or 0.05%).

The post Elon’s America Party could be on North Carolina ballots in 2026 midterms | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article predominantly reports factual information about Elon Musk’s recent social media initiative to form a new political party called the America Party, outlining the legal requirements for new party recognition in North Carolina, voter registration statistics, and Musk’s political background. The tone is neutral, presenting Musk’s statements and related voting data without emotive or persuasive language. While it includes references to Musk’s own political history and platform ideas, it does so descriptively rather than endorsing or criticizing them. The article balances coverage of multiple parties and election rules, adhering to straightforward reporting rather than promoting an ideological stance, thus maintaining a centrist, neutral perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending